The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eligibility and Standards James Garrison Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer.
Advertisements

State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) ACMP Conference Juneau, AK 2007.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
Cultural Heritage and its Management Chaco Culture National Historical Park Larry J. Zimmerman.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
The National Register of Historic Places. NOT THE: National Historic Registry National Historic Registry Historical List Historical List Historical Registry.
IDENTIFYING & EVALUATING HISTORIC PROPERTIES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES –CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION HISTORIC.
SAN JUAN BAUTISTA THIRD STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATIONAL MEETING October 7, 2008.
November 22, 2011 Historical Commission Mission : To promote, preserve and protect Alachua County’s historic resources.
Woodland-Larchmere Commercial Historic District Cleveland, Shaker Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio National Register Public Hearing May 21, 2015 Barbara.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
Environmental Review Todd Levine Architectural historian, environmental reviewer, Connecticut Freedom Trail coordinator, Washington- Rochambeau Revolutionary.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Historic Preservation AMCV1550, Week 4. Movement’s beginnings Mount Vernon Ladies Association (1853) Designated National Historic Landmark 1960 – Role.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Section 106 Processes A Guide to the Ideals and Reals of CRM.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Cultural Resource Management An Introduction to Federal Heritage Preservation and the Law.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Field Survey Introduction. What is a survey? Survey means a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. It includes.
Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director.
Environmental Planning CULTURAL RESOURCES CH 5 - HO # 13
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Procedures and Processes Phase II: Evaluation CRM Phases I-III This presentation uses materials taken from Ricardo Elia’s Cultural Resources Archaeology.
Is there a future for the past? Chaco Culture National Historical Park Larry J. Zimmerman.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
#oldhousefair Old v/s Historic What is historic anyway? Melissa Wyllie.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
3D Technology and the Section 106 Process Matt Diederich Archaeologist Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Oregon Heritage Programs Division.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Historic Preservation in Washington, DC. Purposes of the D.C. Historic Preservation Law Protect, enhance and perpetuate the distinctive elements of the.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
NEPA and Section 106: An Introduction WISDOT MEETING NOVEMBER 3-4, 2015.
The Preservation Process. Sequence of Preservation actions 1. Setting standards or criteria that define what is worth preserving. 2. Undertaking a survey.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
CITY PLANNING ACADEMY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CITY OF SACRAMENTO PRESERVATION OFFICE Community Development Department March 23, 2016.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Anth January 2012.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Landscape Preservation and Archaeology
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
Pedestrian Survey.
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

The National Register

The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the National Historic Preservation Act of The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to expand and maintain a National Register of Historic Place composed of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects of state and local importance significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture that possess integrity of location, design setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association. Listing on the National Register certifies that a property possesses significance, mandates its consideration in the planning of federal or federally assisted projects, and qualifies it for federal tax benefits and preservation grant assistance. Property Types on the National Register include districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects. The National Register website The National Register website has images, explanations, and links to publications to explain the process and the properties listed.

How the criteria for the National Register may change For Legislation to become policy the agency interpretation of the legislative mandate is published in the Federal Register. The National Register criteria as applied is published as 36CFR60.36CFR60 In order for properties to be listed on the National Register they must meet four conditions: They must (1)possess a significance that (2)meets at least one of the criteria of the national register and the significance must (3)be developed from an understanding of the historic context, and (4)retain integrity of location and materials. Though not complete the Register has become the most comprehensive set of documents about the built environment available in the United States.

How do properties become listed on the national register? Properties are nominated to the National Register by the State Historic Preservation officer (SHPO) of the State in which the property is located, by the Federal Preservation Officer (FPO) for properties under Federal ownership or control, or by the Tribal Preservation Officer (TPO) if the property is on tribal lands. Any one may nominate a property. The nomination is prepared under one or more criteria: a.Structures associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or b.That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or c.That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or d.Have yielded or likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

What buildings, sites, or structures would not be appropriate for the national register? 1.Buildings completed within the past fifty years 2.Commemorative properties. 3.Structures moved from their original sites. 4.Religious buildings, properties owned by religious organizations 5.Cemeteries 6.Reconstructed buildings.

