HEER Webinar (note change on mainland due to Daylight Savings Time) When:March 11 th, 2015 Time:11am-12pm Hawaii Time (2:00pm Pacific Time, 5:00pm Pacific.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VAPOR INTRUSION: AN INTRODUCTION OHIO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE JENNIFER MILLER NOVEMBER 7, 2012.
Advertisements

Case Study of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion at a Dry Cleaner Site Amy Goldberg Day AEHS Annual East Coast Conference on Soils, Sediments.
COMPARISONS OF SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS MEASUREMENTS TO MODELED EMISSIONS FROM SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION by John A. Menatti and Robin V. Davis Utah Department.
New Groundwater Techniques and Technologies 17 th Annual RETS REMP Conference June 25-27, 2007 Eric L. Darois, CHP EPRI Consultant/RSCS Inc.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
MPCA Citizens’ Board Information Item February 25, 2014.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
EBC Seminar The IAQ/Mold Assessment – Getting it Right! – Controlling Your Risk Next Speaker Rosemary McCafferty Haley & Aldrich, Inc.
Vapor Intrusion: Investigation of Buildings Overview of the US vapour intrusion framework, empirical attenuation factors, and the conceptual understanding.
Vapor Intrusion Workgroup July 29,
RADON The Health Risks and Solutions. What is Radon? A naturally occurring radioactive gas. Colorless, odorless and tasteless. Found all over the U.S.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
DRAFT Field Sampling Guidance To be used this field season by DEC and consultants Initial focus on soil, groundwater, and vapor intrusion Future versions.
Common Issues for Exposure Scenarios without GNS VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Mike Allen Ohio EPA CO- Supervisor
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Strategy and Modeling Developments
Revised TCE Fact Sheet (a.k.a. “Status Update”) Q&A’s & Template IH Notice Form March 27, 2014 Paul W. Locke MassDEP Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (617)
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Soil Vapor Intrusion... A Decade of Regulatory Requirements & Experiences Paul W. Locke MA DEP Bureau.
Introduction to Atlantic RBCA Version 3 Webinar May 4, 2013.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS WAITING TO EXHALE – OR HOW TO MANUEVER THROUGH THE INDOOR AIR MAZE Vapor Intrusion Pathway By: Lisa Campe, MPH, LSP.
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
Quiz Solution 1 ug/L benzene = ? ppbv For gases, RT = 24 liters/mole at 20C How to go from volume to mass? Ug/L = mass/volume ppbv = volume/volume PV=nRT.
Vapor Intrusion and Environmental Liability Learning From Past Mistakes EDR Insight Webinar, February 12, 2013 Presented by: Joseph Maternowski Hessian.
Background and lessons learned Managers Meeting February 13, 2014.
GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004.
About Engineering Control Corp (ECC) provides construction design, support services and engineering controls to mitigate.
Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop A Study of Vapor Intrusion Modeling in the Context of EPA’s Guidance The 20 th Annual International Conference on Soils,
Michael J. Sullivan, Ph.D., CIH, REA
Discerning Background Sources from Vapor Intrusion Jeffrey Kurtz, Ph.D. and David Folkes, PE EnviroGroup Limited Denver Boston Albuquerque Seattle Colorado.
F I A Forest Inventory and Analysis Program The Nation’s Forest Census 2010 FIA Biomass Update W. Brad Smith.
Statistical Evaluation of Attenuation Factors at Lowry Air Force Base, CO Helen E. Dawson, PHD Regional Superfund Hydrogeologist US EPA Region VIII Denver,
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
1 Neptune and Company, Inc. Technical Guidance for Asbestos Risk in Soils Neptune and Company, Inc. Denver, CO
VI Draft Guidance: Overview of Comments to November, 2002 OSWER VI Guidance Michael Sowinski DPRA, Inc.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
C O A L I T I O N Corner Radon: Health Hazard and Disclosure Issue Coalition Corner: Business training tools for HR staff, real estate licensees and other.
USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009.
Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
GORE, GORE-TEX and designs are trademarks of W. L. Gore & Associates © 2007 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. 1 Environmental Investigations Using Versatile,
Charge Questions for Expert Panel Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, and Water October 19, 2004 Amherst,
Closing Session Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, and Water October 19, 2004 Amherst, MA.
Long-Term Management of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater – Iwilei District, Honolulu April 16, 2015.
Evaluation of Methane Pathway, Risk and Control Rafat Abbasi, P.E., Senior Project Manager Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program Department.
Vapor Study Informational Meeting General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Van Cleve Recreation Center November 12, 2013 Minnesota Department of Health.
Field Investigation of the Chemistry and Toxicity of TPH in Petroleum Vapors: Implications for Potential Vapor Intrusion Hazards Roger Brewer & Lynn Bailey.
Building Trust. Engineering Success. Real-time Vapor Intrusion Investigations in Industrial Buildings Using Portable GC-MS Presented by: Paul Gallagher,
Dungeons, Dragons, Pica Houses and the Need for Alternative, Vapor Intrusion Screening Tools Roger Brewer, Josh Nagashima, Mark Rigby, Martin Schmidt,
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Welcome to the World of AUL Avoiding the voidance of your CNS.
GSI ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Houston, Texas (713) Workshop 1: Assessment and Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion at Petroleum.
What’s the Problem: The Vapor Intrusion Issue Brownfields 2008 Heavy Starch: Cleaning the Dry Cleaners Detroit, MI May 5, 2008 Presented by: Henry Schuver,
Lenny Siegel Center for Public Environmental Oversight Brownfields 2008—May 7, 2008 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT at Schools with Shallow VOCs.
PVI Facts, Fallacies and Implications and the Need for 1,000+ Liter Indoor Air and Subslab Vapor Samples Roger Brewer, Josh Nagashima Hawai’i Department.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Dry Cleaning and the Environment
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Sean Anderson, P.Eng., QPESA Steve Russell, B.Sc., QPRA
Using the HAPSITE® as a Vapor Intrusion Investigation Tool
At facilities with subsurface contamination, what other chemicals may your workers be breathing? Matt Raithel.
Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations: Volatilization Criteria
Case Studies Bruce H. Trimble Sunbelt Environmental Services, Inc.
Radon Vapor Intrusion Screening Level Calculator
A&WMA Regulatory Conference Symposium UST Risk Based Corrective Action
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Presentation transcript:

