Risk Factors for Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia in Adult Patients Cristina Gervasoni Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milano.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linezolid-Induced Anemia in a Patient with Osteomyelitis
Advertisements

Assessment of Adalimumab Dose Selection for Adult Ulcerative Colitis Using Exposure-Response Analyses Michael Bewernitz1, Christine Garnett2,4, Klaus Gottlieb3,
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Interim analysis of a double- blind, placebo-controlled study with TMC207 in patients with Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) Tuberculosis Karel de Beule, CDTL.
The EINSTEIN PE Study 'Xarelto' for the Acute and Continued Treatment of Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism.
The EINSTEIN DVT Study 'Xarelto' for the Acute and Continued Treatment of Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis.
Therapeutic Response to Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (sMDS) Enrolled in the AVIDA Registry 1 Prospective Trial.
1 Statistical Perspective Acamprosate Experience Sue-Jane Wang, Ph.D. Statistics Leader Alcoholism Treatment Clinical Trials May 10, 2002 Drug Abuse Advisory.
Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis. Brief Background Typically follows viral infection Dx is by clinical manifestations Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus.
An analysis of early insulin glargine added to metformin with or without sulfonylurea: impact on glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
When to Initiate ART in Adults and Adolescents (2009 WHO Guidelines) Target PopulationClinical conditionRecommendation Asymptomatic Individuals (including.
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
ORIGIN Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) Trial Overview Large international randomized controlled trial in patients with.
Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis Patients Receiving Treatment with Ruxolitinib Davis KL et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES AT THE BOTSWANA- BAYLOR CHILDREN’S CLINICAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE: A REPORT TO THE WHO TECHNICAL REFERENCE GROUP ON PEDIATRIC CARE.
Efficacy, Hematologic Effects and Dose of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients with Low Platelet Starting Counts ( x 10 9 /L): A Comparison to Patients.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Case Report and Lit Review: Reduction of Proteinuria in Diabetic Nephropathy with Spironolactone Harry W. Floyd, M.D. Family Medicine Kingstree, South.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
C-BR- 1 Raptiva ™ (efalizumab) Benefit:Risk Assessment Charles Johnson, MB, ChB Senior Director Head of Specialty Biotherapeutics Genentech, Inc.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
PO 2726; IAS; Vicriviroc (formerly SCH ): Antiviral Activity of a Potent New CCR5 Receptor Antagonist D. Schuermann, C. Pechardscheck, R. Rouzier,
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Updated Results of a Phase I First-in-Human Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic.
RELEVANCERELEVANCE Is the objective of the article on harm similar to your clinical dilemma? Yes, the article’s objective is similar to the clinical dilemma.
The Rational Use of Antibiotics
Angelo L Gaffo Kenneth G Saag Core Evidence 2009:4 25–36
Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Adult Oncology Patients Hadeel Al-Kofide MS.c; Iman Zaghloul PhD; and Lamya Al-Naim PharmD Department of Clinical Pharmacy,
C-1 Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta  ) Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Pediatric Subcommittee October 20, 2005 Amgen Inc.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
1 The Role of Exposure-Response Evaluation in Drug Development and Regulatory Decisions Case Study: Rosuvastatin Hae-Young Ahn, Ph.D. Office of Clinical.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
C-1 Safety Results S. aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis Study Gloria Vigliani, M.D. Vice President, Medical Strategy Cubist Pharmaceuticals.
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute 4733 Bethesda Ave., Suite #510 Bethesda, MD Phone: Fax: Comparison of.
Response to Antiretroviral Treatment In an Ethiopian Hospital Samuel Hailemariam, MD, MPH; J Allen McCutchan, MD, MSc Meaza Demissie, MD, PMH, PHD; Alemayehu.
From: PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseaseJanuary 2014 Presented by Pavitra Charoensrisakkul and Peeraya Permkarnjaroen 3 rd year medical cadet Phramongkutklao.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Efavirenz Use Not Associated With Depressive Episodes, According to Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes Slideset on: Journot V, Chene G, De.
Anemia in CKD The TREAT Trial Reference Pfeiffer MA. A trial of Darbepoetin alpha in type II diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2019–2032.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
Response to An Initial Dose of Warfarin in Thai Patients Undergoing Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy Weerayuth Saelim R.Ph. 2 nd year Pharmacy resident.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
Comprehensive Treatment of Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis N Engl J Med 2008;359: R2 이 설 라.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
Maternal Toxicity Management
Trial of posaconazole therapy for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis
P 166 Introduction Description of the analyzed population
Maternal Toxicity Management
Maternal Toxicity Management
Neal B, et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:403–411
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
VK2809 in NAFLD: a phase 2 study
Presentation transcript:

Risk Factors for Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia in Adult Patients Cristina Gervasoni Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milano

 Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic active against Gram- positive pathogens resistant to β-lactams and glycopeptides and XDR-M.tuberculosis  Clinical trials have shown that linezolid is safe and generally well tolerated  The major adverse event associated with linezolid treatment is reversible myelosuppression, mostly thrombocytopenia (and, to a lesser extent, leukopenia and anemia), eventually requiring drug discontinuation Background

 To determine the risk factors for linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia Aim of the study

 Retrospective study conducted among consecutive patients who received linezolid therapy (600 mg bid/day) between January 2011 and December 2014 at Luigi Sacco University Hospital, in Milan  Any relevant information on the clinical status and safety outcome of the patient was collected in a standardized database  Linezolid trough concentrations were determined in patients receiving the drug for at least 3 days  The patients with other causes for myelosuppression or treated with rifampicin were excluded  Thrombocytopenia was defined as ≥ 50% decrease in platelet count from baseline Patients and methods

All patients (n=70) Patients with toxicity (n=14) Patients without toxicity (n=56) Age, years54.7 ± ± 11.7*50.8 ± 11.7 Males, % 64%78%61% Weight, Kg64.9 ± ± ± 13.9 Height, cm169 ± 9169 ± ± 9 S. Creatinine, mg/dL1.1 ± ± 1.2*0.9 ± 0.4 GFR, mL/min82.9 ± ± 37.9*93.8 ± 38.6 AST (IU/L)37 ± 4034 ± 3037 ± 42 ALT (IU/L)40 ± 6230 ± 3342 ± 68 Bone infections (30%), skin infections (25%) and drug-resistant tuberculosis (38%) Data were given as mean ± standard deviation *p<0.01 vs patients without toxicity Baseline characteristics of patients who subsequently did (n=14) or did not (n=56) develop drug-related thrombocytopenia during linezolid treatment

Box-plot of linezolid plasma trough concentrations measured in patients that did or did not develop thrombocytopenia (first TDM assessment) Thrombocytopenia [Linezolid], mg/L No thrombocytopenia p = 0.01

Linezolid trough levels, mg/L Patients with toxicity (n=14) 1 st evaluation9.0 ± nd evaluation10.7 ± th evaluation (n=8)*4.0 ± 1.4 Patients without toxicity (n=56) 1 st evaluation4.9 ± nd evaluation4.8 ± th evaluation4.9 ± 4.6 °Data were given as mean ± standard deviation *Six patients withdrew linezolid after the adverse events, while the remaining reduced drug dose.

Time from initiation of linezolid therapy to development of thrombocytopenia Days after initiation of treatment Probability of developing thrombocytopenia

 A significant proportion of patients treated with the conventional LZD dose are at higher risk to experience thrombocytopenia  Age, renal function, length of treatment and LZD plasma concentrations were associated with the development of haematological toxicity  Patients treated with LZD may benefit from TDM-driven adjustments of linezolid doses  TDM-guided dose adjustment may provide potential advantages in terms of costs and tolerability compare with fixed dose LZD regimen treatment Conclusions

 Concomitant rifampicin administration significantly reduces linezolid concentrations  It is currently unknown for how long such effect may persist and when linezolid could be safely administered to guarantee optimal drug exposure in patients previously treated with rifampicin  A significant effect of rifampicin on linezolid concentrations up to 2–3 weeks after its discontinuation was observed  It is mandatory to monitor linezolid concentrations not just before and during concomitant rifampicin administration but also extensively later (i.e., up to 3 weeks) after rifampicin withdrawal in order to guarantee appropriate linezolid exposure

The PD patients had concentrations that were 3- to 4-fold higher than the upper therapeutic threshold of 8 mg/L 3 out of the 4 patients experienced severe toxicity, whereas in the remaining case, the development of toxicity was probably avoided due to an early reduction of the dosage of linezolid These findings call for a careful revision of the most appropriate linezolid dose in PD patients, especially when they are elderly and/or require prolonged treatment Our case series also confirmed that linezolid-related toxicity can be easily handled in clinical practice by TDM-guided early dose adjustments or, if TDM is not available, by stringent haemato- chemical examinations

 No indications on linezolid dose adjustments are given for patients with renal insufficiency or with renal replacement therapy  Emerging evidence shows that these patients treated with the conventional linezolid dose have higher drug exposure and higher frequency of haematological toxicity  This case report shows that in patients on peritoneal dialysis safety outcomes may be improved by applying TDM as soon as possible after starting treatment with linezolid