US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey. Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
Advertisements

Crop Area estimation in Morocco
North American Croplands Richard Massey & Dr. Teki Sankey.
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 18 February 2010 Reading: Ch – 7.19 Last lecture: Spectral Mixture Analysis.
April 28-29, 2015 at Hotel Serena, Islamabad
Accuracy Assessment and Reference data Collection Kamini Yadav Dr. Russ Congalton.
Global Croplands Project Remote Sensing of Global Croplands and their Water Use for Food Security in the Twenty-first Century Prasad S. Thenkabail
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior GFSAD30m Global Cropland Extent Products of Nominal 250 m (GCE V2.0) Updates Pardhasaradhi.
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior GFSAD30m Global Cropland Extent Products of Nominal 250 m (GCE V2.0) Updates Pardhasaradhi.
Ten State Mid-Atlantic Cropland Data Layer Project Rick Mueller Program Manager USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service Remote Sensing Across the.
Mapping of mountain pine beetle red-attack forest damage: discrepancies by data sources at the forest stand scale Huapeng Chen and Adrian Walton.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
North American Croplands: US Updates 21 May 2015 Richard Massey; Dr. Teki Sankey.
Jorge Peña Arancibia, Francis Chiew, Tim McVicar, Yongqiang Zhang, Albert Van Dijk, Mohammed Mainuddin and others 29 April 2014 CSIRO LAND AND WATER Dynamic.
Co-authors: Maryam Altaf & Intikhab Ulfat
Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results M.A. Friedl a,*, D.K. McIver a, J.C.F. Hodges a, X.Y. Zhang a, D. Muchoney b, A.H. Strahler.
Application of GI-based Procedures for Soil Moisture Mapping and Crop Vegetation Status Monitoring in Romania Dr. Adriana MARICA, Dr. Gheorghe STANCALIE,
Meta-optimization of the Extended Kalman filter’s parameters for improved feature extraction on hyper-temporal images. B.P. Salmon 1,2*, W. Kleynhans 1,2,
Operational Agriculture Monitoring System Using Remote Sensing Pei Zhiyuan Center for Remote Sensing Applacation, Ministry of Agriculture, China.
Estimates of Biomass Burning Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Emissions from the GOES Imager Xiaoyang Zhang 1,2, Shobha Kondragunta 1, Chris Schmidt 3 1 NOAA/NESDIS/Center.
National Mapping Division EROS Data Center U. S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Operation Systems (EROS) Data Center World Data.
Summer Session 09 August Tips for the Final Exam Make sure your answers clear, without convoluted language. Read questions carefully – are you answering.
Lu Liang, Peng Gong Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley And Center for Earth System Science,
Crop area estimation in Geoland 2 Ispra, 14-15/05/2012 I. Ukraine region II. North China Plain.
Selection of Multi-Temporal Scenes for the Mississippi Cropland Data Layer, 2004 Rick Mueller Research and Development Division National Agricultural Statistics.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Update: 11/20/2014.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey GFSAD30 Field Work Planning: Progress in Australia Pardha, Prasad, and Jun GFSAD30 monthly meeting,
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Suply Embrapa Satellite Monitoring Assessing vegetation coverage at the Sao Paulo State scale: a tool for aiding.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management California Department of.
North American Croplands: Updates Richard Massey; Teki Sankey.
Remotely sensed land cover heterogeneity
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Rapid Prototyping of NASA Next Generation Sensors for the SERVIR System.
Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL Background – Current BP & FIL grids not showing BP & FIL values in areas designated NB3 by LANDFIRE.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey LP DAAC Stacie Doman Bennett, LP DAAC Scientist Dave Meyer, LP DAAC Project Scientist.
Reference Data Standard Protocols Kamini Yadav Dr. Russ Congalton.
Croplands.org Aiming to release to public in next couple weeks. There will likely be a separation of work space from public space.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Update: 8/21/2014.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey GFSAD30 Field Work Planning: Progress in Australia Pardha, Prasad, and Jun GFSAD30 monthly meeting,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Monthly Progress for Africa GCEV2 Jun Xiong, Prasad, Pardha 23 October, 2014.
1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
MODIS-based Cropland Classification in North America Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University.
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior GFSAD 30 Cropland Products of Nominal 250 m Using MODIS Data and Cropland Mapping Algorithms:
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey.
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior GFSAD30m Global Cropland Extent Products of Nominal 250 m (GCE V2.0) Area claculations Pardhasaradhi.
GLC 2000 Workshop March 2003 Land cover map of southern hemisphere Africa using SPOT-4 VEGETATION data Ana Cabral 1, Maria J.P. de Vasconcelos 1,2,
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
Reference data & Accuracy Assessment Dr. Russ Congalton Kamini Yadav.
Cropland mapping in South America
Monitoring land use and land cover changes in oceanic and fragmented lanscapes with reconstructed MODIS time series R. Lecerf, T. Corpetti, L. Hubert-Moy.
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior GFSAD30m Global Cropland Extent Products of Nominal 250 m (GCE V2.0) Updates Pardha Teluguntla.
Cropland Extent Mapping in South America Global Food Security - Support Analysis m Chandra Giri, Ying Zhong January 19 th, 2016.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Chandra Giri Ying Zhong 7/15/2015 Cropland Extent Mapping in South America.
Dr. Russ Congalton & Kamini Yadav GFSAD30 Meeting, Menlo Park 19 th -21 st January, 2016 Reference Data Collection & Accuracy Assessment: Some Results.
Accuracy Assessment Accuracy Assessment Error Matrix Sampling Method
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior Automated Cropland Mapping Algorithms (ACMA) for Global Food Security Assessment Across Years Pardhasaradhi.
Website: Croplands.org. User Authentication Full user authentication system with roles. User passwords hashed (one way encrypted) with a salt using modern.
ACCURACY ASSESSMENT SOUTH AMERICA, NORTH AMERICA KAMINI YADAV DR. RUSSELL CONGALTON.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
VEGA-GEOGLAM Web-based GIS for crop monitoring and decision support in agriculture Evgeniya Elkina, Russian Space Research Institute The GEO-XIII Plenary.
Built-up Extraction from RISAT Data Using Segmentation Approach
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Paulo Gonçalves1 Hugo Carrão2 André Pinheiro2 Mário Caetano2
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
Corn and Soybean Differentiation Using Multi-Spectral Landsat Data
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Presentation transcript:

