Workshop on cryogenic & vacuum sectorisation of the SPL Vacuum Sectorisation Paul Cruikshank, CERN Technology Department (TE) Vacuum Surfaces & Coatings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cryogenic system in P4: Possible options S. Claudet & U. Wagner LHC Workshop, “Chamonix XlV” January 2005 (Mostly for RF & beam scrubbing)
Advertisements

ColUSM #51 30 th January, 2015 D. Duarte Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, T. Sahner, H. Prin, R. Wawrowski, Q. Deliege, V. Baglin, F. Savary.
M. Jimenez AT/VAC Room Temperature (LSS) Vacuum Systems M. Jimenez.
LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING REVIEW May 2005 CRYOGENIC VACUUM SYSTEM Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC.
SPL Integration Layout Impact on cryo and vacuum sectorisation ◊ Underground obstacles, constraints on slope and length of the SPL ◊ Continuous cryostat.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
LHC VACUUM SYSTEM: 2012 REVIEW AND 2014 OUTLOOK G. Lanza, V. Baglin, G. Bregliozzi, J.M. Jimenez EVIAN 2012.
QRL Leak Tests the story so far………. Paul Cruikshank on behalf of TE-VSC colleagues & AL4030 Consortium (S133) 1 Paul Cruikshank TE/VSC - QRL Leak Tests.
Report from WG 3: Cryomodules (design & integration, construction, assembly) V.Parma, CERN, TE-MSC With contributions from O.Capatina, CERN, EN-MME 2nd.
1 Presented at ColUSM by D. Ramos on behalf of the Cold Collimator Feasibility Study Working Group Longitudinal.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
LTC Extended days, 03 March’08 J.M. Jimenez, AT Vacuum Group LHC Vacuum commissioning J.M. Jimenez On behalf of AT-VAC.
Large-capacity Helium refrigeration : from state-of-the-art towards FCC reference solutions Francois Millet – March 2015.
LHC Machine Status Report Roberto Saban LHCC June 4 th 2014.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
FP 420 Connection Cryostat Design and Integration Keith Potter, Jaak Lippmaa, Guido Ryckwaert, Benoit Florin, Thierry Renaglia, Thierry Colombet, Shrikant.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
Session 3 - What repair activity can be done today on a locally warmed-up sub-sector Paul Cruikshank TE/VSC What repair activity can be done today on a.
Workshop on cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations of the SPL CERN, 9 th -10 th November 2009 Workshop Organisation and Goals Vittorio Parma TE-MSC.
1 LHC vacuum Rossano Giachino Acknowledgments Jimenez,V.Baglin,J.C.Billy,I.Laugier Rossano Giachino November 2007.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
1 Vacuum – Much Ado about Nothing V. Baglin with inputs from P. Cruikshank CERN TE-VSC, Geneva Vincent Baglin LHC Performance Workshop - Chamonix 2011.
05 Novembre 2003Chamonix XIV Workshop, January How to deal with leaks in the QRL and magnet insulation vacuum Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC Germana.
Peter Spiller, COLMAT-Kick off meeting, Cryo-Collimator, CERN, COLMAT Kick-off meeting CERN Peter Spiller Cryo-Collimator (Catcher) for.
Experience with LEP (and LHC) cryo-modules Workshop on cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations of the SPL O.Brunner – November ’09.
Road map of the workshop Machine availability: – “work-horse” in the injection chain – 100% availability not viable,.What is achievable? And at which cost?
Test plan for SPL short cryomodule O. Brunner, W. Weingarten WW 1SPL cryo-module meeting 19 October 2010.
OLAV III Experience with the LHC Insulation Vacuum System S. Blanchard, P. Cruikshank, B. Jenninger, N. Kos, W. Maan, L. Mourier, N. Provot, J. Wallner.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Eric Montesinos - CERN - First SPL collaboration meeting - CERN December 11th 2008 First SPL collaboration meeting Experience with the LHC Main power Coupler.
Consolidation and Upgrade plans for the LHC Vacuum System
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 SPL Cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations 9-10 November, 2009 Joe Preble Workshop on cryogenic and.
SLHC WG3 (Cryomodule) summary & plan with recommendation to the CB V.Parma, CERN TE-MSC P. DUTHIL, IN2P3-CNRS 3rd SPL collaboration meeting, CERN
CHAMONIX XV QRL installation and first experiences of operation G. Riddone on behalf of the QRL team AT/ACR-cd Acknowledgements to AT/ACR-op and AT/ACR-in.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
RF power couplers vacuum issues J.M. Jimenez Vacuum, Surfaces and Coatings Group (TE-VSC)
Can we change a magnet without warming-up a full arc ? Serge Claudet, With help from P. Cruikshank & J-P. Tock (Chamonix Jan’10)
HL-LHC 11 T Dipole for DS Collimation 8 th to10 th December, 2014 D. Duarte Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, T. Sahner, H. Prin, R. Wawrowski, F. Savary,
Overview of Main Linac Cryomodule (MLC)
TE-CRG Activities D. Delikaris, TE-CRG.
Cryogenic Cooling Schemes for the SPL U. Wagner TE-CRG.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
Overview of Main Linac Cryomodule (MLC) Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
LHC Machine Advisory Committee Meeting no.19 QRL status 16 June 2006 G. Riddone, AT-ACR On behalf of the QRL team.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
LHC Beampipes Ray Veness / AT-VAC FP XII 08Beam Vacuum- R.Veness.
A. Kraemer, OLAVIII, July 11th, Gas Loads into SIS100 Cryogenic Vacuum Sections A. Kraemer, Calculations and Transparencies courtesy of St. Wilfert.
ColUSM #63 18 th September, 2015 D. Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, H. Prin, Q. Deliege, A. Bastard, J. Hrivnak.
Overview of elliptical cryomodules vacuum system Vacuum Equipment Standardization meeting February 2014 P. Bosland – C. Darve – N. Elias.
LHC experience with installation Katy Foraz March 6th 2008, Dubna GDE Meeting - ILC Conventional Facilities and Siting Workshop ***********************************
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
SPL RF coupler: integration aspects
CERN – Zanon discussions
Field Emission Minimization for LCLS-II
Installation of an Instrument on a CERN machine
Project X: Cryogenic Segmentation Issues
Leak Detection Tutorial Work
Long Shutdown for the LHC: Vacuum Beam Pipes
Consequences of warming-up a sector above 80 K
Electron cloud & vacuum pressure observations: 2011 proton run
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC
J.M. Jimenez On behalf of TE-VSC group
The 11T cryo-assembly: summary of design and integration aspects
On behalf of TE-VSC group
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on cryogenic & vacuum sectorisation of the SPL Vacuum Sectorisation Paul Cruikshank, CERN Technology Department (TE) Vacuum Surfaces & Coatings Group (VSC)

