Imperial County 2013 State Implementation Plan for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 Moderate Non-attainment Area December 2, 20141, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
Advertisements

REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Inventory Issues and Modeling- Some Examples Brian Timin USEPA/OAQPS October 21, 2002.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
How Will Georgia-Florida Wildfires Affect Regional Air Quality Planning? Wes Younger Georgia Environmental Protection Division.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Kansas City Air Quality, Emissions, and Strategies Douglas Watson Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation January 10, 2006.
CARBON FRACTIONS & Southern Nevada Air Quality Study (SNAQS) Judith Chow Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV February 5, 2002.
Imperial County APCD Regulatory Update CDAWG 2014 Brad Poiriez Air Pollution Control Officer October 8, 2014.
PM-10 EMISSION INVENTORY Average of Peak PM10 Monthly Concentrations, Average of 1998 to 2001 peak readings from the highest site for each month.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair “Telling the ozone story with data”
Environmental Protection Division 1 AWMA Georgia Air Update August 10, 2007 Heather Abrams, Branch Chief.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Emissions Inventory and Air Quality Planning National Urban Air Quality Workshop Lahore, Pakistan December 13, 2004.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
1 One facility, two very different emissions. Module 5. Air Pollutant Emissions in the Mid-Atlantic United States by K.G. Paterson, Ph.D., P.E. © 2007.
Improving Emission Inventories in North America NERAM V October 16, 2006 William T. Pennell NARSTO Management Coordinator.
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Alex Cuclis Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC) Particulate Matter: What Floats in the Air?
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Imperial County APCD Regulatory Update CDAWG 2013 Brad Poiriez Air Pollution Control Officer November 13, 2013.
Inventory Needs and Legal Requirements Martin Johnson Emission Inventory Workshop Air Resources Board March 13, 2006.
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
Low-Wind/High Particulate Matter Episodes in the Calexico/Mexicali Region 1 The University of Utah 2 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 3 San Diego.
Sally Shaver Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency Fall 2004 WESTAR Business Meeting October 4-6, 2004 Agricultural.
You are here.. Kern Council of Governments PM 10 Control Measures Workshop: Identifying the Best Available Control Measures to Local Government for Mobile.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Latvian Environmental, Geology and Meteorology agency Future development scenarios for traffic system and air pollution in Riga city Iveta Steinberga La.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
1 Particle Pollution and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Metropolitan Washington Area Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Joan Rohlfs November 1, 2007.
Imperial County PM 10 SIP: Update Imperial County APCD SIP Workgroup Meeting September 24, 2008.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
Air Quality & Economic Development in the San Joaquin Valley November, 2005.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
SJV PM10 SIP Modeling & Data Analysis December 5, 2002 Policy Committee Meeting.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Air Quality Update Regional Council February 28, 2007.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
Public Workshop Proposed RACT/BARCT Determination for Stationary Spark-Ignited Internal Combustion Engines August 29, 2000 California Environmental Protection.
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
Update on the PM2.5 Designations Process and the PM2.5 Implementation Rule Joseph Paisie WESTAR April 8, 2004.
IMPERIAL COUNTY EMISSION INVENTORY Reyes Romero May 28, 2008.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
Air Pollution Control Program Regulation Update Presented to City Council Public Safety and Health Subcommittee Mamie Colburn, M.S, R.S. Missoula.
Proposed Research Plan Fiscal Year Today’s Proposed Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Allocate $6 million in four research.
1 National Standards Set for Criteria Pollutants  Particulate Matter  Sulfur Dioxide  Nitrogen Dioxide  Carbon Monoxide  Lead  Ozone.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
2018 State Implementation Plan For the Annual PM2.5 Standard
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
Source Attribution AB 617 Community Air Protection Program
Presented By: George Noel – Volpe Mark Glaze - FHWA 1/13/2014
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
An Overview of Europe’s Air Quality and Air Pollutant Emissions
2018 State Implementation Plan for the Imperial County 12 ug/m3 PM2
Presentation transcript:

Imperial County 2013 State Implementation Plan for the Hour PM2.5 Moderate Non-attainment Area December 2, 20141, 2014

PM2.5 – What is it? PM2.5 is small particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter Elevated PM2.5 levels have adverse health and environmental effects Federal standard (24-hour average) = 35  g/m 3

Clean Air Act and Emissions Transport Clean Air Act Transport Provisions CAA includes provisions for areas impacted by international transport. Section 179B of the Clean Air Act reduces planning requirements in border areas impacted by emissions from outside the U.S. States using this provision in CAA can not be reclassified as attainment; however, it can avoid bump-up to a higher classification (“Serious” Non-attainment) U.S. EPA Guidance One or more of five analyses to substantiate transport: Evaluate measured concentrations and wind direction Analyze emission inventory from U.S. side of the border Compare emission inventories from both sides of the border Analyze of particles from filters Model impacts from U.S. and foreign emission sources 3