US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey

Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution 2.Develop an automated classification algorithm

Data Overview 1.MODIS MOD09Q1 8-day composite tiles for band 1 and band 2 2.FAO Global Agro Ecological Zones (GAEZ) for spatial stratification 3.Cropland extent and crop type distribution derived from GCE v1.0 and NASS Cropland Data Layer (CDL) 4.MIrAD-US 2007 classification of Irrigated US

Data Overview: MODIS NDVI dataset 16-day NDVI time-series derived from MOD09Q1 band 1 and band tiles in each annual stacks (3.12 TB/year) 16-day maximum value NDVI composite layer stacks: 24/year Cloud filtering to minimize noise

Data Overview: Global Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZ) (Version 3.0, FAO, UN) AEZ Total Area (Mha) Crop Area (Mha) US area percent % Cropland percent %

Data Overview: Cropland Data Layer (CDL) National Agricultural and Statistics Service, USDA Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops CDL 2008 Crop typeRainfed area (Mha) Percent area of Rainfed cropland (%) Irrigated area (Mha) Percent area of Irrigated cropland (%) Total cropland area (Mha) Percent area of total cropland (%) Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops Total

Data Overview: Sub-zones in AEZ Number of sub- zones: 298

Data Overview: Rainfed- Irrigated map MIrAD-2007 (Pervez and Brown, 2010) Percent area of US land under irrigation: 3% (27.9 Mha) Percent area of US croplands under irrigation: 22%

Temporal Extent: 2 approaches Year-specific classification 1.Cropland extent and crop type classification for 2008 and Classification Training: 2008: CDL crop type and extent from : CDL crop type and extent from 2010 Generalized Temporal Average (TA) 1.Cropland extent and crop type classification for annually 2.Classification Training: Temporal Average 2008: Average Precipitation 2010: Above-average precipitation 2012: Below-average precipitation

Cropland extent Binary overlay of crop classes Samples and extent: Generalized TA Sub-zones NDVI stack (Rainfed-Irrigated) AEZ CDL stack CDL stack CDL stack

