Non-π mode pre-bunching system IPNS, KEK: H. Miyatake, M. Okada, K. Niki, Y. Hirayama, N. Imai, H. Ishiyama, S.C. Jeong, I. Katayama, M. Oyaizu, Y.X. Watanabe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study on the Injection System for Compact Cyclotron Mass Spectrometry Do Gyun Kim, Joonyeon Kim, H. C. Bhang Department of Physics, Seoul National University.
Advertisements

CHAPTER 3 MICROWAVE ‘O’ TYPE TUBES
Direct measurement of 4 He( 12 C, 16 O)  reaction near stellar energy Kunihiro FUJITA K. Sagara, T. Teranishi, T. Goto, R. Iwabuchi, S. Matsuda, K. Nakano,
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Possible new EMMA injectors bdm. Motivation ALICE due to shut down soon Alternate EMMA injection (assuming EMMA project continues which it should …) Several.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Carbon Injector for FFAG
Direct measurement of 12 C + 4 He fusion cross section at Ecm=1.5MeV at KUTL H.Yamaguchi K. Sagara, K. Fujita, T. Teranishi, M. taniguchi, S.Liu, S. Matsua,
KICKER LNF David Alesini LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
Heavy Ion Accelerators for RIKEN RI Beam Factory and Upgrade Plans H. Okuno, et. al. (RIKEN Nishina Center) and P. Ostroumov (ANL) Upgrade Injector Low.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Beam loss and longitudinal emittance growth in SIS M. Kirk I. Hofmann, O. Boine-Frankenheim, P. Spiller, P. Hülsmann, G. Franchetti, H. Damerau, H. Günter.
EBIS ARR Jim Alessi May 4- 7, 2010 Technical Overview.
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Direct measurement of the 18 Ne( , p) 21 Na reaction with a GEM – MSTPC Takashi Hashimoto CNS, University of Tokyo Collaborators CNS S. Kubono, H. Yamaguchi,
Beam Loading experiment at KEK ATF ( Multi-train acceleration at KEK-ATF Injector ) KEK Masafumi Fukuda and Junji Urakawa LCWS /10/052 train acceleration.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Direct measurement of the 4 He( 12 C, 16 O)  cross section near stellar energy Kunihiro FUJITA K. Sagara, T. Teranishi, T. Goto, R. Iwabuchi, S. Matsuda,
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Concept Preliminary Estimations A. Kolomiets Charge to mass ratio1/61/8 Input energy (MeV/u) Output energy (MeV/u)2.5(3.5) Beam.
Progress of Bunched Beam Electron Cooling Demo L.J.Mao (IMP), H.Zhang (Jlab) On behalf of colleagues from Jlab, BINP and IMP.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation - Ring Coolers? - FFAGs? David Neuffer Fermilab.
GEM-MSTPC for direct measurements of astrophysical reaction rates H. Ishiyama 1, K. Yamaguchi 2, Y. Mizoi 3, Y.X. Watanabe 1, T. Hashimoto 4, M.H. Tanaka.
PS-ESS and LEBT State of the art Lorenzo Neri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“
In-pulse-average: Search for multiples of t rf and t DAQ which “coincide”: 1891 t DAQ = ns ~ =41 t rf Calculate sample mean over blocks of.
ESS | Non-Invasive Beam Profile Measurements| | C. Böhme Non-Invasive Beam Profile Measurement Overview of evaluated methods.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Webex meeting Oct ICD-2 chopper requirements and proposal #1.
AIP and Large Projects Arne Freyberger OPS 2015 StayTreat.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
Bunch Shape Monitor for HINS Wai-Ming Tam Project X Collaboration Meeting September 11, 2009.
Alexander Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge, USA
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Bunching system for SPES project
Visit for more Learning Resources
A. Martynov on behalf of accelerator division.
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
HIAF Electron Cooling System &
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
SPES-RFQ review Introduction, general aspects
Beam dynamics of RAON accelerator system
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Part2: Cavities and Structures
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Summary & Concluding remarks
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
The Nanosecond bunching system at KIGAM Tandem Accelerator
Direct Measurement of the 8Li + d reactions of astrophysical interest
The SPL-based Proton Driver at CERN
Pulsed electron beam cooling experiments: data & preliminary results
Improvement of a dc-to-pulse conversion efficiency of FRAC
Presentation transcript:

