Thursday, March 1, 2016. Agenda Status of Post Count Process Common Issues/Errors HMIS data Non-WISP data HIC Deduplication Impact of Service Based Counting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 HUD Data Standards. New & Active Clients All ESG, CoC and SSVF funded agencies are required to begin collecting data on new and active clients based.
Advertisements

2012 Point-In-Time Count (PIT), Housing Inventory Chart (HIC), and a Tool for Determining Unmet Need Utah State Community Services Office May 9, 2012.
Point In Time Count: Focus, Feedback and Planning Cathy ten Broeke, Director, MN Office to Prevent and End Homelessness Amy Stetzel, Project Manager, MN.
Carrie Poser – Starting Points Adam Smith – Division of Housing May 2012.
2014 H OUSING I NVENTORY C OUNT (HIC): W HAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ! J ANUARY 14, 2013.
SERVICEPOINT 4.0 The importance of Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) and Entering Children into a household By NH-HMIS.
HOW TO MAKE HOMELESS POINT-IN-TIME (PIT) COUNT MORE SUCCESSFUL The Second Annual Nebraska-Western Iowa Symposium on Homelessness Homeless in the Heartland.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
General HMIS Resources Housing Inventory Count (HIC) And VA Programs.
OCTOBER 24, 2012 PRESENTED BY RENEE LAMBERJACK, RESEARCH & EVALUATION ASSISTANT Annual Homeless Assessment Report Presentation to Safe Harbors Partners.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Webinar Series SSVF and the 2014 HMIS Data Standards 9/24/2014 Audio can be accessed through the following.
July 22, Agenda Review Night of Count – dates & times Review Geography – locations Survey Tool Post Count Process, requirements, deadline Data Collection.
Housing Inventory Chart (HIC) Point-In-Time (PIT) Service Point (WISP) Created by: Institute for Community Alliances (ICA) Revised: January 2015.
June 25, Agenda Status of PIT methodology Night of Count – dates & times Geography – locations Survey Tool Post Count Process, requirements, deadline.
Nutmegit.com Provided by: P W HMIS DATA COORDINATOR MEETING February 2013.
Annual Point-in-Time Count of Homelessness in Vermont January 30, 2013 TRAINING GUIDE.
Nutmegit.com Provided by: P W HMIS DATA COORDINATOR MEETING May 2013.
AHAR (2014) Orientation Michigan Statewide Homeless Management Information System Overview of the Data Collection and Submission Process for the Annual.
1 The Point in Time Enumeration Process in Washington, D.C. Darlene Mathews The Community Partnership for the Prevention of Homelessness
Think Change Be Change Lead Change CT PIT 2013 Program Staff Training January 2013 Training PowerPoint Provided by CCEH CT Coalition to End Homelessness.
2014 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS) Data Standards for ESG Presented by Melissa Mikel September
Conducting Better Point-in-Time Counts of Homeless Persons Erin Wilson Abt Associates Inc. Washington, DC July 9, 2007.
2015 POINT IN TIME & HIC. Sheltered PIT Data 2015 People in Households with Children.
It’s Not Just Numbers: Implementing Point-in-Time Counts, Using HMIS, and Ensuring Data Accuracy Erin Wilson, Abt Associates Inc. Julie Eberbach, Iowa.
Think Change Be Change Lead Change CT PIT 2014 Permanent Housing Project Training January 2014 Training PowerPoint Provided by CCEH CT Coalition to End.
Think Change Be Change Lead Change CT PIT 2014 Emergency Shelter Project Staff Training January 2014 Training PowerPoint Provided by CCEH CT Coalition.
Thursday, September 3, Agenda Status of Post Count Process Common Issues/Errors HMIS data Non-WISP data HIC Deduplication Impact of Service Based.
System Performance Measures WIBOSCOC Data Committee: CoC Workgroup August 2015.
Data and Evaluation Workgroup 9/10/2015 | 8:30-10:30am| Chinook 115.
Revised HMIS Data Standards: with a focus on Chronic Homeless Status and Project Specific Data Elements Thursday, September 31.
Carrie Poser – Division of Housing Adam Smith – Division of Housing Revised January 2013.
Think Change Be Change Lead Change CT PIT 2014 Transitional Housing Project Training January 2014 Training PowerPoint Provided by CCEH CT Coalition to.
December 22, Agenda Purpose of the PIT Count Results from past counts Status of PIT Methodology Organization of the PIT Count Night of the Count.
Prepared by Abt Associates for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development The First Annual Homeless Assessment Report.
January 14, Agenda Non-WISP Overview Data Collection – Sheltered count Non-WISP Form – Definitions & Explanations Data Collection – Unsheltered.
2016 St. Johns County Point In Time Count When: Thursday, January 28, 2016.
January 11, Agenda Survey collection: interview & observation Review service based count process Data Collection Requirement Sheltered count and.
HMIS and PSH: Receiving Referrals from the One List Ending Veteran Homelessness Initiative.
Housing Inventory Chart (HIC) Point-In-Time (PIT) Service Point (WISP) Carrie Poser – Balance of State COC Coordinator Revised: January 2016.
2015 POINT IN TIME & HIC. Homeless Survey Sectors.
HMIS Data Quality Training 211 Orange County. Learning Objective This training is scheduled for 2 hours. Objective 1.Teach users how to find deficiencies.
Working with the WISP & Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 21, 2016.
Balance of State Coordinated Entry List Holder Training Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator Jesse Dirkman, ICA March 10, 2016.
Agency Technical Administrator (ATA) Team Meeting March 29 th.
Systems Change Modeling Scenarios for System-Wide Change For Consideration in HEARTH Performance Measure Goal-Setting Jenny Helbraun Abramson Sonoma County.
Managing the Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 27, 2016.
PIT/HIC Data Entry and Reporting
Point In Time, 2017 CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR
2017 Housing Inventory Count Webinar
2017 Housing Inventory Count Webinar
Point in Time Count/Housing Inventory Count Presentation
Balance of State Non-WISP Point in Time Training
AHAR (2016) Orientation Michigan Statewide Homeless Management Information System Overview of the Data Collection and Submission Process for the Annual.
Detroit Continuum of Care (CoC) 2017 HIC and PIT Count
2017 HIC & PIT January 26, 2017.
Point In Time, 2017 CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR
2017 Point in time & HIC.
Lake County Homeless Needs Assessment
Point-in-Time January 24, 2017
GoTo Webinar All attendees muted
2018 Point in time & HIC.
2017 State of Homelessness.
2018 Point in time (PIT) & Housing Inventory Count (HIC)
Shelter Count Training
Annual Homeless Point-in-Time & Housing Inventory Count
PIT Q&A Session.
Point in Time Count/Housing Inventory Count Presentation
Point In Time, 2017 CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR
Point in Time Count & Housing Inventory Count Final Report 2018
TPCH Sheltered & Unsheltered PIT 5 Year Review
Presentation transcript:

Thursday, March 1, 2016

Agenda Status of Post Count Process Common Issues/Errors HMIS data Non-WISP data HIC Deduplication Impact of Service Based Counting Impact of Observation Next Deadline

Status of the Post-PIT Data Collection Process 4 of the 21 Continua have successfully completed the Data Collection Process. What does that mean? HMIS numbers match what is reported on the HIC for agencies using HMIS. Non-WISP numbers match what is reported on the HIC for agencies not using HMIS. Both HMIS and Non-WISP unsheltered persons are reported on the deduplication chart. HMIS data 14 of the 21 continua have errors, HIC and HMIS do not match. Non-WISP data 14 of the 21 continua have errors, HIC and Non-WISP do not match. Housing Inventory Chart (HIC) 1 of the 21 continua have errors with RRH. 2 of the 21 continua have errors with >100% utilization 8 of the 21 continua has a different HIC related error (i.e. completing new columns on the HIC) Deduplication 9 of the 21 continua have errors, HMIS and/or Non-WISP unsheltered persons do not match with chart.

Housing Inventory Chart (HIC) & HMIS On the HIC, there are two types of projects: those that use HMIS those that do not use HMIS On the HIC: If a project uses HMIS, information should be written in Column C & D. If a project does not use HMIS, nothing should be written in Column C & D.

For the HMIS agencies, Column AF (Total PIT) should be compared to the PIT report run out of ART. (either 0628 for PSH/RRH or 0630 for ES or TH) Report: Permanent Supportive Housing and Rapid Re-housing 0630 Report: Emergency Shelter, Safe Haven, and Transitional Housing

For the Non-WISP agencies, the numbers for the HIC come from the Non-WISP PIT form. Column AG (unaccompanied children only) – this corresponds directly with the “Unacc. Youth” tab. Column AH (singles) – this corresponds directly with the “individual” tab. Column AI (persons in families) – this corresponds directly with the “Families” tab.

Non-WISP PIT Form On the Non-WISP PIT form, there are 4 columns on each tab. Emergency Shelter (ES) Transitional Housing (TH) Unsheltered Total The numbers that translate over to the HIC are found in row 6 – Total Number of Persons in Household in the ES column & TH columns ONLY. Unsheltered – does not go on the HIC

Double Check Your Math Using the HIC, group up the HMIS and Non-HMIS agencies. By hiding the rows for agencies using HMIS, you will be able to add up the total number of unacc. Youth, singles, & persons in families reported on the HIC with the totals listed on the Non-WISP PIT form. To hide a column, right click the column number on the HIC. Then, make sure you are looking at the right row on the Non-WISP PIT form = Row 6 “Total Number of Persons in Household.”

