1 (1) The accomplishment of the engineering design activities of IFMIF/EVEDA: The European-Japanese project towards a Li(d,xn) fusion relevant neutron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ss Hefei, China July 19, 2011 Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering Center for Plasma-Material Interactions Contact: Flowing.
Advertisements

Andrea Paoli AdV 1 st Project Review Cascina, November 3 rd, 2008 IME – infrastructure modifications for environmental noise reduction.
Current Status of IFMIF
Iván Fernández CIEMAT 2 nd EU-US DCLL Workshop, University of California, Los Angeles, Nov th, 2014.
Lithium Free-Surface Flow and Wave Experiments H.Horiike 1), H.Kondo 1), H.Nakamura 2), S.Miyamoto 1), N.Yamaoka 1), T.Muroga 3) 1) Graduate School of.
Design Constraints for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, M. Yoda and ARIES Team G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta,
Assessment of beam-target interaction of IFMIF A state of the art J. Knaster a, D. Bernardi b, A. García c, F. Groeschel h, R. Heidinger d, M. Ida e, A.
F. Groeschel On behalf of the IFMIF-EVEDA Project Team The IFMIF Target Facility Engineering Design and the Validation of Key Issues within the IFMIF/EVEDA.
Temperature Gradient Limits for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting (June 2004) G. W. Woodruff School of.
ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.
Oct.18, Neutron Field and Induced Radioactivity in IFMIF Environment M. Sugimoto(JAERI) IEA International Work Shop on Fusion Neutronics The Kongreshous.
1 Lecture #24 Fusion ENGR 303I. 2 Outline Fusion →Definition →Atoms usually used Previous attempts at fusion Current attempts at fusion →International.
Activities and Strategy in Japan on Fusion Technology for DEMO Hiroshi Horiike Osaka University Graduate School of Engineering Fusion Power Associates.
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
Design on Target and Moderator of X- band Compact Electron Linac Neutron Source for Short Pulsed Neutrons Kazuhiro Tagi.
FETS-HIPSTER (Front End Test Stand – High Intensity Proton Source for Testing Effects of Radiation) Proposal for a new high-intensity proton irradiation.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies.
1 Intelligent Sensing of Materials Lab., Department of Nanomechanics Effect of Dissolve Gas on Luminescent Spots Induced by a Cavitating Jet Hitoshi SOYAMA.
Broader Approach Activities toward Fusion DEMO Reactors IT/E-2 IAEA 21 st Fusion Energy Conference (Chengdu 17 th October, 2006 ) Shinzaburo Matsuda Japan.
Cryogenics for LCGT Technical Advisory Committee for LCGT ICRR SUZUKI, Toshikazu High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Pro-Science 4 th International Conference of Hydrogen Safety, September 12-14, 2011, SAN FRANCISCO, USA EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF IGNITED UNSTEADY HYDROGEN.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
LIPAc status report EPICS Integration and Commissioning + RFQ LCS status at INFN/LNL Alvaro Marqueta LIPAc Project Team on behalf of the LIPAc Control.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
OCT , 2006 COMSOL USERS CONF BOSTON, MA 1 Use of COMSOL Multiphysics for Optimization of an All Liquid PEM Fuel Cell MEA George H. Miley (Speaker),
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
Title of the slide Operation and commissioning of IFMIF LIPAc Injector and J-M Ayala A), B. Bolzon B), P. Cara C), N. Chauvin B), D. Chel B), D. Gex C),
Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.
06-November-2013 Thermo-Mechanical Tests BE-RF-PM Review of the CLIC Two-Beam Module Program Thermo-Mechanical Tests L. Kortelainen, I. Kossyvakis, R.
Design study of advanced blanket for DEMO reactor US/JP Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies 23 th -24 th Feb at UCSD,
ITER test plan for the solid breeder TBM Presented by P. Calderoni March 3, 2004 UCLA.
Overview of Fusion Neutronics Activities at JAERI/FNS in 2004 Presented by T. NISHITANI Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai-mura, , Japan.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Mechanics Electricity & Magnetism Thermal & Modern.
1/9 Session III-B Special Liquid Lithium Technology Session Summary C. H. Skinner, session chair Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 2 nd International.
Parameter to be measured Proposed Diagnostic System Critical Components Relevant Radiation fields Potential radiation effects Li temperatureIR camera Lens20-50.
JAERI nuclear analyses for IFMIF T. Umetsu, M. Yamauchi and M. Sugimoto Presented by Takeo NISHITANI Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) IAEA Technical Meeting.
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Scope and Project Plan of IFMIF/EVEDA Presented by Masayoshi SUGIMOTO (IFMIF/EVEDA Project Team, Deputy Leader/ JAEA) IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear.
Development of the Room Temperature CH-DTL in the frame of the HIPPI-CARE Project Gianluigi Clemente,
MCTF 8/17/06 A. Bross MTA Activities and Plans MCTF August 17, 2006 A. Bross.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
The International Workshop on Thin Films. Padova 9-12 Oct of slides Present Status of the World- wide Fusion Programme and possible applications.
Taikan SUEHARA et al., LCWS2007 & DESY, 2007/06/01 R&D Status of ATF2 IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Taikan SUEHARA, H.Yoda, M.Oroku,
1 A Self-Cooled Lithium Blanket Concept for HAPL I. N. Sviatoslavsky Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Mi9 Some experimental measurements of the Diffuser flow in a Ducted Wind Turbine assisted by two ejectors Kypros F. Milidonis Department of Mechanical.
Development of Cryogenic Moderators Using a Small Proton Accelerator Yoshiaki Kiyanagi*, Fujio Hiraga, Takashi Kamiyama, Akira Homma, Fumiyuki Fujita and.
CSNS cryogenic system Institute of High Energy Physics Guoping Wang June 21, 2016.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
1 1 מ חויבות ל מ צוינות - ג רעין להצלחה 200 kW Liquid Lithium Neutron Source G. Shimel, A. Arenshtam, I. Eliyahu, A. Kreisel, I. Silverman 6 th High Power.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
Jeong-Jeung Dang, Kyoung-Jae Chung, Y. S. Hwang *
DCLL TBM Reference Design
Designing Safety into a High-power Neutron Spallation Source
LIPAc Control System Reliability improvements
The Earth is {image} meters from the sun
Advanced-Fusion Neutron Source
DONES: DEMO-Oriented Neutron Source Workshop on Advanced Neutron Sources and its Applications. Aomori (Japan) November 4-5, 2017 A. Ibarra (CIEMAT) representing.
Sébastien Bousson (CNRS-IN2P3-IPN Orsay)
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
A. Ibarra and The WPENS team
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
IFMIF/DONES Project: opportunities for the industry
Presentation transcript:

