1 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center ARCSTONE Mission: Accurate Lunar Spectral Irradiance Calibration Concept.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M3 Instrument Design and Expected Performance Robert O. Green 12 May 2005.
Advertisements

2 - 1 WCRP Denver 2011 Measurement of Decadal Scale Climate Change from Space Marty Mlynczak, Bruce Wielicki, and David Young NASA Langley Research Center.
Pre-launch Characterization of the CERES Flight Model 5 (FM5) Instrument on NPP S. Thomas a, K. J. Priestley b, M. Shankar a, N. P. Smith a, M. G. Timcoe.
Reflected Solar Calibration Demonstration System Update J. McCorkel K. Thome D. Jennings B. McAndrew J. Hair D. Rabin A. Daw National Aeronautics and Space.
Traceability to SI temperature standards: A prerequisite for Climate Data Records of SST Peter J Minnett Meteorology & Physical Oceanography Rosenstiel.
ASIC3 WorkshopLandsdowne, VA May 16-18, 2006 J. Harder Page 1 Calibration Status of the Solar Irradiance Monitor (SIM) : The Present and the Future Jerald.
Use of the Moon as an On-orbit Calibration Source Thomas C. Stone US Geological Survey, Flagstaff AZ Hugh Kieffer Celestial Reasonings, Carson City NV.
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
NOAA Research and Operations Marine Optical Buoy Design Review July 18-19, 2006 Plan for calibration and maintenance of AHAB Uncertainty Budget: Laboratory.
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Introduction to ocean color satellite calibration NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space.
SNPP VIIRS On-Orbit Calibration for Ocean Color Applications MODIS / VIIRS Science Team Meeting May 2015 Gene Eplee, Kevin Turpie, Gerhard Meister, and.
2010 CEOS Field Reflectance Intercomparisons Lessons Learned K. Thome 1, N. Fox 2 1 NASA/GSFC, 2 National Physical Laboratory.
Sergey Mekhontsev National Institute of Standards and Technology Optical Technology Division, Gaithersburg, MD Infrared Spectral Radiance Scale.
CLARREO SDT Meeting Alternative Missions & The Path Forward David Young April 10-12,
On-orbit Cross-calibration of AM Satellite Remote Sensing Instruments Using the Moon International Workshop on Radiometric & Geometric Calibration Grand.
CLARREO Mission Studies Overview David F. Young First CLARREO Mission Study Team Meeting Newport News, VA April 30 - May 2.
Integrated Mission Review 28Jan108Jan10: N - 1 Use or disclosure of the data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the IMR cover page.
Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.
1 Reflected Solar Calibration Demonstration System - SOLARIS K. Thome, D. Jennings, B. McAndrew, J. McCorkel, P. Thompson NASA/GSFC.
Climate Absolute Radiance and Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) The Story so Far… David F. Young NASA Langley Research Center CLARREO Mission Study Lead.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
NASA ESTO ATIP Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations 12/12/01 NASA Goddard - Laser Remote Sensing Branch 1 James B. Abshire,
Inter-calibration of Operational IR Sounders using CLARREO Bob Holz, Dave Tobin, Fred Nagle, Bob Knuteson, Fred Best, Hank Revercomb Space Science and.
ASIC 3 May Broadband Breakout Group Recommendations Big 3 Crosscutting Earth Radiation Budget.
CALCON September B. Carol Johnson, Steven W. Brown and Howard W. Yoon National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD Radiometric.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
Recent Solar Irradiance Data From SBUV/2 and OMI Matthew DeLand and Sergey Marchenko Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) SOLID WP-2 Workshop.
1 GSFC CDS Activities and Plans for 2016 K. Thome, A. Angal, J. McCorkel NASA/GSFC CLARREO SDT Meeting Hampton, VA December 1-3, 2015.
1 Science Definition Team Meeting National Aerospace Institute Hampton, VA Dec 1-3, 2015.
SeaWiFS Calibration & Validation Strategy & Results Charles R. McClain SeaWiFS Project Scientist NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center February 11, 2004.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
CLARREO Science Briefing 11/14/08 1 Reflected Solar Accuracy Science Requirements Bruce Wielicki, Dave Young, Constantine Lukashin, Langley Zhonghai Jin,
Polarization analysis in MODIS Gerhard Meister, Ewa Kwiatkowska, Bryan Franz, Chuck McClain Ocean Biology Processing Group 18 June 2008 Polarization Technology.
Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
Orbital Analysis for Inter-Calibration Dave Mac Donnell Brooke Anderson Bruce Wielicki Don Garber NASA Langley Research Center Solar Workshop January 30,
Overview of Climate Observational Requirements for GOES-R Herbert Jacobowitz Short & Associates, Inc.
- 1 CLARREO Science Meeting CLARREO Science Meeting July 6, 2010 July 6, 2010 Bruce Wielicki.
1EUM/RSP/VWG/16/ Tim Hewison Tom Stone Manik Bali Selecting and Migrating GSICS Inter-Calibration Reference Instruments.
1 SBUV/2 Calibration Lessons Over 30 Years: Liang-Kang Huang, Matthew DeLand, Steve Taylor Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) / NASA.
Page 1 NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP) VIIRS Calibration Maneuvers May 15, 2008 Ocean PEATE Team.
Mission/Measurement Overview  Mission Overview / Purpose  Provide a new level of accuracy to greatly improve a wide range of climate change observations.
1 CLARREO Advances in Reflected Solar Spectra Calibration Accuracy K. Thome 1, N. Fox 2, G. Kopp 3, J. McCorkel 1, P. Pilewskie 3 1 NASA/Goddard Space.
2015 GSICS Annual Meeting, Deli India March 16~20, 2015 Xiuqing Hu National Satellite Meteorological Center, CMA Yupeng Wang, Wei Fang Changchun Institute.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
CLARREO Pathfinder - Overview
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
Lunar observation data set preparation
Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu and Tom Stone
TEMPO Instrument Update
The ROLO Lunar Calibration System Description and Current Status
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
An Overview of MODIS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong NASA / GSFC GRWG Web Meeting on Reference Instruments and Their Traceability.
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
Data Preparation for Using the ROLO / GIRO Model
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Measurements of the Moon by CLARREO Pathfinder and ARCSTONE
Update on Advancing Development of the ROLO Lunar Calibration System
Future Developments of the Lunar Calibration System
Data Preparation for ASTER
CLARREO Pathfinder Inter-calibration: Requirements and Objectives
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
Instrument Considerations
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Combination Approaches
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
Lunar Observation Activities with a Small Satellite and a Planetary Exploration Satellite. Hodoyoshi-1 Hayabusa-2 Toru Kouyama, AIST
Current Status of ROLO and Future Development
Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics , Chinese Academy of Science
CLARREO Pathfinder Inter-calibration: Requirements and Objectives
Presentation transcript:

1 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center ARCSTONE Mission: Accurate Lunar Spectral Irradiance Calibration Concept Lead: Constantine Lukashin (NASA LaRC) Concept Team: NASA LaRC: R. Baize, J. Leckey, N. Miller, M. Vanek NASA STMD: S. Horan NASA GSFC: K. Thome and J. McCorkel NIST: K. Lykke, S. Brown, J. Woodward USGS: T. Stone

2 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center ARCSTONE – Accurate Lunar Irradiance: Need and Importance Problem Statement: Science missions in LEO and GEO need reliable calibration methods that can be used across Earth Observing System to provide traceability to absolute standards and inter-mission calibration with high accuracy. Ohring et al., 2005: “Satellite Instrument Calibration for Measuring Global Climate Change,” BAMS, pp – This Workshop provided guidance for accuracy for All key weather and climate parameters (most of them are not currenty met). NRC Decadal Survey 2007 followed with multiple recommendations for NASA and NOAA: -High accuracy observation from TSIS, CERES/RBI, and CLARREO. -Enable long-term stable data records for key variable (minimize gap risk). Accuracy is the foundation stone for measurement usefulness (information content) ! Solutions: -Establish an accurate calibration source available on LEO and GEO missions – the high accuracy Lunar Irradiance/Reflectance (constant in time). -Demonstrate the high accuracy Lunar Irradiance calibration in on-orbit environment using a Small Satellite mission implementation. Impact: This becomes an enabling technology for the past, current and future Earth Science missions in LEO and GEO (processes, weather and climate).