Non-π mode pre-bunching system IPNS, KEK: H. Miyatake, M. Okada, K. Niki, Y. Hirayama, N. Imai, H. Ishiyama, S.C. Jeong, I. Katayama, M. Oyaizu, Y.X. Watanabe Nishina Center, RIKEN: S. Arai ASRC, JAEA: H. Makii, Y. Wakabayashi M. Okada et al., PRST,15(2012) : 2nd RISP W.S. H. Miyatake, IPNS, KEK

Compact pre-buncher coupled with a beam chopper at the injection beam line of the accelerators Intense pulsed-alpha beams (> pμA) sharp time-structure (~20 ns in FWTM) of the pulsed beam enough beam suppression (less than ) during ~200 ns just before the beam-on period Experimental requirements at the TRIAC facility in C(α,γ) 16 O reaction cross section measurement in the low energy region with astrophysical interest

Experimental Setup TRIAC : Tokai Radioactive Ion Accelerator Complex (Now DIAC: Daejon Ion Accelerator Complex) Charger Breeder (ECR Ion source) : provide high intense α beam E α = 0.14 – 1.4 MeV / u → E cm = 0.4 – 4.2 MeV ( 12 C +  ) γ-ray detector Charge Breeder (18GHz ECR Ion Source) Chopper Pre-buncher 26MHz-SCRFQ Bunch interval 38.5 ns 2-4 MHz-beam Bunch interval ns

Single-gap buncher merit –compact design –arbitrary potential waves –unrestricted bunching frequency demerit –high bunching potential –beam distortion due to the leakage electric field Beam gnd electrodepotential electrode (V/cm) (cm) attenuation length ~10 cm < 30 cm (βλ of 2MHz, 2keV/u beam)

Two-gap buncher π-mode operation: tube length=βλ/2 Merit –lower bunching potential –no-leakage field Demerit –fixed bunching frequency –limited wave form of the bunching potential gnd electrodes Beam potential electrode (drift tube) L (=βλ/2) Saw-tooth wave bunching with 1st, 2nd, and 3rd harmonic frequencies is not possible by single two-gap buncher. Three two-gap bunchers are needed.

Bunching potential to the particles Assuming the effective voltages to the 1st and 2nd gap, V 1st and V 2nd, are expressed by the 3rd order harmonics π-mode operation →θ=π (fix !!)

Effective synthesized acceleration voltage, V total : If we adjust the effective potential V n and the phase φ n, Pseudo saw-tooth potential is realized in the single two-gap buncher with non-π drift length Precise digital wave technique is required: Arbitrary Function Generator Module

Optimization of the drift length in terms of the power dissipation P min = 140 deg. cf. P min = two-gap bunchers

βλ non-π mode two-gap pre-buncher particles in these region should be chopped.

Entrance Exit Longitudinal and Transverse Emittance of Simulated Beam at Entrance and Exit of SCRFQ Particle motion in the prebuncher : TRACEP (S. Yamada, 1990) Particle motion in the SCRFQ: PARMTEQ (K. R. Crandall et al., 1988) acceptance of SCRFQ (291π mmmr) Bunching gain =5.4 Back ground beam: ~20%

Beam Chopper Electric deflector with short rise/fall time constant around 40 ns →At the exit of SCRFQ linac, a fast chopper would be applicable: two-mode Tandem chopper (ISAC) with high voltage (~40 kV). →impossible for the installation → At the entrance of the SCRFQ, a single gap deflector would be applicable: chopping voltage (~2 kV) → suffer from a long tail (~10 cm) of the effective field. Chopper of multi-gap (layer) electrodes perpendicular to the beam direction Chopper-On Merit Gap space becomes short. → Required chopping voltage becomes low. Voltage is applied alternately on the layer electrode → Effective field length becomes short Demerit Some fraction of beam particles would be lost by the layer electrodes

variable drift tube (7 to 15 cm) gap (10 mm) inner diameter (40 mm)total length (267 mm)

rise/fall time constant: 50 ns chopping time: 160 ns for 2MHz bunching Beam suppression ~ Multi-layer beam chopper beam 2 keV/u width of each layer: 10 mm thickness of each layer: 0.1 mm gap between two layers: 1.9 mm applied chopping voltage: 160 V estimated tail of the field: ~1.5 mm transparency: 95% 40 mm grounded layers potential applied layers

