Norwalk Community School District Instructional Rounds October 26, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principals Session: Introduction to NTI Goals and Session Framework for Principals EngageNY.org.
Advertisements

Through Instructional Rounds
“ A World Class System of Schools ” INSTRUCTIONAL ROUNDS DEBRIEF Insert School Date Adapted from the book INSTRUCTIONAL ROUNDS IN EDUCATION: A Network.
Lesson Study Overview Unlocking Minds Preparing Osceola County Students for a Bright Future Gladys Moreta K-12 Program Specialist Curriculum & Instruction.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
INTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTRUCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT RICHARD ELMORE HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION DATA WISE INSTITUTE December 2006.
Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.
ABC Curriculum Showcase Coventry Public Schools February 10, 2009 An introduction for parents and community members Left click your mouse to advance to.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Instructional Rounds Training Simpson County Schools January-February 2010.
Having a Strategy for Your Strategy GVSU Learning Network January 2014.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Pascoe Vale North Primary School
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
A Network Approach To Improving Teaching and Learning Center Point High School Instructional Rounds in Education.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Lisa Pruitt Program Director, District and School Support Services.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Adopting the Iowa Core CSL Working Group Nov. 10, 2009.
LESSON STUDY INSTRUCTIONAL LEARNING TEAMS – LIVING WITHIN A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY By Nancy J. Larsen, Ph.D.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Supporting High Quality Teaching and Learning Instructional Rounds Institute Jamie Spugnardi Liz Storey February 8, 2011.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
SOEL April 25, 2014 WISD/LESA. Norms 1. Stay fully engaged with discussion or activity. Hold off side bars and use of technology to scheduled breaks.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Instructional Rounds Holland Public Schools-District Continuous Improvement Team.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Instructional Rounds: Fall 2015 Debrief A Collaborative Approach to Improving Teaching & Learning City, Elmore, Fiarman, and Teitel. Instructional Rounds.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Continuing the School Visit: Deepening the Next Level of Work East Boston High School December 9, 2014.
Highland Community School District Instructional Rounds October 15, 2009.
Iowa Leadership Academy: “Superintendent Network” Heartland AEA 11 Pilot Network Facilitators Denny Wulf Sharon Kurns Dave Stickrod.
New London Debriefing Roles Chuck listens GPAEA team coaches Network members Stay in descriptive voice Stick to the evidence “Everyone speaks once before.
Iowa Superintendents Network Learning Day October 27, 2014 Indianola Middle School.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
AISI October 27, Essential Questions: What does it mean to be an AISI teacher leader? What does “leading” mean? What is critical thinking?
Learning Management System
1 1 Session #3 Superintendent’s Network “Getting results through people is a skill that cannot be learned in the classroom” Jean Paul Getty quotes (American.
1 Sample Introductory Rounds Session, Day 2. Learning Goals By the end of Day 2, we will:  Understand the elements of the instructional core  Be familiar.
Superintendents’ Network Welcome! Apprentice Facilitators And Coaches.
Overview of Network Team Plan.  Deliverable Metrics are being finalized  Assessment of Network Team Deliverables ◦ Principals ◦ Teachers ◦ District.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
1 Session #1 Superintendent’s Network January 7, & 28, 2009 “I wanted to change the world. But I have found out that the only thing one can be sure of.
School-Based Teacher-Led Instructional Rounds FEBRUARY 25, 2016 ARTS AT THE CAPITOL THEATER (ACT) MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL WILLIMANTIC, CONNECTICUT.
West Branch Elementary and Middle School
Central City Junior High and High School
Green Hills Instructional Rounds
Area 9 Superintendents Network
Learning Through Instructional Rounds
Nottingham Curriculum Night
Science Leadership Network
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Instructional Rounds Training
“Everyone speaks once before anyone speaks twice”
Iowa Superintendents Network
“Everyone speaks once before anyone speaks twice”
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Norwalk Community School District Instructional Rounds October 26, 2010

Welcome and Introductions Dan & Denny

Overview DaleBackground DennyTheory of Action Problem of Practice Dan/DebSchedule Dale Building Lay Out Deb Reminders DaleQuadrant C&D, Bloom’s Taxonomy

Schedule 8:15Welcome - Overview 9:00Classroom Rounds 11:30Lunch 12:00Debrief 2:30Next Level of Work 3:30Closing 4:00Adjourn

Theory of Action If teachers engage students with research based curriculum, if teachers deliver lessons which can be integrated into Quadrants “C & D”, and if students frequently engage in meaningful classroom experiences that could be categorized into Quadrants C & D, then students will demonstrate higher order work and responses in classrooms, perform better on standardized tests, and be more successful in college and the workplace.

Problem of Practice Despite the implementation of Research-based curriculum, Iowa Core training focused on Quadrants C & D, Concept Attainment Training, Daggett’s R&R Framework training, and Essential Questioning Training Norwalk students underperform in critical thinking as evidenced by indicators (ACT, ITED, Graduate Surveys, Instructional Rounds findings).

Focusing Questions 1. What tasks are students involved in? 2. What questions are teachers asking? 3. What are the student responses? 4. What did teachers do to assess student learning or help students asses their own learning?

Looking for patterns inductively Later in the process we will see what we can learn about teacher practices and student responses. From the inductive process, we will relate those categories to Quadrant C & D and Bloom’s Taxonomy.

TEACHER STUDENT CONTENT THE INSTRUCTIONAL CORE Points of entry for improvement of instruction The culture is present in the academic tasks that students are asked to do If you can’t see it in the core, it’s not there Academic tasks define the real accountability system in your school

Debrief Roles Denny & the Norwalk team listen Facilitators will keep the process moving smoothly Network members Stay in descriptive voice Stick to the evidence Avoid sharing your opinions during transitions OK to talk to student and teachers, but don’t interject yourself into the learning “Everyone speaks once before anyone speaks twice”

Debrief – Inductively analyze observations Individually: 1. Review notes and circle key observations 2. Record key observations on sticky notes ___for Student Tasks Response ___for Teacher Questions ___for Assessment Activity Team: 1. Organize sticky notes into categories and label categories 2. Summarize patterns in relation to focus questions

Debrief Teams join one other group to share and consolidate their categories Prediction – discuss in combined groups If you were a student at this school and did everything you were expected to do, what would you know and be able to do? Share categories and predictions with large group

Next Level of Work Share examples of reflective questions Combined teams generate reflective questions for Norwalk staff Prioritize questions Share

Next Level of Work District context & plans for sharing with staff Remember Focus on teaching and learning (Core) Aim for clarity about good instructional practice, leadership, and organizational practice Ideas for administrator and building leaders/teams Grain size Tie back to collected evidence related to the 2 questions and predictions

NLOW Form new groups – # Create reflective questions for the hosting school that invite the system to think about: Leadership Structural practices Instructional practices 1 Highest Leverage for each of the above Which questions invite the strongest level of thinking?”

Next Level of Work— Reflective Questions Reflective Questions ARE:Reflective Questions ARE NOT: Open EndedYes/No or single response Judgment freeContain bias Uses positive presuppositions “As a district with new and experienced teachers…” “As a district with inexperienced staff…” Uses explorative language: “What might be some possible ways to…” “Can’t your district…?” Shouldn’t…Couldn’t? Invites thinking at upper levels of knowledgeQuestions that are recall/factual levels referenced from Garmston, Costa, Lipton and Wellman

Thanks Closing Thanks to all for participating Sign the “THANK YOU POSTER” for Norwalk staff