Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden Preoperative simulation reduces surgical time and radiation exposure for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES IN PLIF SURGERY IN RELATION TO PATHOLOGY Manoj Krishna Chandra Bhatia Raymond Pollock Spinal Unit, University Hospital of North.
Advertisements

Lumbar Segmental Instability The Role of Interbody Fusion zRole of Interbody Spacers are to provide a means to stabilize the anterior column zAnterior.
Balancing the Flexion Gap: Relationship Between Tibial Slope and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Release and Correlation with Range of Motion by Adolph V.
Current Concepts Review - Interbody Fusion Cages in Reconstructive Operations on the Spine* by PAUL C. MCAFEE J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume 81(6):
“A Controlled Randomized Outcome Study of Femoral Ring Allograft versus BAK Instrumentation in Anterior Interbody Fusion” Dr. Donald W. Kucharzyk Dr. Michael.
E-Poster #510 Mineralized Collagen and Bone Marrow Aspirate in Anterior Interbody Carbon Fiber Cages Achieve High Fusion Rates in Multilevel Adult Spinal.
Intraoperative Iso-C C-arm navigation surgery for spinal and pelvic trauma Kobe Red Cross Hospital Yasuo Ito K. Koshimune, T. Takigawa, S. Nakahara, T.
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures Via an Extensile Lateral Approach by Karl M. Schweitzer, Trevor R. Gaskill,
Department of Neurosurgery, Mokpo Hankook Hospital, Mokpo-city.
Glenn R. Buttermann, MD XLIF vs ALIF Combined with PSF Results in a Community Practice 1.
Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MIS)
ARTIFICIAL DISC VERSUS FUSION A prospective randomised study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
INTRAMUSCULAR PRESSURE IS LESS WITH MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL RETRACTORS THAN WITH OPEN RETRACTORS Kee D. Kim, MD 1 ; David Spenciner, P.E., Sc.M 2 ; Marike.
Sacroiliac pain after PLIF and/or posterolateral lumbar fusion; anesthetic joint blocks with corticosteroids R. Hart, R. Bárta, F. Okál, M. Komzák Dept.
ORTHOPEDIC PRODUCT PORTFOLIO. KNEE NAVIGATION KNEE ARTHROPLASTY KNEE ARTHROPLASTY – THE CHALLENGES A lot of revisions need to be done in the first two.
Decompression Surgery
Posterolateral versus Posterior Interbody Fusion in Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Introduction Spondylolisthesis is a heterogeneous disorder characterised.
InFUSE ™ Bone Graft / LT-CAGE ™ Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device IDE Clinical Results G Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia.
Back Pain Christopher D. Sturm, M.D., F.A.C.S Medical Director Mercy Institute of Neuroscience & Mercy Regional Neurosurgery Center.
Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients SHINYA OKUDA, M.D., etc… Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
5-year Results from a Prospective, Randomized Study of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System for the Lumbar Spine: DYNESYS Peter Gerszten 1, R. Davis.
The Current State of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery by Choll W. Kim, Krzysztof Siemionow, D. Greg Anderson, and Frank M. Phillips J Bone Joint Surg Am.
Scoliosis Surgery Mark Wilms, CST ST Program Director Anthem College Aurora, Colorado.
A New Monolaterally Inserted Interspinous Device in the Mini- Invasive Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation associated with Lumbar Canal Stenosis.
Analysis of Learning Curve for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Byung-Joon Shin, Jae Chul Lee, Hae-Dong Chang, Su-Jin Yun, Yon-Il.
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Compared with Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Myelopathy by Jacob M. Buchowski, Paul A. Anderson, Lali Sekhon, and K. Daniel.
Enhanced Early Outcomes with the Anterior Supine Intermuscular Approach in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty by Keith R. Berend, Adolph V. Lombardi, Brian.
In the name of God H. Moin M.D, F. R.C.S Oct
Helwan university faculity of engenerring Biomedical department Name Shaimaa adel sayed Supervisor Ahmed Agamya/DR Safaa/Eng.
