Task Two – Suggested Structure By Catherine McSherry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1.04 -THE LAW- System of Rules
Advertisements

Data Protection & Human Rights. Data Protection: a Human Right Part of Right to Personal Privacy Personal Privacy : necessary in a Democratic Society.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 2,
DEFAMATION Torts protecting the reputation. Traditional role of the courts Protection of individuals from the damage that can be caused to the reputation.
Chapter 15 Intentional Torts Intentional Torts - When people deliberately cause harm or loss to another person Intent – the desire to commit an act for.
By Nicky, Bianca and Jessica. Defamation is aimed at protecting the character of individuals against attempts to discredit their standing in the eyes.
 Presentation by David Banks to Durham University 23/2/11.
Business Law Tort Law.
Chapter 3 Tort Law.
DEFAMATION LAW IN IRELAND Augustine O Connell MSc (Comp Sc) MBCS.
HUMAN RIGHTS – BAD? GRESHAM COLLEGE 5 TH NOVEMBER 2014 GEOFFREY NICE.
Denmark and Cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed: Freedom of speech or hate speech? Mandana Zarrehparvar Senior Advisor Danish Institute for Human Rights
Original Version: Defamation Defined  A false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published " with fault,"
1 WHY IS WHISTLEBLOWING IMPORTANT AND ON WHAT PRINCIPLES SHOULD PROTECTIVE LEGISLATION BE BASED? David Lewis, Professor of Employment Law, MiddlesexUniversity,
Data Protection & Human Rights. Data Protection: a Human Right Part of Right to Personal Privacy Personal Privacy : necessary in a Democratic Society.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
Defamation of Character Intentional Torts. Defamation Injury to a person’s reputation or good name by either libel or slander Often with high profile.
Human Rights Search: Basic Documents United Nations Charter 1945 Article 55United Nations Charter Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948Universal Declaration.
Competition law and Article 8 ECHR VMR, 13 March 2008 Jolien Schukking.
CASE OF NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY (Application no /88) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 December 1992.
1 When hate speech tangles privacy... When hate speech tangles privacy...
Airport noise Case law and the balanced approach Marc Martens 10 December 2007.
Intentional Torts Law in Action – Ch. 15.
Session 3 – Conflicts between the right to equality and the freedom of expression Anne Weber, Dr. iur. International standards of limiting the freedom.
Civil Liberties and Public Policy. The Bill of Rights– Then and Now Civil Liberties – Definition: The legal constitutional protections against the government.
Freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak freely without censorship. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously,
Access to Public Information in Slovenia Nataša Pirc Musar, LL.B. Commissioner for Access to Public Information The Hague – 24 th -25 th November, 2004.
The Eighth Asian Bioethics Conference Biotechnology, Culture, and Human Values in Asia and Beyond Confidentiality and Genetic data: Ethical and Legal Rights.
Freedom of speech Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak freely without censorship. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but.
Dr. phil. Dr. rer. publ. Brigitte Jansen
CHAPTER THREE 3-1 TORT LAW. TORT LAW IS BASED ON THE IDEA THAT EVERYONE IN OUR SOCIETY HAS CERTAIN RIGHTS Along With Having Certain Rights, Everyone Has.
Intentional Torts When someone intentionally injures someone or interferes with a person’s use of property Differs from unintentional torts on the basis.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada4-1 Chapter 4: Intentional Torts.
Libel Different types, how to avoid it This is how you keep your job.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. DEFAMATION Defamation according to Somali penal code  Art (Defamation). –  Whoever other than in the cases referred to.
Human Rights Act, Privacy in the context of auditing Phil Huggins Chief Technologist, IRM PLC
Chapter 4.1 The First Amendment. First Amendment Freedoms  The Bill of Rights, added in 1791, protects our civil liberties – the freedoms we have to.
How offensive can you be? PROF. MR YBO BURUMA SUPREME COURT; FACULTY OF LAW, RADBOUD UNIVERSITYNOVEMBER, 6TH 2015.
Freedom of expression: underlying principles and sources
Defamation Training workshop on media and freedom of expression law.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Intentional Torts Section 4.1 The Law of Torts The Difference Between Criminal Law and Tort Law Intentional Torts.
1.04 Understand legal and ethical issues THE LAW- System of Rules 1.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
Civil Law An overview of Tort Law – the largest branch of civil law Highlight the differences between tort law and criminal law How torts developed historically.
Intentional Torts  Intentional torts are actions taken with the intent to harm another person or another's property. The intent to harm does not have.
Chapter 6: Rights and Responsibilities of Citizens.
1.04 -THE LAW- System of Rules
European Court of Human Rights
Human rights and national security
Ioannis Iglezakis, Associate Professor, Aristotle University
Tort law: Defamation.
Where is the harm? Calculating the damages afforded in privacy cases by the European Court of Human Rights Bart van der Sloot May 14th 2017, Haifa, Israel.
1.04 -THE LAW- System of Rules
Data Protection & Human Rights
The Future of Big Data, Equality and Privacy
Article 10 – Freedom of expression
The First amendment Speech Press Religion Petition Assembly.
Privacy Unit 8.
1.04 -THE LAW- System of Rules
1.04 -THE LAW- System of Rules
Is the Human Rights framework still fit for the Big Data era?
Privacy in the Age of Big Data
1.04 -THE LAW- System of Rules
Intentional Torts Chapter 13.
1.04 -THE LAW- System of Rules
1.04 -THE LAW- System of Rules
1.04 -THE LAW- System of Rules
Intentional Torts.
Intentional Torts.
Presentation transcript:

Task Two – Suggested Structure By Catherine McSherry

The Representation Of Religious Beliefs In the world of media today, people from all different backgrounds are represented in particular ways. One of the groups that are often included in the media is religious people, for example, Christians, Muslims, Jewish etc. Many people from different religious backgrounds strongly feel that they are poorly represented within the media. For example, Christians feel that they are very much stereotyped within the media – one of the reasons they feel like this is due to the film The Shawshank Redemption, in which one of the characters is a prison warden who severely mistreats and abuses inmates and constantly makes Bible references to them, as well as handing them their own Bibles. This character is portrayed as a radical Christian, or a Christian extremist, which could initiate a stereotype of all Christians for some members of the audience. Muslims are also a religious minority who feel that they are poorly represented in the media. Since Muslim terrorist attacks are a frequent topic on news channels worldwide today, many Muslims feel that the way in which the news industries represent them could cause members of the audience to form a hatred for all Muslims, and once again, another inaccurate stereotype.

Race Relations Act 1976 The 1976 Race Relations Act was passed in order to create fresh ideas on terms of respect to discrimination on racial grounds. It was also passed to make relations between people of different backgrounds who have experienced racial discrimination before, or could experience it at some point in their lifetime. This law covers certain types of discrimination, for example, racial discrimination, discrimination by way of victimization, meaning of “racial grounds”, “racial group” etc. and harassment.

Privacy Law The term “privacy law” makes reference to the laws which see to the regulation of personal information about certain individuals, which can potentially be gathered by governments and other members of the public, as well as private organizations, and the storage and use of said information. Article 8, Line 1 of The Human Rights Act 1998 states that “everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.” However, Article 8, Line 2 provides that, “there shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, or for the protection of the rights and freedom of others.”

The Defamation Law 2013 (Libel And Slander) The word “defamation” is universal to all situations, and it means to damage someone’s reputation. The Defamation Law was passed in 2013, and aims to create a fair balance between the right of freedom of expression, and the protection of the reputation of other individuals. The newest act of defamation (2013) makes a large number of changes to the original law. It includes a requirement for claimants to prove that they have suffered serious harm before suing the individual who has defamed them, abolishes the presumption of a court case, introduces a defence of “responsible publication on matters of public interest” etc. Defamation when written down is referred to as “libel”, and when spoken in conversation, it is referred to as “slander”. Defamation itself is not necessarily a crime, but more so a “tort” (a civil error, instead of a criminal error.) An individual who has experienced first-hand defamation is able to sue the individual who has defamed them. However, in order to successfully do this, the claimant must prove that they have been defamed, for example, present a document containing malicious libel that is injurious or false about them that has been published.