Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk UK EXAMINATION SYSTEM: RELATIVE GROUNDS EXAMINATION Mark Jefferiss.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UK Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Filing an online request for an extension of time in proceedings procedure demonstration.
Advertisements

UK Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Filing an online notice of defence and counterstatement in opposition proceedings.
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
EPO RULE CHANGES 2010 Nicholas Fox. EPO Rule Changes Changes in search procedures Changes to divisional practice Changes to examination procedure.
Management of an IR: Selected forms and procedures to encounter during the lifespan of the IR Israel, February 8, 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal.
Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.
Paradise Point Resort & Spa San Diego, CA October 19-21, 2011 Patenting Protein Therapeutics: In the Shadow of Uncertainty 4th Protein Discovery and Therapeutics.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Enhanced First Action Interview (EFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
AIPPI FORUM AND EXCO TH OCTOBER 2011 INDIA AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL HIMANSHU W. KANE Advocate & Solicitor W. S. Kane & Company.
Processing a Standard Foreclosure Bob Sagel Morgan County Public Trustee Foreclosure Checklist.
Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector.
HOW WILL THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA) CHANGE THE WAY WE PROTECT AMERICAN IMAGINEERING? Michael A. Guiliana April 24, 2012 Disney’s Grand Californian Hotel.
by Eugene Li Summary of Part 3 – Chapters 8, 9, and 10
Applications for Intellectual Property International IP Protection IP Enforcement Protecting Software JEFFREY L. SNOW, PARTNER NATIONAL SBIR/STTR CONFERENCE.
Trade Mark Registration “Protecting your brand”. Trade Mark O Trade Mark – (Brand) a sign that is graphically represented and identifies and distinguishes.
CCTA District 8 Quadrennial Feb 16, 2011 Delinquent Tax Notices, Endorsements, Advertising, Distraints, Mobile Home Notifications, and Severed Mineral.
The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.
Full First Action Interview (FFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
Increasing number of trademark applications and globalization of branding goods and services; how are these challenges influencing trademark.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association MADRID SYSTEM VS. DIRECT INTERNATIONAL FILINGS BY U.S. PARTIES JPO/AIPLA Joint Meeting.
Patent Protection in Europe
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND YOUR RIGHTS Helen Johnstone Seminar 12 July 2006 EAST MIDLANDS INTERNATIONAL TRADE ASSOCIATION.
Patents- Practical Aspects of International Patent Procurement/Prosecution June 2015 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Practice Overview.
Open Competition Intellectual Property Specialists (AST 3/ AD6) OHIM, Alicante – Spain Open for application: October 31st 2013 Apply before : December.
I DENTIFYING AND P ROTECTING I NTELLECTUAL P ROPERTY Tyson Benson
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Request for Extension of Protection of International Registration to the United States.
Energy Regulatory Partnership Program of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners with the National Commission Exercising State Regulation.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Public Works 26 August
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
ASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 59 TH COUNCIL MEETING “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FROM A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: WHAT IT TAKES TO MAKE IT CLICK” Linda Wang TAY.
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association EMERGING TRENDS IN INTER PARTES REVIEW PRACTICE TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP.
PATENT OPPOSITION AND STRATEGY Essenese Obhan, Obhan & Associates.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Yoshiki KITANO JPAA International Activities Center AIPLA Annual Meeting, 2014 IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar Post-Grant Opposition.
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Presented by: Judy Ausick April 24, 2012 Rural Water Users’ Training
Patent Protection During Exhibitions Wu Ningyan State Intellectual Property Office Date: Sept. 9, 2006.
New Ex Parte Appeal Rules Patent and Trademark Practice Group Meeting January 26, 2012.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Representation, Address for Service, Signatures, Recording Changes.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Protecting your knowledge and creativity, the basis of your success. Trademark registration in Poland: European and national rights Intellectual.
Takeo Nasu JPAA International Activities Center AIPLA 2015 Mid-Winter Institute IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar Updates of Post Grant.
Oppositions, Appeals and Oral Proceedings at the EPO Michael Williams.
Seminar on the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration Evidence & Hearings under the Swiss Rules Belgrade, 9 December 2015 University.
European Patent Attorneys Chartered Patent Attorneys Trade Mark Attorneys Practical approaches to appeals before the European Patent Office Paul Chapman.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 5 – Motions Practice, Discovery, and Trial Management Issues 1.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.
International Intellectual Property Prof. Manheim Spring, 2007 Trademark - Madrid Copyright © 2007.
Options for protecting your trademarks in the European Union A Presentation by Mark Kennedy – OHIM External Relations KIPO Seminar on The Community Trade.
Keep Secure Your Creative Work with Copyright Registration.
How to Complete a Free Trademark Search in India.
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
Recent Developments at the International Level
PATENT Designed and Developed by IP Laboratory, MNNIT Allahabad , Uttar Pradesh, India.
How the OHIM will handle Madrid filings
Speed of prosecution at the EPO Andy Harding – October 20th, 2017
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
PTAB Bootcamp: Nuts and Bolts of IPRs, PGRs, and CBMs
Gordon HUMPHREYS Chairperson of the 5th Board of Appeal
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk UK EXAMINATION SYSTEM: RELATIVE GROUNDS EXAMINATION Mark Jefferiss Intellectual Property Office April 2009

