Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roundtable on Sustainable Forests. Forests cover about 750 million acres -- more than a quarter of the entire United States -- and sustainable management.
Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Preliminary Results of Management Question Survey Jim Geiselman & Jen Bayer March 16, 2006 Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP)
PROPOSED PRIORITIES FOR SCIENCE AND COLLABORATION OCTOBER 2012.
Ecological Monitoring Committee for the Lower Athabasca: Program Development and Implementation Presentation to the Alberta Environmental Monitoring Panel,
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level The Economy and Conservation Agendas:
USDA Forest Service Research and Development Tribal Engagement Roadmap Consultation - January 10 to May 11, 2014 [DATE of PRSTN]
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
1A-1B.Team, Scope and Vision Conservation Coaches Network Workshop Presentation.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America How does the surrogate species effort relate to other ongoing efforts? Birds of Management.
Water Sustainability Seminar Series Academy Village April 16, 2014 Part 2 – Meeting Challenges.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Tom Armstrong Senior Advisor for Global Change Programs U.S. Geological Survey
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
Why Now? Regional, State and Federal Interests in Our and Coasts Why Now? Regional, State and Federal Interests in Our Oceans and Coasts Krista Kamer Program.
Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Californialcc.org Climate Smart Conservation and Tools for Adaptive Management 1 Debra Schlafmann, Coordinator May 16, 2013.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan (CWCP) and Citizen-based Monitoring Signe Holtz Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan Development on Navy Installations in Southern California Coralie Cobb Natural Resources Specialist Southwest.
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
The Invasive Species Threat. The National Strategy and Implementation Plan for Invasive Species Management -Forests Out of Balance- The Impact of Invasive.
State Wildlife Action Plans
A Partnership of U.S. Federal, State and Tribal Fish and Wildlife Agencies with support from the Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Shared solutions.
The West Coast Governors’ Agreement on Ocean Health Jessica Hamilton Keys Natural Resources Policy Advisor Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski Hydrographic.
Marine Spatial Planning for Wave Energy Development in Oregon Kate Sherman, M.S. Candidate Marine Resource Management College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric.
State Wildlife Action Plans Alternatively Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategies (CWCS), State Comprehensive Wildlife Plans (SCWP), Etc. Created.
PRESENTATION FOR TAMARISK COALITION WEBINAR 18 DECEMBER 2013.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative December 4, 2009 Dr. Benjamin Tuggle and Steve Guertin Regional Directors,
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
BDCP, Interfacing with Conservation Plans Habitat Conservation Planning from Tahoe to the Bay 7 th Annual Workshop November 18, 2009 Carl Wilcox California.
Solutions on the Horizon: Integrated Planning in the 21 st Century Trisha White Defenders of Wildlife.
Seabird Monitoring in the California Current System U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey.
WNTI Strategic Planning Robin Knox – WNTI Coordinator “A National Fish Habitat Partnership”
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies 1 State Wildlife Action Plan saving the world one piece at a time Mark Humpert, Teaming With Wildlife Director,
Developing Proposals for a System of Indicators on the Nation’s Environment (the SINE) H. Theodore Heintz, Jr. Indicator Coordinator White House Council.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Incorporating Climate Change into Department Activities Panel Presentation North Pacific LCC Steering Committee.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Safeguarding California: Implementation Action Plans Listening Tour October 2015.
The UNEP/CMS Secretariat North America Officer in Washington DC, USA (shared with UNEP/RONA) Purpose: Raise Awareness & Understanding of CMS; Build Political.
Sara Vickerman May 10, 2012 Defenders of Wildlife Proposed Habitat/Biodiversity Metric Framework Agreement.
Renewable Energy in California: Implementing the Governors Renewable Energy Executive Order California Energy Commission Department of Fish and Game Fish.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Problem Definition Exercise Summary & Discussion.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
United States Department of Agriculture Northeast Climate Hub USDA Northeast Climate Hub USDA Northeast Climate Hub Advisory Team Meeting, December 18.
USING STEWARDSHIP AUTHORITY TO ADVANCE RESTORATION Mae Lee Hafer Regional Stewardship Coordinator Collaborative Restoration.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Shortleaf Pine Demonstration Areas Assist Promoting Restoration
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses

2015 Update Purpose and Objectives

Background Completed in 2005, required updates every 10 years Meet required elements for receiving SWG funding Relationship to the Strategic Vision (plants, inverts) Need to pull expertise across Department-this crosses the entire Department  Need to outreach to other natural resource agencies, tribes  Overhaul maps-use USDA ecoregion delineations, HUCs, MLPA  Existing recommendations for actions needs to be reviewed and made more specific so we have an implementable plan.  Collaborate with NGOs, use established tools, make compatible with other national and state plans.

