1 MTAC WG #175 Update for Northeast Area Focus Group May 4 th, 2016 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
Advertisements

MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
® 1 Mail Prep and Entry Steering Committee Meeting May 14, 2013.
CO-PALLETIZATION AND CO-MAILING UPDATE Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC), May 17, Update on Co-Palletization and Co-Mailing May 17, 2006.
1 MTAC 117  Workgroup Leaders Ty Taylor / Pritha Mehra  Origin Containerization Joel Walker / Sharon Harrison  Continuous Mailers Steve Krejcik / Kelly.
Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
1 R Mail Preparation Changes NCSC January 18, 2007.
Seamless Acceptance Pritha Mehra, USPS Manager, Marketing Technology & Channel Management.
AIMS™ (Assurety Integrated Mailing Solution) is a complete IDEAlliance, PostalOne! compliant mailing system with USPS FAST appointments for mailers and.
1 Product Redesign MTAC Update Cost-Based Rates for Periodicals and Standard Flats February 5, 2004.
1 It’s Time for Intelligent Mail ® : Bringing It All Together Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008.
® Confidential and Privileged Five-Day Delivery MTAC Briefing Sam Pulcrano, Vice President, Sustainability Bob Michelson, Manager, Program Management and.
Thursday, October 23, 2014 Area Mailing Industry Focus Group Postal/MTAC Update.
Reduce Postage Costs and Improve Delivery, Combined Mailing Solutions PCC Mailers Forum 2014 September 10 th, 2014 Deborah Damore Fairrington Transportation.
1 DSCF Entry Discount Review Tampa Bay Suncoast PCC January 14, 2015.
CSA Simplification March 1, CSA Simplification  CSA to eDoc Association will be modified in June  No changes to CSA file downloaded from FAST.
® Agenda Full-Service Mail Quality Reports Accessing the Mailer Scorecard Electronic Verifications Tab Full-Service Assessable Metrics.
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION November 5, FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION Issue #81 MTAC November 5, 2003.
Southern Area Operational Window Change Effective January 5, 2015 August 21, 2014.
Network Rationalization Mail Moves, Labeling Lists and Mail Direction File Industry Webinar July 1, 2013 To listen to a recording of this presentation.
National Postal Forum April 12, 2010 National Postal Forum ®
MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRSENTATION FEBRUARY 21, 2007 PRESENTED BY Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
Status of NDC Activations MTAC Briefing August 12, 2009.
November 01, 2005 MTAC 93 Design & Concept Testing Workgroup Status.
® Flats Update Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS Krista Finazzo Manager, Operational Requirements MTAC – November 2010.
® Flats Track for Periodicals, Catalogs & Printers David Mastervich Manager, Periodicals, Catalogs & Saturation Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS National.
MTAC Workgroup 93 Streamlining Verification Debbie Cooper Bob Galaher May 18, 2005 Washington DC.
® MTAC 131 Workgroup Update. 2 MTAC 131 Charter Recap MTAC charter:  This workgroup will focus on the issues regarding communicating what separations.
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP #81 MTAC Report February 5, 2004.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations August 2010.
1 MTAC 117 Intelligent Mail Barcodes and Electronic Documentation Workgroup Update.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process October 6, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
Presented by: Caulette Briggs-Jackson Shipping Solutions Specialist DOMESTIC SHIPPING SPECTRUM The Greater New York Postal Customer Council.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
1 Presentation Topics Agenda  January Release  BMA Channel Strategy –eDropship –Expanded Start-the-Clock  MTAC Workgroups.