Cropland extent: Generalized TA (CDL Temporal Average)

NDVI Temporal Average Samples Random samples for each subzone (center of the field) 3000 max samples/subzone Proportion of each crop class was based on ratio of its cropland area across all three years. Sample pixels were divided into training (75%) and validation (25%) datasets AEZ: 6 sub-zone: 4, 2008AEZ: 10 sub-zone: 14, 2011

AEZ: 6 sub-zone: 4 AEZ: 10 sub-zone: 17 If NDVI 15 + NDVI 16 < Corn-Soybean Wheat/Barley If NDVI 16 + NDVI 17 > Cotton Decision Tree Classification Corn-Soybean If NDVI 13 + NDVI 14 < Others

Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley CDL 2008 Classified image CDL 2008 Classified image AEZ: 6 sub-zone: 4, 2008 AEZ: 10 sub-zone: 14, 2011 CORN- SOYBEAN WHEAT- BARLEYTotal User-s Acc % CORN- SOYBEAN72,49526,23998, WHEAT- BARLEY25,052121,498146, Total97,547147,737245,284 Prod Acc % Overall81.1% CORN- SOYBEANCOTTONOthersTotalUser-s Acc % CORN- SOYBEAN12,8875, , COTTON5,00319, , Others1, ,0133, Total18,89824,8863,08447,784 Prod Acc % Overall76.3% Decision Tree Classification Corn-Soybean Cotton Others Corn-Soybean Cotton Others

Decision Tree Classification Sub-zones (n = 298) NDVI stack (Rainfed-Irrigated) Cropland extent Decision tree classification for each sub-zone Mosaicking all sub- zones together Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops Classified crop type map

Algorithm Overview: Generalized TA Divide each AEZ into sub-zones using CDL 2008, 2010, and 2014 Sample spectra for each sub-zone using CDL 2008, 2010, and 2014 Combined crop map for US Subset NDVI time-series by AEZ, Rainfed-Irrigated, Extent Decision Tree classification Crop type map for each sub-zone Combined crop map for each AEZ Iterative Optimizaton Comparison with CDL Data preparation Training Classification Assimilation of Results Cropland extent by binary overlay CDL

Produced crop type maps for annually Irrigated and Rainfed Mapping accuracy calculated Pixel-to-pixel comparison with CDL Additional assessment coming from Kamini/Russ Results: Generalized TA Overall accuracies (%) for Rainfed-Irrigated maps in the US for years Rainfed Irrigated

Results: Generalized TA (By AEZ) AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ Overall Overall accuracies (%) for all AEZs in the US for years

CORN-SOYBEANWHEAT-BARLEYPOTATOALFALFACOTTONRICEOTHERSTotalUser-s Acc CORN-SOYBEAN14,447,100478,3563,738135,82583,17419,916371,01116,089, WHEAT-BARLEY354,8482,897,13023,296170,036110, ,8444,342, POTATO1,87827,07312,4298,610009,15259, ALFALFA356,022111,7274,420626,6717, ,5351,178, COTTON141,729115,14805,405620,2574,130120,5091,007, RICE47, ,828189,33112,346234, OTHERS141,103198,2318,48249,871144,5119,1641,909,5782,160, Total16,690,6163,328,14152,365996,720769,673124,1682,979,97525,071,658 Prod Acc Overall77.7 % Kappa: CDL crop types 2009 Classified crop type Results: Generalized TA Example Combined crop type map for 2009 Error matrix between CDL and classified map Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops

CORN-SOYBEANWHEAT-BARLEYPOTATOALFALFACOTTONRICEOTHERSTotalUser-s Acc CORN-SOYBEAN14,447,100278,3563,73835,825113,17439,916371,01116,089, WHEAT-BARLEY354,8482,747,13023,296120,036110, ,8443,842, POTATO1,87821,07328,4298,610009,15259, ALFALFA156,022111,7274,420826,6717, ,5351,178, COTTON241,72955,14805,405520,2574,130120,5091,007, RICE147, ,82869,33112,346234, OTHERS241,103198,2318,48249,871144,5119,1641,609,5782,160, Total16,690,6163,328,14152,365996,720899,673124,1682,979,97525,071,658 Prod Acc Overall75.5 % Kappa: CDL crop types 2011 Classified crop types Error matrix between CDL and classified map Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops Results : Generalized TA Example Combined crop type map for 2011 Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops

