CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 10 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 18, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-Answer Motions. 12(b)(1) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Should have been in state rather than federal court 12(b)(2) Personal Jurisdiction This court.
Advertisements

Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
How to Brief a Case Hawkins v. McGee.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 20 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 30, 2001.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 5 (9/4/01) SERVICE OF PROCESS Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
1 Agenda for 3rd Class Misc. –Nameplates out –Audio recordings –Model answers Finish up Service of Process Introduction to Motion to Dismiss Haddle History.
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2001 Class 6 September 6, 2001 Professor Fischer.
Amparo and Habeas Data Class 11 July Justice Azcuna’s annotation Contents of the Return. The section requires a detailed return. The detailed return.
Prof. Washington Civ. Pro. Spr. 06 PLEADINGS. PLEADINGS The pleading stage of litigation involves the complaint, the answer and pre-answer motions The.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 11 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 20, 2002.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation LAW-123 Introduction to Interviewing and Investigating.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Alaska Mock Trial Glossary of Terms. Laws Rules created by society to govern the behavior of people in society. Among other things, the laws are one formal.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 15 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 29, 2003.
 Is the most common response to a Complaint  Must be served within 30 days in California  Filed with the Court with a filing fee  Mailed to Plaintiff.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 9 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 20, 2001.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 12 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 2, 2001.
Tuesday, Aug. 26. Civil Procedure Law 102 Section 1.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 24 DISCOVERY V.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America September 30, 2005.
4-1 Chapter 4— Litigation REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2002 Class 8 September 13, 2002 Professor Fischer.
Chapter 5 The Court System
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
Tues. Oct. 29. venue in federal court Sec Venue generally (b) Venue in general.--A civil action may be brought in-- (1) a judicial district.
Wed., Oct. 15. venue in federal court Sec Venue generally (b) Venue in general.--A civil action may be brought in-- (1) a judicial district.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial. Introduction to Law, 4 th Edition Hames and Ekern © 2010 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
WHERE WE ARE Complaint Answer 12(b) Motions Amended Pleadings Pre-Trial Trial & Post-Trial Appeal Reply.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 16 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 2, 2002.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 15 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 26, 2005.
Justice Miers? §This morning at 8 a.m., President Bush announced he was nominating White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the United States Supreme Court.
Thurs. Nov. 1. waiver of defenses FRCP 12(g) Joining Motions. (1) Right to Join. A motion under this rule may be joined with any other motion allowed.
Mon. Sept. 10. service Rule 55. Default; Default Judgment (a) Entering a Default. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 33 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America November 7, 2005.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION F CLASS 13 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 21, 2005.
March 4, 2011 Civil Procedure.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 9 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 16, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 7 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 13, 2001.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 18 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 8, 2003.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 22 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 16, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 14 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 27, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 16 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 28, 2005.
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION F CLASS 13 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 26, 2003.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY II October 11, 2005.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 4 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION I – Federal Question Jurisdiction Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 CLASS 3 (8/29/03) STAGES AND ESSENTIAL CONCEPTS OF A CIVIL ACTION Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor.
Types of Courts Unit A Objective Dual Court System Federal Court System State Court System.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION F CLASS 22/23 DISCOVERY IV.
Wed., Sept. 10. service service when defendant is an individual.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
No-answer and Post-answer
Thurs., Aug. 29.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Tues., Oct. 22.
Tues., Sept. 9.
Thurs., Oct. 25.
Tues., Sept. 3.
Introduction to GAP Associate Program
Mon., Sept. 9.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Civil Pretrial Practice
The Canadian Legal System
Presentation transcript:

CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 10 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 18, 2002

WHAT WILL WE DO TODAY?  We will continue to discuss waiver and consolidation rules for Rule 12 defenses under Rule 12(g) and 12(h)  We will do a rule reading exercise  Next, we will discuss the pleading requirements for the Answer under the FRCP Rules 8(b) and c

HYPERTECHNICALISM  Are you being driven crazy by the superbly technical wording of Rules 12(g) and (h)  If so, I invite you to take up Glannon’s challenge and rewrite the rules in simpler language without changing their meaning.

ANOTHER HYPO  Jean brings an action in federal court against George for his statement that there is no relationship more important than that between the U.S. and Mexico. Jean’s complaint claims that this injures all Canadians. George makes a Rule 12(e) motion, which is granted. After Jean supplies further particulars, George makes a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Is the second motion procedurally permissible under the FRCP?

DANGER OF WAIVER  Certain Rule 12 defenses may be waived if party does not follow the requirements in Rule 12 (g) and (h)  THIS IS AN AREA WHERE IT IS EASY FOR LAWYERS TO MAKE MISTAKES WITH SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES, SO PAY ATTENTION CAREFULLY!

USE IT OR LOSE IT  FRCP Rule 12(g), 12(h)  Which types of 12(b) defenses can be waived? (see 12(h)(1) and (2))  How can a D lose the right to make these 12(b) defenses?  Are there any exceptions?  What is the purpose of the consolidation and waiver provisions?

