Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Management of Drainage Water in Illinois
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico Spring 2013.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Water Quality Concerns in Ohio Waters What has been Happening in Lake Erie? Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems.
IPM in NRCS Programs Joe Bagdon USDA - NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)
Iowa P-Index Relationship to Feedlots Steve Brinkman CCA Nutrient Management Specialist USDA / NRCS
Impacts of Climate Change in Agriculture and Possible Adaptations in Atlantic Canada Jean-Louis Daigle, Executive Director Gordon Fairchild, Ph.D., P.Ag.,
Economic Concepts Related to Appraisal II. Outline What is meant by economics Sustainable agriculture What are the basic issues related to appraisal Example.
Lecture #3 Ways We Use and Abuse Soil & Other Ag Resources
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
GREEN BUILDING.
Economic and Biophysical Models to Support Conservation Policy: Hypoxia and Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CARD Resources and Environmental.
Crop Farming and Sustainability The good and the bad.
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
Environment and Natural Resources Stewardship: Opportunities and Issues Jim Pease and Matt Helmers.
United States Department of Agriculture Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative Illinois River and Eucha-Spavinaw Watershed Initiative Bayou.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
1 RUSLE 2 Wisconsin Website da.gov/technical/cons plan/rusle Judy Derricks-WI RUSLE2 MANAGER.
World Resources Institute. Hypoxia: What is it? What causes It? The Dead Zone > Seasonally oxygen depleted zone in the Gulf of Mexico > Mobile aquatic.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
PARTNERSHIP EFFORT WITH AGRICULTURE AND MINNESOTA PRODUCERS 2014 Drainage Water Management Initiative.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
Spatial mapping as a tool for mainstreaming biodiversity values Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Agriculture’s Role in Climate Change Mitigation July 18, 2007 (revised) Daniel A. Lashof, Ph.D. Science Director Climate Center Natural Resources Defense.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
BMP CHALLENGE Experience: Cannon River Watershed Partnership Information provided by: Dave Legvold Executive Director Cannon River Watershed Partnership.
Soil Erosion Soil erosion is the movement of soil components from one place to another, usually from wind or water. Plant anchor the soil so that it is.
“AerWay No Till on Highly Erodible Lands” July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2012 Capital RC&D Council Hammond, La.
Cover crop economics: estimating a return on investment Liz Juchems and Jamie Benning.
Slide 1 Robert Kellogg NRCS, Beltsville Results and Lessons Learned on Regional/National Modeling Efforts: Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP)
Sediment & Nutrient Management in the L’Anguille River Watershed St. Francis County Cost Share Project Patricia Perry St. Francis County Conservation.
An Overview of Air, Water & Soil in Agriculture Barbara McCarthy, Ph.D. Environmental Health Department Colorado State University.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Private Lands Voluntary Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin Vicki Anderson Great Lakes Coordinator.
Lesson 1 Identifying Environmental and Economic Impacts from Soil Erosion.
USDA’s Inventory & Improvements Marci Baranski, PhD USDA Office of the Chief Economist Climate Change Program Office.
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Conservation Tillage and Wildlife Modified by the GA Agriculture Education Curriculum Office July 2002.
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico James Gillespie.
Taking on the Challenge Addressing Sustainability and Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Goals Caroline Wade, Nutrient Watershed Manager Illinois Corn Growers.
Biofuel and the Environment: Opportunities and Risks Joe Fargione The Nature Conservancy.
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Warm-Up Review What are the 5 components in soil?
Costs and Environmental Gains from Conservation Programs
Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao
Mountain Building The study of erosion and its effects on mountains
Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
VOLUNTARY CONSERVATION- WORKING? STRENGTHEN PARTNERSHIPS?
Soil Carbon Sequestration and Other Soil Ecosystem Service
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project

What CEAP Reveals ― Overview of the Upper Mississippi Basin Slide 2  Conservation practices work  Comprehensive planning is needed because suites of practices work better than single practices  Targeting critical acres improves effectiveness significantly  The most critical conservation issue is reducing the loss of nutrients, especially nitrogen

Slide 3 What CEAP Reveals ― Conservation Practices Work Protected SoilUnprotected Soil Compared to no conservation practices: Sediment loss reduced by 69 % Total phosphorous loss reduced by 49 % Total nitrogen loss reduced by 18 % Pesticide risks to human health reduced by 48 %

Slide 4 What CEAP Reveals ― Comprehensive Planning is Needed Surface nitrogen losses reduced by 46 % BUT subsurface losses are reduced by only 5 % Without nutrient practices, erosion control practices can increase subsurface nitrogen losses

Slide 5 What CEAP Reveals ― Significant Progress Made in Reducing Erosion and Sedimentation 45 % of the cropland and 72 % of Highly Erodible land has structural practices 95 % of the cropland has reduced tillage, 71 % is no-till or mulch till Edge of field sediment loss reduced by 69 % In-stream sediment reduced by 37 %

Slide 6 What CEAP Reveals ― Progress Has Been Made, but Opportunities Exist to Expand Nutrient Management Phosphorus losses have been reduced by 49 % but nitrogen losses have been reduced only by 18 % About 60 % of the cropland needs nutrient management, but much can be done. Examples: Timing ─ Nitrogen is fall-applied on 45 % of the cropland acres Rate ─ Nitrogen is applied at rates greater than 1.4 times removal at harvest on 66 % of the cropland Method ─ Nitrogen is not soil incorporated, banded, or foliar/spot treated on 44 % of cropland acres

What CEAP Reveals ― Conservation Practices Reduce Pesticide Risks Significantly Slide 7 Pesticide risks to human health are very low ─ on average, only 1 % to 2 % of the pesticides applied are leaving fields Conservation practices have reduced the pesticide threats to human health by 48% Much can be done to further reduce pesticide losses: Rotations, Scouting, Precision Application

Slide 8 What CEAP Reveals ― Cropland is Gaining Organic Carbon Cropland in the Upper Mississippi Basin sequesters about 7.5 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO 2 e) annually This offsets the combustion of 0.75 billion gallons of gasoline, enough gasoline to power about 1.3 million cars for one year The average cropland acre, with existing conservation, has an annual net gain of 259 pounds of CO 2 e 5 % of the cropland is losing greater than 670 pounds of CO 2 e 5 % of the cropland is gaining more than 1,000 pounds of CO 2 e Erosion control practices can significantly increase sequestration rates by reducing losses of organic matter due to erosion.

Slide 9 What CEAP Reveals ― Targeting Conservation Increases its Impact Targeting the most critical acres, compared to acres that have limited needs, increases practice effectiveness per acre: Over 5 times in reducing sediment Over 4 times in reducing total Nitrogen Over 3 times in reducing total Phosphorus The CEAP report is the beginning, additional information is needed for implementation: Soil leaching and run-off vulnerability maps Small watershed modeling Stakeholders’ input Water quality monitoring data

Slide 10 So What? Voluntary, incentive-based conservation works. Reduced tillage is used on 95 % of the cropland - sediment losses reduced 69 %. Nutrient management is the greatest need. Much can be done through expanded adoption of existing practices. Targeting can greatly enhance program effectiveness. Treating the most critical acres can have 3 to 5 times the benefit of treating acres with less serious problems. Comprehensive conservation planning is essential. Suites of practices that address multiple resource concerns are more effective than single practices.

Slide 11