HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

Expected performance in the injectors at 25 ns without and with LINAC4 Giovanni Rumolo, Hannes Bartosik and Adrian Oeftiger Acknowledgements: G. Arduini,
Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
Muon Coalescing 101 Chuck Ankenbrandt Chandra Bhat Milorad Popovic Fermilab NFMCC IIT March 14, 2006.
Catalina Island Meeting May, Proton Drivers for Neutrino Factories: The CERN Approach Presented by B. Autin, CERN.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Status of the PSB 2 GeV Upgrade and the RCS Study SGUI Meeting B. Mikulec, 07 July 2011.
22/03/1999A.Blas1 Hollow bunches A. Blas, S. Hancock, S. Koscielniak, M. Lindroos, F. Pedersen, H. Schonauer  Why: to improve space charge related problems.
Moriond 2003M. Benedikt, S. Hancock Injection and Accumulation in a High Energy Ion Storage Ring Michael Benedikt, Steven Hancock AB Division, CERN.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
F 1 MW Proton Beam for Neutrinos Dave McGinnis AAC Meeting May 10, 2006.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
0 1 Alternative Options in the Injectors – Preliminary Summary H. Damerau LIU-TM#8 18 October 2013 Many thanks for discussions and input to T. Argyropoulos,
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
MTE vs CT D.Manglunki for BE/OP - pictures from M.Giovannozzi - details in “Fifty years of the CERN Proton Synchrotron (Vol I)” CERN
Injection Energy Review D. Schulte. Introduction Will review the injection energy So could answer the following questions: Which injection energy can.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Lecture17(Course Summary).PPT - E. Wilson - 3/3/ Slide 1 COURSE SUMMARY A Design Study of a Compressor ring for A Neutrino Factory MT 2009 E. J.
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Longitudinal Painting S. Hancock p.p. G. Feldbauer.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
High Intensity Beams in Existing Accelerators for CN2PY: SPS studies, PS issues E. Shaposhnikova Laguna-LBNO General Meeting CERN, Acknowledgments:
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
Beam Manufacture in PS2 M. Benedikt, S. Hancock. LHC Beams in the PS by 2015 Typeh injε l inj [evs] h ejN bunch ej RF ej [MHz] ε l ej [evs] τ ej [ns]
Towards a Common Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Impact of the current debuncher limitations (…can we get rid of longitudinal painting?)
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Other Scenarios for a partial Upgrade of the Injector Complex C
Elena Wildner CERN CA15139 Meeting, Sofia 15/
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
New AD Production Beam in the PSB
Multiturn extraction for PS2
FCC-hh injection group 7
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV
A Design Study of a Compressor ring for
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring
Generation of Higher Brightness Beams for LHC
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Injection design of CEPC
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team

Layout -Reflexion on Machine circumference -Acceleration for LAGUNA Beam -Acceleration for LHC/FT beams A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Layout -Reflexion on Machine circumference -Acceleration for LAGUNA Beam -Acceleration for LHC/FT beams A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

The HP-PS is a machine designed for high intensity beams for neutrinos production. However, due to high cost of such a machine and present budget restrictions, one good way to see our project accepted, consists, for the accelerator part, on designing a flexible machine. Applied to the CERN accelerator complex, a flexible machine would be able to accelerate both LAGUNA beams and CERN beams (LHC and Fixed-Target beams). That’s why we decided to modify the HP-PS in order to improve it’s flexibility. Introduction A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

LHC SPS PS PSB Experiments & Test Beams LINAC 4 LP - SPL CN2PY Target 2 MW HP-PS 2 Hz 1 Hz 160 MeV 4 GeV 50 / 75 GeV Inj. / Extr. Collimation Acceleration 3-fold Symmetry Basic scenario for CERN Complex with HP-PS A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

LHC SPS PS PSB LINAC 4 LP - SPL CN2PY Target 2 MW HP-PS 2 Hz 1 Hz 160 MeV 4 GeV 50 / 75 GeV Inj. / Extr. Collimation Acceleration 3-fold Symmetry New possible scenario for CERN Complex with HP-PS A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 LHC / FT beams

HP-PS as injector for SPS In order to allow good beam transfer between HP-PS and SPS, ring must be synchronized. It is achieved by adjusting the size of the HP-PS. Circumference ratio between HP-PS and SPS must be a integer, or a ratio of integer. Present ratio : C SPS / C HPPS = possible solutions matching requirements are close to the present ratio : C SPS / C HPPS = 6and C SPS / C HPPS = 5.5 Ratio of 6 implies a circumference diminution of ~20m. This is not reasonably sustainable due to constraints on magnets strengths. Ratio of 5.5 has been chosen. A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

