Reduction of grazing intensity favours biodiversity as a result of increased pasture heterogeneity. There is a clear lack of data on the impact of grazing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grazing Grazing is another form of predation – a grazer is simply a predator that moves from ‘victim’ to victim consuming part of it but not killing it.
Advertisements

COMMUNITY ECOLOGY.
Beneficial Management Practices for Saskatchewan Species at Risk: Western Spiderwort Threatened.
Chapter 53 Notes Community Ecology. What is a Community? A __________ is any assemblage of populations in an area or habitat. Communities differ dramatically.
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY.
Wildlife Management Principles. Goals What are some goals related to the management of wildlife habitats?
Chapter 53 Reading Quiz 1.A bunch of populations living close together and possibly interacting is called a ____. 2.Which type of interspecific interaction.
IV. Productivity, Diversity, and Stability. A. Productivity.
Food Webs and Trophic Cascades
Introduction Subalpine meadows play a crucial role in species diversity, supporting many endangered species of plant and wildlife. Subalpine meadows play.
Species Abundance and Diversity
Biodiversity. Are communities saturated? A closed system must balance the gains in energy from net production with those taken by consumers and decomposers.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 13
Species Abundance and Diversity
The Assembly of Communities in a Heterogeneous Landscape. JoVonn G. Hill 1, Keith S. Summerville 2, Richard L. Brown 1, and Joe A. MacGown 1 1 Mississippi.
Scientific Method in Action – Group Task Group members : Mabandi Mnisi Moses Shitlhelani Christopher Shai.
Patterns in Communities & Succession. Species Richness Species richness: number of species in a community Species evenness: relative abundance of species.
Hosted by Type your name here Definitions FeedingRandom Ecosystem s
Valuation of damage to ecosystems due to air pollution Preliminary findings ECLAIRE-project Rome, 7-10 April 2014 Rob Maas, TFIAM.
1 Species Abundance and Diversity. 2 Introduction Community: Association of interacting species inhabiting some defined area.  Community Structure includes.
Predicting diversity of large herbivores from moisture and nutrient availability based on the article of Olff et al. (2002): “Global environmental controls.
Community Ecology Interactions of a community: interactions that affect survival and drive evolution – Competition - negative effect on both species –
Regeneration of Natural Pasture in Enclosures for Parthenium Weed Management in the Rangeland of Jigjiga, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia B Y Lisanework.
Eric Kortenhoeven Mentor: Dr. Neil Cobb Hooper Undergraduate Research Award (HURA)
Conservation Describe the management of grassland and woodland habitats to maintain or increase biodiversity, as illustrated by mowing, grazing, scrub.
BIOLOGY 157: LIFE SCIENCE: AN ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACH (Communities and Succession)
1. During the power point use context clues to determine what the underlined words mean 2. Share with your shoulder partner what you think the words mean.
Ten Must For a Forage Program Know Animal Nutritional Needs and Forage Options Stage of Pregnancy Stage of Lactation Body Weight of Livestock Animal Age.
Foraging Strategies K.Launchbaugh K.Launchbaugh BLM Photo
What is ecological succession?
Ecosystem Functioning. Richness Abundance Body mass Ecosystem Functioning.
Chapter 54 Community Ecology How many interactions between species can you see in this picture? -Community Interactions are classified by whether they.
APES Day 72! Respond to the quote by Adam Smith from The Wealth of Nations, “No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part.
Meeting the Nutritional Needs of Livestock on Pasture Donna M. Amaral-Phillips University of Kentucky.
Which species benefits from its interactions?
Diurnal Changes in Forage Quality Affects Animal Preference, Intake, Performance Hank Mayland, Dave Mertens and Bret Taylor USDA-ARS Kimberly, ID; Madison,
R ESULTS Management and development of the crop Seasonal course of the fluxes R ESULTS Management and development of the crop Seasonal course of the fluxes.
Biological Invasions. Definitions from the National Invasive Species Council: Native species = a species that, other than as a result of an introduction,
Know how. Know now. Jerry D. Volesky Walter H. Schacht University of Nebraska-Lincoln Ethanol CoProduct Conference Grazing Management when Supplementing.
Factors Contributing to Biodiversity. Biodiversity  Why are there more species in some places than others???
Ecology. What is ecology? The study of interactions between organisms and their environment Remember: Cell  Tissue  Organ  Organ System  Organism.
C.4 Conservation of biodiversity Understanding: -An indicator species is an organism used to assess a specific environmental condition -Relative numbers.
Factors influencing butterfly diversity in a long-term experiment differing in grazing intensity Sabrina Jerrentrup 1 Nicole Wrage 2 Johannes Isselstein.