John T. Wilkinson m. d. , Chad E. Songy m. d. , Frances l
Volume 91(Supplement 2 Part 1):50-73
by Robert W. Gaines J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume 82(10):
by Robert M. Kay, and Susan A. Rethlefsen
Surgical Treatment of Main Thoracic Scoliosis with Thoracoscopic Anterior Instrumentation by Peter O. Newton, Vidyadhar V. Upasani, Juliano Lhamby, Valerie.
Rui Shi Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University.
Isolated Subtalar Arthrodesis
Emerging Technologies in Spinal Surgery Presenter/author date.
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (MILIF) USING A NOVEL EXPANDABLE RETRACTOR SYSTEM Michael H. Winer, M.D. Scottsdale,
Division of Plastic Surgery University of Puerto Rico Norma I. Cruz, MD Nothing to disclose.
INTRODUCTION A major limitation of C-arm fluoroscopy is the inability to capture radiographic images in more than one anatomical plane at a time. The G-arm.
Review of LIF and role of neurography in XLIF
POSTERIOR SUBTOTAL VERTEBRECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF THORACIC OSTEOMYELITIS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS Meric ENERCAN, MD Cagatay OZTURK, MD Mehmet AYDOGAN, MD.
OUTCOME OF SPINE SURGERY IN ELDORET
Introduction In the last years several interspinous prostheses have been used for the treatment of several degenerative disc diseases involving the lumbosacralregion;
MAST® MIDLF™ Procedure with Cortical Bone Screws
Joseph A. Sclafani MD1,2, Kevin Liang PhD 2, Choll W Kim MD,PhD1
INTRODUCTION METHODS CASE SERIES DISCUSSION
One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients
Dissecting the ALPHABET SOUP of Spine Surgery
David W. Lowry MD1, Scott M. Tuinstra PA-C1, Joseph A. Sclafani MD2
Symptomatic progression of degenerative scoliosis after decompression and limited fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis  John K. Houten, Rani Nasser 
Ronnie I. Mimran, MD Danville, CA
CHONG E1,2, PARR WCH2, PELLETIER MH2, WALSH WR2, MOBBS RJ1,3,4 E1,
FIGURE 1. Axial T2 (A, B) and T1 postgadolinium (D, E) spinal magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating a contrast-enhancing mass at T4 and T5 with significant.
Acknowledgements & Disclosures
Advances in Spine Care Could Save the U.S. Healthcare System Billions
Anterolateral Biplanar Proximal Tibial Opening-Wedge Osteotomy
MIS Techniques Applied to Deformity:
WHAT is a FUSION of the LUMBAR SPINE?
Software Tools and Surgical Guides in Dental-Implant-Guided Surgery
Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia
David E. Hartigan, M. D. , Mark A. McCarthy, M. D. , Aaron J. Krych, M
Anterolateral Biplanar Proximal Tibial Opening-Wedge Osteotomy
Radiographic illustrations of restoring the middle-column height in an 80-year old-woman with a complex C4-C5 and C5-C6 fracture subluxation with retropulsion.
Grade II L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Percutaneous screw and rod placement
Lumbar spondylolisthesis (MISS TLIF)
Anterior instrumentation and correction
Scoliosis surgery with hybrid system in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI)
Presentation transcript:

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden Preoperative simulation reduces surgical time and radiation exposure for the staff in navigation-guided minimal-invasive Hybrid-LIF B. Rieger, D. Podlesek, W. Polanski, H. Jiang, G. Schackert MIS-HLIF in degenerative listhesis (a, b) is a hybrid of the PLIF- and the TLIF-procedure. The approach utilizes a standard unilateral midline approach for decompression, but bilateral (ipsilateral and contralateral crossover) facetotomy and discectomy (Fig. 2). The ipsilateral facetotomy is later utilized to implant a special designed cage (Fig. 5). Using navigation, pedicle screws are placed in a vertical (dorsoventral) vector ipsilaterally (Fig 3 -  ) and in conventional percutaneous dorsolateral technique on the contralateral side (Fig 3 -  ). This study reports that preoperative simulation accelerates MIS-HLIF and reduces the radiation exposure for the staff. Developing the SOP (Fig. 1-6) for MIS-HLIF, 163 patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis underwent treatment so far. Previous quality assurance study of MIS-HLIF, Numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and core outcome measures