City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Advertisements

Hubbard County, Minn. Classification and Compensation Study Update GREG MANGOLD| AUGUST 5, 2014.
Mt. San Antonio College CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY February 2012.
HR Contacts Meeting May 23, 2013 Human Resource Mgmt Services Office of Management & Budget.
P.O.C.C. Presentation P.O.C.C. Compensation Overview Maggie Wollaston, SPHR Laurie Grenya DAS HRSD Classification and Compensation Unit.
Market Based Pay System The Market Based Pay System Project.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. City of Sierra Vista, AZ. City Council Presentation August 12, COMPENSATION AND.
Human Resources Peer Network Fundamentals of Compensation and Utilizing the CPCA Compensation & Benefits Survey April 3, 2014 Presented by: Brenda Gilchrist,
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Salary Findings April 25 th, 2011 Faculty Senate Budget Committee.
COMPENSATION - OVERVIEW WHAT IS COMPENSATION? PURPOSES BASES FOR COMPENSATION HOW TO IMPLEMENT? TRENDS.
Classified Employee Legislative Issues ERNN CONFERENCE PRESENTATION FEBRUARY 28, 2015.
Human Resources Office of 1 Job Classification System Redesign Information Session Health Care and Animal Care October 28, 2014.
Compensation Studies GFO AZ Conference February 16, 2012 Patty Goodwin Director of Surveys
Salary Administration East Carolina University Department of Human Resources Classification and Compensation.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
Total Rewards and Compensation
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
1. Percent change in employment, (Seasonally adjusted: private wage-and-salary workers) Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current.
Staff Meeting Compensation Plan Adopted during the November 11, 2010 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting.
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Review of Unclassified Pay Plan February 1, 2007 State of New Hampshire.
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
OPEN – C&HR – INFO 1-2 UM Total Rewards Update Board of Curators January 29 - February 1, 2014.
Classification & Compensation Study Outside firm (BCC) was hired to perform: Classification Study Internal Equity Pay equity compliance Study.
Compensating Employees Definition Objective Bases Types Determining Reward Job Evaluation Compensation Structure.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
Benchmarking Compensation & Benefits: How Do You Compare? Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group April 30, 2008.
Kingdom of Bahrain Civil Service Bureau Position Classification.
Reward Systems By H.V.Kothari. Total Compensation System MonetaryNonmonetary OrganizationMembership Individual or Team Attributes Job or Position Mandatory.
1 Fall Managing TXSTATE For Supervisors Office of Human Resources 601 University Drive Suite340 J. C. Kellam Bldg San Marcos, Texas Classification.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
Agenda Review Major Changes from January 8 Presentation of Draft Preliminary Results Review Final Recommendations Other Progress to Date  
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
Recommendations Recommendation 1: Regrade the ten classifications found to be 20 percent or more below market midpoint to be in alignment with the market.
MAG Management Advisory Group, Inc.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Budgets and Administration Chapter 18.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management Course code: MGT 712 Lecture 12.
State Administration Staffing a report by the Office of Program Evaluation & Government Accountability FINAL REPORT May 2008 FISCAL OPPORTUNIT Y STUDY.
Average Annual Premium Increases for Family Coverage,
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
Selecting Employees Chapter 7 Understanding Base Wage and Salary Systems Review.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
Creating a Salary Structure 101
Human Resources Department Bridget Paris, Compensation Specialist Work Session July 7, 2011.
Building Effective Compensation and Classification Systems to Attract and Retain Talented Employees 5050 Quorum Drive, Suite 625, Dallas, Texas
Dallas  Seattle  Austin  Cleveland THE WATERS CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Presented by: Report on Total Compensation.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Fair Pay for Northern California Nonprofits: The 2016 Compensation & Benefits Survey HIGHLIGHTS AND TRENDS May 12, 2016 Sponsored by CompassPoint Nonprofit.
Town of Carolina Beach Executive Summary for the Town Council Classification and Pay Study March 2015.
New Mexico Highlands University
2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession.
Compensation and Classification Study for Midwestern State University April 29, 2015 Presentation of Results.
Management Advisory Group, Inc. Executive Summary City of Fairfax Compensation and Classification Study July 1, 2016.
Job Evaluation & Base Wage Systems
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Designing pay levels, mix and pay structures
Job Evaluation Salary Administration Program
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
Appalachia Regional Library, North Carolina Board of Directors
FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE
NATIONAL HEALTH REFORM ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED SENATE EXCISE TAX
LUHR Compensation Program.
Presentation transcript:

City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

Class and Comp Study Overview Employees completed questionnaires and 150+ on-site interviews were conducted by our team. 210 titles currently in the system, 199 titles are proposed and will result in updated draft job descriptions and job titles reflecting the work being performed. Salary and benefits data has been collected from the targeted comparison employers, and a new pay plan has been designed for non-civil service positions. 2

Survey Methodology Job comparisons were made on actual job duties. Data point used for comparisons is pay range Midpoint, as the range width of pay plans among the comparators vary (some wide, some narrow). Benefits data was collected including health insurance and civil service certification pay. 3

Survey Illustration

Base Pay Survey Findings Pay data was compared for 114 jobs. 5 Relationship to Prevailing Rates Benchmark Job Classes % of Sample Average Variance Below (-5% or more)6759%- 11% Comparable (within 5%)3026%+0.01% Above1715%+ 12% Since actual salaries vary from Midpoints, this information simply illustrates that jobs move at different rates; over time, “blanket” adjustments to pay structures result in inconsistent market relationships (some high, some low).

Family Insurance Contributions by Employer 6 Market average contribution to family health is $1,010/month, Galveston $515/month However as a percentage, market pays 68% of premium to City’s 64%

Other Trends World at Work (formerly the American Compensation Association) surveyed 5,200 private and public employers for , and the national average budgeted salary adjustment is 3.1%. This is a different number than the CPI. Towers Perrin National Benefits Survey of private employers finds average employer contributions of $796 per month for health insurance ($9,552 per year). Bureau of Labor Statistics’ quarterly report (January 2015): 7 Compensation ComponentPrivate IndustryState and Local Government Wages and Salaries69.40%64.10% Benefits30.60%35.90%

Proposed Pay Plan – Non Civil Service A new salary table has been designed to allow job placement using market averages at Midpoint. The proposed table provides 50% range width between Minimum and Maximum, and will result in actual salaries being much closer to market. All non-civil service job classes have been placed on the proposed scale using available market data, internal reporting relationship logic, and career ladder opportunities. 8

Sample Illustration 9 Each non-civil service job placed on a range with consideration to Market, career ladder, and internal reporting relationships

Employees Below Proposed Minimums ee’s 129 ee’s 124 ee’s (166k is General Fund) (118k is General Fund) (100k is General Fund)

Pay Ranges – Non Civil Service 11 Full implementation of a market study can often occur over multiple budget years, and/or be prioritized according to available funding. 93% of all non-civil service are below proposed Midpoints; average time in job is 5.25 years.

Important Notes for Going Forward Adopting the proposed table for non-civil service, and budgeting regular salary adjustments commensurate with annual market salary movement, will bring actual salaries closer to market average. The City will have the data, tools, and template to more regularly gauge market movement and maintain an equitable, competitive, and sustainable pay plan. 12