Validation in Arctic conditions Steinar Eastwood (met.no) David Poulter (NOCS) GHRSST9, 2008-06-10 Perros-Guirec OSI SAF METOP SST, 2007-09-27 8 days mean.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OSTIA : Transition to an Operational System John Stark, Craig Donlon. GlobColour / Medspiration Workshop, 4-6 Dec
Advertisements

Improvements to the NOAA Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Product Suite Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz, Prabhat Koner.
15 May 2009ACSPO v1.10 GAC1 ACSPO upgrade to v1.10 Effective Date: 04 March 2009 Sasha Ignatov, XingMing Liang, Yury Kihai, Boris Petrenko, John Stroup.
Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
GHRSST XI Science Team Meeting, ST-VAL, June 2010, Lima, Peru Recent developments to the SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) and SST validation with In situ.
1 High resolution SST products for 2001 Satellite SST products and coverage In situ observations, coverage Quality control procedures Satellite error statistics.
Forecasting Polar Lows Gunnar Noer The Norwegian Meteorological Institute in Tromsø.
Satellite SST Radiance Assimilation and SST Data Impacts James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA Sea Surface Temperature Science.
Medspiration user meeting, dec 4-6 Use of Medspiration and GHRSST data in the Northern Seas Jacob L. Høyer & Søren Andersen Center for Ocean and Ice, Danish.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder SST field, Versions 5 & 6 Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’ RSMAS Nov 8, 2010 with.
1 High Resolution Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Errors Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University)
GOES-13 Science Team Report SST Images and Analyses Eileen Maturi, STAR/SOCD, Camp Springs, MD Andy Harris, CICS, University of Maryland, MD Chris Merchant,
1 Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Atmosphere: John Wilkin Sea Surface Temperature IMCS Building Room 214C
NOAA Climate Obs 4th Annual Review Silver Spring, MD May 10-12, NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center 1.SSTs for Daily SST OI NOAA’s National.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
1 Improved Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analyses for Climate NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Thomas M. Smith Richard W. Reynolds Kenneth.
1 Sea Surface Temperature Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Arctic SST retrieval in the CCI project Owen Embury Chris Merchant University of Reading.
Interannual and Regional Variability of Southern Ocean Snow on Sea Ice Thorsten Markus and Donald J. Cavalieri Goal: To investigate the regional and interannual.
1 Comparisons of Daily SST Analyses for NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, NCDC) Dudley B. Chelton.
NACLIM 20 year re-processed Sea and Ice Surface Temperatures data set Gorm Dybkjær, Jacob Høyer, Rasmus Tonboe and Steffen M Olsen Center for Ocean and.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
ECOOP-WP3 Better use of remote-sensing data and in situ measurements Francis Gohin, Ifremer T3.1 Optimal synergy between altimetry and tide gauge data.
Real time Arctic SST retrieval from satellite IR data issues and solutions(?) Pierre Le Borgne, Gérard Legendre, Anne Marsouin, Sonia Péré, Hervé Roquet.
Assimilating Retrievals of Sea Surface Temperature from VIIRS and AMSR2 Bruce Brasnett and Dorina Surcel Colan CMDE November 21, 2014 Brasnett, B. and.
1http://saf.met.noSAF on Ocean and Sea Ice SAF=Satellite Application Facility Distributed MSG/Metop ground segmentDistributed MSG/Metop ground segment.
Status VOS/SHIP from Norway 2011 and future plans.
DMI-OI analysis in the Arctic DMI-OI processing scheme or Arctic Arctic bias correction method Arctic L4 Reanalysis Biases (AATSR – Pathfinder) Validation.
Application of in situ Observations to Current Satellite-Derived Sea Surface Temperature Products Gary A. Wick NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory With.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
Capacity of HRSST-2 buoys to measure SST with a high degree of accuracy Pierre Blouch E-SURFMAR Operational Service Manager.
The HR-DDS for NCOF David J. S. Poulter, National Oceanography Centre, UK Ian S. Robinson, National Oceanography Centre, UK Craig Donlon, ESA/ESTEC, The.