Elements Information on the distribution and abundance of wildlife, including low and declining populations, that describes the diversity and health of the state’s wildlife. 2.Descriptions of locations and relative conditions of habitats essential to species in need of conservation. 3.Descriptions of problems that may adversely affect species or their habitats, and priority research and survey efforts. 4.Descriptions of conservation actions proposed to conserve the identified species and habitats.

Elements Plans for monitoring species and habitats, and plans for monitoring the effectiveness of the conservation actions and for adapting these conservation actions to respond to new information. 6.Descriptions of procedures to review the plan at intervals not to exceed 10 years. 7.Coordination with federal, state, and local agencies and Indian tribes in developing and implementing the wildlife action plan. 8.Broad public participation in developing and implementing the wildlife action plan.

Through the California State Wildlife Action Plan, the Department of Fish and Wildlife seeks to conserve the resources in the nation’s most biologically diverse state. We seek to create a flexible but scientific process to respond to changing challenges, including population growth, the need for renewable energy, and global climate change. The Department seeks to make best use of limited resources while developing lasting partnerships and increasing public participation in the conservation and management of California’s valued natural resources. Vision for SWAP 2015 Update

Organization Strategy Development Open Standards Goals and Actions Effectiveness Measures Monitoring Plan Adaptive Management Strategy Public Outreach Web and Social Media Advisory Committees Tribal Public State/Federal Agencies Stakeholder Committees Climate Invasive Specie Peer review Public Scoping Internal Coordination Executive Committee Steering Committee Technical Team Ecoregional/Watershed/ Marine Study Region Teams Data Development Range maps Species Data-Base Species at Risk-Target Species Vulnerability Study List of Stressors/Threats Administrative Grants and Contracts Training

Expectations Each conservation unit identifies at least one target with an actionable conservation strategy developed through the OS process. For each target, there is a Miradi file created and completed through the development of the conservation strategy.

How will deliverables be used? Miradi files gathered into Tanager Information will inform development of a report that will go into SWAP update. Some information will be combined into statewide strategies Some information will pass forward to companion plans

Open Standards Process

Conservation Strategies Rule The intension of developing conservation strategies using the Open Standards process for the SWAP 2015 update is to identify and implement conservation actions directed at specific threats and stresses, that will benefit the greatest number of SGCN within an ecoregion, watershed, or MLPA study region.

SGCN All State and Federal Listed and Candidate Species All Species of Special Concern All Species Vulnerable to Climate Change Approximately 380 species

MCV Based on National Vegetation Standard Required Vegetation Mapping Standard SB 85 (2007) –CNDDB Crosswalk with WHR

O:Drive Maps Climate Change Information Crosswalks and definitions Schedule References and Proquest Other resources –Outside expertise lists –Examples and tutorials

Targets Terrestrial: MCV Macro-groups or WHR habitats Aquatic: HUC 4-12 Watersheds Marine: MLPA Marine Study Regions

Miradi Software availability Support Tutorials, guidebook, examples available on-line and on the O:Drive

Conceptualize What you will achieve in the context of where you are working –Define team –Define scope and targets –Identify critical threats, stresses –Complete situation analysis

Define Team In this case, internal agency process before stakeholder workshops –What is the target? –What species occur there? –Who should be on the team? –What do we already know?

Define Scope Work with team before workshop –Spatial scale (watershed, ecoregion, Marine Study Area) –Jurisdiction (public, private lands) –May include additional constraints

Conservation Targets Conservation or biodiversity targets –Species – SGCN –Guilds/Assemblages –Ecological systems/habitats –Ecological processes

OS Model of Targets Stresses and Threat

SWAP Companion Plans Agriculture Consumptive and Recreational Uses Energy Development Forest and Rangelands Land Use Planning Transportation Planning Tribal Lands Water Use and Management

Schedule of Next Steps –March-Threats and stresses –April –Developing Conceptual Models –May-Strategies and Results Chains –June- Goals, Objectives, Monitoring Plans –July-Make-up –August-September-Compilation, Overlaps, –October-November-Public Scoping