What are the exceptions to the exceptions? 1.Religious properties that have aesthetic or historic significance. 2. A relocated buildings significant for architecture, or historic association. 3. A birthplace or grave of a figure of outstanding importance 4. Cemetery with transcendent corpses, distinctive design, or associative value. 5. A reconstructed building the only associated structure with a person of transcendent importance. 6. A commemorative property significant for its own age, design, or history 7. A property achieving significance under 50 yrs old of exceptional importance.

Historic Context HISTORIC CONTEXT. The historic context is a comparative evaluation of the property nominated that compares the facts discoverable about a property with the stages of development for that particular region or activity. The context statement for the nomination breaks down the question of “Is it appropriate to the National Register?” into three questions: 1.Under what theme of historical development was this building significant? 2. In what place is the property significant? 3. During what time was the property significant? After describing the evidence for the significance of the property, it is necessary to describe the remaining historic fabric, to describe the historic integrity of the building.

Concept of Property Types property type. A grouping of individual properties based on a set of shared physical or associative characteristics. These may be physical [structural, stylistic, materials of construction, or site type] or associative [associated activities, associated with particular groups, category of information which a property might yield information. The preferred method of developing historic context is to first establish what the significant historic contexts are and then to survey locales for building relating to that activity and time frame. White Paper on Historic Context April 2009.White Paper on Historic Context The information provided in the historic context should directly relate to the criteria under which the site is being nominated.

Contributing and non-contributing resources A contributing building, site, structure, or object adds to the historic associations, historic architectural qualities, or archeological values for which a property is significant because: a. it was present during the period of significance, relates to the documented significance of the property, and possesses historic integrity or is capable of yielding important information about the period; or b. it independently meets the National Register criteria (Identify contributing resources of this type and explain their significance in section 8). A non-contributing building, site, structure, or object does not add to the historic associations, historic architectural qualities, or archeological values for which a property is significant because: a. it was not present during the period of significance, or does not relate to the documented significance of the property due to alterations, disturbances, additions, or other changes, it no longer possesses historic integrity or is capable of yielding important information about the period; or b. it does not independently meet the National Register criteria

Parts of the National Register nomination 1. Name of Property 2. Location 3. State/Federal Agency Certification 4. National Park Service Certification 5. Classification 6. Function or Use 7. Description 8. Statement of Significance 9. Major Bibliographical References 10. Geographical Data 11. Form Prepared By 12. Additional Documentation

What are the challenges for the National Register? The register has not fulfilled the original goal of becoming the all-inclusive list of what is significant in the nation’s history. Although the number of listings is impressive, so is the number of properties that have not been identified, evaluated, and formally listed. There is a growing concern that too much is on the National Register and that the criteria for eligibility are too loosely applied. White Paper on Common Resources April 2009.White Paper on Common Resources a. This opinion is most often heard from agencies and organizations required to follow the protective procedures that attach to listing or eligibility for listing. Failure to meet the challenges posed can erode the political support for preservation.

What do national register nominations and sites look like? View some recent properties listed on the national register in Virginiarecent properties View nominations of properties in Virginia to the national register.nominations of properties View the nomination process in Virginia.nomination process

When is national register consideration mandatory? Federal agencies are required by the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and other provisions of Federal law to consider historic resources in the planning and execution of their projects. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part CFR Part 800 requires Federal agencies to clearly define the scope of their undertaking; develop a statement of the Area of Potential EffectsArea of Potential Effects make a reasonable and good-faith effort to identify and evaluate historic properties; and assess the project's effects when historic properties are present. If adverse effects are identified, the Federal agency must consult on ways to avoid, minimize, or mitigate those effects. The process is consultative and there is no prescribed outcome. Consultation takes place with DHR, which serves as the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)in Virginia, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), Indian tribes that attach religious or cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by an undertaking, local governments, interested public, and other stakeholders. DHR’s role in the process is advisory. More information on Section 106 is available on the ACHP websiteACHP website The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to consider the human environment, including cultural resources, in evaluating a project’s impacts. Under certain circumstances, NEPA may be used to satisfy the requirements of Section 106.