THE REAL SUPPLEMENT VERSUS SUPPLANT STORY Maintenance of Effort ( MOE)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEA Final Report Process
Advertisements

Project Narratives Colorado Department of Education June 2011.
IDEA-B LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) FY 2014 and Beyond Texas Education Agency (TEA) Division of Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting November 2013.
Campus Improvement Plans
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
West Virginia’s Experience. West Virginia Issues  SEA Maintenance of Financial Support (MFS) – USED Waiver  LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) – OSEP Verification.
Indirect Cost Rate Proposal Region 11 Education Service Center January 28, 2015.
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
Special Education Monitoring – IDEA Grant
April 2009 Copyright © 2008 Mississippi Department of Education Instructional Programs and Services Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) April.
IDEA-B and NCLB LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Maintenance of Effort for Special Education April 11, /11/14Office of Special Education1.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Developing a Federal Platform Presentation to State Board of Education January 2013.
Federal Fiscal Compliance 101 Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Application for Approval of Funding for Residential Placement
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
FY 14 Special Education Funding Issues Illinois ASBO Annual Conference May 16, 2013 Illinois State Board of Education Funding and Disbursement Services.
Special Education Funding Education Service Center, Region 20 Sherry Marsh 1.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
Transfer Payment and Financial Reporting Branch Ministry of Education Financial Statement Checking Procedures TPFR Information Sessions Fall 2007.
Noneducational Community-based Support Services Funding Education Service Center Region 11 Fort Worth, Texas.
RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ESE and Charter Schools.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Maintenance of Effort Danna Sanders Phone:
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
VCASE PRESENTATION Annual Plans, Maintenance of Effort (MOE) and Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) 1 October 7, 2013.
Revenue. Objectives Participants will learn: Sources of special education funds Purpose of special education funds Federal funding sources State funding.
1 Annual Request for Special Education Funds Application Training Fiscal Year 2010 May 28, 2009 New Hampshire Department of Education Bureau of Special.
 Two aspects to IDEA MOE: 1. Eligibility Process  Determines eligibility to receive IDEA-B funds  Compares upcoming year’s Budget to prior year Expenditures*
1 Understanding IDEA and MOE The basics of maintenance of effort.
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SPED Finance-Grants and Data LEA Academy SPED Finance 1.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE). MOE REQUIREMENT Federal law requires that each local education agency (LEA) receiving federal funds pursuant.
Budgeting. Objectives Participants will learn: Resources for budgeting Distribution of state special ed funds Projecting state and federal funds Code.
Maintenance of Effort Office of Special Education Fall Forum 1.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) for Special Education April 7, 2015 April 2015Office of Special Education1.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Special Education Budgets GCASE – SELDA February 2015.
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section IDEA Part B Grant Fiscal Monitoring Presented by: Antonia Johnson, IDEA Part B Consultant.
1 Connecticut State Department of Education American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA): Bureau of Special Education Teleconference May 21, 2009.
Special Education Consolidated Grant Application and Program Guidelines Revisions for TEA|Division of IDEA Coordination May 2011.
Maintenance of Effort Federal Cross-Cutting & Special Education MoE Daniel Lunghofer Supervisor, School District/ESD Accounting.
Consolidated Fiscal (OCFO) Requirements: Special Education and Federal Programs Components Spring Fiscal WorkshopsSpring Fiscal Workshops.
Local Education Agency (LEA) Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Requirements under IDEA.
Utilizing Federal IDEA Special Education Funds Permissively to Serve At-Risk Students in General Education The Fiscal Mechanics of RTI and PBS.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012 BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION Division of Performance and Accountability Special Education Program 1.
COORDINATED EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES CEIS 1.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 IDEA Recovery Funds for Services to Children and Youths with Disabilities.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MONITORING – IDEA GRANT Jenifer Spear Office of Special Education Programs.
1 Understanding IDEA and MOE The basics of maintenance of effort.
Copyright© Texas Education Agency April 2011 FAR (Financial Accounting and Reporting) Coding System: –Mandatory Account Codes for School Districts,
ESS G RANT M ANAGEMENT IDEA Charter School Expansion Act (CSEA), Basic Entitlement and supplemental grants New Charter Operator Training 2015.
Fundamentals of Special Education Finance OkASBO Conference FY 2013.
1 RTI, MOE and Other Complex Fiscal IDEA Issues. Agenda - Allowability - Significant Disproportionality, CEIS and RTI - Time and Effort Reporting - Maintenance.
Special Education Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Michael Brooks Division of School Finance Special Education.
IDEA Grants Application: Maintenance of Effort. 2 What is Maintenance of Effort? IDEA regulation (34 CFR § ) which directs districts, for each grant.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Introduction to LEA MOE Tool
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
LEA Maintenance of Effort and Excess Cost Calculation
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
IDEA Maintenance of Effort
Special Education Maintenance of Effort (MOE)
VASBO Spring Conference May 19, 2016 Tracie L. Coleman
TEA|Division of IDEA Coordination May 2011
Early Intervening Services
Special Project Grants Funds and
SPECIAL EDUCATION FINANCE UPDATES
Presentation transcript:

THE REAL SUPPLEMENT VERSUS SUPPLANT STORY Maintenance of Effort ( MOE)