Corporate Flats Strategy MTAC November 7, Slide 2 Presentation Overview Background Near Term Actions (FY 2003 and 2004) Longer Term Planning (FY.
Northeast Area Mailing Industry Focus Group February 25, 2015 New York, NY.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations November 18, 2010.
Optimizing Parcel Preparation & Entry for Seamless Acceptance Final Presentation MTAC Work Group # 109 Industry Leader: Wendy Smith USPS Leader: Jim Cochrane.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
1 Wed Aug. 6, 2008 Intelligent Mail®. 2  Implementation  Investing in Intelligent Mail  Full Service Review » Intelligent Mail® Barcodes and Labels.
1 FOOTER (10PT. ARIAL, BOLD, GREY, CAPS) TITLE OF PRESENTATION (24PT. ARIAL, BOLD, ALL UPPERCASE) Subtitle (20pt. Arial, Bold, Title Case) Network Rationalization.
Product Redesign MTAC Update February 6, PRODUCT REDESIGN Bob O’Brien – Industry Co-Chair John DePiazza Joe Lubenow Clarence Banks Robert Lindsay.
MTAC Workgroup 106 Improve, integrate, and optimize data sources… Brian Euclide, Perry Judd’s Inc. Bob Galaher, USPS Marketing Nov 02, 2006 Washington.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail May 16, 2007.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
1 FOOTER (10PT. ARIAL, BOLD, GREY, CAPS) TITLE OF PRESENTATION (24PT. ARIAL, BOLD, ALL UPPERCASE) Subtitle (20pt. Arial, Bold, Title Case) Network Rationalization.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
MTAC Workgroup 93 Streamlining Verification Debbie Cooper Bob Galaher Feb 22, 2006 Washington DC.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup 87 Update Washington, D.C. August 2, 2007.
Advance Notification Streamlined Acceptance and Visibility for First-Class Mail MTAC Workgroup 102.
® Service Standards and Performance Measurement MTAC Workgroup 114 Status Report.
1 November, 2008 Intelligent Mail® Readiness. 2 Agenda Intelligent Mail® Readiness  Full Service Project Schedule/Infrastructure  Recap Full Service.
® Confidential and Privileged Five-Day Delivery MTAC Briefing Sam Pulcrano, Vice President, Sustainability Bob Michelson, Manager, Program Management and.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Update Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail January 2008.
1 Seamless Acceptance, Performance- Based Verification Implementation, Benefits, Obstacles and Feedback Ty Taylor, JC Penney Pritha Mehra, USPS MTAC 117.
® Flats Symposium 2008 National Postal Forum ® National Postal Forum 2008.
Streamlining Verification MTAC Workgroup Mission Statement: –Collectively determine how the USPS and the Industry can leverage existing, or guide.
SERVICE STANDARDS MTAC Work Group #114 February 21, 2007 Jeffrey C. Williamson Manager, Network Development & Support.
1 Product Redesign MTAC Update November 5, Steering Committee Will Continue To Meet –Regular Updates And Feedback Regarding USPS Activity on Key.
1 MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRESENTATION November 7, 2007 Presented By Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations May 20, 2010.
1 MTAC May 26, 2011 Washington D.C. Kelly Sigmon Vice-President, Engineering USPS Operations Plan for Flats & Technology Update.
1 Start-the-Clock for Non Full-Service Mailings MTAC 139 November 17, 2010 Rose FlanaganChris Simone Data-Mail IncUSPS.
1 MTAC General Session Intelligent Mail Implementation Workgroup 122 April 29, 2009.
Product Redesign MTAC Update November 7, Workgroups Joint Meeting of Workgroups –Originally Planning For Early 2003 –Primarily Information Sharing.
1 MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRESENTATION August 2, 2007 Presented By Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
Flexible and Dynamic Co-Palletization
Network Rationalization
Presentation transcript:

1 MTAC WG #175 Update for Northeast Area Focus Group May 4 th,

2 ® Work Group Mission Statement: This workgroup will identify an approach to automate First-Class Mail container preparation from being based on CSAs to using software driven by labeling lists and the DMM. Desired Results:  Define set of software, labeling lists, and business rules to automate First-Class container preparation  Develop a plan to automate the ability to control the numbers of separations based on the capabilities of an individual mailers’ facility  Define a plan for pilot testing and establish a schedule for industry migration Expected Date of Completion: May 2016 CSA Mission

3 WG #175 Status Update  Current Status - Business Rule Pilot Expansion  Continuous Mailers: Completed  Large Mailers: Completed  Medium Mailers: Final Phase of Analysis  Small Mailers: In Progress

4 Hartford DST Before - After Hartford DST Separations BeforeHartford DST Separations After Proposed Future State: Applied business rules to design future state Volume driven direct separations and alignment with USPS transportation network Meet the Mailer Requirement of 23 Letter Separations Collaborated with Area stakeholder to vet feasibility Received agreement from Hartford Plant Manager  Reduction in working volume to 01Z: from ~2600 to 633 trays per day

5 Concept Proposal Palletization Rules escalate based on the mailer’s volume in a job. The objective of each tier is to build full pallets that can be transported into the network as far as possible before being worked. Co-palletization Opportunities were evaluated separately. Current DMM Minimal Usage Today Required Origin SCF (no minimum) Mixed ADC Air (no minimum) SCF AADC/ADC Origin Mixed ADC Surface – O-SCF Origin Mixed ADC Surface – O-STC Optional 5-digit Proposed Palletization Rules Tier 0: (If total volume in job below a threshold) 1.Mixed Surface (CET 2000) 2.Mixed Air (CET 2000) Tier I (All): 3 Required Separations. 1.Mixed Air (CET 2000) Same as Tier I 2.Origin SCF (CET 0800); 72 feet minimum 3.Mixed Surface Tier II: Based on volume and negotiated # of container separations 1.5-digit ZIP (CET 1200); 72 feet minimum [finer depth of sort for Origin SCF (#2)] 2.Destination SCF (CET 2400); 72 feet minimum 3.Destination STC (CET 2400); 72 feet minimum 4.Optional Origin STC (CET 2400); 72 feet minimum Tier III: Mailers with TMS/SWYB

6 Analysis Parameters  Single Site Analysis  Based on separations mailer is willing to do  Trays/pallet max per mailer  Data Analysis source: PostalOne!  Used existing tray level data from eDoc submissions to determine new palletization and new separations  Analysis includes non-Copalletization and Copalletization

7 Results: Few jobs required additional separations as compared to eDoc separations. Only high volume jobs required additional separations under the Tier II rules WG #175 Pilot Expansion Results Analysis based on mailer maximum pallet height (trays/pallet)

8 Pallet Volume and Co-palletization Results: All sites would prepare a few more pallets per day (Average of 5 greater pallets created under Proposed Business Rules). If mailers invest in co-palletization the number of pallets generated can be reduced compared to Proposed Business Rules & Today’s Palletization. WG #175 Pilot Expansion Results Analysis based on mailer maximum pallet height (trays/pallet)

9 Pallet Destination Results for following Proposed Business Rules: Mailers can build a significant number of destination pallets (5D, D-SCF,D- STC) minimizing handling by moving pallets further into the network before working the mail WG #175 Pilot Expansion Results Analysis based on mailer maximum pallet height (trays/pallet)

10 Results for following Proposed Business Rules w/ Copalletization: Investing in copalletization significantly reduces the # of pallets created across all mailing sites while maximizing the number of destination pallets built. Pallet Destination WG #175 Pilot Expansion Results Analysis based on mailer maximum pallet height (trays/pallet)