HP-PS beam structureLAGUNA beam RF harmonic 168 – 25 ns bunch spacing – 157 bunches – 11 empty buckets as extraction kicker gap (275 ns gap for 250 ns rise time) Batch length at extraction is μs This is the beam structure to the target (and if required the SPS for LHC) 157 bunches 11 empty buckets T rev (extr.) = μs 275 ns 8 A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

HP-PS to SPS for LHC Bunch to bucket transfer with 25 ns bunch spacing – 157, 314, 471, 628, 785 bunches for 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 batches SPS injection kicker rise time dominates HP-PS extraction kicker rise time – Inter-batch gap 500 ns (SPS) – Up to 5 batches can be transferred to SPS SPS extraction kicker gap of 975 ns sufficient for 950 ns rise time. – Kicker flat top length to be checked – Impact of LHC filling scheme with 500 ns gaps to be checked. Batch 1 Batch 2 Batch 3 Batch 4 Batch 5 SPS T rev = μs μs 975 ns Up to 5 HP-PS fast extractions 500 ns 9 A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

HP-PS to SPS for FT with 5–turn bunched MTE Bunch to bucket transfer with 25 ns bunch spacing, using 5-turn MTE – 5 x 157 = 785 bunches (out of 4620 SPS buckets => 175 occupation) HP-PS MTE fast bump gap assumed identical to extraction kicker rise time. 5-turn MTE can be transferred to SPS – One single SPS injection kick with flat op length of 21 μs SPS extraction: – In case of FE the kicker gap of μs is largely enough for the 950ns kicker rise time – In case of SE the beam will be de-bunched, filling all the gaps and no extraction kicker gap needed. Turn 1 Turn 2 Turn 3 Turn 4 Turn 5 SPS T rev = μs μs 2.375μs 1 HP-PS cycle 275 ns 10 A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

HP-PS to SPS for FT with 5–turn de-bunched MTE Beam de-bunched in HP-PS prior to 5 turn MTE extraction – (5 x 3.917) μs occupied for μs in total  84.5% bucket occupation HP-PS MTE fast bump gap assumed identical to extraction kicker rise time. 5-turn MTE can be transferred to SPS – One single SPS injection kick with flat top length of 21 μs. SPS extraction: – In case of FE the kicker gap of μs is largely enough for the 950ns kicker rise time – In case of SE the beam will be de-bunched, filling all the gaps and no extraction kicker gap needed. Turn 1 Turn 2 Turn 3 Turn 4 Turn 5 SPS T rev = μs μs 2.375μs 1 HP-PS cycle 275 ns 11 A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Layout -Reflexion on Machine circumference -Acceleration for LAGUNA Beam -Acceleration for LHC/FT beams A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Beam for LAGUNA : stability After calculation the longitudinal emittance must be increased up to 1 eV.s in order to maintain Threshold value above space charge impedance. A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Beam for LAGUNA : Voltage Voltage has been recalculated using fixed filling factor of 0.9 in momentum and a longitudinal emittance of 1.0 eV.s with new magnetic field. 2.1 T 0.19 T A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Beam for LAGUNA : Bunch / bucket properties Bunch length during acceleration Beam and bucket momentum spread during acceleration. A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Beam for LAGUNA : transition gamma All previous calculations have been done taking into account same transition gamma than for present design. Due to high intensity and high transition gamma, the longitudinal emittance which maintain beam stable is much higher than PS2, leading to high voltage. One way to decrease this emittance (thus maximum voltage) would be to “play” with transition gamma. A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Layout -Reflexion on Machine circumference -Acceleration for LAGUNA Beam -Acceleration for LHC/FT beams A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Beam for SPS : constraints -Longitudinal emittance of 0.5 eV.s -Maximum bunch length at extraction 4 ns -Maximum intensity 2.5*10 11 pppb A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Beam for SPS : Voltage with bunch compression 455 kV 4 ns 0.5 eV.s A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Beam for SPS : transition gamma As for LAGUNA beam calculations have been made for I transition gamma. It is thus possible to calculate the admissible intensity as a function of transition gamma. A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13

Conclusion -A new HP-PS with improved compatibility with CERN complex is under design -Work on collective effects is on progress -Check on RF cavities performances is on progress