Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

IntelliDrive for Safety, Mobility, and User Fee Project Cory Johnson Mn/DOT IntelliDrive Program Engineer.
Interstate 2.0: a 21 st -Century Network Financed by All- Electronic Tolling by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation.
Funding Options and Trends at the State and Federal Level Steve Pickrell Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Funding Options and Trends at the State and Federal.
1 This document and its contents are the property of The University of Iowa’s Public Policy Center National Evaluation of a Mileage- Based Road User Charge.
Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to International Fuel Tax Agreement Managers’ Workshop September 2006 PowerPoint Presentation provided by:
Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Act 374 of 2009.
County Transportation Systems Association of MN Counties, MN County Engineers Association, MN Inter-County Association Presentation to MN Senate Transportation.
Oregon Mileage Fee Concept and Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to WASHTO Construction and Materials Committee Portland, Oregon April 8, 2008 James.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
Presented by presented by David M. Laney September 2005 Funding of Highways: Crisis and Solutions.
Sources of Funds by Major Funding Source Total Funding = $4
Iowa State Association of Counties 2013 Fall School of Instruction November 14, 2013 Stu Anderson Iowa Department of Transportation.
An Innovative Approach to Communicating Complex Funding Issues Chad Edwards & Elizabeth Whitaker May 18, 2009 TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
Washington State Truck Freight Performance Measure Research Interim Report Dale A Tabat Truck Freight Program and Policy Manager Freight Systems Division.
GE541 Economic Geography of Transport October 30th.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation Research Board Executive Committee June 17, 2005 TOLL: The Four.
Value Pricing for Transportation in Washington, D.C. Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Berkeley.
Innovations in Transportation Infrastructure Development: A Road Less Traveled Perspectives of the Public Owner.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Fees What’s been done? What’s happening? What do you need to know? Trey Baker Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.
Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to NEACT LaGrande, Oregon August 4, 2005 James Whitty, Manager Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
Public-Private Partnership Program 2015 Update 2015 American Council of Engineering Companies ACEC – Los Angeles Chapter Luncheon, July 8, 2015.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
Mileage based user fees and sustainable transportation funding Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
1 Potential User Benefits and Costs of Rising Fuel Prices in the Puget Sound Region TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 By Maren Outwater.
High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.
Advanced Technology Approach to Assessing Road User Charges: Research Progress  David J. Forkenbrock  Director, Public Policy Center  University of.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
Interstate Tolling: Why and How by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation
Interstate 2.0: a 21 st -Century Network Financed by All- Electronic Tolling by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,
Liberating road users: Options for progress. Liberating road users at ADC 2 September 24, 2010 How are road users constrained? Governments determine 
A A S H T O S P R I N G M E E T I N G 1 7 M A Y B E D F O R D S P R I N G S, P A 1 Surface Transportation Authorization: Review of Mid-Course.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.
Status of Funding and Authorization Subcommittee's of Traffic Engineering and Operations and Management Manchester NH 2009 Ken Kobetsky.
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Revenues Sources for Transportation Financing Jeffery A. Richard Foster Pepper & Shefelman.
1 520 Tolling Implementation Committee Cascadia Center for Regional Development Beyond Oil Conference Thursday, September 4, 2008 Richard Ford, Commissioner.
13 March 2014 By a California Country Mile The Business Case for Road Usage Charging Matthew J. Dorfman and Travis P. Dunn D’Artagnan Consulting, LLP.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
2005 TWG Legislative Recommendations. Fix It First ? WSDOT recommends first priority be Alaskan Way Viaduct, SR-520 with new state revenue Does the TWG.
Evaluation of a New Approach to Address Metropolitan Congestion
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Washington State Road Usage Charge Assessment
Alternative Solutions to Shrinking Tax Revenues
How to Put Together the Pieces of Road Usage Charge Legislation
Presentation transcript:

Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington State Department of Transportation

2003 Legislative Funding Package Revenue Sources: Increased taxes and Fees: Gas Tax: 5¢/gal Gross Weight Fee for Trucks: 15% New Taxes and Fees: Additional Sales Tax on Vehicle Sales: 0.3% License Plate Number Retention fee: $20.00

To raise a billion dollars of new revenue per year what type of tax increase is needed?

How much could be borrowed if tolls paid the debt service? What is the potential funding level from tolls for SR 520? SR 167 HOT Lane Pilot Project: How much will the toll be & what revenues will be raised? Most recent work done this year… Examined 24 financial scenarios encompassing various financial and operating assumptions Produced a funding range from $320 M to $1.07 B for the six lane alternative if bonded Showed several combinations could likely yield $700 M Found that a four lane alternative funding is 5-10% less  Dynamic pricing; Toll rate will be changed based on the congestion in the corridor and is estimated to be:  $0.60 during the off peak and potentially free at night  $1.20 at peak period and potentially more during severe congestion.  Rates will increase if congestion continues to grow.  Opening year revenue is estimated to be $1.1M  Capital costs could be paid off in approximately years by revenue System-Wide Tolling Estimates (Analysis Done in 2002) How much revenue might be raised if we tolled all major freeways in the Puget Sound? $285 - $530 million/year* Included in the analysis: I-5, Alaska Way Viaduct SR-520, SR 167 I-405 SR 509 I-90 Confidence level: 2002 analysis - very preliminary Further analysis done in 2004 indicate revenues may be higher Implementation issues: numerous * Displayed in 2014 dollars

Bonding and Debt Service Requirements 1¢ of gas tax generates approximately $32.5 million in revenue per year (September 2004 Transportation Revenue Forecast) The amount of debt service that 1¢ of gas can pay for depends on the interest rate.  At 4% interest, $32.5 million will pay level debt service on about $500 million of bonds.  At 5% interest, $32.5 million will pay level debt service on about $450 million of bonds.  At 6% interest, $32.5 million will pay level debt service on about $400 million of bonds. * Multimodal Account Bonds will be paid from revenues deposited in the Multimodal account, i.e.. Rental Car Tax, Sales tax on new and used vehicles, and licenses, permits and fees. ** Tacoma Narrows Bridge toll revenues will be used to pay debt service on the TNB bonds. Interest Rates on Bonds Sold for the Biennium August 2003 Bond Sale February 2004 Bond Sale August 2004 Bond Sale 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% Gas Tax Backed Bonds Multimodal Bonds Tacoma Narrows Bridge Bonds No Bond Sale forMultimodal ProjectsNo Bond Sale forMultimodal Projects 4.65% 5.38% 4.41%4.44% 4.89% 4.67% 5.19%

Vehicle Mile Tax (VMT) – What work is going on nationally regarding VMT type taxes? Pooled Research Study – Completed in 2002 developed a GPS/GIS concept for VMT.  11 States, FHWA, TRB, AASHTO  Minnesota DOT Lead Agency  University of Iowa Public Policy Center Oregon Road User Fee Task Force has developed a mileage fee concept.  Per mileage charge (1.22¢/mile)  Mileage is collected electronically at gas stations  Payment is made at gas stations In October 2005 a field test is planned in Eugene, Oregon with 280 vehicles and up to four gas stations. Puget Sound Regional Council has a $1.88 million grant from the USDOT for a value pricing study.  Demonstration is currently underway  GPS will track when and where vehicles travel  Participants will have a budget and will be charged for travel based on the time of day and routes they choose  Exposes drivers to “congestion-pricing” road user charges

Although no state currently imposes a VMT Tax, four states currently have weight-distance taxes. Note: 100% of revenues are used for highways in all four states. Oregon offers a reduced tax rate for additional axels. Weight-Distance and Diesel Fuel Tax Rates