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk The practice pre 2007 Reasons for the change Managing the change The practice post 2007 The opposition procedure Future developments to the system

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk The practice pre 2007 Full examination process Earlier trade marks - bar to registration Around 30% of applications filed had an earlier trade mark raised against it

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Reasons for change Width of claims Increasing volumes Commercial relevance The impact of OHIM Anomaly between the UK and OHIM systems Anomaly within the UK system – - Use requirement for oppositions

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Reasons for change Live marks on UK system UK marks - 529,349 Madrid UK marks - 84,080 OHIM marks - 576,442 Madrid EU marks - 45,361 Total - 1,235,232

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Example of wide specification claims Application : Butterfly Computer software in Class 9 Earlier trade mark : Betterfli Computer software in Class 9

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Managing the change 2001 first consultation no support for change 2005 pre consultation gathering information 2005 consultation Proposed options 2006 consultation Covering the mechanics of the system

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk The options 1 – Retain the existing system Full examination Raise earlier trade marks Bar to registration

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk The options 2 – Search and raise with notice Conduct a complete search Raise earlier trade marks Applicant to notify earlier trade mark holder Copy letter to IPO

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk The options 3 – Search and raise with notice coupled with a proof of use Conduct a complete search Raise earlier trade marks Applicant to notify earlier trade mark holder Copy letter to IPO Earlier trade mark holder to show use of the trade mark

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk The options 4 – Search and notify (the applicant only) Conduct a complete search Raise earlier trade marks Do not notify earlier trade mark holder

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk The options 5 – Search and notify (the applicant and the earlier mark owner) Conduct a complete search Raise earlier trade marks Notify earlier trade mark owner on advertisement of later filed mark

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Consultation Lessons learnt from 2001 consultation Involving the users in the decision making process Went from existing system to almost universal acceptance of the new system

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk The practice post 2007 Retain a full search as part of examination process Notification to earlier right holders opt-in / opt-out system

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Level of oppositions 3% oppositions received prior to % oppositions received post 2007

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Decision making process Mark is advertised in the trade mark journal Open to opposition for 2 months Period can be extended by 1 month (TM7A) Opposition must be filed on official form (TM7) together with the fee

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Decision making process Defence Cooling off period Periods for filing evidence and written arguments Possibility of oral hearing Decision

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Decision making process Hearing –Oral hearing –From the papers Decision Costs

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk The Change to an Opposition System Oppositions increase from 1036 in 2007 to 3012 in defences filed in 2008 (610 in 2007) 895 enter cooling off period (216) 163 Revocation applications (non-use) (243) 86 invalidation applications in 2008 (78, 2007)

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk 2008 Rule Changes Shorter 2 months opposition period Extended to 3 months in 7% of cases Timetables set for the filing of evidence/submissions Speeding up procedural decisions – telephone hearings

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Application Rate 2007/ ( Madrid designations) 2008/ ( Madrid designations) Total UK filings reduce by approx 12% – from to (projected)

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Application Success Rate 88% of national applications are now accepted and published 31k trade marks published in 2008 (+ 7.3k Madrid Designations) 38.5% of UK applications/designations are the subject of notifications to owners of earlier marks Current opposition rate = 5% Another 1% withdrawn in opposition period

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Future developments to the system Changes to the cooling off periods (9 months plus 9) Reduction in opposition fee New £100 fee for requests to stay proceedings Increase fee (£100) for an extension of time or an extension of the cooling off period

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Any questions ?