Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: 2016-01-19 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0410r2 Submission March 2011 Slide 1 Data Transmission Protection on the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink Date: Authors:
Advertisements

PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /0517r0 May 2013 Submission Slide 1 Authors: Combining Process in Virtual CS Mechanism for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
Doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 1 Authors: Transmission Mechanism in MU-MIMO Date:
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r1 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1437r1 November 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Efficient Wider Bandwidth Operation in IEEE ax Date:
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: Authors:
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0354r1 March 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r0 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Multi-STA Block ACK Protection
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 OFDMA Non-contiguous Channel Utilization Date: Authors:
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r0 January 2013 Submission Channel indication in RAW/TWT Date: Authors: Merlin, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /86r0 Submission January 2015 Uplink MU Transmission and Legacy Coexistence Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1280r1 November 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1122r0 Submission Identifiers in HE PPDUs for power saving Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September.
Doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1348 Multiple NAVs for Spatial Reuse Date: Slide 1IITP Authors: Nov 2015 NameAffiliationAddressPhone Evgeny.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0066r0 Submission January 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Downlink OFDMA Protocol Design Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0042r2 January 2016 Geonjung Ko, WILUSSlide 1 BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0881r1 July 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Regarding buffer status of UL-STAs in UL- OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 January 2016 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Congestion control for UL MU random access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1116r1 September 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Trigger Frame Channel Access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0662r0 May, 2016 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on channel access rule to facilitate MU transmission opportunity.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
HE Trigger Frame Format
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
UL OFDMA Random Access Control
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
AP access procedure for UL MU operation
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
Regarding UL MU protection
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
Random Access UL MU Resource Allocation and Indication
BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set
Congestion control for UL MU random access
CW value after UL MU procedure
NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation
TXOP Truncation Enhancement
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Regarding trigger frame in UL MU
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 2 Introduction TG specified Trigger frame variant MU RTS frame and Simultaneous CTS frame in SFD [1] – The spec shall define a frame that solicits simultaneous CTS responses from multiple STAs to protect DL MU transmission – MU RTS may request STAs to send non-HT CTS immediate response – The MAC format of MU-RTS is a variant of trigger frame format MU RTS frame and Trigger Frame would be interpreted as a normal data frame for legacy 11 devices to set a NAV by its duration field

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 3 MU RTS/CTS procedure DL MU and UL MU procedure is initiated by AP – UL MU procedure is initiated by trigger frame of AP – DL MU procedure is initiated by DL MU PPDU of AP – DL and UL MU RTS/CTS procedure is also initiated by MU RTS frame of AP DL MU RTS/CTS procedure UL MU RTS/CTS procedure

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 4 Recap : RTS NAV reset RTS frame is sent by transmitter to set a NAV and to solicit CTS frame STAs which received RTS frame set a NAV if there are no detection of PHY-RXSTART.indication during (2 × aSIFSTime) + (CTS_Time) + aPHY-RX-START-Delay + (2 × aSlotTime) [2] If there are no response to the RTS frame, RTS NAV is reset due to the RTS timer

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 5 Idle NAV problem on MU RTS NAV MU RTS NAV is set by Duration field of M-RTS – Legacy STAs cannot recognize MU RTS, they recognize MU RTS as a Data Frame – NAV from Data Frame cannot be reset itself – RTS NAV reset would not be performed in MU RTS / Simultaneous CTS exchange even though there are no CTS response and Data transmission

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 6 Idle NAV problem on Trigger Frame MU RTS NAV is set by Duration field of Trigger Frame – TF - UL Data - BA(M-BA) is basic process of UL MU transmission – Trigger Frame set long NAV for UL Data but transmission time of Trigger Frame is relatively short – Hidden nodes cannot recognize absence of UL transmission – Idle NAV problem would be happened if the trigger frame is failed

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 7 Idle NAV problem Idle NAV problem could degrade channel usage and it might be worse in dense scenario – OBSS cannot transmit its data due to its NAV duration even though there are no data transmission on original BSS – If there are many APs in original BSS area, more performance degradation might be observed due to idle NAV problem

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 8 Solution 1 : MU RTS reset Similar to conventional RTS reset, MU RTS reset could be adopted to solve MU RTS Idle NAV problem 11ax STAs which update its NAV setting based on MU RTS reset its NAV if no PHY-RXSTAT.indication primitive is detected from the PHY during MU RTS timer duration

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 9 Solution 1 : MU RTS reset MU RTS reset mechanism cannot solve the M-RTS NAV problem of conventional STAs – Conventional STAs cannot recognize M-RTS – Fairness problem between 11ax STAs and legacy STAs

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 10 Solution 2 : CF-END procedure for NAV reset CF-END frame could reset NAV of receiver STAs If AP cannot receive simultaneous CTS so that AP would not transmit its DL MU PPDU or Trigger Frame after transmit MU RTS Frame, AP transmits CF-END frame after trigger timer to reset MU RTS NAV

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 11 Solution 2 : CF-END procedure for NAV reset Idle NAV problem on Trigger type frames could be solved by CF-END procedure for NAV reset CF-END procedure with trigger timer could be applied on other trigger type frame not only MU RTS to reset NAV

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 12 Conclusion MU RTS could cause Idle NAV problem Idle NAV problem is also occurred in Trigger based UL transmission Using MU RTS reset timer (Solution 1) is a basic solution with no cost To solve Idle NAV problem on legacy STAs and Trigger Frame case, CF-END Procedure for NAV reset (Solution 2) also needs to be considered as a 11ax feature

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 13 StrawPoll 1 Do you agree to add to the TG Specification Frame work document? – Spec shall use the legacy RTS reset timer to reset the NAV set by MU RTS frame. After receiving MU RTS, if a STA can not detect any signal during the RTS reset timer duration, the STA shall reset the NAV set by MU RTS frame at the expiry of the RTS timer. Y N A

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 14 StrawPoll 2 Do you agree to add to the TG Specification Frame work document? – AP may transmit CF-END frame after trigger timer (TBD) expires following MU RTS Frame if AP cannot detect the (Simultaneous) CTS frame(s). – CF-END frame may be transmitted after trigger timer (TBD) expires following Trigger Frame if AP cannot detect the UL response(s). Y N A

Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 15 References [1] 15/0132r9 “Spec Framework” [2] IEEE Std