Characterizing Diurnal Calibration Variations using Double-Differences Fangfang Yu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Tim Hewison SEVIRI-IASI Inter-calibration Uncertainty Evaluation.
Advertisements

10 th GSICS EXP Meeting, June , Geneva NOAA GPRC Report to the GSICS 10 th EXP 6-8 June 2011, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stratospheric Measurements: Microwave Sounders I. Current Methods – MSU4/AMSU9 Diurnal Adjustment Merging II. Problems and Limitations III. Other AMSU.
Combining Multiple References GSICS Web Meeting
A Fundamental Climate Data Record for the AVHRR Jonathan Mittaz Manik Bali & Andrew Harris CICS/ESSIC University of Maryland.
1 Weekly Report on GOES-14 PLT Science Test NOAA / NESDIS / STAR X. Wu, G. Rancic, F. Yu December 18, 2009.
Surface Skin Temperatures Observed from IR and Microwave Satellite Measurements Catherine Prigent, CNRS, LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, France Filipe Aires,
Where m is the first order gain, q is the second order gain, is the observed blackbody counts, is the observed space counts, is the radiance of the blackbody,
GOES-13 Science Team Report SST Images and Analyses Eileen Maturi, STAR/SOCD, Camp Springs, MD Andy Harris, CICS, University of Maryland, MD Chris Merchant,
Assessment of GOES Imager Infrared Radiometric Calibration Accuracy toward Long-term Climate Data Record Fangfang Yu 1*, Xiangqian Wu 2, Scott Lindstrom.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 MAP (Maximum A Posteriori) x is reduced state vector [SST(x), TCWV(w)]
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
THE NOAA SSU STRATOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE CLIMATE DATA RECORD Cheng-Zhi Zou NOAA/NESDIS/Center For Satellite Applications and Research Haifeng Qian, Lilong.
GSICS Bias Monitoring Routine comparisons of satellite radiances against reference GSICS Correction Function to correct issued radiances For consistent.
Evaluation of the Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park; 2 STAR/NESDIS/NOAA Yuling Liu 1, Yunyue.
Global Space-based Inter- Calibration System (GSICS) Progress Report Mitch Goldberg, NOAA/NESDIS GSICS Executive Panel chair.
Chelle L. Gentemann & Peter J. Minnett Introduction to the upper ocean thermal structure Diurnal models M-AERI data Examples of diurnal warming Conclusions.
Radiative transfer in the thermal infrared and the surface source term
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
AVHRR Radiance Bias Correction Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate Studies University of Maryland Some concepts and some.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Monitoring of IR Clear-sky Radiances over Oceans for SST (MICROS) Alexander.
The MODIS SST hypercube is a multi-dimensional look up table of SST retrieval uncertainty, bias and standard deviation, determined from comprehensive analysis.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
JMA Report 24 Mar 2009 Yoshihiko Tahara Incorrect RMA equation reported in the January meeting GSICS correction for MTSAT –Don’t we need standard GSICS.
GRWG Agenda Item Towards Operational GSICS Corrections for Meteosat/SEVIRI IR Channels Tim Hewison EUMETSAT 1.
1 SBUV/2 Calibration Lessons Over 30 Years: Liang-Kang Huang, Matthew DeLand, Steve Taylor Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) / NASA.
Bias analysis and correction for MetOp/AVHRR IR channel using AVHRR-IASI inter-comparison Tiejun Chang and Xiangqian Wu GSICS Joint Research and data Working.
22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Tim Hewison NWP Bias Monitoring Double-Differencing as inter-calibration technique.
NOAA GPRC Report Fangfang Yu and Fred Wu 05 March 2012.
JMA GPRC report Arata OKUYAMA Meteorological Satellite Center,
GSICS activities and strategy plan in CMA
Joint GRWG and GDWG Meeting February 2010, Toulouse, France
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
Fangfang Yu, Fuzhong Weng, Xiangqian Wu, and Ninghai Sun
Review of EUMETSAT’s GEO-LEO Correction
Report from KMA 17th GSICS Executive Panel, Biot, 2-3 June 2016
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
KMA GDWG Activity Progress Report
Masaya Takahashi Meteorological Satellite Center,
Fangfang Yu and Fred Wu 22 March 2011
Combining Vicarious Calibrations
GOES Imager IR Midnight Calibration Anomaly and Correction
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
Combining Multiple References
NOAA-KMA Collaboration on Imager Midnight IR Calibration Anomaly
AHI IR Tb bias variation diurnal & at low temperature
Diurnal and Seasonal variations of COMS IR inter-calibration
GEO-GEO products – diurnal variations
GSICS ATBD (ISRO) GSICS Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for Inter-Calibration of Indian GEO satellites Pradeep Thapliyal Space Applications.
KMA Agency Report NMSC/KMA
Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency
Na Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen, Min Min
Use of GSICS to Improve Operational Radiometric Calibration
Developing GSICS products for IR channels of GEO imagers Tim Hewison
GSICS Products’ Improvements and Developments
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Tim Hewison1 and all GSICS Developers EUMETSAT
Presentation of GSICS Inter-Calibration Results - Web Displays
goes-16/17 abi lunar calibration
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Variogram Stability Analysis
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Inter-calibration results of COMS/MI using with and without MBCC
Inter-calibration result of COMS/MI using before and after reprocessed CrIS data March 2019 Minju Gu and Dohyeong Kim.
Discussion Way Forward for Multispectral IR
Midnight calibration errors on MTSAT-2
Atmospheric reanalysis at ECMWF
How good is IASI-A as an in-orbit reference in GSICS in LWIR and IR
Towards a GSICS DCC product...
Presentation transcript:

