FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
Advertisements

SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
Conservation Commissions and the Kinder Morgan Proposed Gas Pipeline PRESENTATION TO NORTHEAST MUNICIPAL GAS PIPELINE COALITION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 MASSACHUSETTS.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
1 The National Environmental Policy Act in the Oil & Gas Industry.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
March 2, 2006Connecticut Siting Council Symposium Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Siting: The Federal Framework and the FCC’s Role Jeffrey Steinberg.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
Presented to: Association of California Airports By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date: September 21, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: Hershey Aviation Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, Charlie Campbell & Suki Gill Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Environmental.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Engineer Circular Requests to Alter USACE Projects
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Biological Reviews JOELLE L. GEHRING, Ph.D. Federal Communications Commission.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS SECTION 404 INDIVIDUAL PERMIT EVALUATION PROCESS July 22, 2005.
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
Streamlined Environmental Requirements for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation October 2004.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA
ACA Conference - September 2017
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts of how to comply with our rules Nuts and bolts of how to comply with our rules

NEPA (42 U.S.C. §§ ) Requires agencies to consider and disclose the environmental effects of their actions to improve decision-making and encourage transparency, public participation, and accountability. Requires agencies to integrate environmental considerations into their decisions.

NEPA and CEQ regulations Define effects broadly to include ecological, aesthetic, historic, social, and cumulative and indirect. Define actions broadly to include programs, rules, funding, licensing, permitting. NEPA sets out a process—no mandated outcome NEPA sets out a process—no mandated outcome

NEPA Three levels of review: ­­Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) ­Environmental Assessments (EAs) Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Categorical exclusions (CE, CX, CatEx) “Extraordinary circumstances”

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS

Environmental Compliance Regulations The FCC is responsible for ensuring that its actions comply with environmental laws and regulations, including NEPA. NEPA compliance rests with FCC.

FCC’s NEPA PROCEDURES Agency actions that trigger NEPA:  Licensing Spectrum (for associated facility construction)  Registering Towers To meet NEPA obligations, FCC imposes enforceable duties on licensees and applicants FCC has delegated initial assessment of whether proposed facility is CatExed and EA preparation to applicants and licensees FCC has CatExed all agency actions associated with construction of facilities but for those in certain categories (our extraordinary circumstances)

FCC Extraordinary Circumstances -- Triggers for EA High intensity white lights in residential neighborhoods High intensity white lights in residential neighborhoods Radiofrequency exposure in excess of FCC guidelines Radiofrequency exposure in excess of FCC guidelines Located in designated wilderness area or wildlife preserve Located in designated wilderness area or wildlife preserve Presence of sensitive species or their habitat Presence of sensitive species or their habitat Historic districts and properties, Indian religious sites Historic districts and properties, Indian religious sites Floodplain Floodplain Significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, water diversion, deforestation) Significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, water diversion, deforestation) Structure over 450 feet tall (migratory birds) Structure over 450 feet tall (migratory birds)

Who needs to comply? Registrants Registrants  Tower owners needing to register for aircraft navigation safety - non-licensee tower owners wanting towers available for collocators - non-licensee tower owners wanting towers available for collocators Licensees and spectrum lessees Licensees and spectrum lessees  Commercial licensees, utilities, broadcasters, RR, mining cos…  Site-specific (e.g. public safety) and geographic

How to Comply: FCC Form 854/Form 601 Prior to FCC’s granting an application, an applicant must certify that the proposed antenna structure will not have a significant effect on the environment. Certifying means all statements are “true, complete, correct, and made in good faith.” Certifying means all statements are “true, complete, correct, and made in good faith.” To answer questions and to certify, complete the NEPA Checklist. Must submit EA if might have significant effect. Retain the Checklist for your records. To answer questions and to certify, complete the NEPA Checklist. Must submit EA if might have significant effect. Retain the Checklist for your records.

NEPA Checklist Will the facility be located in an officially designated wilderness area? Will it be located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? Will the facility affect listed or jeopardize proposed threatened or endangered species (TES) or designated critical habitat? Will the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture that are listed, or are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places”? Will the facility affect Indian religious sites? Will it be located in a floodplain? Will construction involve “significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, deforestation or water diversion)”? Will the facility be over 450 (so might affect migratory birds)? High intensity white lights in residentially zoned neighborhood? Radio Frequency exposure? All other facility deployments, including deployment of new wireless towers, are categorically excluded.

Application for WTB Radio Service Authorization Form 601 Application for WTB Radio Service Authorization Would a Commission grant of Authorization for this location be an action which may have a significant environmental effect? (22 of Schedule I, 26 of D, 48 of M) See 47 CFR If “Yes,” submit an EA in accordance with 47 CFR Sections and This item is required for compliance with NEPA. See also Part 1, Subpart I of the FCC rules (47 CFR ).

