Categorizing Nitrogen Availability for Corn Fields Using Field History and Cornstalk Nitrate Test Haiying Tao 1, Thomas Morris 1, Suzy Friedman 2, Richard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crop rotation and fertilizer type affect ammonia and
Advertisements

Conservation Innovation Grant Precision Nutrient Management Using a Systems Approach January 13, 2010 Craig W. Yohn WVU Extension Agent and Certified Crop.
Multiple Regression.
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Current Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Corn in Nebraska Richard Ferguson Bob Caldwell.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
An integrated study of nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions Tyson Ochsner and Rodney Venterea Soil and Water Management Research Unit Agricultural.
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
Using Adapt-N On-farm strip trials on Long Island, NY: Above: A = 93 lb N, G = 159 lb N Below: A = 132 lb N, G = 175 lb N AG AG Incorporating Local Weather.
Ordinal Logistic Regression
Long-Term Field Research for Developing Nitrogen BMP’s Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center
Managing Manure Nutrients for Crop Production – Using DDGS, an Agronomists Viewpoint. Joel DeJong ISU Extension Field Specialist/Crops September 27, 2006.
Introduction Agriculture is a large contributor of non-point source pollution to surface water. Field surface application of manure as a soil amendment.
Research Process Research Process Step One – Conceptualize Objectives Step One – Conceptualize Objectives Step Two – Measure Objectives Step Two – Measure.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Curtis Dell USDA-ARS-PSWMRU University Park, PA
EFFECTS OF Calliandra calothyrsus and Alnus acuminata GREEN MANURES IN MAIZE PRODUCTION IN THE HIGHLAND VOLCANIC SOILS OF RWANDA Didace HABAMENSHI ISAE.
Off-farm labour participation of farmers and spouses Alessandro Corsi University of Turin.
Education Research 250:205 Writing Chapter 3. Objectives Subjects Instrumentation Procedures Experimental Design Statistical Analysis  Displaying data.
Bill Jokela, Jason Cavadini, and Mike Bertram
Relative Cost Efficiency of No-Till Farms 2008 Ag Profitability Conference: McPherson Michael Langemeier January 15, 2008.
Acknowledgements: This research was supported by the USDA-ARS Specific Cooperative Agreement Biologically Based Weed Management for Organic Farming Systems.
Adjusting N:P ratios in liquid dairy manure through nitrification and chemical phosphorus removal to match crop fertilizer requirements Background Nutrient.
Lawn Turf Color and Density in Relation to Soil Nitrate Concentration Xingyuan Geng, Karl Guillard and Thomas Morris Department of Plant Science and Landscape.
Tracy Blackmer Peter Kyveryga Advancing Agricultural Performance ® 1 Iowa Soybean Association On-Farm Network®
Step 1 – Based on the soil test shown on P. 5 describe a soil sampling strategy for each field that will result in the taking of the proper number of soil.
Soil Quality Measurement Unit: Soil Science Lesson 7.
Integrated Pest Management. Learning Objectives 1.Define IPM (Integrated or Insect Pest Management). 2.Describe why IPM is important. 3.Describe what.
1. Measuring Soil Quality Soil quality integrates the physical, chemical, and biological components of soil and their interactions. Therefore, to capture.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Soil Carbon and Phosphorous Fractions in Ciampitti I.A. 123, F.O. García 1, G. Rubio 2 and L.I. Picone 4 Field Crop Rotations of the Argentine Pampas Ciampitti.
Current N Fertilization
Agricultural Policy Effects on Land Allocation Allen M. Featherstone Terry L. Kastens Kansas State University.
Summary of supplementary data GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5 July 23, 2013.
NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 14 Comparing Groups: Analysis of Variance Methods Section 14.3 Two-Way ANOVA.
Current N Fertilization Strategy for Corn in Missouri Newell Kitchen Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri USDA-ARS.
Revised Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn Carrie Laboski, Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski UW-Madison, Soil Science.
Nutrient content of dairy slurry Slurry nutrient variability and nutrient prices Slurry data from UW soils lab (Marshfield, WI) First year available 715.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Chapter 1: Getting Started Section 1: Essential question: What is statistics?
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
May 2010 Understanding the NCDA&CS Plant Analysis Report NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Plant/Waste/Solution/Media Section.
Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Photo :Tom van Cakenberghe/IWMI Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Water for a food-secure world W. Mekuria, A. Noble, C.T.
Principles of Soil and Plant Testing December 2009 Eugenia Pena-Yewtukhiw and Jeff Skousen West Virginia University.
Manure and Environmental Impacts Amber Moore et al. Extension Soil Fertility Specialist University of Idaho Twin Falls, Idaho.
