Quantitative Literacy Across the Curriculum. Members of the QLAC Committee Beimnet Teclezghi – co-chair Laura Pannaman – co-chair Marilyn Ettinger John.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 2007 ULS Information Literacy and Assessment of Learning Program.
Advertisements

Student Learning Outcomes at PCC Adapted from a presentation to the PCC Board of Trustees in 2007.
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
Evaluating Competency Based Education in Clinical and Translational Science Wishwa Kapoor, MD, MPH.
Multi-State Collaborative 1.  Susan Albertine Vice President, Office of Diversity, Equity, and Student Success, AAC&U Faculty Engagement Subgroup, MSC.
Transitioning to the Common Core Common Core Academy - Summer 2011.
KSU General Education Learning Outcomes Assessment: Fostering a Faculty-Driven Process Thomas J. Doleys, Ph.D. Department of Political Science & International.
A Quantitative Literacy Assessment Rubric Development & Lessons Learned - Stuart Boersma, Central Washington Univ. - Caren Diefenderfer, Hollins University.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Writing Across the Curriculum Pilot Project – DABCC Susan Wood.
NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.
A Quantitative Literacy Assessment Rubric Development & Lessons Learned - Stuart Boersma, Central Washington Univ. - Caren Diefenderfer, Hollins University.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Algebra I Model Course Background. Education Reform Act signed into law by Governor Rell May 26, 2010 Includes many recommendations of the ad hoc committee.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
The BVSD Curriculum Essentials Document. Drama & Theatre Arts Essential Questions: 1.How were the Drama & Theater Arts Curriculum Essentials Documents.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
1 C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs Bob Smallwood, University of.
Accreditation: An Opportunity to Promote Information Technology Fluency NLII Annual Meeting San Diego, CA January 26, 2004 Joan K. Lippincott CNI.
Linking Information Literacy Skills to ABET’s Lifelong Learning Component One department at a time! Kimberly Ogden and Paul Blowers University of Arizona.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Department of Mathematical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.A. in Mathematics CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Instruction & Assessment Plan, Melissa Bowles-Terry April 4, 2011.
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
1 General Education Assessment Institutional Portfolio Model.
Joey Offer, Ph.D. QEP Director. QEP Central Goal: Considerations Survey results from the ACC community and the greater Austin community ACC student success.
Understanding the Common Core Kansas Development of Common Core Standards.
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
ACADEMIC SUCCESS STARTS WITH INFORMATION LITERACY A Pilot Program.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Competency Assessment Advisory Team (CAAT) QUANTITATIVE REASONING DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS REP – ROB NICHOLS 1.
VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Assessment Taskforce Update College Council November 6, 2009.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Prior Learning Assessment (PLA) Pilot Project At VSU Prepared by the PLA Assessors Group.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Orientation Meeting Humanities Distribution- Cycle B Fall 2012.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
FALL 2015 MIRAMAR COLLEGE LAURA MURPHY COLLEGE- WIDE OUTCOMES AND ASSESSMENT FACILITATOR ISLO Assessment Summary.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
Quantitative Literacy at WOU. LEAP In November, Faculty Senate recommended that WOU adopt LEAP's (Liberal Education & America's Promise) learning outcomes.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Information Literacy Standards for Freshmen Seminars
How Technologically Literate are EMCC Students?
Stop, Collaborate and Listen:
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Quantitative Literacy at WOU
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Setting Writing Goals in Science The Living Environment
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Teaching Quantitative Reasoning
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Quantitative Literacy Across the Curriculum

Members of the QLAC Committee Beimnet Teclezghi – co-chair Laura Pannaman – co-chair Marilyn Ettinger John Donnellan William Montgomery Hanae Haouari Reed Carroll Vanashri Nargund

Goals of a QLAC Program Upon completion of a designated number of classes that incorporate instruction in Quantitative Literacy skills, students will 1- Understand basic Quantitative Literacy skills; 2- Apply Quantitative Literacy skills to discipline specific and every-day life situations; 3- Communicate solutions to real world problems using quantitative data.

