Www.usac.org Program Compliance Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle St. Louis Atlanta.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Contracts, Competitive Bids 2004 USAC E-rate for Beginners 2004 USAC E-rate from the Service Provider Perspective FCC Orders.
Advertisements

Better Libraries Through Technology Bob Keith Technologist Library Development Bureau New Jersey State Library.
© 2014 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved. E-rate Program Fall 2014 Applicant Trainings Maximizing Cost Effectiveness and Simplifying.
Miscellaneous PIA Updates Catriona Ayer Train-the-Trainer Workshop September 27-29, 2004 Schools & Libraries Division.
Audit Readiness & Success I 2012 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings1 Fall 2012 Applicant Trainings The E-rate Program Audit Readiness & Success.
Beginner’s Presentation I 2012 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Understanding the Basics Fall 2012 Applicant Trainings The E-Rate Program.
1 Preparing the Audit. 2 Preparing For An Audit  Types of audits  Preparing for the audit  Record keeping.
Tom Torlakson State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 CALNET 2.
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program Training for Success Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland.
The E-rate Program Understanding the Basics Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Portland I St. Louis I New Orleans I.
E-rate Program Beginner’s Presentation: Understanding the Basics Fall 2010 Applicant Trainings.
E-rate Audits/Reviews Be prepared!! Prepared by Judy Jones, State Library of Iowa.
Introduction to E-rate I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Introduction to E-rate Fall 2013 Applicant Trainings E-rate Program.
Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial Fall 2013 Applicant.
Craig J. Nichols, Secretary 1 SUNCOM STATE MASTER CONTRACT FILING PROCEDURES FY 2014/15.
The Path to Success (and Avoiding the Road to Denial) Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington,
How Do I Run a Good Competitive Bidding Process? Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans.
Form 470 Changes Timm Harwick Train-the-Trainer Workshop September 27-29, 2004 Schools & Libraries Division.
1 Approving Technology Plans John Noran Schools and Libraries Division USAC.
Understanding and Complying with Audits I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 E-rate Program Understanding and Complying with Audits.
Oregon E-rate Training (Strategies to Maximize Funding) Funding Year Oregon Department of Education Baron Rodriguez – State E-rate Coordinator.
Intro Jeannene Hurley Michigan Department of Education 2006, Year 9 Funding Year.
Beginners Session Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston.
CHANGES Fall 2012 The E-Rate Program. New and Recent Changes New – FY2013 Eligible Services List – Technology Plan requirement – Use of manufacturer’s.
Presented by: Bob Rice, President Triple R Consultants E-Rate Top 10 things you need to know! ©2011 Triple “R” Enterprises, Inc.
Program Compliance Catriona Ayer and Ray Mendiola Train-the-Trainer Workshop September 27-29, 2004 Schools & Libraries Division.
Program Enhancements Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle St. Louis.
What Documents Should I Keep? Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland San.
Competitive Bidding Catriona Ayer Train-the-Trainer Workshop September 27-29, 2004 Schools & Libraries Division.
E-Rate Training for TASBO Members October 8, 2008 Presented by Susan Sullivan Director of Technology/Media.
Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Los Angeles I Kansas City I Jacksonville I Portland I Dallas/Fort Worth E-rate Program Program Compliance Fall.
© 2015 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved Applicant Training Fiber Options.
Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Los Angeles I Kansas City I Jacksonville I Portland I Dallas/Fort Worth E-rate Program Beginner’s Presentation:
Audits. 97 How To Prepare For The Audit  Follow All E-rate Rules  Document, Document, Document ! –Plan ahead for an audit by documenting every.
Successful Invoicing Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle St. Louis.
Craig J. Nichols, Secretary 1 SUNCOM STATE MASTER CONTRACT FILING PROCEDURES FY
Two-in-Five Rule for Internal Connections Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston.
Program Compliance Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October 2009 Helping You Succeed Schools.
Issues in Competitive Bidding Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October 2009 Helping You.
E-Rate 103: Completing form 471 Funding Year 2009 July 1, 2009-June 30, school year.
Contracts Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October.
The E-rate Program Understanding the Basics Washington K-12 Statewide Training, November 23, 2015 Presentation posted at
31 2. Form 470: Starting the Application Process.
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland.
Ensuring Program Compliance I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 E-rate Program Ensuring Program Compliance Fall 2013 Applicant Trainings.
Ministerial and Clerical Errors Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle.
Invoicing Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October.
© 2016 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved Applicant Training Audit Compliance September – November 2016.
The E-Rate Program Tips for Success Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
Understanding and Complying with Audits
After the FCC Form 471 E-rate Program Applicant Training
Step 3: Legally Binding agreements and contracts
Sample Bid Evals and Best Practices
© 2017 Universal Service Administrative Co.
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program
Road to Success The E-rate Program Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings
Process Overview for Service Providers
Understanding the Audit Process
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program
Ensuring Program Compliance
E-rate Program Program Compliance September – November 2016.
How Do I Write a Good Technology Plan?
Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division
Service Provider DO’s and DON’Ts Mel Blackwell and John Noran
What Are the “New” Basics?
Ministerial and Clerical Errors
Introduction to E-rate
2019 Service Provider Training
STARTING FUNDING YEAR (FY) 2020
Presentation transcript:

Program Compliance Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle St. Louis Atlanta Houston San Diego

2 Compliance Success  Know Your Role  Technology Plan –Document Creation Date –Technology Plan contains all Five Elements  Budget –Demonstrate Applicant Share  Posting Form 470/RFP -Descriptive Product/Service Description

3 Compliance Success  Competitive Bidding –Award Contract after 28-day period –Able to demonstrate fair and open process –Properly documented evaluation process  Contracts –Contracts meet Program requirements –State Master Contracts

4 Know Your Role  Applicants –Write tech plan, file Form 470 and write RFP, evaluate bids, select provider, document the process, file Form 471, select invoice method  Service Providers –Respond to 470/RFPs, assist with preparing Item 21, provide answers on specific goods and services requested, but NOT on competitive bidding

5 Know Your Role  Consultants –If separate from service provider, can assist applicants with their role after Letter of Agency (LOA) is in place.

6 Know Your Role Mistakes Occur When…  Applicants turn over responsibility for the program compliance process to a service provider or their consultant  Applicants DO NOT differentiate between applicant and service provider roles

7 Technology Plan  Creation date –Month and year that the plan is “written”  Sufficient detail to support and validate the services requested  Five elements –Goals/strategy for using technology –Professional development strategy –Needs assessment –Sufficient budget –Evaluation process

8 Technology Plan Mistakes Occur When…  The plan DOES NOT cover the fund year  The plan is created AFTER to posting the Form 470  The plan DOES NOT include the Form 471 Block 1 entity  The plan is created by an outside entity

9 Selective Review  Further review of –Budget –Necessary Resources –Competitive Bidding and contracts –Technology Plan  Sample Selective Review Information Request (SRIR) available on SLD website  Retain your documentation!

10 Budget  Purpose is for you to show us you can fund your share  Operating budget (or draft) has dates that cover the funding year (July – June)  Secure applicant share prior to the Form 471 is certified  Budget documentation should clearly identify applicant’s share (e.g., expense line item)

11 Budget  Can you pay your share? –Final budget or draft budget accompanied by letter explaining budget approval process –Cannot rely on grants that you have applied for but haven’t received (yet) –Funds cannot come from the service provider or an entity controlled by the service provider where funding is contingent upon selecting that provider. –Service provider bills can’t be ignored or waived.

12 Payment Plans  Applicants are required to pay their share at the same time that USAC pays the discounted amount. –Service Provider certifies that the invoices they submit are for services that “have been billed to service provider’s customers.” –Therefore, deferred payment plans that allow the applicant to pay after USAC has paid will jeopardize a funding request. –FCC Rules include a presumption that the non-discount share will be paid within 90 days.

13 Budget Mistakes Occur When…  An approved, final budget is not available and the draft budget is not provided  Your budget documentation does not : –Identify your share –Identify the funding source –Include authorized signatures & dates –Have a date before the 471 certification

14 Necessary Resources  Do you have the other necessary resources? –Are there end user computers? Must have reasonable plans to fully utilize all internal connections for which they are requesting discounts (e.g., 2 year plan to get computers for all network drops). –Do you have software to run on the computers? –Staff trained on how to use the technology? –Electrical capacity? –Can you maintain your eligible and ineligible equipment?

15 Form 470/RFP  Form 470 indicates types of products and services ordered on the Form 471  Form 470/RFP is based on tech plan  Form 470 and RFP must be available for 28 days  Define and document your evaluation process  Indicates who will be receiving the services

16 Form 470/RFP  Be able to explain what you were asking for (avoid generic descriptions or statements that are overly broad)  Post for what you want (multi-year contract, type of service, voluntary contract extensions)  Indicate on your Form 470 if you are issuing an RFP

17 Form 470/RFP Imposing restrictions:  Applicants can set some requirements for bidders. –For example, applicants may require service providers to provide services that are compatible with one kind of system over another (e.g. Apple vs. Windows).