Imperial County Agricultural region Largest cities: Brawley, El Centro, and Calexico Portion of county nonattainment for federal PM2.5 standard of 35 ug/m3 4

PM2.5 Air Quality Trends All three cities with similar emission sources and activity patterns Air quality improving in El Centro and Brawley Similar air quality trend expected in Calexico 5

Calexico & Mexicali Common airshed Significant difference in urbanized area and population Differences in population and activity patterns impact air quality 6 Mexicali Calexico Mexicali Area (sq. miles) Population38,512689,775

Atmosphere Stability and Dispersion Air Pollutant Concentration a Factor of Amount of Pollution and Dispersion Temperature Inversion a Layer of Cool Air Trapped below a Warmer Layer of Air Temperature Inversions are Common during Winter Months Temperature Inversions can last for Several Days causing Air Stagnation and Buildup of Pollutants Atmosphere with and without a temperature inversion 7

Mexicali – January 1 st,

PM2.5 Gradient PM2.5 concentrations decrease with increasing distance from border Gradient pronounced during winter months (Dec.-Feb.) Concentrations over 35 ug/m3 standard observed in multiple years at Calexico air monitoring station 9 PM2.5 concentrations from December 23, 2012

Five High Concentration Days Objectively evaluate the origin of emissions resulting in high concentration days Occur during winter under stagnant conditions Limited to border area Comprehensive analyses using best available data PM2.5 mass Analysis of wind speed/direction during high concentration days Particulate composition and elemental analysis Emission inventory analysis Atmospheric mixing height data Back trajectory analysis Source apportionment (PMF) 10 Date Calexico PM2.5 (ug/m3) December 4, February 5, December 11, January 31, December 23, Federal 24-hr Standard for PM2.5: 35 ug/m3

Meteorology on Elevated PM2.5 Days High PM2.5 concentrations linked to variable wind direction, low wind speeds Stagnant atmospheric conditions with low mixing heights 11 Wintertime (Dec. – Feb.) Exceedance Days (5) Calexico PM2.5 Concentrations and Wind Speed on Exceedance Days Calexico Wind Rose Plots

Emission Inventory Analysis Imperial County emission inventory includes latest ARB updates for on-road and off-road sources, unpaved road dust, ag and prescribed burning, and farming operations Magnitude of emission inventories consistent with differences in Calexico - Mexicali population and emission sources 12 Draft PM2.5 Emissions Inventory (annual average tons/day)* Source Category Imperial County Mexicali Metropolitan Area** Point Sources (stationary facilities) Areawide Sources (consumer products, road dust) On-Road Mobile (cars, trucks) Off-Road Mobile (trains, ships) TOTAL *Imperial County point source data from 2008; Mexicali data from 2005 **Partial data available for point sources

Analysis Summary Population and activity patterns suggest that Calexico, El Centro, and Brawley should have similar air quality Meteorology, emission inventories, sample chemical composition, and source apportionment indicate that PM2.5 measured in Calexico originate outside the U.S. Known emission activities in Mexicali support concept of a shared airshed and accumulation of high levels of PM2.5 Emissions from Mexicali may affect air quality in Calexico on a daily basis 13

Attainment of PM2.5 Standard Clean Air Act contains provision to address cross- border emissions Evaluating emissions transport is important in evaluating air quality planning requirements Analysis indicates that transport from Mexicali to Imperial County contributed to PM2.5 exceedance days resulting in county’s nonattainment status Imperial County would attain the 35 ug/m3 PM2.5 standard “but for” emissions from Mexico 14

Improving Border Air Quality Local, state, and federal agencies are working together with counterparts in Mexico Imperial County APCD Air Resources Board U.S. EPA Secretariat Environmental Protection Agency (SPA) Mexicali/Imperial Air Quality Task Force (AQTF) Border 2020 Program Mexicali and Imperial County Environmental Education Campaign POE Vehicle Idling Study Community Outreach - AQI Alerts and other web-based information School Flag Alert Program Diesel Truck Inspection Program 15

REASONABLE AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACM) What is RACM?  Control measures that are technologically and economically feasible Includes a wide range of sources such as power plants, unpaved roads, and mobile sources Includes all Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) What is RACT? “Lowest emission limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economical feasibility” (44 Federal Register §53762, September 17, 1979) Why is it required? One of the essential elements of the Clean Air Act. Must show that the area was applying RACM/RACT by the attainment year, identified as

REASONABLE AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACM) How do you evaluate RACM? Imperial took a two step approach What sources were significant for PM2.5 and precursors? What current measures are applied to those identified significant sources? Significant Sources of PM2.5? Unpaved roads, windblown dust, Agricultural Operations, Managed burning. Imperial County listed all applicable measures under regulation and compared those regulations with other districts. No deficiencies were identified. A Rule Comparative analysis is included in Attachment B. Significant Sources of Precursors? No significant sources of NOx, VOCs, SOx or Ammonia. However, the Air District has committed to study ammonia emission sources as a future further study. Chapter 5 section

QUESTIONS 18