Student Learning Outcomes As students progress through a series of classes that incorporate Quantitative Literacy activities, students will “demonstrate progressively more sophisticated levels of attainment” in the following competencies, as detailed in the AAC&U Quantitative Literacy Value rubric:

The ability to convert relevant information into various mathematical forms (e.g. equations, graphs, diagrams, tables, words); The ability to explain information presented in mathematical forms (e.g. equations, graphs, diagrams, tables, words); The ability to perform calculations; The ability to make judgments and draw appropriate conclusions based on the quantitative analysis of data, while recognizing the limits of this analysis; The ability to make and evaluate important assumptions in estimation, modeling, and data analysis; The ability to express quantitative evidence in support of the argument or purpose of the work (in terms of what evidence is used and how it is formatted, presented, and contextualized).

Timeline Spring 2015 QLAC members are appointed QLAC meets during the spring semester to define the activities of the committee QLAC, in collaboration with Sue Gerber, designs a Quantitative Literacy survey to be sent to all department chairs. The survey’s aim is to identify if and how Quantitative Literacy is addressed in department course offerings (exclusive of General Education and major requirements in mathematics) and how Quantitative Literacy can be further introduced into department curricula

Summer 2015 Survey sent to chairs of all university departments Responses to survey received from 24 of 37 department chairs (64.9% response rate)

Fall 2015 Identify Quantitative Literacy needs based on survey responses Define goals of a Quantitative Literacy initiative Develop a plan for a QLAC pilot program Develop a plan for extension of the pilot program to all university departments

Spring 2016 Select departments to participate in the pilot program (3 from College of Arts and Sciences, 2 from College of Professional Studies, 2 from School of Business, 2 from College of Education). Faculty members from selected departments discuss adding specific QL content to their courses; Select a liaison from each pilot program department; Plan five workshops for Fall 2016 (General Introduction to QL, STEM-focused, Social Science-focused, Arts and Humanities- focused, Business and Professional Studies-focused); Identify possible workshop leaders; Start developing a QL website; Define Quantitative Literacy skills to be assessed; Start developing assessment tools to assess students’ quantitative skills and the impact of the QL program; Identify appropriate software to implement QL in pilot program departments.

Summer 2016 Complete developing assessment tools; Continue developing QL website; Select workshop leaders for Fall 2016.

Fall 2016 Departments selected for the pilot program implement QL into curricula; Workshops for faculty implementing QL into their classes; Schedule five workshops (General Introduction STEM-focused, Social Science-focused, Arts and Humanities-focused, Business and Professional Studies-focused) for faculty across the university; Identify appropriate software to implement QL across university departments; Identify workshop leaders for Spring 2017; Select additional departments to participate in the Spring 2017 expanded pilot program; Select a liaison from each additional department in the expanded pilot program; Add resources to QL website; Assess students’ quantitative skills in the courses that integrated QL in Fall 2016.

Spring 2017 Assess success of Fall 2016 pilot program; Expand pilot program, doubling the number of departments participating; Add resources to QL website; Schedule five workshops (General Introduction to QL, STEM-focused, Social Science-focused, Arts and Humanities-focused, Business and Professional Studies-Focused); Faculty members from all departments discuss adding specific QL content to their courses; Assess students’ quantitative skills in the courses that integrated QL in Spring 2017.

Summer 2017 Assess success of the Spring 2017 expanded pilot program; Select a liaison from each department across the university; Add resources to QL website; Identify workshop leaders for Fall 2017.

Fall 2017 Start implementing QL across all university departments; Schedule five workshops (General Introduction to QL, STEM-focused, Social Science-focused, Arts and Humanities-focused, Business and Professional Studies-Focused); Faculty members from all departments discuss adding specific QL content to their courses; Add resources to the QL Website; Assess students’ quantitative skills in the courses that integrated QL in Fall 2017.

Spring 2018 Assess success of the Fall 2017 QL program; Assess the overall success of the program; Continue implementing QL across all university departments; Assess students’ quantitative skills in the courses that integrated QL in Spring 2017