1 (1) The accomplishment of the engineering design activities of IFMIF/EVEDA: The European-Japanese project towards a Li(d,xn) fusion relevant neutron source by Juan Knaster* on behalf of IFMIF/EVEDA family * Absent in FEC 2014 due to unsurmountable difficulties in obtaining the VISA (2) Evaluation of Li Target Facility of IFMIF in the IFMIF/EVEDA Project by Eiichi Wkai (JAEA) on behalf of IFMIF/EVEDA family FNS/1-2Ra & MPT/1-Rb

2 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg IFMIF: International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility EVEDA: Engineering Validation & Engineering Design Activities Article 1.1 of Annex A of the BA Agreement mandates IFMIF/EVEDA …to produce an integrated engineering design of IFMIF and the data necessary for future decisions on the construction, operation, exploitation and decommissioning of IFMIF, and to validate continuous and stable operation of each IFMIF subsystem ( Signed in February 2007, Entered into force on June 2007) IFMIF/EVEDA

3 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg IFMIF evaluation has successfully passed through all needed key steps as below: Conceptual Design Activity (CDA) phase in 1996 As a joint effort of the EU, Japan, RF and US Conceptual Design Evaluation (CDE) report in 1998 Towards a design simplification and cost reduction The Conceptual Design Report (CDR) in 2004 Co-written by a committee of EU, Japan, RF, US The final Phase of EVEDA within BA activities from 2007 As an efficient risk mitigation exercise to face the construction on cost and schedule timely with the world needs for a fusion relevant neutron source IFMIF through all technical steps

4 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg IFMIF Concept Availability of facility >70% A flux of neutrons of ~10 18 m -2 s -1 is generated in the forward direction with a broad peak at 14 MeV 125 mA CW deuterons at 40 MeV collide on a liquid Li screen flowing at 15 m/s and irradiate three regions >20 dpa/y in 0.5 liters >1 dpa/y in 6 liters <1 dpa/y in 8 liters Materials will be tested in the PIE

5 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg A Fruitful International Collaboration IFMIF/EVEDA A fruitful Japanese- European International collaboration under the BA Agreement with 7 countries involved with the respective main research labs in Europe and main universities in Japan

6 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg EVEDA Phase presents two parallel work packages EDA Phase Engineering Design Activities EVA Phase Engineering Validation Activities Two Work Packages

7 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg The Design of IFMIF is broken down to 5 facilities Accelerator Facility Lithium Target Facility Test Facility Post-irradiation and Examination Facility Conventional Facilities Objective of Validation activities Design of IFMIF

8 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg EVA Phase Advancing Successfully J. Knaster et al., IFMIF: overview of the validation activities, Nuclear Fusion 53 (2013) (18 pp)

9 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg Complete WBS, detailed 3D models of plant, RAMI of individual facilities, remote handling studies, DDDs of all sub-systems (x35), licensing scenarios, safety reports, cost and schedule… A Quality Review Panel (Muroga-sensei, Horiike-sensei, Carlo Pagani and Anton Möeslang) and emitted a report to the Steering Committee, who adopted it EDA Phase Accomplished on Schedule

10 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg Report available upon request at IFMIF Plant Description document

11 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg Alvarez-type Drift Tube Linac replaced by a Superconducting RF Linac Reduction in beam losses and operation costs Configuration of the Test Cell changed irradiation modules have no more a shielding function Improved irradiation flexibility and the reliability of the remote handling equipment Quench Tank of the Lithium loop re-located outside the Test Cell Reduction of tritium production rate and simplification of maintenance processes Maintenance strategy modified Allowing a shorter yearly stop of the irradiation operations and a better management of the irradiated samples. Mario Pérez and the IFMIF/EVEDA Integrated Project Team The Engineering Design Evolution of IFMIF: from CDR to EDA Phase SOFT 2014 Main Design Improvements from CDR (CDR: Comprehensive Design Report)

12 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg Risk Analysis

13 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg Possible inquiries please or at +81 (0) Wikipedia J. Knaster et al., IFMIF, a fusion relevant neutron source for material irradiation current status, Journal of Nuclear Materials 453 (2014) 115–119

14 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg Evaluation of Li Target Facility of IFMIF in the IFMIF/EVEDA Project by Eiichi Wkai (JAEA) on behalf of IFMIF/EVEDA family Part II: EVEDA Li Test Loop constructed in JAEA-Oarai

-D + -Li stripping reaction generates high intense neutrons to simulate fusion irradiation conditions. - High-speed liquid Li flow along concave back plate is selected as IFMIF target to handle a high heat load of 10MW D + beams. IFMIF Liquid Lithium Target Concept Liquid Li Condition: Temp.: 250 o C, Velocity: 15 m/s Vacuum: Pa 15

Validation of stable long-time operation of a high-speed free-surface liquid Li simulating IFMIF target. Validations of diagnostics on the Li flow and impurity control systems for a Li loop. Main Missions of EVEDA Li Test Loop (ELTL) Averaged heat flux : 1 GW/m 2 Jet velocity : 15 m/s (range m/s) Jet thickness/Width : m/0.26 m Surface wave amplitude : < +/- 1 mm Initial (inlet) Li temperature: 250 o C Vacuum pressure : Pa near Li free surface Major Requirements for Li Target in IFMIF Main Missions of EVEDA Li Test Loop (ELTL) 16

