Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0216r1 Submission February 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 1 Comment Resolution Receiver Parameters Date: 2012-2-15 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
256-QAM TX EVM and RX Sensitivity
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1367r0 Submission Nov 2013 Mingguang Xu, et. Al.Slide 1 Tx EVM for MCS-10 in ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0785r0 Submission July 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0870r0 Submission June 2011 MediaTek BF Clarifications Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1196r1 Submission Data Rate and Spectrum Requirements for IEEE aj (45 GHz) Date: Authors: Haiming Wang (SEU)Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0229r0 Submission February 2012 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Transmit Mask Correction Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0436r0 Submission February 2011 Mediatek Path Loss and Delay Spread Models for 11ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0705r2 Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu (MediaTek)
Doc.: IEEE /0706r2 Submission Bandwidth and Packet Type Detection Schemes for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxx Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems.pptx Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu, et.
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
Direction Finding Positioning for
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 Submission January 2015 Daniel Schneider, SonySlide 1 Non-Uniform Constellations for Higher Order QAMs Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0705r1 Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu, et.
Doc.: IEEE /0647r2 SubmissionSlide 1 PHY abstraction method comparison Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek May 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 PSDU Size For Receiver Sensitivity Power Level Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0935r0 Submission July 2012 Vinko Erceg, Broadcom 6-10GHz UWB Link Budget and Discussion Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /337r0 Submission 9 July, 2001 James P. K. Gilb, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: /1320r00 Bo, Sun (ZTE Corp), et al Slide 1 11aj 45GHz Link Budget for use cases discussion Date: Authors: Nov 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1059r0 September 2013 Dongguk Lim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 PHY Abstraction for HEW Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1401r0 Submission November 2014 Slide 1 Shiwen He , Haiming Wang Quasi-Orthogonal STBC for SC-PHY in IEEE aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors:
Doc.: IEEE /0553-r1 Submission April 2011 James Wang, et al, Mediatek COST231 Walfish Ikegame Model for for 11ah Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE ah lowest MCS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /089 Submission January 2002 Steve Halford, IntersilSlide 1 Maximum Received Power for g Steve Halford Mark Webster.
Doc.: IEEE /0112r0 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. January 2013 Submission Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for the Next Generation WLAN Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r0 January 2010 R. Kudo, K. Ishihara and Y. Takatori (NTT) Slide 1 Measured Channel Variation.
Doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 1 Power Amp Effects for HRb OFDM Paul Chiuchiolo and.
Doc.: IEEE /0819r1 Submission July 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Preamble Discussions Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0645 Submission May 2012 Open-Loop Link Margin Index for Fast Link Adaptation Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell,
Submission doc.: IEEE /1314r2 November 2015 Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 I/Q Imbalance Impact to TGax OFDMA Uplink Reception Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Submission Jan 2013 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Receiver Sensitivity Levels Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE c Submission Slide 1 July, 2008 Chang woo Pyo, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission ah M2M Channel Access Performance Date: September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE Submission Nov 2014 Link Budget Analysis for 40-50GHz Indoor Usage Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan Liu, Mediatek Inc.
Doc.: IEEE /0535r0 Submission May 2008 Thomas Kenney, Minyoung Park, Eldad Perahia, Intel Corp. Slide 1 PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80.
Doc.: IEEE /1484r4 Submission January 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0058r0 Submission Usage Scenarios and Applications For Long Range WiFi January 2016 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu.
Submission doc.: IEEE /838r0 July 2016 Guido R. Hiertz, EricssonSlide 1 Resolution to CID 8291 Date: Authors:
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Spectrum Mask in IEEE802.11p Date: Authors: March 2008
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
SC 64-QAM in clause 21 PHY Date: Authors: November 2015
Tx EVM for MCS-10 in ah Date: Authors: Nov 2013
Spectrum Mask in IEEE802.11p Date: Authors: March 2008
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Maximum Input Level in OFDM Mode
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
Discussion on 11ah Peak Throughput Requirements
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
May 2015 Bandwidth and Packet Type Detection Schemes for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: Frank Hsu, et. al. (MediaTek)
Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
Single User MCS Proposal
Straw Polls and Motions on 256 QAM and BW: Optional-Mandatory Features
STBC in Single Carrier(SC) for IEEE aj (45GHz)
White Space Regulatory Issues
On TX EVM Date: Authors: September 2017 Month Year
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Table 1. nRF24L01p specifications
LDPC Tone Mapping for IEEE aj(45GHz)
Additional SC MCSs in clause 20 (DMG PHY)
Discussion on 11ah Peak Throughput Requirements
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission February 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 1 Comment Resolution Receiver Parameters Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission Comment 6144 – Receiver Sensitivity for MCS T Receiver sensitivity of MCS 1 at -68 dBm is only 1 dB lower than MCS2. This does not make sense for repetition coding. Based on simulation results in P42 of IEEE /0432r0, the MCS1 should be 2 dB lower tha MCS2. Change MCS1 sensitivity to -69 dBm Date: February, 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTek MCS1 employs repetition coding and the performance should be approximately 3 dB better than MCS2. The difference between ½ code and 5/8 code should be approximately 1 dB Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission SCM Performance-AWGN February, 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTek Simulation Conditions: Packet Length-8192 Bytes AWGN Red line-With impairments (PN, PA) Blue line-no impairments BPSK MCSs QPSK MCSs 16QAM MCSs 2 dB 1 dB Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission Proposed Receiver Sensitivity Date: February, 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTek Current SensitivityProposed Value MCS1-68 MCS MCS3-65 Motion: Instruct the editor to change the sensitivity of MCS2 in Table 21-3 Page 489 to -66 dBm Slide 4

doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission 6145 Receiver Maximum Input Level T It is not clear about the definition of the receiver maximum input level "the maximum power level at the receive antenna(s) of the incoming signal, in dBm, present at the input of the receiver for which the error rate criterion (defined at the RX Sensitivity subclause) is met." It is not clear whether it is defined at antenna port (same as receiver sensitivity) or at the air to antenna interface. It makes more sense to be at air to antenna plane. For some docking applications in close proximity, the defined level seems too low. Please clarify it and revises the value if necessary. Date: February, 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission Proposed Maximum Receiver Input Typical phased-array device transmit EIRP ~ 25 dBm For some applications, the distance can be as short as.5 meter Maximum input level should be defined at air-to- antenna plane Field strength –10 microwatt/cm^2 = 25 dBm/Area = 25 dBm/(4*π* 50^2) Date: February, 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission Proposed Text for.5 Meter or Higher Maximum Input Requirement The receiver maximum input level is the maximum power level at the receive antenna(s) of the incoming signal, in dBm, present at the input of the receiver antenna for which the error rate criterion (defined 21 at the RX Sensitivity subclause) is met. A compliant receiver shall have a receiver maximum input level at the receive antenna(s) of at least -33 dBm 10 microwatts/cm^2 for each of the modulation formats that the receiver supports. Date: February, 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission Febraury 2012 Slide 8James Wang, MediaTek Thank You!