HEER Webinar (note change on mainland due to Daylight Savings Time) When:March 11 th, 2015 Time:11am-12pm Hawaii Time (2:00pm Pacific Time, 5:00pm Pacific Time) Who:Martin Schmidt (Cox-Colvin, Inc.) and Harry O’Neil (Beacon Environmental, Inc.) What:Use of Active and Passive Soil Gas Samples to Support Vapor Intrusion Investigations TCEPCE

Dungeons, Dragons, Pica Houses and the Need for Alternative, Vapor Intrusion Screening Tools Roger Brewer, Josh Nagashima, Mark Rigby, Martin Schmidt, Harry O’Neill February 18, 2015 contact:

Reference Roger Brewer & Josh Nagashima: Hawai’i Dept of Health State vapor intrusion guidance Mark Rigby: Parsons Corporation, UC Santa Barbara Toxicology, risk assessment, vapor intrusion Martin Schmidt: Cox-Colvin and Associates, Inc. Vapor intrusion field investigations, Vapor Pins Harry O’Neill: Beacon Environmental Services, Inc. Vapor intrusion field investigations, passive soil gas Brewer, R., Nagashima, J., Rigby, M., Schmidt, M. and O'Neill, H. (2014), Estimation of Generic Subslab Attenuation Factors for Vapor Intrusion Investigations. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 34: 79–92.

Vapor Attenuation slab contaminated soil or groundwater source subslab vapors Method #1: Ratio of Vapor Entry to Indoor Air Exchange Indoor Air Exchange Rate (L/minute) Vapor Entry Rate (L/minute) Subslab AF = Vapor Entry Rate IAER

Example Vapor Intrusion Risk Regions VIR Region A(cold, +Alaska) Highest Risk VIR Region B 2 (warm) Moderate Risk VIR Region C (Med) Lower Risk VIR Region B 1 (Coastal) Moderate Risk VIR Region D (tropical) Lowest Risk Region A: High Vapor Flux, Low Indoor Air Exchange (SSAF = 0.003) Region B: Mod Vapor Flux, Mod Indoor Air Exchange (SSAF = 0.002) Region C: Lower Vapor Flux, High Indoor Air Exchange (SSAF = ) Region D: Low Vapor Flux, High Indoor Air Exchange (SSAF = ) VIR Region D (tropical) +Hawai’i

Method #2: Indoor Air and Subslab Soil Vapor Database Subslab AF = Conc. Indoor Air Conc. Soil Vapor Indoor Air Sample (µg/m 3 ) X Subslab Vapor Samples (µg/m 3 ) contaminated soil or groundwater source AF Scenario A: Homogeneous subslab vapor plume; Location of vapor entry point(s) unknown; Size and location of subslab vapor sample unimportant; Calculated subslab AFs identical.

Method #2: Indoor Air and Subslab Soil Vapor Database Subslab AF = Conc. Indoor Air Conc. Soil Vapor Indoor Air Sample (µg/m 3 ) X Subslab Vapor Samples (µg/m 3 ) contaminated soil or groundwater source Scenario B: Heterogeneous subslab vapor plume; Location of vapor entry point(s) unknown; Size and location of subslab vapor sample important; Calculated subslab AFs can vary widely; Correct AF unknown ? ?????

Effect of Heterogeneous Vapor Plumes in USEPA Vapor Intrusion Database? Many subslab samples representative of vapor entry point (median = 0.003)? Less Conservative More Conservative Subslab Attenuation Factor Frequency 95% UCL Nonrepresentative subslab samples collected from higher concentration area (false high attenuation)? Nonrepresentative subslab samples collected from lower concentration area (false low attenuation)?

Presentation and Recording of February 18 th Webinar Posted to HEER Web Page (“What’s New”)

Example subslab areas covered by different volumes of subslab soil gas samples (assuming sample collected from first 15cm of fill under slab and 20% air-filled porosity); Total volume of air-filled pore space in first 15cm of subslab fill approximately 2,250 liters per 100m 2 area; Collection of large-volume samples more challenging in tight soils (increase # of samples). More and/or Bigger Samples are Better Subslab Vapor Sample Volume vs Approximate Area of Influence 100L 50L 50ml 1L 6L 200cm For example only

Today’s Webinar When:March 11 th, 2015 (11am-12pm HI Time) Who:Martin Schmidt (Cox-Colvin, Inc.) and Harry O’Neil (Beacon Environmental, Inc.) What:Use of Active and Passive Soil Gas Samples to Support Vapor Intrusion Investigations TCEPCE

Upcoming Webinars (contact When:To Be Announced Who:Various What: Environmental Hazard Management Plans (e.g., institutional and engineering controls); Unexploded ordinance; Discrete vs Multi-Increment Sampling Methods; MIS for sediment; Environmental Action Levels; etc.