Control circuit of the pre-bunching system Arbitrary function generator (AFG) is a key device –Bunching wave form is described with 0.5 ns step. –Numerical input table for the AFG is adjusted by monitoring the rf output. –Ideal wave form can be synthesized by taking account the transit time factor of the actual bunching electrode Triggers for the pre-buncher and the chopper are synchronized to the master generator for the accelerator complex.

BUNCHER OFF and CHOPPER OFF 13 micro-bunches in one bunching cycle (2 MHz) for the 26 MHz SCRFQ BUNCHER ON and CHOPPER OFF bunched into the central micro-bunch bunching gain: 5.46 width of the central bunch: 12 ns in FWTM background bunches: 20 % to total BUNCHER ON and CHOPPER ON beam suppression factor during 250 ns before the central bunch: 5 x bunching gain: 4.85 * beam loss (14%) due to the beam chopper time width of the central bunch: 13 ns in FWTM Beam test (1.1 MeV/u)

Summary Single two-gap pre-buncher of the non-π mode operation becomes available for the pseudo saw-tooth beam bunching. –It is realized by the precise wave digitized technique, AFG module. The multi-layer beam chopper for the low-energy beam is suitable for the sharp beam-chopping with relatively low voltage (160V) and short effective field length (1.5 mm). Combining the two-gap pre-buncher and the multi-layer beam chopper, beam suppression of with bunching gain of ~5 are achieved. This performance has been satisfied with the experimental conditions MeV de-excited γ-rays from the α-capture state in 16 O, by bombarding 6 pμA, 701 keV/u bunched α beams Induced γ-rays by neutrons from (α, n) reactions of 13 C, contaminant of the 12 C-target.

Thank you

exp. 12 C(α,γ) 16 O reaction cross section measurement in the low energy region with astrophysical interest –Background neutrons from 13 C(α,n) 16 O smear out the prompt γ-rays in the DC-beam experiment –Pulsed intense alpha beams (~pμA) are essential Enough beam suppression (less than ) during ~200 ns beam off period Sharp structure (~20ns in FWTM) of the pulsed beam induced γ- rays by neutrons from 13 C(α,n) 16 O

Saw-tooth wave bunching with two-gap buncher Pseudo saw-tooth synthesized from 1st, 2nd, and 3rd harmonic waves ? 3 two-gap bunchers in π-mode are ideal, but expensive and need space. Possibility of a single two-gap buncher in non π-mode operation

BUNCHER ON bunched into the central micro-bunch bunching gain = 5.46 time width of the central bunch: 12 ns in FWTM background bunches: 20 % to total BUNCHER ON and CHOPPER ON beam suppression factor during 250 ns before the central bunch: 5 x bunching gain = 4.85 * beam loss due to the beam chopper time width of the central bunch: 13 ns in FWTM background bunches: 20 % to total

Installation Multi-layer beam chopper variable frequency saw-tooth wave two-gap pre-buncher

Chopping the background bunches 12 micro-bunches should be chopped clearly in every 13 micro-bunches Electric deflector with short rise/fall time (~38 ns) At the exit of the SCRFQ (178 keV/u) ? → two-mode tandem chopper at ISAC * need much space for the TRIAC At the entrance of the SCRFQ (2 keV/u) ? →single gap deflector suffers from the long tail of the effective field Chopper of multi-gap (layer) electrodes perpendicular to the beam direction gap space becomes short →required deflection voltage becomes low effective field length becomes short, if the voltage is applied alternately on the layer electrode some fraction of beam particles would be lost by the layer electrodes

Transit Time Factor