Modular 1. Introduction of the Course Structure and MyLabsPlus.
Introduction : Phosphorus (P) is one of the critical nutrient elements after nitrogen for increasing crop growth and yield. The Phosphatic fertilizers.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – MMP NBS Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Figure 1. Rodale Farming Systems Trial with rotations. Note the presence of cover crops and amendment in organic systems. Synthetic fertilizer herbicide.
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
Manure management plan summary – MMP NBs
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
The Netherlands: towards a request for a derogation for the period
Nutrient rates applied annually in the six treatments
Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
and No-Tillage under Various Crop Rotations.
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Introduction to logistic regression a.k.a. Varbrul
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Luba Kurkalova and Sergey Rabotyagov
Figure 1. Long term annual precipitation received at Bird City, Kansas
Obtaining and Using USDA Market and Production Reports
Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen
Luba Kurkalova and Sergey Rabotyagov
Luba Kurkalova and Sergey Rabotyagov
Presentation transcript:

Categorizing Nitrogen Availability for Corn Fields Using Field History and Cornstalk Nitrate Test Haiying Tao 1, Thomas Morris 1, Suzy Friedman 2, Richard Meinert 1 and Dawn Pettinelli 1, (1) Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, (2) Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, DC Previous studies indicate that the estimated availability of N from dairy manure applications made for the current season only explains a small fraction of the N availability to corn. Estimating the amount of available N during the growing season is further complicated by the presence of residual N available from previous manure applications and crops. This study used information about N management supplied by farmers to categorize the relative efficiency of N management practices based on the results of the cornstalk nitrate test (CSNT), which indicates N availability to corn during the growing season. Table 1. Descriptive statistics for explanatory variables used for identifying important factors affecting N availability in 1525 field- years in in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Table 2. Effects of explanatory variables on the cumulative probability of corn stalk samples to test in a higher corn stalk nitrate category in 1525 field-years in in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Table 3. Descriptive statistics for explanatory variables used for identifying possible factors affecting N availability in 3356 field- years in in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Table 4. Effects of explanatory variables on the cumulative probability of corn stalk samples to test in a higher corn stalk nitrate category in 3356 field-years in in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. *, **, *** Significant at p< 0.1, 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. † Manure 8of10 = manure applied 8 of last 10 years. Manure application = manure applied for current season. ‡ Reference categories are underlined. The average N fertilizer rate was 15 kg ha -1, which indicates most of the N available to corn was from manure or the soil. The explanatory variables fertilizer rate, previous crop, manure applications, 8 of 10 years of manure history, and March through August rainfall had significant effects on the cumulative probability to test in a higher CSNT category. Tillage was not a significant explanatory variable in the years when the information was collected, Results in Table 4 show that fields with 8 of 10 years of manure applications were about 1.14 times more likely to have CSNT values in higher categories than the fields that had fewer than 8 years of manure applications in the past 10 years; Fields receiving manure for the current season were 1.97 times more likely to have CSNT values in higher categories compared with fields that did not receive manure; Fields in alfalfa as the previous crop were 1.91 times as likely to test in a higher stalk category compared with corn after corn; Fields in soybean as the previous crop were only 0.73 times as likely to test in a higher stalk test category compared with corn after corn. These data suggest that long-term manure history is an important factor that should be included in N recommendations. The cornstalk values for the previous crop indicate that N availability for fields planted to corn after corn is much greater than for corn after soybeans. Forty-six percent of fields in corn after corn had excessive stalk values compared with only 34% of the fields in corn after soybean. Contact: Tom Morris An Equal Opportunity Employer and Program Provider Farmers should target their use of the CSNT to obtain estimates of N availability on fields that have a long- term history of manure applications and on fields that have corn as the previous crop. Adjustments to N applications can be made in future years based on the field history and CSNT values. Conclusion Results and Discussion Introduction Farmers in Lancaster County Pennsylvania applied N according to their usual practice or based on the Pre- sidedress Soil Nitrate Test (PSNT). The farmers provided us with information about their N practices on each field and information about tillage, rotation and field size. These data are from 30 farms and 3356 field-years from 2004 to Consultants working with the farmers collected CSNT samples from each field by collecting 15 randomly chosen samples. Ordinal logistic regressions were used to estimate the odds ratio of a stalk sample to test in a higher CSNT category and to identify important factors affecting stalk test outcomes. Tillage information was collected in only, so the data for were analyzed separately to show the effect of tillage. The CSNT categories used to describe N availability were (in mg kg -1 nitrate-N): Low, 0-250; Marginal, ; Optimum, 700 to 2000; Excessive, greater than Materials and Methods