GHRSST 8 th Science Team Melbourne, May 2007 GHRSST Sea Ice Working Group Peter Minnett RSMAS University of Miami.
Meeting Description 8th GHRSST-PP Science Team MeetingMelbourne, Victoria - 14th - 18th May 2007 Status and Application of the HR-DDS Dave Poulter Ocean.
Intercomparison of Polar Cloud Climatology: APP-x, ERA-40, Ground-based Observations Xuanji Wang Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies.
GHRSST XI Meeting, IC-TAG Breakout Session, 22 June 2010, Lima, Peru Cross-monitoring of L4 SST fields in the SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM)
AMSR-E Vapor and Cloud Validation Atmospheric Water Vapor –In Situ Data Radiosondes –Calibration differences between different radiosonde manufactures.
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
Geophysical Ocean Products from AMSR-E & WindSAT Chelle L. Gentemann, Frank Wentz, Thomas Meissner, Kyle Hilburn, Deborah Smith, and Marty Brewer
AVHRR Radiance Bias Correction Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate Studies University of Maryland Some concepts and some.
November 28, 2006 Derivation and Evaluation of Multi- Sensor SST Error Characteristics Gary Wick 1 and Sandra Castro 2 1 NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory.
EuroGOOS Arctic Task Team Workshop September 2006 Satellite data portals for Arctic monitoring Stein Sandven Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing.
NOAA Climate Observation Annual Review Silver, Spring, MD Sept. 3-5, Intercomparisons Among Global Daily SST Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Ship SST data for satellite SST and ocean.
GHRSST HL_TAG meeting Copenhagen, March 2010 Validation of L2P products in the Arctic Motivation: Consistent inter-satellite validation of L2p SST observations.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Three-way error analysis between AATSR, AMSR-E and in situ sea surface temperature observations
Impact of Microwave SST Dr. Craig Donlon and The International GHRSST Science-Team.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
Use of high resolution global SST data in operational analysis and assimilation systems at the UK Met Office. Matt Martin, John Stark,
9th June 2008 GHRSST-9, Perros-Guirec SST framework at European level Medspiration, Marine Core Services & SAF O&SI Status and products Jean-François Piollé.
International GHRSST User Symposium Santa Rosa, California, USA 28-29th May 2009 MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures Peter J Minnett & Robert H. Evans With.
2 Jun 09 UNCLASSIFIED 10th GHRSST Science Team Meeting Santa Rosa, CA 1 – 5 June Presented by Bruce McKenzie Charlie N. Barron, A.B. Kara, C. Rowley.
Cloud and sea ice masking at high latitudes Steinar Eastwood (met.no)
New HR-DDS User Services David J. S. Poulter, National Oceanography Centre, UK
In order to accurately estimate polar air/sea fluxes, sea ice drift and then ocean circulation, global ocean models should make use of ice edge, sea ice.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder Versions 5 & 6 SST field to various reference fields Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’
EARWiG: SST retrieval issues for High Latitudes Andy Harris Jonathan Mittaz NOAA-CICS University of Maryland Chris Merchant U Edinburgh.
Uncertainty estimation from first principles: The future of SSES? Gary Corlett (University of Leicester) Chris Merchant (University of Edinburgh)
Edward Armstrong Jorge Vazquez Mike Chin Mike Davis James Pogue JPL PO.DAAC California Institute of Technology 28 May 2009 GHRSST Symposium, Santa Rosa,
SST and SIC in HIRLAM and HARMONIE Mariken Homleid ALADIN/HIRLAM Workshop/ASM, 14 May 2009.
Michael Steele Polar Science Center / APL University of Washington Jan 14, 2009 AOMIP WHOI Mechanisms of Upper Ocean Warming in the Arctic and the Effect.
Report from breakout session in the High Latitude Working group Prepared by Jacob L. Høyer, Bob Grumbine and Steinar Eastwood.
GHRSST interest in upgraded drifters - Summary from the GHRSST Joint Workshop Melbourne Andrea Kaiser-Weiss, Gary Corlett, Chris Merchant, Piere LeBorgne,
Validation of MTSAT-1R SST for the TWP+ Experiment Leon Majewski 1, Jon Mittaz 2, George Kruger 1,3, Helen Beggs 3, Andy Harris 2, Sandra Castro 4 1 Observations.
Mid Term II Review.
Validation of Satellite-derived Lake Surface Temperatures
AVHRR and Ship IR sensor versus in situ SAIL, BOOM and CTD instruments
Comparison of observed SST Vs. Satellite AVHRR SST
Presentation transcript:

Validation in Arctic conditions Steinar Eastwood (met.no) David Poulter (NOCS) GHRSST9, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF METOP SST, days mean

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Validation in Arctic conditions What is special about the Arctic? Availability of in situ observations. How can we use the HRDDS? Some validation results and lessons learned during OSI SAF METOP SST validation work.

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Sea Ice concentration Areas of interest: –Inner Arctic –Outer Arctic (Barents Sea) –Arctic conditions (Baffin Bay, Hudson Bay, Labrador Sea)

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF What is special about Arctic? Dry atmosphere Low SST Illumination conditions High air-sea temperature difference Sea ice cover –MIZ –Polynyas –Climatologies From REMSS AMSR-E MDB All match-ups,

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF What is special about Arctic? Dry atmosphere Low SST Illumination conditions High air-sea temperature difference Sea ice cover –MIZ –Polynyas –Climatologies OSI SAF METOP SST, , 8 days mean

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF What is special about Arctic? Dry atmosphere Low SST Illumination conditions High air-sea temperature difference Sea ice cover –MIZ –Polynyas –Climatologies

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF What is special about Arctic? Dry atmosphere Low SST Illumination conditions High air-sea temperature difference Sea ice cover –MIZ –Polynyas –Climatologies

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF What is special about Arctic? Dry atmosphere Low SST Illumination conditions High air-sea temperature difference Sea ice cover –MIZ –Polynyas –Climatologies OSI SAF Ice Conc

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Dry atmosphere Low SST Illumination conditions High air-sea temperature difference Sea ice cover –MIZ –Polynyas –Climatologies , 8 days mean SST What is special about Arctic?

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF What is special about Arctic? Dry atmosphere Low SST Illumination conditions High air-sea temperature difference Sea ice cover –MIZ –Polynyas –Climatologies Well covered by polar orbiters.....but often cloudy

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Availability of in situ observations Drifting buoys during Usually very few drifting buoys visit the Arctic through GTS

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Availability of in situ observations Usually very few drifting buoys visit the Arctic through GTS “Poleward” project deploys more than 100 drifters in 2007 and 2008 Ships available, also in inner Arctic, but how representative for SST? Drifters trajectories since deployment (in 2007). Courtesy of Inga Koszalka, University of Oslo, Norway.

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF How to use HRDDS in validation? Find general performance of SST products from in situ in Arctic: –METOP –AATSR –AMSR-E Use HRDDS for more detailed validation studies –Intercomparison between satellites for more details METOP – AATSR METOP - AMSR

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Drifting buoys from Confidence level 4 and 5 Open sea only Daytime (T11,T12)Night time (T37,T11,T12) BiasStdNumBiasStdNum Global Arctic Inner Arctic Antarctic N-Atlantic Tropics METOP MDB validation (OSI SAF)

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF METOP MDB validation (OSI SAF) What about using conventional ship observations? High standard deviations, different biases compared to drifters Even in situ from research vessels show bad validation results DaytimeNight time BiasStdNumBiasStdNum Global Arctic Inner Arctic Antarctic N-Atlantic Tropics

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF In situ ship observations Select all ships that went into the inner Arctic during summer Plot the global match-ups for these ships during