11 Proposed Business Rules (1/2) Tier 0 Jobs: 2 Required Separations – Mixed Air/Mixed Surface 1.Determine each tray’s transportation mode. Generate a Mixed Air separation and a Mixed Surface separation. There is no minimum volume requirement for these separations. (CET: 2000) 2.Mixed-Surface/Mixed Air tray minimum separation. For each job if there is not enough volume to make 36 2’ tray pallets labeled to both Mixed-Surface & Mixed-Air, then all Mixed-Surface volume within that job will be labeled as Mixed-Air. Tier I Jobs: 3 Required Separations – Origin SCF/Mixed Surface/Mixed Air 1.Build the same Mixed Air separation as defined by Tier 0. (CET: 2000) 2.If there are more than 36 2’ trays (72 linear ft) in the same job* that are local turn-around mail (i.e destined for the same SCF area as the entry SCF), create a separation just for Origin SCF volume. (CET: 0800) 3.All remaining trays not destined for the origin SCF and not air should be palletized as Mixed Surface. (CET: 2000) 4.Mixed-Surface/Mixed Air tray minimum separation. For each job if there is not enough volume to make 36 2’ tray pallets labeled to both Mixed-Surface & Mixed-Air, then all Mixed-Surface volume within that job will be labeled as Mixed-Air.

12 Proposed Business Rules (2/2) Tier II: Based on volume and negotiated # of container separations 1.Build the same Mixed Air separation as defined by Tier 0. (CET: 2000) 2.Build the same Origin SCF separation as defined under Tier I. (CET: 0800) Additional separations are prioritized as follows: 5D, Destination SCF, Destination STC, Origin STC, Origin SCF. 3.If there are more than 36 2’ trays in the same job* going to the same 5D zip, then those trays should be palletized for the 5D zip. (CET: 1200) 4.If there are more than 36 2’ trays remaining in the same job* going to the same Destination SCF, then those trays should be palletized for the D-SCF. (CET: 2400) 5.If there are more than 36 2’ trays remaining in the same job* destined for the same D-STC area, then those trays should be palletized and labeled to their Destination STC. (CET: 2400) 6.Optional Separation for remaining Mixed Surface volume: For trays not separated for mixed air, a D-SCF or a D- STC, use the Service Standards file to determine if the tray is committed for 2 days or 3 days. Trays with a 2 day commitment should be palletized as mixed surface volume (CET: 2000). Trays committed for 3 or more days, can be separated (still as mixed volume) and labeled to the Origin STC. If a mailer elects to make the optional Mixed Surface separation for Origin STC volume, that separation should only be made in cases where jobs have enough volume to make a 36 2’ tray pallet to both the Origin STC and Origin SCF with mixed surface volume. If only a partial mixed surface pallet (<72’ of trays) will remain for either the Origin STC and Origin SCF, all mixed surface volume should be palletized together for the Origin SCF. ** (CET: 2400) 7.Mixed-Surface/Mixed Air tray minimum separation. For each job if there is not enough volume to make 36 2’ tray pallets labeled to both Mixed-Surface & Mixed-Air, then all Mixed-Surface volume within that job will be labeled as Mixed-Air. *Applies per job if the mailer does not co-palletize **Induction Point Option: All pallets will be inducted into the Origin SCF, except Mixed Surface O-STC pallets have the option to be inducted in the Origin STC or the Origin SCF Tier III: Same business rules as Tier II but with additional Air Separations [Requires TMS]

13 Overall Results Number of Pallets MailerSite Tray Max/ Pallet Today's Palletization Proposed Business Rules Average additional pallets/ day Proposed Business Rules (Mixed- Surface/Mixed-Air minimum) Average additional pallets/day Proposed Business Rules w/ Co- palletization Telecom 1 Georgia Site Telecom 1 California Site <11879 Insurance 1Ohio Site 48N/A 1666N/A545 Insurance 1 Colorado Site 48N/A 843N/A258 MSP 1Iowa Site Bank 1 Minnesota Site <1388 Bank 1 North Carolina Site TBA Bank 1 Arizona Site TBA

14 Next Steps  Complete analysis on small mailers  Analysis on USPS transportation cost vs. tray handling cost  Finalize work group recommendations to MTAC Executive Leadership  Scope change  Workgroup needed to establish technical requirements  Expected Work group date: End of May