Framework for DWDM interface Management and Control draft-kdkgall-ccamp-dwdm-if-mng-ctrl-fwk-01 Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom Gabriele Galimberti Cisco.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Seamless IP Optical Network Integration OIF Interoperability Update Amy Wang, Avici Systems.
Advertisements

Page th IETF – Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 WSON Signal Characteristics and Network Element Compatibility Constraints for GMPLS Greg
76th IETF – Hiroshima, Japan, November 2009 PCEP Requirements for WSON Impairments Young Huawei Greg
A Framework for Management and Control of Optical Interfaces supporting G draft-kunze-g management-control-framework-00 Ruediger Kunze Manuel.
Page th IETF – Stockholm, July 2009 A Framework for the Control and Measurement of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) with Impairments.
Page th IETF – Beijing, November 2010 A Framework for the Control and Measurement of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) with Impairments.
Application-Based Network Operations (ABNO) IETF 88 – SDN RG
Problem Statement and Architecture for Information Exchange Between Interconnected Traffic Engineered Networks draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-03.txt.
LMP G parameters draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g lmp-09.txt Gabriele Galimberti Cisco Systems Zafar Ali Cisco Systems Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom.
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
Gap Analysis of Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions (SUPA) Presenter: Jun Bi draft-bi-supa-gap-analysis-02 IETF 92 SUPA BoF Dallas, TX March 23, 2015.
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
Extension to the Link Management Protocol (LMP/DWDM - rfc4209) for Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Optical Line Systems draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g lmp-05.txt.
Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN) BoF
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
Draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g lmp-00  Dharini Hiremagalur; Ruediger Kunze; Gert Grammel; Gabriele Galimberti; Manuel Paul; John Drake.
A Framework for Management and Control of Optical Interfaces supporting G draft-kunze-g management-control-framework-02 March rd IETF.
Page th IETF – Dublin, Ireland, July 2008 Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) Greg
Network Architecture and Protocol Concepts. Network Architectures (1) The network provides one or more communication services to applications –A service.
Interoperable Intelligent Optical Networking: Key to future network services and applications OIF Carrier Group Interoperability: Key issue for carriers.
TERENA Networking Conference 2004, Rhodes, Greece, June Differentiated Optical Services and Optical SLAs Afrodite Sevasti Greek Research and.
Framework for Black Link Management and Control draft-kunze-black-link-management-framework-00 Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom March th IETF Prague1.
Intorduction to Lumentis
OPTICALINTERNETWORKINGFORUM OIF Technical Committee and Its Activities Joe Berthold, Ciena, Technical Committee Chair.
SNMP MIBs to manage G parameters for Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Optical Line Systems draft-galikunze-ccamp-g snmp-mib-06.txt.
1 Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-02 CCAMP WG, IETF 86 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
Page rd IETF – Minneapolis, MN, November 2008 A Framework for the Control and Measurement of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) with Impairments.
Page 1 OIF worldwide interoperability demonstrations on ASON inter-domain interfaces A carrier’s point of view Hans-Martin Foisel Deutsche Telekom OIF.
Page th IETF – San Francisco, CA, March 2009 A Framework for the Control and Measurement of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) with Impairments.
Models to manage G parameters 1.draft-galikunze-ccamp-g snmp-mib-09.txt 2.draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g lmp-08.txt 3.draft-dharini-netmod-g yang-01.txt.
William Stallings Data and Computer Communications
Models to manage G parameters draft-galikunze-ccamp-g snmp-mib-11.txt Gabriele Galimberti Cisco Systems Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom Lam,
Contribution Number: oif Working Group: Architecture & Signaling Title: Project proposal for interworking of G RFC 3473 network domains.
GRNET: owned fiber in South East Europe ready for e2e lamda services (via GEANT2) Chrysostomos Tziouvaras MSc. GRNET Broadband Infrastructures Development.
1 MPLS: Progress in the IETF Yakov Rekhter
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-signaling-02.txt Greg BernsteinGrotto Networking Young LeeHuawei.
Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks Greg
Extension to the Link Management Protocol (LMP/DWDM - rfc4209) for Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Optical Line Systems draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g lmp-02.txt.
Models to manage G parameters draft-dharini-netmod-g yang-03.txt Gabriele Galimberti Cisco Systems Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom Lam, Hing-Kam.
Dissuasion, Working Group Scope and Deliverables Lou Berger Pat Thaler
SNMP MIBs to manage G parameters draft-galikunze-ccamp-g snmp-mib-00.txt Former draft-galimbe-kunze-g snmp-mib-02.txt Gabriele Galimberti.
Extension to the Link Management Protocol (LMP/DWDM - rfc4209) for Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Optical Line Systems draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g lmp-07.txt.
SNMP MIBs to manage Black Links networks draft-galimbe-kunze-black-link-mib-00.txt Gabriele Galimberti Cisco Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom March 2011.
Interdomain Multicast BCP Draft IETF 84 Vancouver, BC Robert Sayko
1 73th IETF, CCAMP WG, Minneapolis, MN, USA November 2008 A Framework for defining Optical Parameters to be used in WSON Networks draft-martinelli-ccamp-opt-imp-fwk-00.txt.
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
A YANG model to manage the optical optical parameters for in a WDM network draft-galimbe-ccamp-iv-yang-00 Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom Gabriele Galimberti.
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
Models to manage DWDM interface parameters draft-galikunze-ccamp-dwdm-if-snmp-mib-00.txt Gabriele Galimberti Cisco Systems Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom.
OSI Model OSI MODEL. Communication Architecture Strategy for connecting host computers and other communicating equipment. Defines necessary elements for.
OSI Model OSI MODEL.
Problem Statement Controlling pre-standard coherent Optical Interfaces
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
SNMP MIBs to manage G parameters
draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g lmp-10
A Framework for the Control and Measurement of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) with Impairments
SNMP MIBs to manage G parameters
IETF 78th Maastricht, Netherlands, July 2010
73rd IETF – Minneapolis, MN, November 2008
draft-dharini-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-00
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
draft-dharinigert-ccamp-dwdm-if-lmp-06
Framework for DWDM interface Management and Control
Framework for DWDM interface Management and Control
YANG data model for Flexi-Grid Optical Networks
OSI Model OSI MODEL.
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
draft-dharinigert-ccamp-dwdm-if-lmp-07
YANG data model for Flexi-Grid Optical Networks
draft-ggalimbe-ccamp-flex-if-lmp-07
Presentation transcript:

Framework for DWDM interface Management and Control draft-kdkgall-ccamp-dwdm-if-mng-ctrl-fwk-01 Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom Gabriele Galimberti Cisco Systems Gert Grammel Juniper Networks Dieter Beller Alcatel Lucent November 2015 IETF 94 - Yokohama1

Introduction Black Link: The Black Link approach [ITU-T G.698.2] allows supporting an optical transmitter/receiver pair of one or different vendors to inject a DWDM channel and run it over an optical network composed of amplifiers, filters, add-drop multiplexers from a different vendor. We would like to extend the parameters list used to manage the DWDM interfaces. November 2015 IETF 94 - Yokohama2

Motivation The Problem: State-of-the-art is to interconnect Routers via standard grey interfaces to proprietary Transponder equipment hosted by the ROADM/DWDM When DWDM interfaces are fitted outside the DWDM network, – Transponders and DWDM equipment may be implemented by different vendors, so there is a need for a common parameter base – the network and the terminal equipment need at least to exchange Interface characteristics, operational state and verify the inter-layer connectivity quality. To control the multivendor packet-optical networks requires a common network model November 2015 IETF 94 - Yokohama3

Document Scope The purpose is to identify the necessary information elements and processes for the given Architecture. This document describes use cases and requirements for the control and management of optical interfaces parameters Give requirements for the drafts: – draft-dharinigert-ccamp-dwdm-if-lmp – draft-dharini-netmod-dwdm-if-yang – draft-galikunze-ccamp-dwdm-if-snmp-mib The focus is on automating the network provisioning process irrespective on how it is triggered This document covers management and control plane aspects for single channel DWDM interfaces November 2015 IETF 94 - Yokohama4

Solution initially in scope. NMS IP Netconf Client EMS – Element Management System NMS – Network Management System November 2015 IETF 94 - Yokohama5 NMS Optics

Key Requirements This document covers management and control plane considerations to control single channel DWDM interfaces. Specification of solutions ensuring an interoperable management of multivendor deployments for 10G, 40G, 100G and beyond. The Management or Control planes of the Client and DWDM network must know the parameters of the Interfaces to properly set the optical link. Not in scope: – Optical Routing and Wavelength assignment based on WSON – wavelength ordering process and the process how to determine the demand for a new wavelength from A to Z based on WSON Note that the Control and Management Planes are considered two separate entities that are handling the same information in different ways. November 2015 IETF 94 - Yokohama6

Next Steps Requesting Working Group feedback Progressing work on Use Case section and on Requirements Extend solution section if there are further approaches Coordinate with partner-drafts covering protocol implementations November 2015 IETF 94 - Yokohama7