Engineering Design Construction, operation and tests of EVEDA Li test loop ( installed at Oarai ) Erosion/Corrosion Diagnostics Li purification system N H Dump tank EMP Nozzle Li flow Remote handling Li Safety handling ( the EU: Cavitation test, etc.. ) (1)Functional tests of each equipment (2)Tests of high-speed fluid with a free surface under vacuum (3) Long-duration tests ・ The tests for 1000 to 8000 hours in a small Li loop of the EU (F82H, Eurofer 97) ・ Wave height measurement of high- speed Li flow ・ Applicability evaluation of diagnostics by a Li loop at Osaka Univ. ・ Assistance analysis by a water test loop ・ Replacement of the integrated target assembly (Japan). ・ Replacement of only the backplate (the EU). Nozzle Target assembly Cold trap (O, Be, etc.) Impurity monitors (H, N, O, C etc.) Impurity traps(N, T(D)) ・ Removal of impurities in Li, impurity monitors Engineering Validation Research ・ Li handling technology, fire extinguishing testing Lithium Facility Subjects in IFMIF/EVEDA Projects 17

Construction, operation and tests of EVEDA Li Test Loop (ELTL) – Schedule - 18

Li Dump Tank Heat Exchanger of Air cooling type Air Duct of Heat Exchanger Confinement Vessel for Lithium flowing with free surface in target assembly First floor: EMP, Cold trap, Cavitation Sensor, etc. Second floor: Li sampler, Heat Exchanger, Cavitation sensor Cabinet Third floor: Target vessel, A part of Quench Tank, etc. Under ground level: Li dump tank. (2.5 ton Li (5000 L) 20 m in Height Vacuum pump for Target Vacuum pump This height was needed to prevent the occurrence of cavitation in Electro-Magnetic Pump. World largest liquid Li test loop constructed by JAEA in Oarai-site ( Nov. 2010) 19

20 M AIN M EASUREMENT APPARATUS (D IAGNOSTICS ) InstrumentModel, MfrMajor spec. Flow rateEMF(Electro- magnetic flow meter) Sukegawa electric Co., Ltd.Range: 0 ~ 3000 L/min (operational range) Accuracy (2σ): +/-55.8 [L/min] or 1.86 % FS* Pressure Pressure gauge PTU-S, SwagelokRange: to 0.3 MPaG Accuracy: +/- 0.5 % FS Cold- cathode Pirani gauge M-360CP-SP/N25, Cannon Anelva Corp. Range: 5 x to 1 x 10 5 (Pa) Accuracy: +/- 30 % RD** Target Flow Obser.& Meas. Video camera HVR-Z7J, SonyRecord format: HDV1080/60i Digital still camera D800 (Lens: AS Nikkor mm), Nikkon Number of pixels: 36.3 M Laser Distance meter Optical Comb Absolute Distance Meter ML-5201D1- HJ, Optical Comb, Inc. See: Next page * FS: Full Scale, **RD: Reading The flow rate and pressure were recorded in a control PC in the central control room every one second. On the other hand, the appearance of the Li target was monitored and recorded by a video camera and a digital camera. Table:. Model and major specifications of the instruments 20

ItemValue (IFMIF condition) Mean Li jet speed U m [m/s]10, 15, 20 (10 ~ 16) Inlet Li temperature [°C]250 (or 300) Vacuum pressure P v [Pa]1.6 ~ 4.0 x (10 -3 ~ )1.6 ~ 2.1 Measurement positions [mm]* At Y = 0 mm: -50 <= X <= 50 At X = 0 mm: -50<= Y <= 50 (-25 <= X <= 25 and -20 <= Y <= 20) Whole measurement range: -50 <= X <= 50 and -50 <= Y <= 50 (-25 <= X <= 25 and -20 <= Y <= 20) Sampling frequency [kHz]500 Data recording time [sec]60 (one-turnover circulation time of approximately 60 s at 15 m/s) Laser wavelength [nm]1550 Laser spot diameter [mm]0.13 (determined based on the preliminary result) Measurement error [mm] (Evaluated experimentally) 0.04 (for target thickness) 0.02 (for wave height) *The intervals of measurement positions are 10 or 15 mm for the X direction and 5 mm for the Y direction. Specification of Laser Distance Meter 21