The effect of grazing multispecies swards on ewe and lamb performance
Ecosystems Part 9 Biodiversity.
Legendre H.1, Goby J.P.², Le Stum J.2 Martin G.3, Gidenne T.1
Niderkorn V., Martin C., Rochette Y., Julien S., Baumont R.
Chapter 20 Table of Contents Section 1 Species Interactions
Abiotic and biotic factors and
Community Ecology Chapter 54.
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
What is ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION?
What’s the relationship of diversity and productivity?
Why are there so many species?
Multi-Species Grazing
4.3 Succession.
Livestock & Wildlife Interactions
Literature Review ANSC 312 Grant Edwards.
Biodiversity.
Grazing Ecology and Management
Chapter 54: Community Ecology
Biodiversity.
April May April May June July July June August Sept August
Ecology and Sustainability
Day 15 – Biodiversity & Sustainability
Climate and Terrestrial Biodiversity
Measuring biodiversity
Intra-annual patch stability Inter-annual patch stability
Sustainable Grazed Pasture
Multi-Species Grazing
Presentation transcript:

Reduction of grazing intensity favours biodiversity as a result of increased pasture heterogeneity. There is a clear lack of data on the impact of grazing horses which differ by their digestive system and which strongly prefer short lawns. Mesophile grassland, central France (430m a.s.l.) Continuous grazing (April-November); horses were removed from pastures in August to prevent animals being limited in their intake in highly grazed plots. Liveweight change: 3horses/plot when animals entered and left their pastures Species richness and abundance:  This study ( ): Analysis of the effects of continuously grazing horses at a high or a moderate stocking rate (SR) on both animal performance and the diversity of vascular plants, ground beetles and grasshoppers in a hill-range pasture. Ménard et al J. Appl.Ecol. 39, ; Wallis de Vries et al Grass For. Sci. 62, ; Dumont et al Grass For. Sci. 64, Vascular plants (25 fixed 50×50cm quadrats/plot) ; June 2006 & Ground beetles (Carabidae) (18 pitfall traps/plot); each year in June - Grasshoppers (Orthoptera) (3 fixed 50×2m transects/plot); each year in July & Sept MATERIALS AND METHODS Moderate SR (1.1LU.ha -1 ) 3 saddle horses/2.7ha ×3 replicates High SR (1.8LU.ha -1 ) 5 saddle horses/2.7ha 1LU=600kg.ha -1 Stocking rateYear ModerateHighs.e.P s.e.P Gr. beetles Species richness NS28.3 a 18.7 c 16.7 c 23.5 b 0.02*** Log N individuals †2.18 a 2.17 a 1.87 b 2.10 a 0.06*** Short grassland (<10cm) NS1.13 a 0.96 a,b 0.49 c 0.71 b,c 0.18* Tall grassland (>10cm) * NS Table 1. Species richness and abundance of ground beetles (log N individuals / plot) and grasshoppers (log N+1 individuals / plot in July)  The reduction of SR did not affect horse performance per ha (April-July: 617g.ha -1.d- 1, Sept-Nov: 331g.ha -1.d -1 )  Plant species richness (28 species/plot) was unaffected by SR. The creation of relatively stable short patches by horses (Ménard et al. 2002) enabled legumes to compete with tall grasses: legume abundance increased under the high SR (0.042 to of plot area) while it remained stable (0.082 of plot area) under the moderate SR (SR×year p=0.024).  Species richness of ground-beetles and grasshoppers were unaffected by SR. Reduction in grazing intensity benefited ground beetles and grasshoppers, especially those species asociated with tall swards (Table 1). Consistent with observations made in ruminants (Wallis de Vries et al. 2007, Dumont et al. 2009)  greater number of ecological niches, higher availability of food resources, more favourable microclimate, lower levels of disturbance from livestock in moderately grazed pastures. NS not significant; † P<0.1; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 Within each row, mean values with different superscripts are significantly different at P<0.05 MATERIAL AND METHODS RESULTS & DISCUSSION Grasshoppers Species richness NS10.7 a 5.8 c 8.7 b 7.3 b,c 0.04*** Log N+1 individuals NS2.30 a 0.96 c 2.00 b 1.81 b 0.09*** Short grassland (<10cm) NS1.64 a 0.56 c 0.96 b 0.73 b,c 0.21*** Tall grassland (>10cm) *2.18 a 0.69 c 1.94 b 1.76 b 0.10*** How does stocking rate influence biodiversity in a hill-range pasture continuously grazed by horses? G. Fleurance 1,2, B. Dumont 2, A. Farruggia 2 1 IFCE, Arnac-Pompadour, France. 2 INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Theix, France.