Collaboration with Community Partners to Provide Breast and Cervical Cancer Services to the Underserved University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Tyler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outreach Strategies That Work Nancy Jo Bleier, LCSW, C-ASWCM WISEWOMAN Women's Health Program Coordinator Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium Nancy.
Advertisements

Sage Screening Program 2013 Program Basics Note: Click on red text items for hyperlink.
CANCER SCREENING 2011 DELAWARE CANCER EDUCATION ALLIANCE STEPHEN S. GRUBBS, M.D. HELEN F. GRAHAM CANCER CENTER DELAWARE CANCER CONSORTIUM OCTOBER 5, 2011.
Global Health: The 10 year Ghana Experience James Aikins, MD FACS, FACOG Associate Professor Cooper Medical School of Rowan Univ. Medical Director /Founder.
BREAST CANCER SCREENING PRACTICES AMONG WOMEN WITH DISABILITIES Melissa A Clark, PhD Associate Professor of Community Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
†Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department.
Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African AmericansIn Lansing Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African Americans In Lansing Costellia Talley, PhD,
Integrating HBOC Screening into Public Health Practice
Eligible Women and Participation in the Women’s Health Network Ellen M. Kramer ScD RD April 7, 2005.
KAREN CODJOE, MD, MPH, CLC HEALTH OFFICER FAYETTE COUNTY West Tennessee Cancer Mortality Disparity.
Abstract #3715 Increasing Access for Disparate Women to Participate in Breast Cancer Research Hypothesis Kristina L. Bondurant, Ph.D., Melanie Goodell,
Kentucky Women’s Cancer Screening Program JULY 2013 CCSG CHANGES.
Centralized Eligibility For Take Charge! program contracted healthcare providers.
Somaiya Medical College and Maina Foundation Five Year Project for Raising breast Cancer Awareness in Pratikshanagar - Mumbai.
YWCA Salem Women’s Health Program Primary focus is breast cancer: – Screening referrals – paid by YWCA Salem fundraising and by Oregon Breast and Cervical.
ACCP Evidence base: Implications for policy and practice R. Sankaranarayanan MD Head, Screening Group World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency.
Linking Multilevel Analysis to Health Policy Interventions Richard B. Warnecke, Sarah Gehlert, Carol Ferrans, Richard Barrett, Julie Darnell, Young Cho,
Cancer Prevention in Taiwan
U.S.A. P roject A ccessibility Removing Barriers for Women with Disabilities: Improving Accessibility And Breast Health For Women With Disabilities.
Early Detection of breast cancer Anthony B. Miller, MD, FRCP Associate Director, Research, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCER CONTROL PROGRAM Emily Vance Nursing 250.
Chronic Disease in Missouri: Progress and Challenges Shumei Yun, MD, PhD Public Health Epidemiologist and Team Leader Chronic Disease and Nutritional Epidemiology.
Breast Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survival in Medicare and Medicaid Insured Patients Cathy J. Bradley, Ph.D. Professor of Health Administration Co-leader,
Emergency Medicine in Jordan Rashed Hijazi MD, FRCSEd (A&E) Consultant EM.
Disparities in Cancer September 22, Introduction Despite notable advances in cancer prevention, screening, and treatment, a disproportionate number.
Nannozi Ssenkoloto, Program Manager October 8, 2013.
Breast Care for Women of Mid-Michigan (BCM) Mary Smania, MSN, FNP-BC Assistant Professor MSU College of Nursing Nurse Practitioner.
Community Partnerships Make a Difference: Free Cancer Clinics in Wyoming County Cheryl McGovern, Valerie Bell, Regina Allen Partnership History The Wyoming.
Implementation of an evidence-based cancer screening program for an urban disabled population Ryan Goetz BSCh Lewis Cancer & Research Pavilion at St. Joseph’s/
Mammography Screening Information for Providers Indian Health Service National GPRA Team.
Cervical Cancer in California Janet Bates, MD MPH Research Program Director Research and Surveillance Program California Cancer Registry.
Outcomes of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 43 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto, Canada (2006)
University of Maryland Baltimore City Cancer Program Rhonda Silva, RN BSN Program Manager November 12, 2004.
