Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting 2006.01.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2006 Status of analysis.
Advertisements

First look at mass constraint [How simple can it be?] Two decays: i) pi 0 -> g g ii) K 0 -> pi+ pi- - Mother particle momenta: P = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 GeV -
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
Efficiency and Purity Studies Outside the VXD: Applying AxialBarrelTrackfinderZ and GarfieldTrackFinder By: Tyler Rice, Chris Meyer August 21, 2007.
Invariant Mass Calculation J/ψ Rosi Reed 10/31/07.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
MC Study on B°  S (Status Report) Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 05/25/01.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
First Observation of B°  D*°         Decays Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang Syracuse University CLEO Plenary 05/11/01.
Τ ± → π ± π + π - π 0 ν τ decays at BaBar Tim West, Jong Yi, Roger Barlow The University of Manchester Carsten Hast, SLAC IOP HEP meeting Warwick, 12 th.
STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.
Discovery of D sJ (2463) + (part II) JC Wang CLEO Meeting 06/20/03 Authors Dave Cinabro Selina Li Sheldon Stone Jon Urheim Jianchun Wang Committees Roy.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Analysis work by: Marina Artuso Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/dompi.ps Study of B  D   Jianchun Wang 05/12/00.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Invariant Mass Calculation J/ψ Rosi Reed 3/5/08. Introduction J/ψ is the first excited state of charmonium Rest mass Gev/c 2 Full Width 93.4 keV.
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
Cynthia HadjidakisTerzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE Detection of photons and electrons in EMCAL Photons, Electrons and  0 at large p T Identification.
1 The Study of D and B Meson Semi- leptonic Decay Contributions to the Non-photonic Electrons Xiaoyan Lin CCNU, China/UCLA for the STAR Collaboration 22.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction: Polarisation Transfer & Cross-Section Measurements.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
Kinematics of  + n   p   0  p reaction Susumu Oda 2007/04/10-19.
V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Mainz, September 2008 Photoproduction of    on protons ► Introduction ► Data analysis.
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
New Observations on Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Yanping HUANG For BESIII Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) ICHEP2010, Paris,
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
Victor Ryabov (PNPI) for the PHENIX Collaboration QM2005 Budapest Aug,06, First measurement of the  - meson production with PHENIX experiment at.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
A search for deeply-bound kaonic nuclear states in (in-flight K -, N) reaction Hiroaki Ohnishi RIKEN.
22 September 2005 Haw05 1  (1405) photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS H. Fujimura, Kyoto University Kyoto University, Japan K. Imai, M. Niiyama Research.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
 0  5  Outline Event selection & analysis Background rejection Efficiencies Mass spectrum Comparison data-MC Branching ratio evaluation Systematics.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
Resolution and radiative corrections A first order estimate for pbar p  e + e - T. H. IPN Orsay 05/10/2011 GDR PH-QCD meeting on « The nucleon structure.
Non-photonic electron production in p+p collisions at √s=200 GeV Xiaozhi Bai for the STAR collaboration Central China Normal University University of Illinois.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
Survey of R04 Data quality check of R04 Conclusion Checks of the R04 Data Quality outline Jin Yi May 25, 2004BES Annual Meeting JieXiu, Shanxi.
BESIII EMC Simulation & Reconstruction He Miao
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Calo Calibration Meeting 29/04/2009 Plamen Hopchev, LAPP Calibration from π 0 with a converted photon.
Radia Sia Syracuse Univ. 1 RICH 2004 Outline:  The CLEO-III RICH Detector  Physics Requirements  CLEO-III RICH at work… Performance of the CLEO-III.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Status of Analysis Software Kanglin He For Analysis Software Group.
Σ Eγ comparison using Woochun Park Univ of South Carolina Feb 26,
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 2003 Fall Meeting of the Division of Nuclear Physics (2003/10/31) 1 KANETA, Masashi for the PHENIX Collaboration RIKEN-BNL Research.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
QCHS 2010 Lei Zhang1 Lei Zhang (on behalf of BESIII Collaboration) Physics School of Nanjing University Recent.
Paper Committee: Moneti(chair?), Danko, Ehrlich, Galik 1 OCT 21, 2006.
Pi0 Reconstruction with High p t Photons John Chin-Hao Chen.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Study of the
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
Λ 1520 Invariant Mass Analisys
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
PrimEx p0 radiative width extraction
Search for
Missing Mass Reconstruction of Ds*(2317)± in pp →Ds±Ds(2317)±
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting

Contents Photon Spatial resolution of photons Selection of good photons Detection efficiencies of photons π 0 / η reconstruction Some physics analysis J/  γ + X, X  0  0 J/  γ η’ Summary