index (COMI) were assessed for the first 28 patients preoperatively as well as 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery (Tbl. 1). For these patients, segmental realignment was statistically objectified using Boxall`s method. Furthermore, the surgery time as well as radiation exposure for the staff were evaluated and compared to in-house conventional open surgery and MIS-TLIF. The radiation dose for the 3D-scan was subtracted from the cumulative dose to get the staff`s radiation exposure. P<0.05 was considered as significant. Previous outcome evaluation in the first 28 patients showed significant improvement of NRS, COMI and ODI scores at all postoperative follow-up time points (p<0.05). Further, postoperative statistical evaluation of x-ray data from these patients showed a significant reduction of listhesis from an average of 22% preoperatively to 9% postoperatively (p<0.01). The average blood loss was less than 500 ml. After establishing a preoperative simulation in the SOP, mean surgical time (by one surgeon) decreased from 180 (SD 27) to 140 minutes (SD 30) and mean radiation exposure for staff was reduced from 570 (SD 110) to 350 cGy·cm 2 (SD 50) significantly in the last 33 cases, compared with in house patients after MIS-TLIF: (720 cGy·cm 2, SD 90) and after open TLIF: (420 cGy·cm 2, SD 30) as a function of the BMI. 1. Preoperative Simulation 2. Decompression and Release 3. Navigation 4. Realignment MIS-HLIF combines advantages of the PLIF and TLIF procedure and its outcome is not inferior. The preoperative software- assisted simulation of the cage concerning the sagittal balance reduces the surgical time and radiation exposure for the staff. Based on preoperative imaging data, this simulation suggests the optimal height of the device so it has not to be defined intraoperatively via x-ray. CONCLUSION preoperativ6 weeks3 months6 months1 year NRS back 7,2 ± 0,43,5 ± 0,5*3,3 ± 0,5*3,9 ± 0,5* 3,6 ± 0,5* NRS leg 7,1 ± 0,53,4 ± 0,6*3,0 ± 0,5*3,2 ± 0,5* COMI 8,4 ± 1,35,4 ± 2,5*5,0 ± 2,8*5,1 ± 3,0* 4,9 ± 3,3* ODI 50 ± 1638 ± 16*34 ± 18*35 ± 19*31 ± 17* Tbl. 1: Clinical data (n=28) with preoperative, 6 weeks, 3, 6 months and 1 year postoperative NRS, COMI & ODI scores. Significant (*p<0,05) improvement. R E S U L T S Reference: Reinshagen C, Ruess D, Walcott BP, et al. A novel minimally invasive technique for lumbar decompression, realignment, and navigated interbody fusion. J Clinical Neuroscience 2015;22: Cage-Implantation6. Ipsilateral Screw Placement and Compression Fig. 2: A mm posterior midline skin incision is used for decompression and contralateral undercutting. To maintain maximal stability, only the medial parts of the facet joint are resected. The contralateral facet is opened for better release and fast ossification. Afterwards the same approach served for nucleotomy. Fig 3: Insertion of guide-wires under navigation control (e) in standard fashion vis-à-vis . Ipsilaterally guide-wires are introduced using cortical bone trajectories . Navigation avoids the violation of the upper facets. Fig 5: With an anterior and posterior element linked by a joint, the cage is easiliy inserted through the space gained from facetotmy (f). Fig. 4: Contralaterally, pedicle-screws are implanted. They were then used to achieve optimal distraction and realignment (g) of the segment under fluoroscopic control. To secure the result, a rod is implanted and the screws are tightened. Fig 6: The second rod is implanted and the screw-towers are used to achieve optimal compression on the cage. Usually, a fluorsocopic scan is obtained before closing. The figure illustrates the position of tubular retractors in regard to muscle layers. HybridLIF leads to considerable reduction of paraspinal muscle and soft-tissue injury in comparison to standard TLIF techniques. Fig. 1: For restoring sagittal balance preoperative analysis is done by radiographs and the Vertaplan TM software (c). Position and range of motion of all lumbar segments are shown. An optimal cage type/length, ventral/dorsal height and angulation is proposed by the software’s cage database. After virtual placement (d) into the segment, the position and range of motion of every lumbar segment may again be simulated under dynamic conditions. M E T H O D S INTRODUCTION a b d c e f g h  