Evaluation of Primary Versus Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: an evidence based literature review Jennifer Vestle, PA-S, John Carter, PhD Department.
TARA HANCOCK CALIFORNIA STATE LONG BEACH SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK MAY 2012 CONTRIBUTIONS OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.
Cancer Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
PERIODIC MEDICAL EXAMINATION BY DR. ANGELA ESOIMEME MBBS, MPH, FWACGP.
Sanford USD Medical Center Sioux Falls, SD Becky Nelson, Senior VP & COO Health Service Operations Sanford Health.
Factors associated with abnormal PAP Smears in a health center X – Costa Rica, 2009 Leandra Abarca 1, Julia Freer 1, Maricela Salas 2 1, MD, MsC, FETP,
Report from Cervical Cancer Committee Maryland State Cancer Plan Strategies for Improving the Control of Cervical Cancer in Maryland.
Figure 1. Younger Women Are Most Likely to Be Uninsured Part-Year MenWomen Source: Analysis of the 2004 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey by S. Glied and.
Reducing Health Disparities Through Navigation to Mammography Screening Worcester County, Massassachusetts.
Computing for a Cure: Noralynn Valletta Mentored by Dr. Cecily Heiner COSE Symposium, November 12 th, 2012 Why Mammogram Rates in Utah are Lower than the.
Joni Reynolds, RN-CNS, MSN Director of Public Health Programs Winnable Battles: Cancer in Colorado.
SUSAN G. KOMEN CENTRAL GEORGIA AFFILIATE WE LIVE HERE. WE RACE HERE. WE SAVE LIVES HERE.
REACH Lay Health Worker Intervention Program: A Community-Based Model to Promote Breast Cancer Screening Among Vietnamese-American Women Gem M. Le, MHS.
Incorporating Multiple Evidence Sources for the Assessment of Breast Cancer Policies and Practices J. Jackson-Thompson, Gentry White, Missouri Cancer Registry,
Provider’s Guide to Accessing Women’s Health Care.
Patient’s Guide to Accessing Women’s Health Care.
Cooperative Agreement Number U58/CCU U58DP Spirit Health Education (S.H.E.) Circle Early Detection or Survivorship of Cancer in Underserved.
Medicaid and the 4 A’s: Use of 1115 Waivers and State Plan Amendments American Cancer Society Washington, Dc June 5, 2008 Erin Reidy
SUSAN G. KOMEN CENTRAL GEORGIA AFFILIATE WE LIVE HERE. WE RACE HERE. WE SAVE LIVES HERE.
Florida Cancer Plan Phil Roland, MD FACS FACOG Florida State Chair A Commission on Cancer.
BREAST CANCER BY STAGE OF DISEASE AT DIAGNOSIS, CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Arthur Owora, MPH; Aaron Wendelboe, PhD; David Thompson, PhD; Janis Campbell, PhD The.
Background Cervical cancer is a major cause of mortality in Ecuador and in developing countries worldwide It is the 2 nd leading cause of death from cancer.
CANCER OF THE CERVIX SCREENING AND EARLY TREATMENT Dr Nelly R. Mugo MBchB, MMED, MPH Dr Rose J. Kosgei MBchB, MMED, Msc Kenyatta National Hospital: Department.
Effectiveness of Patient Navigation on Diagnostic Interval, Anxiety, and Satisfaction of Minority Women with Abnormal Mammograms: a Randomized Controlled.
Sonia “Carol” Robazetti Hodgson, MD, CCRC The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston – School of Medicine NEW.
COLLABORATION WITH COMMUNITY PARTNERS TO PROVIDE BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCER SERVICES TO THE UNDERSERVED Patti Olusola, M.D. 1, Sarah Low, M.D. 1, Michelle.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services Policy and Management 1 Women’s Cancer Screening Services Utilization Versus Their Insurance Source Presenter:
Lower Mammography Use is Associated with the Geographic Clustering of Late-stage Breast Cancer in Saint Louis City Min Lian, Donna B. Jeffe, Mario Schootman.
Finding Answers: Disparities Research for Change A National Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation at the University of Chicago Interventions to.
Need to submit travel reimbursement forms?
Spartanburg Family Medicine Residency
Patient Navigation Process
Addressing Breast Health Inequalities Among Women with Disabilities
CULTURALLY COMPETENT PATIENT NAVIGATION IN THE PREVENTION OF CANCER IN UNDERSERVED HISPANIC WOMEN: THE SAN ANTONIO EXPERIENCE Donald J. Dudley, M.D.,
Patti Olusola, M.D. Kathryn Wortz, Ph.D. Robert B. Tompkins, M.D.
Closing the Gap Hispanic Women and Breast Cancer
Lung Cancer Screening Sandra Starnes, MD Professor of Surgery
Presentation transcript:

Collaboration with Community Partners to Provide Breast and Cervical Cancer Services to the Underserved University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Tyler 1 Northeast Texas Public Heath District 2 Patti Olusola, MD 1 Sarah Low, MD 1 Michelle Parker, MD 1 Jessica Osizugbo, MD 1 Stephanie Taylor, CCPH 2

Background Breast cancer is the most common and cervical cancer is the 7 th most common cancer to affect women in the state of Texas. Many studies have proven that screening for breast cancers with mammograms 1,2 and cervical cancers with pap smears and HPV testing 3 decreases mortality related to these cancers. Underserved and uninsured women have a higher incidence of these cancers due to lack of access to these important screening exams. 4 Many community and non-profit resources such as Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure and the Breast and Cervical Cancer Services (BCCS) program are available to financially assist underserved or uninsured women obtain these exams; however, coordinating these funding sources with facilities and providers that perform the exam can at times be challenging.

Northeast Texas Region (Public Health Region 04) Population at Risk: 2,782,222 Cases: 3883 Mortality Rate: 20.8%

Northeast Texas Region (Public Health Region 04) Population at Risk: 2,782,222 Cases: 240

Project Desciption For the past few years, the North East Texas Public Health Department (NET Health) and the Family Practice Clinic at UT Health Sciences Center at Tyler (UTHSCT) began a collaborative effort to provide breast and cervical cancer screening services to underserved and uninsured women in the Northeast Texas region. NET Health uses funds from the BCCS program, funded by the Texas Department of State Health Services, and the Komen Race for the Cure through the local affiliate with money raised locally. This study retrospectively reviews the number of women who obtained cervical and breast cancer screening and follow-up services through the Family Practice residency clinic and UTHSCT. – The total number of women who received pap smears, HPV testing, and colposcopies through the clinic in the 3 years prior to the collaboration were compared with the total number of women who received these exams in the 3 years since the collaboration. – The total number of women diagnosed with cervical dysplasia or cancer in the Family Practice clinic through this program are reported. – The total number of women undergoing breast biopsy and receiving a breast cancer diagnosis through this program at UTHSCT are reported.

Collaboration Flowchart NET Health identifies women in the service area and confirms their eligibility for BCCS and/or Komen Women are scheduled screening mammograms in multiple different locations throughout the region including UTHSCT Women needing clinical breast exams, pap smears and pelvic exams are schedule by NET Health to be seen in the Family Practice Clinic by one of the resident physicians Women with abnormal screening pap smears are referred for colposcopy in the Family Practice Clinic Women requiring breast biopsy are referred to one of the radiology or surgical specialist at UTHSCT Women requiring cervical excisional procedure are referred to the Gyn specialist at UTHSCT NET Health assists women diagnosed with cancer in applying for government funded insurance or other programs to obtain the further medical care they require

Results Through our collaborative effort, a significant number of underserved and uninsured patients received recommended screening exams, needed biopsies and follow-up exams. Five women have been diagnosed with breast cancer and one with cervical cancer. The Family Medicine residency clinic has performed significantly more pap smears and colposcopies in the years since this collaborative program began.

Numbers of Women Receiving Services Through BCCS and UTHSCT Cervical Cancer Services Pap Smears – 527 HPV Testing – 221 Colposcopy - 90 Breast Cancer Services Mammogram – 554 Breast Ultrasound Breast Biopsy - 31

Abnormal Pap Smears

Colposcopy Results

Family Medicine Clinic Procedure Numbers

Challenges Collaborative efforts such as this one require an incredible amount of planning and communication. Some of the barriers to our program include:  Scheduling: some patients have to wait up to 2 months for their provider visits  Identifying Komen and BCCS patients in the clinic  Communicating results and recommended follow-up exams to patients and NET Health  Providers filling out required forms and getting copies to NET Health  Tracking patients that are “lost to follow-up”  Billing, coding, and reimbursement

Conclusions Overall the collaboration between NET Health and the UTHSCT Family Medicine Residency clinic is a “win-win” partnership. It has been very successful in providing needed breast and cervical cancer services to underserved and uninsured women in Northeast Texas. In addition, the Family Medicine residents have received invaluable patient care experience in the evaluation and management of breast and cervical health issues.

Future Directions  A Pubmed search using criteria of internship and residency AND (breast neoplasms OR uterine cervix neoplasms) AND (early detection of cancer OR mass screening OR prevention and control) did not reveal any similar studies that had been published in the literature.  It would be interesting to survey public health organizations and residency training programs in the country to see if other similar partnerships exist.  Our goal is to encourage collaboration in other communities to improve access to needed services for patients and increase educational training opportunities for residents.

References 1.Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years. Ann Intern Med 2002;137: Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, Johns L, Waller M, Bobrow L; Trial Management Group. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cervix Cancer Screening. IARC Handbook of Cancer Prevention, vol. 10. Lyon, France: IARC Pr; Ward, E., Jemal, A., Cokkinides, V., Singh, G. K., Cardinez, C., Ghafoor, A. and Thun, M. (2004), Cancer Disparities by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 54: 78–93.

Acknowledgements Special thanks to Stephanie Taylor and the NET Health staff for collaborating so effectively with our Family Medicine residency clinic. Thank you to Zeding Li for gathering data to include in our study.