Area Estimates: Generalized TA Area (Mha) estimated in the annual classification ( ) Crop type Area of classified map 2008 (Mha) Area of classified map 2009 (Mha) Area of classified map 2010 (Mha) Area of classified map 2011 (Mha) Area of classified map 2012 (Mha) Area of classified map 2013 (Mha) Area of classified map 2014 (Mha) CORN-SOYBEAN WHEAT-BARLEY POTATO ALFALFA COTTON RICE OTHERS Total Crop type Area of CDL map 2008 (Mha) Area of CDL map 2009 (Mha) Area of CDL map 2010 (Mha) Area of CDL map 2011 (Mha) Area of CDL map 2012 (Mha) Area of CDL map 2013 (Mha) Area of CDL map 2014 (Mha) CORN-SOYBEAN WHEAT-BARLEY POTATO ALFALFA COTTON RICE OTHERS Total Area (Mha) estimated in annual CDL ( )

Comparison of area estimates

Produced crop type maps for 2008 and 2010 Irrigated and Rainfed Mapping accuracy calculated Pixel-to-pixel comparison with CDL Additional assessment coming from Kamini/Russ Results: Year-specific classification Overall accuracies (%) Rainfed Irrigated

Results: Year-Specific Classification By crop type, 2008 example CORN-SOYBEANWHEAT-BARLEYPOTATOALFALFACOTTONRICEOTHERSTotalUser-s Acc CORN-SOYBEAN 13,017,100475, ,969112,60172,445521,62914,358, WHEAT-BARLEY 547,3214,250,08011,118121,22341, ,6505,277, POTATO 17,79515,47420,8427, ,64768, ALFALFA 151,710132,4121,464595,8252, ,477969, COTTON 104,77444,20202,824557,61612,11080,692802, RICE 74, ,873137,02310,377228, OTHERS 574,915380,4417,76986,69681,7888,2932,415,6903,555, Total 14,487,9755,299,04442,134972,686801,675231,1003,425,16225,259,776 Prod Acc Overall83.0 % Kappa: CDL crop types2008 Classified crop types Error matrix between CDL and classification Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops

Comparison of overall accuracies Year-specific classification accuracies (%) Rainfed Irrigated Rainfed Irrigated Generalized TA classification accuracies (%) AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ Overall AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ AEZ Overall

Conclusion Developed Generalized Temporal Average algorithm to classify crop types annually between Generalized Temporal Average classification performs adequately and particularly well for 2012 Developed Year-specific classification algorithms for 2008 and 2010 Year-specific classification has higher accuracies than Generalized Temporal Average (~83% Vs ~78%) US crop type map for 2008 using year-specific classification is available at Publication manuscript: In preparation

Moving Forward Extend Generalized Temporal Average classification to in the USA Crop intensities at 250m Develop Generalized Temporal Average classification algorithm for Central America and Canada (between ) at 250m resolution Data fusion of MODIS 250m and Landsat 30m to generate high resolution time-series data for North America

Thank you

Sample cleaning using 5x5 buffer (pixel size 56m) CDL 2008 CDL 2008 after removing boundary pixels Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops Corn-Soybean Wheat-Barley Potato Alfalfa Cotton Rice Other Crops

Spectral Separability NDVI spectra for many crop types still look similar. We identify areas where each spectra differs from others: Quantitative method Automated approach Parameter for the decision tree Rice Corn Soybean Corn Separability=1.0 for both crops Separability=0.5 for Corn, 0.45 for Soybean

NASS CDL availability for conterminous US

Fallow Cropland Classified using: 1.NDVI time-series thresholds derived from CDL random samples 2.Different time-series thresholds for AEZ 2 – 6 and AEZ 7 – 13 3.NDVI time-series standard deviation < 0.05 for growing months (April - September) Fallow cropland area Year CDL Fallow (Mha) Classified Fallow (Mha)

Data Overview: Global Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZ) (Version 3.0, FAO, UN) AEZ Total Area (Mha) Crop Area (Mha) US area percent % Cropland percent %