Topic #1: EOP2A Meetings Please comment on the goals of the proposed EOP2A meeting and the impact that such meetings could have on optimizing dose selection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Pharmacometrics (PM)?
Advertisements

Industry Issues: Dataset Preparation for Time to Event Analysis Davis Gates Schering Plough Research Institute.
1 Case Studies in Modeling and Simulation Discussion Stella G. Machado, Ph.D. Office of Biostatistics/OTS/CDER/FDA FDA/Industry Workshop, September 2006.
Development of Evaluation and Consultation on Bridging Studies: Thailand Experiences Suchart Chongprasert, Ph.D. Investigational New Drug Subdivision Food.
Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
Advancing the Development of Pediatric Therapeutics (ADEPT) II: Evaluation of Long-term Neurocognitive Development in Pediatrics U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Continuous School Improvement Final Presentation School Name Date.
Assessment of Adalimumab Dose Selection for Adult Ulcerative Colitis Using Exposure-Response Analyses Michael Bewernitz1, Christine Garnett2,4, Klaus Gottlieb3,
Approaches to incorporating pharmacoeconomic data into early drug discovery Kevin Sheehy Acting CEO Medicines New Zealand.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
Neonatal/Juvenile Animal Safety Studies Kenneth L. Hastings, Dr.P.H., D.A.B.T. Office of New Drugs, CDER.
Clinical Pharmacology Overview From the Antiviral Perspective Kellie Schoolar Reynolds, Pharm.D. Pharmacokinetics Team Leader Office of Clinical Pharmacology.
NMF 3/6/03 Susan Galbraith, MB BChir PhD Vice President Clinical Discovery Oncology & Immunology Phase 0 Trials Why aren’t they more widely used by industry?
Pilot Risk-Ranking Model to Prioritize Manufacturing Sites for GMP Inspections Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Manufacturing Subcommittee.
Charge to the Committee Kimberly Struble, Pharm.D. Regulatory Review Officer Division of Antiviral Drug Products.
Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Meeting April 22, 2003 Pediatric Population Pharmacokinetics Study.
FDA Nasal BA/BE Guidance Overview
Office of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics IDSA/ISAP/FDA Workshop 4/16/04 1 Improvement in Dose Selection: FDA Perspective IDSA/ISAP/FDA Workshop.
Criteria and Standard.
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
Chief Examiner’s Checklist CONCLUSION, EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A review of the design process should be considered explaining how the final outcome.
1 Topic 3: Using Disease, Placebo, and Drug Prior Knowledge to Improve Decisions Objectives: Context for this work- Bob Powell Industry perspective- Jaap.
Sotalol Pediatric Decision Tree and Exposure-Response Relationship Peter Hinderling, OCPB Saul et al. JCP 2001;40:35-43 Saul et al. CPT 2001;69:
Nonclinical Perspective on Initiating Phase 1 Studies for Small Molecular Weight Compounds John K. Leighton, PH.D., DABT Supervisory Pharmacologist Division.
Modeling and simulation (M&S) was employed to recommend doses for human Phase I studies of a direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor, CS Predicted human.
Expectations of Legislation Bree Collaborative Jason T. McGill, JD Executive Policy Advisor, Health Care Governor's Office (360)
CPTR Overview CPTR 2012 Workshop October 2-4, 2012.
1 QT Evaluation Studies: Pharmacometric Considerations Leslie Kenna, Peter Lee and Yaning Wang Office of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics CDER/FDA.
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
Proposal for End-of-Phase 2A (EOP2A) Meetings Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18, 2003 Lawrence.
Update: Topics Previously Presented to the CPSC Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee (CPSC) of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science November.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) The use of.
Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Meeting April Quantitative risk analysis using exposure-response.
1 Study Design Issues and Considerations in HUS Trials Yan Wang, Ph.D. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics IV OB/OTS/CDER/FDA April 12, 2007.
Disease Models Overview and Case Studies Joga Gobburu Pharmacometrics Office Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, CDER, FDA.
1 METHODS FOR DETERMINING SIMILARITY OF EXPOSURE-RESPONSE BETWEEN PEDIATRIC AND ADULT POPULATIONS Stella G. Machado, Ph.D. Quantitative Methods and Research.
Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee (CPSC) Report ACPS Presentation, April 13, 2004 Jürgen Venitz, MD, Ph.D. Goals of the Advisory Subcommittee: To provide.
1 Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Questions June 24, 2008 Ira Krefting, MD.
Ameeta Parekh, Ph.D. CDER/OCPB CPSC Meeting November 17/18
Introduction to the Meeting Introduction to the Meeting Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18,
 An exposure-response (E-R) analysis in oncology aims at describing the relationship between drug exposure and survival and in addition aims at comparing.
Initiatives Drive Pediatric Drug Development January 30, 2002.
1 The Role of Exposure-Response Evaluation in Drug Development and Regulatory Decisions Case Study: Rosuvastatin Hae-Young Ahn, Ph.D. Office of Clinical.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Special Populations.
Charge to the Committee Mark Goldberger, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Office of Drug Evaluation IV CDER / FDA.
Chesapeake Bay Program Independent Evaluator – GIT 6 Review & Next Steps.
12/4/031 Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee Advancing the Science of Proprietary Drug Name Review Paul J. Seligman, MD.
Office of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics IDSA/ISAP/FDA Workshop 4/16/04 Current Status of Dose Selection in Antimicrobial Drug Development.
1 Biopharmaceutics Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh. 2 Biopharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics is the science that examines this interrelationship of the physicochemical.
My Industrial Placement 15 th February Where I work Company: Pfizer Pfizer is the world’s largest research-based pharmaceutical company Division:
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT Ramana S. Uppoor, R.Ph., Ph.D. Division of Clinical Pharmacology-1 Office of Clinical Pharmacology, CDER, FDA.
Joint Non-Prescription Drugs and Pediatric Advisory Committee Meeting October 18-19, 2007 Considerations for Extrapolation of Efficacy from Adults to Children.
Methods to Adjust Doses Based on Exposure-Response Information Points to Consider Richard Lalonde Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Pfizer.
Version: 27 May 2007 New Models for Collaboration: Patients as Drivers and Partners in Neurological Research Integrating Patient Input Within the Drug.
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
Clinical practice guidelines and Clinical audit
Concepts of Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIP)
Regulatory Perspective
A Primer on Health Economics and Cost-Effectiveness
Multiple Model Dosage Design
Biopharmaceutics Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
Issues in Hypothesis Testing in the Context of Extrapolation
Measuring Healthcare What to Measure and Why
بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم. Dr Sima Sadrai TUMS
Development Plans: Study Design and Dose Selection
Health Strategies Group
Yang Liu, Anne Chain, Rebecca Wrishko,
Assessing similarity of curves: An application in assessing similarity between pediatric and adult exposure-response curves July 31, 2019 Yodit Seifu,
Assessing Similarity to Support Pediatric Extrapolation
Presentation transcript:

Topic #1: EOP2A Meetings Please comment on the goals of the proposed EOP2A meeting and the impact that such meetings could have on optimizing dose selection strategies and efficiency in clinical pharmacology drug development. What major obstacles would be expected to stand in the way of achieving the goals of the EOP2A meeting and how can they be avoided? Based on the examples of quantitative analysis of exposure-response data to assess benefit/risk presented to the committee, are these the approaches that are best used to optimize dose selection strategies? What considerations should be given to the prerequisite studies and data, methods of analysis, assumptions and certainty of results at this point in time of drug development, in order to maximize the value of an EOP2A meeting? What benchmark measurements and metrics for measuring the future impact of the EOP2A meeting should FDA consider?

Topic #2: PK-PD (QT) Study Design What additional study design points would the committee recommend for consideration in the analysis of PK-QT data? Please comment on the case studies presented to the committee and the pros and cons of using clinical trial simulation (CTS) approaches to evaluate PK-PD (QT) study design. Are there other methods of analyzing PK-QT data that FDA should consider? What critical design elements influence the outcome of a PK-QT study that has as its goal to identify a meaningful change in QT?

Topic #3: Pediatric Bridging: Pediatric Decision Tree Please provide feedback on the pros and cons of the current pediatric decision tree and the changes that have been proposed in light of the examples that have been presented? Please comment on the relevant adult data and information, as well as quantitative methods of analysis that determine the similarity between E-R in adults and pediatric patients. How do we know that by adjusting dose and exposure we achieve efficacy and safety in all populations ? Under what circumstances do they predict deviations will occur ?