Topics  Typical Vacuum Instrumentation  Cold & RT beam vacuum  Cryostat insulation vacuum  LHC & LEP inputs  LHC Vacuum sectorisation  LEP cavity experience  Sectorisation Variants for SPL  Advantages / Disadvantages Vacuum Sectorisation

Typical Beam Vac Config 09/11/09 Vacuum Sectorisation 3

Typical Insulation Vac Config  09/11/09 Vacuum Sectorisation 4

LHC; Arcs and LSS Arcs: - 8 x 2.8 km = 22.4 km - cryomagnets in a continuous cryostat LHC arc LHC LSS LSS (Long Straight Sections): - up- and downstream of the experiments - 8 x 2 x 250 m = 4 km - room temp and standalone cryo- magnets Cryogenic distribution line QRL

LHC Vacuum Overview 6 > 300 beam subsectors

LHC Vacuum Overview A few numbers…. CharacteristicQuantity for LHC machine & distribution line (QRL) Insulation vacuum system length22,4 km & 25 km Welds~ ( in-situ) Weld length~ m Elastomer joints~ Elastomer joint length~ m Multi-layer insulation~ m 2 or 200 m 2 /m of cryostat Vacuum subsectors234 Vacuum subsector length214 m (machine) & 428 m (QRL) Vacuum subsector volume~ 80 m 3 Fixed turbo pumps178 Nominal turbo pumping speed0,25 l/s/m of cryostat Fixed vacuum gauges974 Mobile turbo pumping groups36 Mobile primary pumping groups36

LHC Vacuum Sectorisation  LHC Sectorisation Working Group setup in 1995  Consider beam vacuum, insulation vacuum, cryogenic layout  Increased flexibility ?  Reduce down-time ?  Analyse types of intervention  Short – diode replacement, weld repair,instrument repair  Long – change of cryomagnet  Additional equipment required?  Implementation Cost ?  LHC Project Report #60 – September 1996  Quantifications, recommendations, (dis)advantages, costs 09/11/09Vacuum sectorisation8

LHC Sectorisation  Long Straight sections  Low density of cold magnets ( m cryostats in 250m) & lots of RT equipment – needed helium distribution line  Beam vacuum sectorisation at each cold warm transition (CWT)  Arc  Coherent vacuum & cryogenic subsectors to allow local warm- up of 2.8 km continuous cryostat  Vacuum barriers and helium plugs every 214 metres - compromise between staged installation, leak localisation, partial warm-up, additional heat inleaks, limit degraded vacuum  No beam vacuum sectorisation in 2.8 km continuous cryostat  QRL  Separation of QRL vacuum from magnet vacuum to allow staged reception and leak localisation in long cryostats 09/11/09Vacuum sectorisation9

Insulation vacuum sectorisation

Insulation Vacuum (3) 11 LHC magnet cryostat QRL cryostat Jumpers Vacuum barriers

Baseline ‘short interventions’ in insulation vacuum subsectors Scenario from LHC Project Report 60 Vacuum barriers every 214m n-2….floating, cold, under vacuum n-1thermal buffer, RT, under vacuum n intervention, RT, vented, W opened n+1thermal buffer, RT, under vacuum n+2….floating, cold, under vacuum With subsector length of 214m, it is necessary to warm-up 642m of the 2.8 km continuous cryostat n n-1  Eg repairs on diode, busbar, line Y, helium leak….but no intervention on beam vac n-2n+1n+2

Sectorisation of LEP RF Cavities Beam Vacuum Commissioning and installation During the installation and commissioning, the RF cavities shall stay under vacuum to: Limit the contamination by dusts –Without any sectorisation, several venting will be required, increasing the risk of dust contamination. Preserve the RF commissioning on surface –Venting always implies repeating partly the RF commissioning During the pre-commissioning on the surface, absorber blocks have to be installed on the other side of the sector valves to absorb the accelerated electrons emitted by field emission. Once installed in the LEP tunnel, the sector valves were the absorbers. Modules were warmed individually to change tuners or couplers.

