FFAG 4-Bend Injection Line into EMMA C. Johnstone, Fermilab EMMA phone conference July 24, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
Advertisements

SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University.
FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
ELIC Low Beta Optics with Chromatic Corrections Hisham Kamal Sayed 1,2 Alex Bogacz 1 1 Jefferson Lab 2 Old Dominion University.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Dynamic aperture of non-scaling FFAG with sextupole Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 21 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
1 st September 2005LHC-LUMI 05 - G.Arduini – CERN/AB Optical requirements for the magnetic lattice of the high energy injectors (SSPS in the SPS tunnel)
EMMA Extraction / Diagnostic line Bruno Muratori STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 01/09/08.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
EMMA injection & extraction Takeichiro Yokoi(Oxford University)
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
KEKB lattice Taken from LATTICE DESIGN FOR KEKB COLLIDING RINGS By H. Koiso and K. Oide.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Super Tau Charm Lattice ST20_49/55 Pantaleo Raimondi La Biodola, May
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Status of Baseline Linac and RLAs Design.
Analysis of Garren’s 27-Jul-2011 Hybrid Synchrotron Lattice J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting February 2,
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
Target insertion matching and standard cell optics optimization
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Muon Acceleration in a Neutrino Factory
SuperB ARC Lattice Studies
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Vertical Dogleg Options for the Ion Collider Ring
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Ion ring lattice with -I sextupole pairs for ir chromaticity correction Y. Nosochkov, M-H. Wang
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Presentation transcript:

FFAG 4-Bend Injection Line into EMMA C. Johnstone, Fermilab EMMA phone conference July 24, 2007

FFAG Design Considerations For a bend/reverse bend pair, to ~cancel dispersion (as is required in the EMMA lattice) –360  of phase advance is required between bends –180  is the maximum phase advance across a minimum in the  function (where  * the value at the minimum) Such minima are very achromatic and are generally only found in IRs (EMMA survives with low betas because the cell length is extremely short and therefore the phase advance never approaches 180  - above 130  /cell EMMA demonstrates stability problems) The momentum acceptance of such IRs, which scale with 1/  *, are only a fraction of a percent and even this small acceptance requires sextupole correction –A short drift between a 2-bend achromat requires very deep minima – and at least two. –A 1% deviation in momentum will exhibit very different optical functions from the central momentum and cannot be controlled or matched into EMMA.

FFAG Design Considerations cont… Matching or ~canceling D’ further requires either –Reflection symmetry about the center point between bends –Adjustment, then fixing the bend from the ERLP – given the fixed bend in the septum Matching a different injection energy into EMMA requires a different D and D’ and therefore the value of this bend must change with energy. A 3- bend design is also very constrained and difficult to vary.

FFAG 2-bend solution 360  of phase advance + fixed bends

FFAG Proposed Solution : 4-bend design With a 4 bend design one can lengthen the injection line considerably and allow for the critical, dispersion-free, transverse emittance measurement from the ERLP. The 4-bend solution permits tuning and matching if designed as follows: –Two –same sign center bends effectively compensate for each other with 180  of phase advance between the two. –The “reverse-bend” septum is paired with an ~ equal bend from the ERLP. Now only 180  of bend is required outside of the insert between the two center bends. This remaining phase advance between the septum and this insert and the insert and the bend to the ERLP can be adjusted to match and cancel D’ and track matching conditions at different injection energies. –The two center bends can be changed together to align the line into EMMA.

FFAG Center - Insert Center bends Septum – set to 0  1 st bend from ERLP – set to 0 

FFAG 4-bends – canceling Septum – set to 75  1 st bend from ERLP – set to 75 

FFAG Adding injection kickers

FFAG Emittance measurement

FFAG 20-MeV tune

FFAG 50 deg septum example

FFAG Possible injection lines 180  phase 360  phase advance impossible Line 1 Line 2

FFAG Inside Injection 60  phase advance

FFAG Outside vs. Inside Outside injection –Line 1 is too short to support matching, diagnostics, and vertical phase space painting, and dispersion suppression –Line 2 horizontal bends are too close, required phase advance for dispersion suppression is impossible Inside injection –Long line, easily match to required phase advance for dispersion suppression and accommodate other functions

FFAG Injection kicker locations : same kickers MeV MeV ~50mr/ kicker Injection septum Injection kicker #1 Injection kicker #2

FFAG Extraction kickers: 10 – 20 MeV Extraction kicker #1 Extraction kicker #2 Extraction septum

FFAG Proposal When studying the higher energies, 15-20, use all kickers for injection –Resonance study – no acceleration –For long-term resonance studies, there is time to re-fire the kickers for extraction –Or beam simply slowly dissipates –For quick resonances, it is likely we won’t have time to trigger and extract anyway. –New strength requirements would be half – or ~25 MeV