1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K. Fujiki, H. Ito, M. Tokumaru Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory (STELab), Nagoya University. SOLAR WIND FORECAST BY USING INTERPLANETARY SCINTILLATION.
Advertisements

Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
Heliospheric Propagation of ICMEs: The Drag-Based Model B. Vršnak 1, T. Žic 1, M. Dumbović 1, J. Čalogović 1, A. Veronig 2, M. Temmer 2, C. Moestl 2, T.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
Assessing the Contribution of Heliospheric Imaging in Improving Space Weather Prediction SHINE Session 6 Simon Plunkett and Doug Biesecker Thursday Morning.
Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES &
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
ZEC Model parameters of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Jan. 18, 2011.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
MHD Modeling of the Large Scale Solar Corona & Progress Toward Coupling with the Heliospheric Model.
The First Space-Weather Numerical Forecasting Model & Reconstruction of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao NAOC Oct.
NADIR – Focus Area V: Forecasting Geomagnetic Activity MURI All-Hands Meeting, Boulder, CO, October, 21-22, 2008 David FalconerUniversity of Alabama &
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Characterization of Coronal Mass Ejection Deflection using Coronagraph Image Sequences Jenna L. Zink, GMU Undergraduate Research Scholars Program, Rebekah.
Samantha Sanders Code 674 Dr. David G. Sibeck NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Space Weather Tools Demonstration R. Mullinix and M. L. Mays NASA GSFC Heliophysics Science Division, Space Weather Laboratory 25 September 2013
Radio Remote Sensing of the Corona and the Solar Wind Steven R. Spangler University of Iowa.
Exploration Physics International, Inc. HAF: An Operational, Event-driven Solar Wind Forecast Model 1 Murray Dryer
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Assessing Predictions of CME Time- of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations Angelos Vourlidas Vourlidas- SHINE
Semi-Empirical MHD Modeling of the Solar Wind Igor V. Sokolov, Ofer Cohen, Tamas I. Gombosi CSEM, University of Michigan Ilia I Roussev, Institute for.
Remote Sensing of Solar Wind Velocity Applying IPS Technique using MEXART Remote Sensing of Solar Wind Velocity Applying IPS Technique using MEXART Mejía-Ambriz.
Olga Khabarova Heliophysical Laboratory, Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS (IZMIRAN), Moscow, Russia
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Space weather forecasters perspective: UK David Jackson and Mark Gibbs SEREN Bz workshop, Abingdon, 9-10 July 2014.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
11. Assessing the Contribution of Heliospheric Imaging, IPS and other remote sensing observations in Improving Space Weather Prediction Bernie Jackson,
Improving Space Weather Forecasts Using Coronagraph Data S.P. Plunkett 1, A. Vourlidas 1, D.R. McMullin 2, K. Battams 3, R.C. Colaninno 4 1 Naval Research.
Modeling of CME-driven Shock propagation with ENLIL simulations using flux-rope and cone-model inputs Using observations from STEREO/SECCHI and SOHO/LASCO,
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Radio and Space Plasma Physics Group Tracking solar wind structures from the Sun through to the orbit of Mars A.O. Williams 1, N.J.T. Edberg 1,2, S.E.
Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Solar Wind Propagation Tool Chihiro Tao 1,2, Nicolas Andre 1, Vincent Génot 1, Alexis P. Rouillard 1, Elena Budnik 1, Arnaud Biegun 1, Andrei Fedorov 1.
CASS/UCSD Dusan_CCMC_2013 Heliospheric Solar Wind Forecasting Using IPS Slides For A Possible CCMC Presentation 2013 Introduction:
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
Multi-Point Observations of The Solar Corona for Space weather Acknowledgements The forecasting data was retrieved from NOAA SWPC products and SIDC PRESTO.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
IPS tomography IPS-MHD tomography. Since Hewish et al. reported the discovery of the interplanetary scintillation (IPS) phenomena in 1964, the IPS method.
Heliospheric Modeling at the CCMC and possible ways these modeling efforts can be improved MacNeice and Taktakishvili SHINE June 26, 2012.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
H.-S. Yu 1, B.V. Jackson 1, P.P. Hick 1, A. Buffington 1, M. M. Bisi 2, D. Odstrcil 3,4, M. Tokumaru 5 1 CASS, UCSD, USA ; 2 STFC RALab, Harwell Oxford,
B.V. Jackson H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington,
B.V. Jackson, H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, and A. Buffington,
Towards unambiguous characterization of coronal structures
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
ICME in the Solar Wind from STEL IPS Observations
Utilizing Scientific Advances in Operational Systems
2014SWW - S9 3D Reconstruction of IPS Remote-sensing Data: Global Solar Wind Boundaries for Driving 3D-MHD Models Hsiu-Shan Yu1, B.V. Jackson1, P.P. Hick1,
Predicting the Probability of Geospace Events Based on Observations of Solar Active-Region Free Magnetic Energy Dusan Odstrcil1,2 and David Falconer3,4.
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Met Office Forecaster and Customer Requirements and Rationale
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
Modeling Coronal Mass Ejections with EUHFORIA
Presentation transcript:

1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter, M. Kuznetsova, and P. K. Manoharan Science for Space Weather, Jan 24 – 29, 2016, Goa, India

2 Ensemble Modeling of CMEs at CCMC/SWRC

Ensemble Modeling 3 Ensemble modeling is used in weather forecasting to quantify prediction uncertainties and determine forecast confidence Individual forecasts which constitute an ensemble forecast represent possible scenarios that approximate a probability distribution which reflects forecasting uncertainties. Uncertainties can be from initial conditions, observation error, and techniques and models. Different forecasts in the ensemble can start from different initial conditions and/or be based on different forecasting models/procedures. Provides a quantitative description of the forecast probability that an event will occur by giving event occurrence predictions as a percentage of ensemble size (probabilistic forecast). Conveys the level of uncertainty in a given forecast in contrast to a categorical yes/no forecast (with only two probabilities, zero and one).

Cone Model Concept Zhao et al, 2002, Cone Model: CME propagates with nearly constant angular width in a radial direction CME Parameters: input to WSA-ENLIL+Cone Model 1 set of input parameters – 1 modelling result, no estimate of uncertainty level, no probabilistic forecast.

Ensemble Modeling with WSA-ENLIL+Cone 5 Measure a set of n CME input parameters. Typically n=36 to 48 provides an adequate spread of input parameters, and this number can be increased as needed. These are used as input to an ensemble of n WSA-ENLIL+Cone model runs. This gives an ensemble of n profiles of MHD quantities and n CME arrival time predictions at locations of interest. At Earth, n Kp estimates are made using WSA-ENLIL+Cone model plasma parameters as input to the Newell et al. (2007) coupling function for three IMF clock angle scenarios (Θ C =90°, 135°, and 180°). For n=48, an average run takes ~80 minutes on a cluster (using 128 processors).

6 Ensemble of input CME parameters obtained by measuring the same feature using StereoCAT, which employs geometric triangulation techniques. Example ensemble simulation: 18 April 2014 CME Halo CME associated with M7.3 flare, coronal wave visible south of the AR

18 April 2014 CME: WSA-ENLIL+Cone modeled magnetic field, velocity, density, and temperature profiles at Earth for 36 ensemble. Clear ICME arrival with enhanced post-shock temperatures, enhanced magnetic field with rotations in direction, and declining solar wind speed. Observed CME arrival

18 April 2014 CME: Histogram distribution of arrival time predictions at Earth -5.2 hours prediction error for average predicted CME arrival Mean predicted arrival: 20 April :07 UT Spread: 20 April :05 to 11:15 UT. 100% arrival likelihood

Kp is forecast using ENLIL predicted solar wind quantities at Earth as input to the Newell et al. (2007) coupling function for three clock angle scenarios (Θ C =90°, 135°, and 180°) and all three angles combined, assuming equal likelihood. 18 April 2014 CME: Distribution of Kp probability forecast Observed Kp: 5 during period 12:00-15:00 UT on 20 April. 84% of the forecasts fall between Kp = 5 to 7. The most likely forecast is for Kp=7 at 41%, followed by Kp=5 at 27% and Kp=6 at 16% likelihood of occurrence. Kp =5 observed

10 Can real time IPS observations improve ensemble modeling results? Pruning of Ensemble modeling using Ooty Radio Telescope IPS observations

IPS observations from Ooty Radio Telescope With the availability of year-round IPS observations from many distant radio sources it is possible to obtain images of heliospheric density to track the propagation of CMEs in the heliosphere starting at ¼ AU.

CME: two different members of the ensemble member #1member #10

Pruning of the Ensemble simulation If, say at ½ AU, we can observe it’s track in the heliosphere, we can get rid of wrong ensemble members and improve the prediction accuracy!

Tracking CMEs using Ooty Telescope The scintillation g-index of a radio source ( P.K. Manoharan et al, Solar Phys., 2006): the ratio of observed scintillation to average expected scintillation The sky map with the Sun in the center and the outer perimeter being at 90 degrees away from the Sun. The center represents the Sun-Earth line. The top points towards heliographic north, the bottom south. Angles from the Sun are translated into distance in R_S with 90 degrees corresponding to the Earth’s distance from the Sun.

Summery We need more sources and probably higher time resolution of the IPS data to be able to track the CME propagation and accordingly prune the ensemble simulation