Application for Antenna Structure Registration Form 854 Application for Antenna Structure Registration Item 48 Does the applicant certify that authorizations at this location would not have a significant environmental effect pursuant to Section ? Before certifying, look at Section checklist to answer. If “yes,” submit an environmental assessment in accordance with 47 CFR and Comply with environmental notice requirements.

Options Once an EA is Triggered OR Begin the EA Process; FCC approval can take Days. Consult with Agencies on changes to eliminate or mitigate triggering effects.

Primary FCC Triggers for EA May affect historic properties or Indian religious sites May affect historic properties or Indian religious sites  Required if adverse effect found through Section 106 process Located in 100-year floodplain or wetland Located in 100-year floodplain or wetland May affect threatened or endangered species or critical habitat May affect threatened or endangered species or critical habitat  Required if USFWS required formal consultation and Biological Assessment

When EAs are Required EA required under two circumstances   Action meets one or more of specific criteria stated in rules (checklist)   FCC orders EA in response to petition or on own motion EA requirement applies, if triggered, even excluded from Section 106 review

Contents of EA Requirements outlined in 47 CFR Must address all factors in 47 CFR (a) and (b) and include info on site selection and alternatives sites, impact of O and M in sensitive areas, extent of unavoidable effects, features of site with special environmental significance, effects… More than summary of checklist. Must address all factors in 47 CFR (a) and (b) and include info on site selection and alternatives sites, impact of O and M in sensitive areas, extent of unavoidable effects, features of site with special environmental significance, effects… More than summary of checklist. Specific expectations for each factor is spelled out in EA checklist Specific expectations for each factor is spelled out in EA checklist

Contents of EA – Endangered Species Protected species not present Protected species not present  Relevant documentation (typically IPaC response) Protected species present, but not affected Protected species present, but not affected  Determination by USFWS or own qualified biologist Not likely to Adversely Affect protected species Not likely to Adversely Affect protected species  USFWS concurrence Likely to Adversely Affect protected species Likely to Adversely Affect protected species  USFWS incidental take statement

Contents of EA – Historic Properties/Indian Religious Sites TCNS file number TCNS file number List of Tribes contacted List of Tribes contacted If no adverse effect, SHPO/Tribal Nation concurrences or explanation of why concurrences not needed If no adverse effect, SHPO/Tribal Nation concurrences or explanation of why concurrences not needed If adverse effect, MOA or FCC decision on avoidance/mitigation If adverse effect, MOA or FCC decision on avoidance/mitigation All relevant correspondence All relevant correspondence

Contents of EA – Floodplain/W etland 100-year floodplain 100-year floodplain  FEMA map or best available  If in floodplain, showing construction will be at least 1 foot above floodplain Wetlands Wetlands  US Army Corps map  If not in wetland, indicate  If wetland fill required, US Army Corps permit or other authorization

Contents of EA – Other Factors Migratory Birds Migratory Birds Wilderness area/wildlife preserve (wilderness always on federal land, preserve generally on federal land) Wilderness area/wildlife preserve (wilderness always on federal land, preserve generally on federal land)  Relevant databases, maps, etc.  If in protected area, relevant approvals or permits High-intensity white lights High-intensity white lights  Type of lights  Location (will not use high-intensity white lights in residentially zoned area) Radiofrequency exposure Radiofrequency exposure  Certification of compliance with Commission guidelines

Processing of EAs Placed on Public Notice within one week Placed on Public Notice within one week 30-day comment period 30-day comment period Staff may request additional information Staff may request additional information  Will not delay processing if timely response and no material change If no issues or petitions to deny, FONSI ordinarily granted within 45 days If no issues or petitions to deny, FONSI ordinarily granted within 45 days

Environmental Review If after review, no significant impact, applicant certifies and if no request for further environmental review (854) or petitions to deny (601) or agency ID’d issues, application granted. If an EA was prepared, and no significant issues, the Commission can issue a FONSI. If an applicant cannot certify no significant impact, FCC can prepare an EIS prior to approval or the applicant can withdraw the application.

Other agencies No EA needed if another agency has done NEPA No EA needed if another agency has done NEPA Federal land management agency EAs and EISs are sufficient, but not CatExs Federal land management agency EAs and EISs are sufficient, but not CatExs

CAPTIONING

Reminders The height/design of a tower is not relevant in determining that a proposed tower is subject to the NEPA process – some level of review is required, even for a CatEx Antenna Structure Registration requires environmental notice, even without an EA The grant of a license is not permission to construct; even with a license, building without following environmental regs can be violation of our rules A licensee must consider environmental effects and if necessary complete an EA before constructing facilities not otherwise requiring pre-construction authorization Refer to rules (1.1307) throughout process, not only form instructions and checklists

NEPA OVERVIEW Questions? Questions?

Contact: Contact: Erica Rosenberg