18 Form 470/RFP  Applicants must be prepared to explain if and how they disqualified bids.  Applicants must inform all bidders of any requirements that could lead to disqualification.

19 Form 470/RFP Mistakes Occur When…  The “establishing” Form 470 service requested DOES NOT match services (and the service category) requested on Forms 471.  Service description are not detailed enough for bidders to ask questions and formulate bids.  All entities receiving services, including NIFs are NOT included.  Contracts are awarded prior to 28-day posting period  470 doesn’t indicate that applicant is seeking voluntary contract extensions.  Applicants don’t retain documentation of the process

20 Keep dates in order  Remember the correct order for dates: –Allowable Contract Date (28 days after 470) THEN –Contract Award Date THEN –Form 471 filing THEN –Form 471 Certification date ALL BEFORE –Window close

21 Competitive Bidding  Fair and open competitive bidding process  Avoid conflicts of interest –Independent consultant  Service Provider –Applicant  Service Provider  Open competition and bid evaluation  Follow the rules – FCC and state/local  Read the contract fine print  Document the process!

22 Competitive Bidding  Selecting the winning bidder –Price must be the primary factor, considering only ELIGIBLE goods and services. –Solution must be cost-effective (not just the most cost-effective)  May not use E-rate to subsidize the procurement of ineligible or un-requested products or services because that constitutes a rebate of the non- discount portion of the costs, which is a violation of FCC rules.

23 Contracts  Contracts, tariffed service & month-to- month –Tariffed services provided under contract are contracted services. –Month-to-month and tariffed services do not need contracts. –Internal connections and Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections are contracted services.

24 Contracts  Contracts must be signed contract after your 28 days has elapsed but before you file your 471.  Signed and dated by both parties (applicant and service provider).  Be prepared to explain documents that don’t look like a traditional contract.

25 Contracts Mistakes Occur When:  Contracts are not signed and dated  Contracts are signed/dated prior to the 28-day waiting period  Contracts are signed/dated after the Form 471 certification postmark date  Applicants didn’t request the goods and services on the establishing Form 470.  The contract DOES NOT cover the fund year

26 State Master Contracts  Applicant Files Form 470 –Can use State Master contract as a bid response –Contract Award date is date the applicant selected the State Contract as their winning bid  State Files Form 470 –Applicants may cite that Form 470

27 State Master Contracts  Single winner –Applicants do not need to justify the selection of the winning bidder  Multiple winners –Applicants must be able to document why they selected the specific provider off the master contract.

28 State Master Contracts  Multiple Award Schedules –Applicants must be able to document why they selected the specific provider off the multiple award schedule.  Only Terms and Conditions, not prices –These contracts do not meet FCC contract requirements.

29 State Master Contracts Mistakes occur when:  Applicants can’t explain their selection process  The State Master Contract does not cover the services and products cited in your Form 470  Applicants do not post a Form 470 when they need to

30 Red Light Rule  Applicants and service providers that don’t pay their bills on time to USAC or the FCC are put on “Red Light”  Entities that are under “Red Light” are subject to disbursements and applications being held and/or denied.  Tied to your TIN – so your status may be affected by other entities that share your TIN (e.g., Police department, TV station, etc.)

31 Red Light Rule  If a service provider is on Red Light: –No effect on Forms 471 processing –For SPIs and BEARs, payments are netted for USAC debt and held for FCC debt.

32 Red Light Rule  If an applicant is on Red Light: –Applicants with FY2005 and beyond Forms 471 are given notice and 30 days to pay the debt. After that, any pending applications are denied. –BEARs to RL applicants are held. SPIs are unaffected by the applicant’s Red Light.

33 Documentation  Retain documents to show your compliance: –Letters of agency and any agreements with all consultants –Technology Plan and CTPA Plan Approval letter –RFP, including evidence of publication date –Any and all bids (winning and losing)

34 Documentation  Retain documents to show your compliance: –Documents describing bid evaluation criteria and weighting –Any correspondence with potential bidders –Documents related to the selection of the service provider(s) –Signed and dated copies of contracts. –Also, see further list on USAC website

35 Questions?