22 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg V = 15.1 m/s, P = 1.3 x Pa T = 250 o C Flow appearance of Li target (a)Flow straightener (b)Double contraction nozzle (c)Target flow channel (back plate) (d)Viewing port Nozzle Side wall B/C 100

23 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg 15 m/s, 3 Pa, 250 o C (X,Y)=(0,0): B/C Mean : 0.52 mm Max. : 3.26 mm 15 m/s, Pa, 250 o C Average thickness : / mm (1σ) at B/C - Nonuniformity (max.-min.) is 0.16 mm Wave amplitude (= height/2) : - Mean : / mm (1σ) at B/C % are less than 1 mm (requirement) - Weilbull Distribution Wave height distribution T. Kanemura, H. Kondo et al., “Measurement of Li-target thickness in the EVEDA Li Test Loop”, To be published in Fus. Eng. Des. 12 Time-averaged thickness of Li flow -3D image -  Laser-distance meter (Optical Comb Inc.) Time-of-flight (TOF) measurement  Analysis method: Zero-up crossing method for average thickness and statistical properties of wave height Laser-probe method B/C Li target measurement

24 J. KnasterFEC 2014 – Saint Petersburg Long-time stability of the Li target was successfully demonstrated. Day 1Day 25 Period: 1 month (2 – 26 Sep. 2014) Condition: Li target (15 m/s, 300 – 250 o C, 120 kPa) in parallel with the purification system (cold trap at 200 o C) Stable Li target throughout the continuous operation Accumulated time of Li target operation > 1000 hours (At present it is continuing the Li flowing up to end of Oct. 2014) Our Target Area for Design Requirement Long-time continuous operation

1.The Li target in the IFMIF conditions (250 o C, 15 m/s, Pa) and its stability were successfully demonstrated.  Average thickness: ± 0.08 mm (1σ)  Mean wave amplitude: 0.26 ± 0.02 mm (1σ)  Maximum wave amplitude: 1.45 ± 0.14 mm (1σ) The maximum wave amplitude is very few over the design requirement of 1 mm, and 99.7 % of the total wave components are within the requirement. Therefore, we confirmed that the Li target of the current design was quite stable and satisfies the design requirement. We finally validated the Li target stability. 2. Continuous long-term operation of the Li target was conducted (continuous operation: 1 month, accumulated time: >1000 h). Validation of the Li target was the highest priority subjects for the Li target system of the IFMIF/EVEDA project. To achieve this goal, we designed and constructed the ELTL, and produced a stable Li target that complies with IFMIF requirements. (The validation operation of the Li test loop is continuing up to the end of Oct ) Li Target Validation Tests - Summary - 25

Thank you for your attention 26

Specification of ELTL and IFMIF LF 27

Erosion/corrosion ENEA Brasimone Lithium Loop: Lifus 6 MaterialExposure [h] F82H/ Eurofer ~ 1000 ~ 2500 ~ 3500 To perform corrosion/erosion tests at constant temperature (reference 350°C) and velocity (reference 16 m/s in test section) under the purification control for Li with less than 30 wppm N To test lithium purification and impurities monitoring systems including Purification 28

(a)Flow Straightener - A honeycomb for removing large scale turbulence. - Three perforated plates for flattening velocity distribution. (b) Contraction Nozzle - Two-step contraction, contraction ratio is 10. (250 mm to 25 mm in thickness) To obtain flow velocity up to 20 m/s. (c) Target Flow Section (back plate) i) Flow Width and Thickness : 100 and 25 mm ii) Viewing Ports: Two Ports 29 Li inventory 2.5 tons (5000 l) Li flow rate 3000 L/min (max.) EM flow meter range  3000 L/min Li flow velocity in Target  20 m/s Material S.S. 304 for pipe, 316L for back- plate Li temp °C Design temp. 400 °C Design pressure Pa to 0.75 MPa G Design Specification of Proto Type of EVEDA Lithium test loop (ELTL) 29