Characterizing Diurnal Calibration Variations using Double-Differences Fangfang Yu

GEO Diurnal Calibration Variations All the GEO IR instruments experience some diurnal calibration variations According to Johnson and Weinreb (1996), the causes to the GOES midnight calibration anomalies are attributed to: – Extra radiation reflected by the non-unity emissivity of BB to the detectors, when the instrument is viewing the BB. – Scattered solar radiation contamination at space view Most pronounced at pre-eclipse and post-eclipse around the equinox. An empirical midnight calibration correction has been implemented (Weinreb and Han 2003)

Diurnal Cal. Variation and MBCC Calibration Evaluation (Yu et al. 2013) Time dependent Tb bias and the standard deviation (at 30 minute time bin), as well the onset frequency of MBCC application for the winter of 2008.

Time-dependent correction during the midnight effect time – Duration and amplitude vary at different IR channel – Depends on the frequency of MBCC application – Change with seasons – Has seasonal long-term trending Evaluation of MBCC performance for each channel and in each month for GOES-11, courtesy of Rama V. R Time-series of Tb bias to AIRS at midnight time for GOES- 11 Ch4

Diurnal Calibration Variations -1 In Yu et al. (2013), diurnal Tb variation is characterized as: Diurnal Tb Variation = max(Tb GEO, daytime -Tb AIRS,daytime ) – min(Tb GEO,midnight - Tb AIRS,midnight ) – Three months of collocation data are used to ensure enough data for a robust Tb bias at each half-hour time intervals In the IR product, the correction coefficients are based on monthly collocation Diurnal Tb Variation = (Tb GEO, daytime -Tb AIRS,daytime ) – (Tb GEO,midnight -Tb AIRS,midnight ) This method cannot work for shortwave channel (IR3.9µm) – Directional reflectance May also over-estimate the uncertainty of window channel (10.7µm) in the day-time. – Directional emissivity

Diurnal Calibration Variations - 2 Can we use IASI night-time collocations? SNO night-time collocations for the SW channels Extra resource needed SNO has the cold scene issue Can we currently assume AIRS-IASI =0 for this channel? Need to characterize the IASI-AIRS difference Double difference  need to know GEO t1 -GEO t2 Diurnal Tb Variation = (Tb GEO, nighttime –Tb IASI,nightime ) – (Tb GEO,midnight -Tb AIRS,midnight )

Issues: – Aqua overpasses at 1:30am. As a result, most collocations occur between 00:00-03:00am satellite local time – Need sufficient collocations for robust statistics – May work fine if the non-perfect BB is the main issue for the midnight calibration anomaly: 1-3 hours of midnight – May result in relatively larger uncertainty for the stray-light contamination at pre/post-eclipse seasons: peak at midnight? How about the spinners which have stray-light effect peaks around satellite midnight time? Diurnal Calibration Variations -3 Can we use hourly interval AIRS night-time collocations?

Since the purpose of diurnal calibration variation and the its uncertainty is mainly for the reference of correction residual (NOAA currently doesn’t plan to provide the midnight correction product), it is proposed that we use AIRS as the reference instrument to characterize the diurnal calibration variation – Night time collocation for SW channel (3.9µm) Diurnal Calibration Variations -4 Diurnal Tb Variation = (Tb GEO, before00Z –Tb AIRS,before00Z ) – (Tb GEO,after00Z -Tb AIRS,after00Z ) Diurnal Tb Variation = (Tb GEO, daytime –Tb AIRS,daytime ) – (Tb GEO,midnight -Tb AIRS,midnight ) – Day/night AIRS collocations for the other IR channels Diurnal Tb Variation = (Tb GEO, night –Tb IASI, night ) – (Tb GEO,midnight -Tb AIRS,midnight )

In addition to seasonal variations, the diurnal variation may also change (trending) as the instrument ages – Ideally dynamic Are they really needed in the netCDF file, if it is for the reference of correction residual purpose? If it is required in the netCDF file, how long (12 months) should we provide the diurnal variations if dynamic data can be guaranteed? Diurnal Calibration Variations -5 Suggest addressing the diurnal calibration variation and the uncertainty in the product uncertainty analysis document instead of the netCDF file

Parameters in netCDF Global attributes: – Reference instrument for diurnal calibration variation: Aqua AIRS/Metop-A IASI – Diurnal calibration variation equation: = (Tb GEO, nominal –Tb LEO,nominal ) – (Tb GEO,midnight -Tb LEO,midnight ) Variables: std_scene_tb_bias_geo2leo_midnight – long_name: channel standard scene of GEO to LEO brightness temperature bias for midnight period std_scene_tb_bias_geo2leo_midnight_se – long_name: standard error of midnight channel standard scene of GEO to LEO brightness temperature bias number_of_collocations_midnight – long_name: collocation number for regression analysis for midnight period std_scene_tb_bias_geo2leo_nominal – long_name: channel standard scene of GEO to LEO brightness temperature bias for nominal period std_scene_tb_bias_geo2leo_nominal_se – long_name: standard error of nominal channel standard scene of GEO to LEO brightness temperature bias number_of_collocations_nominal – long_name: collocation number for regression analysis for nominal period std_scene_tb_diurnal – long_name: diurnal brightness temperature variation at standard scene radiance std_scene_tb_diurnal _se – long_name: standard deviation of diurnal brightness temperature variation at standard scene radiance