We use howl to generate 1000 events with photon’s momentum ranged from 0.2 GeV to 3.2 GeV with fine step at 0.2 GeV. In this channel, the two photons are back to back in direction.  (  ) and  (  ) are the spatial resolution Spatial resolution of photons radian Sample: e + e -  2 γ  (  ) distribution vs. energy  (  ) distribution vs. energy

Selection of good photons Eliminate the fake photons associated with charged tracks Eliminate the fake photons split from other photons with higher energy Reduce the noises

In this channel, the detected photons are called fake photons. In the above plots,the   and  are the delta angle between the detected photons and the extrapolated track directions Fake photons from charged tracks     20 o  /  between Ext and Emc shower the concentrating zone is(   <20&&  <20) Sample:J/  4 

Fake photons from other photons 7o7o Angle between γandγ Sample:J/  π 0 + ρ 0 In this channel, the detected true photons are from π 0, we get the delta angle between any two photons. As show in the above plot, we can see that the fake photons could be easily eliminated from the true photons by setting the cut of delta angle = 7 o degrees events

Detection efficiencies of photons with low E Energy threshold of photon = 40MeV E γ >20MeV E γ >30MeV E γ >40MeV E γ >50MeV E γ >60MeV E γ >70MeV Events GeV Detection efficiencies of photons with low energy in the channel J/  ρ 0  0. Let the threshold equal different energy to get the different efficiencies plots. In the right plots, the curves had been made unitarily.

GoodPhoton selection efficiencies We use tester to generate 10k single photon events with momentum ranged from 0.1 GeV to 2.0 GeV with fine step at 0.1 GeV Then let the photon energy threshold equal 10,20,30,40MeV separately, to see the photon reconstruction efficiencies and the noises level

Noises at different E threshold E>10MeV noises ~ 6% E>30MeV noises ~ 0.6% E>20MeV noises ~ 1.5% E>40MeV noises ~ 0.3%

Selection efficiencies of photons E>10MeV efficiencies ~ 99% E>30MeV efficiencies ~ 99% E>20MeV efficiencies ~ 99% E>40MeV efficiencies ~ 99%

π 0 reconstruction Selection Criteria Good Photon Selection  and  >20 o (between Photon and Charged Track)  (Angle) >7 o (between two Photons) Energy Threshold = 40 MeV π 0 Selection cosθ< 0.98 ( π 0 decay angle) chisq < 20.0 (Chisq of mass constraint fit) masswindow of π 0 is (0.07,0.18)GeV

Reconstruction Efficiencies of π 0 We use tester to generate 10k single π 0 events with momentum ranged from 0.1 GeV to 2.0 GeV with fine step at 0.1 GeV. The reconstruction efficiencies are greater than 50%.

Invariant mass of π 0 (inclusive) Sample: J/  ρ 0  0 In the above plots, we get the inclusive  0 ‘s invariant mass spectrum (before 4C fit ), with its fit by ( Crystal ball + gauss + poly ). No 4C fit  0 mass = / GeV/c 2  0 width = / GeV/c 2

J /  γ X, X  0  0 Invariant mass spectrum of X Events GeV In the generator of Howl, we set the resonance’s mass = 1.270GeV and its width = 0. As show in the above plot, the width of X is about 13 MeV. Mass of X = 1.270GeV

Run 50k events of J/  γη’, then we got the number of events withη’ of each decay mode , η’ are reconstructed as following plots: J /  γη ’ η’->2  0 + η, η ->2 γ η’->2  0 + η, η ->3  0 η’->2  0 + η, η ->  + +  _ +  0 η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->2γ η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->3  0 η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->  + +  _ +  0 η’->γ + ρ 0, ρ 0 ->  + +  _

Invariant mass spectrum of η ’ η’->γ + ρ 0, ρ 0 ->  + +  _ η’->2  0 + η, η ->2 γ η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->2γ η’of all decay modes

Invariant mass of η ’ (cont.) η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->3  0 η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->  + +  _ +  0 η’->2  0 + η, η ->  + +  _ +  0 η’->2  0 + η, η ->3  0

J /  γη ’ from J /  Anything As show in the above plot, in 200k events of J/  Anything, we can only get the η’ of ( η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->2γ ) and ( η’->γ + ρ 0, ρ 0 ->  + +  _ ). η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->2γ η’->γ + ρ 0, ρ 0 ->  + +  _

Invariant mass spectrum of η ’ η’of all decay modes η’->γ + ρ 0, ρ 0 ->  + +  _ η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->2γ

Summary Photon Selection Criteria  and  >20 o (between Photon and Charged Track)  (Angle) >7 o (between two Photons) Energy Threshold = 40 MeV In η’ channel, the above two decay modes have best efficiencies η’->γ + ρ 0, ρ 0 ->  + +  _ η’->  + +  _ +η,η ->2γ Many work should be done in the future Thank you !