Measurement for Li free surface in ELTL (Non-Contact Method – Developed Laser distance meter ) Fig. Interference condition of laser The present laser condition:  Spot diameter: 0.1 mm (MFD)  Laser incident angle: 0.85 o Fig. Slope angle α (solid line) with sine curve y (dashed line) The incident laser is returned to the laser head from the region of mm. This means 62 % of the total energy is returned (the laser energy is distributed to normal distribution), which is considered to be large enough for a significant signal. A : 0.28 mm λ : 4 mm [3] 30

31 Laser Head Nozzel Hatch for measurement PRECISION POSITIONING STAGE Base of Laser head X Direction Li Flow Optical bench Target Assembly Figure: Setting of measurement instruments Y Direction Z direction Origin ( X,Y)=(0,0) 光学定盤 Laser Distance Meter

The solid red line denotes the Rayleigh distribution, The dashed blue line denote the Weibull distribution, the “parent” distribution of the Rayleigh distribution, Nondimensional wave height distribution at P v = Pa (1) (2) Stability limit! Temporal fluctuation 32

Three-dimensional plot of the average thickness of the Li target at U m = 15 m/s at P v = 1.8 Pa. (Black symbols denote measurement data) Average thickness distribution along the Y (spanwise) direction at X = 0. Average thickness distribution along the X (streamwise) direction at Y = 0. The area corresponding to the IFMIF beam footprint (-25 <= X <= 25 and -20 <= Y <= 20) Un-uniformity inside the beam footprint was 0.16 mm along the Y (spanwise) direction, 0.10 mm along the X (streamwise) direction. The Li target is adequately smooth on average. Beam center Flow direction Sliced at Y = 0 Sliced at X = 0 Average thickness of Li Target Presented by T. Kanemura in SOFT

Statistics of measurement results U m [m/s]101520Design requirement N*562- A mean [mm]** 0.23 ± 0.02 (1σ) *** 0.26 ± 0.02 (1σ) *** 0.24 ± 0.01 (1σ) *** 1 mm A max [mm]**1.50 ± 0.11 (1σ) *** 1.45 ± 0.14 (1σ) *** 1.66 ± 0.10 (1σ) *** η mean [mm]25.73 ± 0.07 (1σ) *** ± 0.08 (1σ) *** ± 0.08 (1σ) *** 25 mm N: the number of the data samples, A mean : Mean wave amplitude, A max : Maximum wave amplitude, η mean : Average thickness *The data were obtained on different days to check reproducibility. **Amplitude A is half wave height (A = H/2). ***Measurement uncertainty includes variation of measured data itself and measurement error. Statistics of measurement results obtained at the beam center (X, Y) = (0, 0) under the IFMIF condition. The Li target of the current design is quite stable and satisfies the design requirement. Presented by T. Kanemura in SOFT

Purification of Lithium 1000/T ( K -1 ) Solubility ( at.ppm ) O C H N Solubility of H, C, N, O in Li Temperature ( ℃ ) Cold trap: 453~500K Formation of Li-Cr-N is one of the most serious corrosion for S.S. (>60~70wppmN) YN is very stable, which degrades hydrogen gettering efficiency. ⇒ Titanium react with N even N in Li is less than 1wppm C, O : solubility is small enough to use cold trap. Purposes of impurity reduction suppression of corrosion (C, N, O) suppression of erosion (H(?), C, O) reducing of radio-activity of Li (T(H,D)) preventing Y from degradation (N, O) N:N: Hydrogen distribution ratio between Y/Li is very large. However, Yttrium easily react with N and O in Li H:H: Total content of H isotope in Li (  10 wppm) T content in Li (  1 wppm) N content in Li (  10 wppm) O content in Li (  10 wppm) 35