3 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center Lunar Calibration On-Orbit: State of the Art - SeaWIFS Example 1 -SeaWIFS scatter due to oversampling corrections. -MODIS scatter due to lower lunar signal at higher lunar phase angle. SeaWIFS and MODIS lunar calibration comparison, at 412 nm wavelength: SeaWiFS gain stability 0.13% (k=1) achieved with Lunar calibration monthly ! Absolute biases up to 3% (k=1) Needed: Absolutely accurate irradiance for all lunar phase and libration states ! Lunar image by SeaWIFS

4 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center Lunar Calibration On-Orbit: State of the Art: CERES Example 2 TotalShortwaveWindow FM10.219% / decade 0.150% / decade 0.481% / decade CERES gain stability from Lunar Observations, Broadband [Daniels et al., 2014]: Needed: Absolutely accurate irradiance for all lunar phase and libration states ! CERES SW channel gain stability 0.15% per decade demonstrated with Lunar calibration monthly ! Potential impact on future CERES operations and calibration approach !

5 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center Lunar Calibration On-Orbit: Effect of Libration Effect of Libration on Lunar Irradiance: 2% variation in amplitude Threshold requirement for covering lunar libration space: measurements over approximately 3 years time period of daily sampling ! From Lorentz et al., LUSI Concept, 2009

6 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center ARCSTONE Mission: Concept Concept of Operations and Data Products: -Data to collect: Lunar and Solar spectral irradiance (every 24 hours at least). Collection within 10 min each day to achieve combined accuracy < 1% (k=2). Spectrometer with single field-of-view about 1 o (no scanning !). -Preferred orbit – 90 o inclination polar (best sampling). -Spectral range from 800 nm (350 nm trade space?) to 2300 nm, spectral sampling 4 nm. Note: NIST plans to do VIS measurements from Mauna Loa starting in Data Products: After 1 year: Improvement of current Lunar Calibration Model (factor > 2); After 3 years: New Lunar Irradiance Model, improved accuracy level (factor > 6). Longer time: More Lunar geometries covered – better model reliability. Key Technologies to Enable the Concept: -Approach to orbital calibration via referencing Sun using precision aperture (pin hole): Demonstration of lunar and solar measurements with the same detector and without filters or specific optics that can degrade on orbit. -Pointing ability (precision & accuracy) of small spacecraft now permits obtaining required measurements. -A standard small satellite bus can now accommodate mission needs.

7 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center ARCSTONE Mission: Calibration of Lunar Irradiance Concept of Operations: - Spectrometer w/ single FOV on small satellite; - Preferred orbit: polar 90 o inclination; - Lunar observations daily, < 10 min; - Solar observation daily, < 10 min; - Duty cycle is very low (power efficiency); - Rigorous approach to sensor ground calibration; - New approach to sensor calibration on-orbit; - Pointing operations by small satellite bus. Proposed Technical Approach: - Enable accurate LEO and GEO sensor calibration; - Lunar spectral irradiance measurements; - Solar spectral irradiance measurements; - Combined accuracy in reflectance < 1% (k=2); - Spectral range from 800 (350 nm ?) nm to 2300 nm; - Spectral sampling 4 nm; - New high accuracy Lunar Irradiance/Reflectance Model. ROM Cost and Schedule: - ROM Cost < $15M; - 3 years of preparation (2 ?), and from 1 to 3 years in-orbit. Deliverables: - Accurate Lunar Irradiance/Reflectance Calibration Model. Proposal Team: - NASA LaRC (Project, Sensor/Bus Integration, Operations); - Instrument (spectrometer): TBD, RFI is online. - NASA GSFC (instrument ground/orbit calibration); - NIST (instrument ground calibration); - USGS (building new Lunar Irradiance Model). Concept of ARCSTONE Implementation Lunar Observations Solar Observations Impacts: - SM&P: potential cost saving for NASA missions; - Improve quality of data products (weather, climate); - Enable Earth climate climate change observations;