Early Determination of 12(b) Defenses  See Rule 12(d)  Why do the FRCPs encourage the early determination of the 12(b) defenses?

ANOTHER HYPO  Pooh is served with a complaint in a federal civil action brought by Piglet. Pooh makes a pre-trial 12(b)(2) motion for lack of personal jurisdiction and loses. In preparing his Answer, Pooh wants to include a defense that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction. Please advise Pooh on whether he can include this defense in his Answer

THE ANSWER  What is an answer?

TIME LIMITS FOR ANSWER  When must D SERVE her answer?  When must D FILE her answer?

TIME LIMITS FOR ANSWER  When must D SERVE her answer? If formal service, 20 days from service of complaint/summons (12(a)(1)(A)); if waiver of service, 60 days from request if D in U.S. (12)(a)(1)(B))  When must D FILE her answer? Within a reasonable time of serving answer (5(d))

HOW DO YOU SERVE THE ANSWER?  See RULE 5(b)- mail service permitted or can hand deliver to attorney/party or can leave at attorney/party’s office w/someone in charge or at a conspicuous place, or, if no office, at party’s dwelling house with someone of suitable age and discretion  Must file certificate of service with court

What are D’s Options When Served With A Complaint?  (or waives service of complaint)

What are D’s Options When Served With a Complaint?  Don’t respond -- consequences?  Rule 12(b) pre-answer motion -12(b)(1)-(7)  Rule 12(e) motion  Answer with admissions & denials - 8(b)  Answer with admissions & denials and affirmative defenses - 8(b) and 8(c)

More Options  Counterclaims and cross-claims (FRCP 13)  Add additional D to counterclaim (13(h))  Impleading a Third Party (FRCP 14)  Whether to Claim a Jury Trial?

Pleading the Answer  Notice Pleading  “Short and plain” statement of D’s defense to each pleaded claim (8(b))  Respond by numbered paragraphs in the answer corresponding to numbered paragraphs in complaint (10(b))  Can be inconsistent in answer as well as complaint: 8(e)

3 PLEADING OPTIONS IN ANSWER  Admit  Deny  Deemed Deny

ADMISSIONS  8(b) - Can make specific admissions  8(d) - Anything not denied is deemed admitted - SO BE CAREFUL!  Exception - where an answer would subject a party to criminal charges, the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects him

DENIALS  8(b)- D need only deny allegations in the complaint that she actually disputes. It’s typical to deny entire paragraphs but that is not always appropriate - Zielinski case  Specific Denial - deny particular portion of a claim  General Denial - deny each and every averment of Complaint  8(d) - Anything not denied is deemed admitted - SO BE CAREFUL!!

DEEMED DENIALS  Effect of pleading that D is “without knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment”.  How much inquiry must a D make prior to pleading a deemed denial? See Greenbaum v. U.S.; Controlled Environment Systems v. Sun Process

Greenbaum v. U.S.  What was substantive dispute?  What was the procedural issue?  How did the E.D. Pa. Resolve this procedural issue?  Didn’t court disregard anti-waiver provision of 12(h)(3)?

Controlled Environment Systems v. Sun Process Co., Inc.  What was the problem with the plaintiff’s pleading in para. 10 of the answer to counterclaim?

DEEMED DENIALS  1. One can lack knowledge but still have enough information to form a belief under 8(b)  2. The phrase “on information and belief” is generally accepted but is not recognized as a denial by 8(b)

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES  Some defenses must be affirmatively pleaded under 8c  1. ENUMERATED: E.g. contributory negligence, fraud, res judicata  2. UNENUMERATED: Also “any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense”  CONCEPT: Is D relying on some new facts that would come as a surprise at trial?

UNENUMERATED AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES  How does the D know if something is an affirmative defense or not?

UNENUMERATED AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES  How does the D know if something is an affirmative defense or not?  Research - there may be relevant court opinions  D may be able to construe statutes to discern whether language gives rise to affirmative defenses

CONSEQUENCE OF FAILING TO PLEAD AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE  What happens if D fails to plead an affirmative defense?

CONSEQUENCE OF FAILING TO PLEAD AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE  The defense will be waived, unless the court allows amendment  In determining waiver, courts will examine:  1. whether P had knowledge of the facts  2. Prejudice to P resulting from failure to plead  If wrongly plead as counterclaim, court will relabel as affirmative defense

BURDEN OF PROOF FOR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES  Who bears the burden to prove an affirmative defense?

BURDEN OF PROOF FOR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES  Party raising the affirmative defense must prove it at trial  NOTE THAT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES SHIFT THE BURDEN OF PROOF ON THAT DEFENSE

RESPONDING TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES  How should plaintiff respond to an affirmative defense?

RESPONDING TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES  All affirmative defenses are AUTOMATICALLY DENIED under 8(d). No response is required.