Sectorisation of LEP RF Cavities Beam Vacuum RF processing is required to increase the accelerating field above 6 MV/m Injection of helium ( mbar, reading on the gauge) onto the cold (4.5 K) RF cavity. Sequence is as follow: Installation of a pumping group with an helium injection line (4 h) Bake out (24 h) Helium injection (3 h) …RF processing… Helium pump down (10 h minimum) needs a partial warm-up to release the condensed helium  Need that each module is sectorised to allow for an RF processing

SPL Sectorisation Variants 09/11/09Vacuum sectorisation15 Continuous Segmented Option B Segmented Option A

Typical Insulation Vac Config  Cost for vacuum system:  Draft estimate from S. Calatroni  Includes instrumentation, controls, cabling, in-situ leak test  Insulation vacuum subsector ~ 90 kCHF  Beam vacuum ‘cell’ ~ 90kCHF (cold) + 90kCHF (RT with valves) 09/11/09Vacuum sectorisation16

SPL Sectorisation Variants Volume types Max ‘Segmented’Max ‘Continuous’ Insulation vacuum volumes - cryomodule 35 ((10+5)+6+(12+2)) 3 200m+90m+212 m Beam vacuum volumes - cryomodule + intermodule Insulation vacuum volumes - helium distribution line 5 ? 106m*5 0 or 1 530m Total vacuum volumes Vacuum sectorisation17

Design aspects – vacuum  Advantages  More modular design  Minimise cold equipment – access, alignment, repairs, upgrades, unecessary outgassing, leaks, etc  Modules are complete & tested before installation  Disadvantages  More vacuum equipment eg cold to warm transitions, intermodules  More vacuum instrumentation  Advantages  Compact longitudinal layout – fewer CWT, fewer RF contacts  Helium transfer line can be integrated – less vac systems  Disadvantages  Beam vacuum sectors long- cold sector valves don’t exist!  Some sensitive equipment is imprisoned in cryostat - needs vacuum compatibility and validation Vacuum Sectorisation18 SegmentedContinuous

Installation aspects – vacuum  Advantages  Minimise tunnel work and problems - modules are complete and tested before installation  Fewer problems treated on- line  Staged acceptance tests  Decoupling of problems  Disadvantages  Beam and insulation vacuum systems are exposed to tunnel environment – dust contamination? Vacuum sectorisation19 SegmentedContinuous

Repair aspects – vacuum  Advantages  Reduced search zone  Decoupling of repair and other activities  Limit zones of warm-up and opening of vacuum system – cost & downtime  Disadvantages  Difficult access at cold to warm transitions – not std interconnect design  Advantages  Less tasks for systematic repairs on modules – venting, repumping..  Disadvantages  Equipment will see more thermal cycles – create leaks? Vacuum Sectorisation20 SegmentedContinuous

Commissioning aspects – vacuum  Advantages  Precommissioning before installation  Staged tests – smoothing of resources, earlier identification of problems  Decoupling of problems  Recommissioning of ‘weak’ module possible  Disadvantages  More volumes to commission  Disadvantages  Cavities need to be recommissioned if vented  RF processing with helium required for field above < 6 MV/m – complicated  Movable blocks or valves to absorb field emission electrons? Vacuum Sectorisation21 SegmentedContinuous

Operational aspects – vacuum  Advantages  Limit zone of degraded ins vacuum (helium leak)  Easier diagnosis of problems  Disadvantages  More equipment (fixed pumping systems & valves)  More interlocks  More risk of equipment failure  More maintenance  Advantages  Simpler controls  Redundancy in fixed pumping systems  Disadvantages  MCI would affect more equipment Vacuum Sectorisation22 SegmentedContinuous

SPL Vac Sectorisation – next steps  Which sectorisation variants are not possible?  Strong vacuum constraints need to be identified & investigated – eg can we expose cavity to tunnel air, etc.  Constraints for other technologies to be confirmed  For retained variants, advantages and disadvantages presently expressed qualitatively, now need to be quantified in time, manpower and expenditure.  Are there other vacuum aspects to add?  Continue to get feedback from other operational machines Vacuum Sectorisation23

Last Slide Thanks for your attention Vacuum Sectorisation24

ITER/CERN Collaboration - LHC Insulation Vacuum - Paul Cruikshank - 25 June 2009 Semi-standalone cryo-magnet - typical installation and leak test sequence - HELIUM CIRCUIT JUMPER CRYO-MAGNET CRYOGENIC DISTRIBUTION LINE (QRL) CRYO-MAGNET BEAM VACUUM TUBES PUMP + DETECTOR DETECTOR