8 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center The success of JPL’s Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) imaging spectrometer for deriving solar-illuminated mineralogical properties has driven interest in miniaturizing such a system for in situ use on other solar system bodies. JPL’s Ultra-Compact Imaging Spectrometer (UCIS) is a highly miniaturized M3-like Offner pushbroom spectrometer suitable for a Mars-like rover where it could be mounted on the rover mast for determining the mineralogy of the surrounding terrain and guiding the rover towards closer examination of scientifically important targets. MDL has successfully designed and e-beam fabricated a shaped-groove grating on a very small substrate (~1 cm diameter) that maximizes and spectrally equalizes the overall signal-to-noise ratio of the UCIS instrument. Ultimately, UCIS will achieve a mast-mounted total mass of 1.5 kg, with some additional electronics potentially located on the rover body, enabling high-resolution imaging spectroscopy from a rover platform. ARCSTONE Mission: Examples of Compact Imaging Spectrometers SPILAB manufactured a palm sized Offner imaging spectrometer. The convex diffraction grating was manufactured by QUDOS Tech using electron beam milling. ARCSTOME mission concept requires even simpler instrument: A spectrometer with single field-of-view !

9 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center A. Component-level testing using NIST Standards. B.Instrument level calibration and characterization will validate the uncertainty goals. C.Other Important Characterizations Scatter within instrument: - Size-of-source effect; - Spectrometer out-of-band signal; - Linearity of response and Spatial uniformity; - Sensitivity to polarization of incoming light. D.SIRCUS facility at NIST provides a tunable laser source from 300 nm to 2500 nm. The basis of SIRCUS is a well-understood tunable laser source that can be coupled to a fiber optic system providing both radiance and irradiance sources. The output of the source is determined via detector standards characterized against the Primary Optical Watt Radiometer (POWR). The accuracy of such a radiance-based calibration has been demonstrated in NIST facilities to an expected accuracy of 0.2% for k=3. Leverage CLARREO RS calibration approach: SOLARIS Calibration Demonstration System (GSFC) CLARREO RS Calibration Approach: From CLARREO SDT Report, October ARCSTONE Mission: Instrument Calibration & Characterization

10 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center Ensuring SI-traceability and adequate accuracy requires evaluation of sensor performance on-orbit and a traceable error budget. The basis of the sensor traceability is via a high- fidelity sensor model developed from prelaunch characterization data coupled with on-orbit absolute solar irradiance measurements to show the sensor did not change going to orbit. Disagreement between reported solar irradiance and predicted values mean that the sensor model requires modification. Stellar views provide information regarding the optical quality of the sensor. Temporal changes in the sensor are evaluated using these techniques as well. The sensor model can be thought of as the numerical abstraction of the physical instrument, encapsulating knowledge of both optical physics and empirical results gained from laboratory analysis. Disparities between laboratory results and model predictions guide model improvements. CLARREO RS Calibration Approach: From CLARREO SDT Report, October Leverage CLARREO RS calibration approach: SOLARIS Calibration Demonstration System (GSFC) ARCSTONE Mission: Instrument Calibration on-Orbit

11 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center ARCSTONE Mission: Project Success Criteria Key Performance Parameters (KPP) State of the Art (SOA)Threshold ValueGoal Value Accuracy3% (k=1)1.5% (k=1)0.5% (k=1) Stability0.13% (k=1) per decade0.1% (k=1) per decade OrbitSurfaceISS / Sun-synch orbit90 o inclination polar Time on-OrbitNone1 year3 years Instrument pointingNone0.2 o combined0.1 o combined Spectral Range800 nm – 2200 nm350 nm – 2300 nm Spectral SamplingMulti-Spectral8 nm4 nm * To be expanded to all key mission parameters.

12 ARCSTONE Mission ConceptGSICS Meeting, March, 2015 NASA Langley Research Center ARCSTONE Mission: Summary