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF AATSR MDB validation (Medspiration) Drifters from Confidence level 4 and 5 DaytimeNight time BiasStdNumBiasStdNum Global Arctic Antarctic N-Atlantic Tropics

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF AATSR MDB validation (Medspiration)

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF AMSR-E MDB validation (REMSS) Drifters from Provided by Chelle Gentemann Comparable results with Medspiration MDB All day BiasStdNum Global Arctic Antarctic N-Atlantic Tropics

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF AMSR-E MDB validation (REMSS) Global Arctic

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF High standard deviation at daytime in Arctic DaytimeNight time BiasStdNumBiasStdNum Global Arctic Antarctic N-Atlantic Tropics METOP MDB validation (OSI SAF)

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF HRDDS in Arctic Time series of average SSTs at the HR-DDS site in the Chukchi Sea; Black symbols represent METOP-A SSTs, dashed lines with symbols represent analysis SST products (green is OSTIA), dashed lines without symbols represent climatological products, solid lines represent model SSTs, large circles represent NOAA AVHRR observations. Note the general consensus of SST data, with the exception of three extremely cold METOP-A SSTs.

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF HRDDS in Arctic A scatter plot of the maximum negative deviation from reference SST for each HR-DDS granule at the Bear Island site against the median solar zenith angle for the granule.

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF High standard deviation at daytime in Arctic DaytimeNight time BiasStdNumBiasStdNum Global Arctic Antarctic N-Atlantic Tropics METOP MDB validation (OSI SAF)

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF METOP MDB validation (OSI SAF) Remove solar zenith angle cases in Arctic DaytimeNight time BiasStdNumBiasStdNum Global Arctic Antarctic N-Atlantic Tropics

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Cloud issues in the Arctic C A B SST close to twilight north of Bering Strait

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Cloud issues in the Arctic C A B A C B Extra cloud and ice flag in METOP SST retrieval Uses Bayesian approach to determine probabilities of clouds, ice and open water Uses fractions between visible channels –A3/A1 –A2/A1

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Cloud issues in the Arctic Applies the extra cloud and ice flag up to 90 degrees solar zenith angle (instead of 85)

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF HRDDS: AMSR-AATSR SST difference Bias (K) of whole area AMSR-E SSTs to whole area high quality AATSR SSTs in Arctic regions with a 360 minute time window. Mean bias is K, standard deviation is 1.47 K Positive bias at low SSTs, less at higher SSTs. Compares well with MDB comparison. Larger bias in inner Arctic compared to North Atlantic.

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF HRDDS: AVHRR-AATRS SST difference Positive bias at day, less at night Compares well with MDB comparisons Bias (K) of focus area METOP-A SSTs to focus area AATSR SSTs in Arctic regions with a 720 minute time window. Mean bias is 0.54 K, standard deviation is 1.11 K

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Conclusion Conventional shipobs are not reliable HRDDS is very useful for detailed validation studies in the Arctic IR SST products are usually accurate in the Arctic (std), but not always precise (biases) MW has some bias issues Mind your cloud masking in the Arctic!

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Extra slides

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF SST MDB tool On-line tool to list content of METOP SST MDB Station-by-station Monthly averages –Station –Area Mean or Central SST

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF SST vs ice concentration Ships also go into the sea ice. Measures the ice concentration, together with the SST.

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Deployment of “Poleward” drifters More info on: /

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Ship SST obs August – September 2006 A few ships in the Arctic.

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF Ship SST obs August – September 2007 More ships in the Arctic during the International Polar Year A few ship campaigns will go into the Arctic basin, and also into the sea ice.

GHRSST9 meeting, June 2008, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF First results from MDB, ships Available ships DBLK – Polar Stern (germ ocean.res.ship) NEPP – USCGC Healy (am ocean.res.ship) LAHV – Jan Mayen (nor ocean.res.ship) UANA – Fritjof Nansen (russ ocean.res.ship) LJIT – Håkon Mosby (nor ocean.res.ship) LMEL – G.O.Sars (nor ocean.res.ship) ++