Common Issues and Errors – HIC & HMIS If the 5 projects on the HIC have reported numbers, but the ART report only shows 4 projects. The numbers that do show up on the ART report do not match what was reported on the HIC. Example: 9 people in families, but the provider on the HIC shows 10 people (3 singles & 7 in families).

Data Completeness Issues In both the 0630 and 0628 ART reports, there is a tab dedicated to Client Detail. This tab allows you to see the actual answers included in the PIT. Each agency is responsible for ensuring their data is completed and correct.

Common Issues and Errors – Non-HMIS Non-WISP PIT form: families tab and emergency shelter column equals the total number of people served in emergency shelter projects not reported in HMIS and reported in Column AI (persons in families). Non-WISP PIT form: families tab and transitional housing column equals the total number of people served in transitional housing projects not reporting in HMIS and reported in Column AI (persons in families).

Common Issues and Errors – Non-HMIS Non-WISP PIT form: families tab and emergency shelter column equals the total number of people served in emergency shelter projects not reported in HMIS and reported in Column AC (singles). Non-WISP PIT form: families tab and transitional housing column equals the total number of people served in transitional housing projects not reporting in HMIS and reported in Column AC (singles).

Non-WISP PIT Form Errors In this example, the numbers entered for Unsheltered show 6 households, but only 1 person in those households. In this example, the numbers entered for Emergency Shelter (ES) show 7 households, but only 5 people in those households. In addition, there are 8 ages collected over the age of 24.

Common Issues and Errors – HIC Rapid Re-housing (RRH): Data reported in Column AH (singles) and Column AI (persons in families) must match the number of beds indicated in Columns K (family beds) and Column M (single beds). In Column L (family units), the number of family households should be listed. If the project uses HMIS, Column P & Column Q should match as well. This must change each month to reflect 1:1 relationship between people served and beds available

Common Issues and Errors – HIC Shelter > 100%: Emergency Shelters report the total number of beds in Column O. If the number total number of people served during the PIT (indicated in Column AF) is greater than the total number of beds (in Column O), then you have to put that difference in Overflow (Column AD). If the project uses HMIS, then you have to put that number in Overflow in HMIS (Column AE) as well.

Common Issues and Errors – HIC Shelter > 100%: Motel Voucher Programs do not report a total number of beds. There should be a ZERO in Column O (Total Year Round Beds). If a voucher program serves people the night of the PIT (indicated in Column AF), then that is the number that is reported in the Overflow/Voucher Column AD. If the agency in question uses HMIS, then you have to put that number in Overflow/Voucher in HMIS (Column AE) as well.

Common Issues and Errors – Deduplication The Unsheltered people recorded in HMIS show up on the PIT report run out of ART. These people should have completed a survey. All people who completed a survey should be recorded on the deduplication chart. Unsheltered people are recorded on the Non-WISP PIT form on the Unsheltered column = singles on the “individual” tab and persons in families on the “families” tab.

Common Issues and Errors – Deduplication Both unsheltered persons recorded in HMIS and on the Non-WISP PIT form were to be included on the deduplication chart in google drive. Column M instructions: Each row should have HMIS, OV, or SB. The number with “HMIS” should match the number of people in the PIT report. The number with “OV” added with the number with “SB” should match the number of people on the Non-WISP PIT form, column titled “Unsheltered,” on the “single” tab and “families” tab.

Impact of Service Based Counts Of the 21 continua: Only 3 continua reported a total of 5 people counted through the service based post-PIT count process. 17 continua reported 0 people counted through the service based post-PIT count process. What else needs to be done to increase the outreach for the use of service based counting during the July 2016 PIT count? Questions?

Impact of Observation Option Reliance on professional judgement Unclear impact of observation on the overnight night street count Of the estimated 118 people counted during the street/known location count, only 4 identified as using the “observation” form. 12 local continua indicated that they used observation-only forms. 6 indicated they did not use observation-only forms. 3 continua did not respond to this question – answer pending More information will be needed to continue to allow observation in the PIT count process.

PIT Survey I will be formulating a compilation of responses from the PIT survey. It is clear that there needs to be a “rebranding” of the PIT count as street outreach, rather than a HUD requirement. This is an opportunity to generate community attention, awareness, and support for the issue of homelessness. We need to move forward with PIT methodology, additional training, and more develop more resources for homeless connect events.

Next Step - Deadline for the PIT Data Correction – next deadline: Friday, March 25 th. The HIC, Non-WISP, and HMIS must match at this point. The deduplication number should match the number of unsheltered reported in the Non-WISP and HMIS. Note: It is the PIT lead’s responsibility to ensure the accuracy of the HIC, Non-WISP PIT form, all data entered into the Deduplication Chart (this includes the unsheltered count – in HMIS and surveys not in HMIS and the service based count), and HMIS data for the continua are “cleaned and correct” before submission to COC Coordinator.

Questions?