Supplementing and Supplanting  Special education funds must be used to supplement and increase the level of federal, state, and local funds expended for special education and related services provided to children with disabilities and in no case to supplant those federal, state, and local funds (34CFR )

Special Education Funds  Federal SPED funds  State Block Grant  FSP(state funds) and Local tax $$

MOE: Supplement not Supplant  By taking Federal money, a state and its LEAs are agreeing that each will spend at least as much from the general funds from one year to the next to support the special education program. Spending is the “effort”; therefore the amount spent in year 1 should be spent in year 2 to maintain the effort… Hence the term, maintenance of effort or as we call it--- MOE.  34CFR (a)

MOE  Maintenance of effort can be demonstrated by spending as you did in the previous year by 4 tests:  The same total amount of dollars from the general fund (state and local and local only) or  The same amount from general fund per special education student (state and local and local only)

What Are the Parts of MOE Calculation? 6

Data Sources for MOE  General Fund PIC 23 and PIC 33, Functions 11, 12, 13, 21, 23, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 41, 51, 53  SSA expenditures on behalf of member LEAs, found on the 033 record submitted by SSA  IDEA-B Formula maximum entitlement, including Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) expenses, if any  Child count, IDEA eligible, from fall PEIMS submission of 163 records  Summary of Finances  unallocated funding reports 7

Is It Only Fund 199? Locally Defined Classification  Used, at the option of the LEA, to further classify specific revenues and related expenditures  For PEIMS reporting these accounts are converted to General Fund code 8 (Financial Accountability System Resource Guide, )

What Is PIC?  Program Intent Code. Codes used to account for the cost of instruction and other services that are directed toward a particular need of a specific set of students  PIC 23 Special Education. Costs incurred to evaluate, place and provide educational and/or other services to students who have Individual Educational Plans (IEP) approved by Admission, Review and Dismissal (ARD) committees 9

Where To Find PIC in Coding 10 Example: 420 – 11 – – 101 – XXX

Are There Other PICs Besides 23? Examples:  11Basic Educational Services  21Gifted and Talented  22Career and Technology  24Accelerated Education  25Bilingual Education and Special Language 11

MOE Reduction (50% of IDEA-B Increase) Can Increase in Federal Entitlement Be Used To Help with MOE?  Adjustment to local fiscal efforts apply in certain fiscal years (MOE reduction)  “Amounts in excess.… for any fiscal year for which the allocation received by an LEA under § exceeds the amount the LEA received for the previous fiscal year, the LEA may reduce the level of expenditures otherwise required by § (a) by not more than 50 percent of the amount of that excess.” [ § (a) ] But… 12

Criteria for MOE Reduction  LEAs are eligible to reduce their MOE by 50% of the increase only if they:  Meet the state targets for all five of the SPP compliance indicators (9, 10,11, 12, and 13) and  Have a Determination level of “Meets Requirements” and  Are not identified as having significant disproportionality 13

State Enforcement “If an SEA determines that an LEA is not meeting the requirements of Part B of the Act, including the targets in the State’s performance plan, the SEA must prohibit the LEA from reducing the LEAs maintenance of effort under § for any fiscal year.” [ § (a) ] 14

Coordinated Early Intervening Services and MOE Reduction Coordinated Early Intervening Services may impact MOE… “An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of the Act for any fiscal year, … to develop and implement coordinated, early intervening services, … for students … who are not currently identified as needing special education or related services, but who need additional academic and behavioral support to succeed in a general education environment.” [ § (a) ] 15

What Does That Mean?  If using up to 15% of the entitlement for CEIS, it will reduce amount of federal entitlement increase applied toward MOE  How much? Up to all of it.  See IDEA-B regs Appendix D for examples of how CEIS impacts MOE [ § (d) and § (a) ] 16

Child Count Includes eligible students, ages 3 through 21, who:  meet the requirements of 19 TAC § (Disabling Conditions) and 19 TAC § (ARD Committee)  are enrolled and receiving special education and related services through an IEP or individualized services plan as of the PEIMS snapshot date  have on file a current individualized education program or individualized services plan and  have on file a current full and individual evaluation  Students with disabilities who graduate under 19 TAC § (c) and return to school may not be counted on the IDEA Part B child count [ Pursuant to 34 CFR § (a)(3) ] 17

MOE Exceptions 18

Allowable Exceptions to MOE  § Exception to maintenance of effort “ Notwithstanding the restriction in § (a), an LEA may reduce the level of expenditures by the LEA under Part B of the Act below the level of those expenditures for the preceding fiscal year if the reduction is attributable to any of the following:”  The voluntary departure, by retirement or otherwise, or departure for just cause, of special education or related services personnel  A decrease in the enrollment of children with disabilities 19

 The termination of the obligation of the agency, consistent with this part, to provide a program of special education to a particular child with a disability that is an exceptionally costly program, as determined by the SEA, because the child— (1) Has left the jurisdiction of the agency (2) Has reached the age at which the obligation of the agency to provide FAPE to the child has terminated; or (3) No longer needs the program of special education 20 Allowable Exceptions to MOE

 The termination of costly expenditures for long-term purchases, such as the acquisition of equipment or the construction of school facilities  The assumption of cost by the high cost fund operated by the SEA under § (c)  LEAs may take advantage of these MOE exceptions, even if they do not meet the targets on SPP compliance indicators (9, 10, 11, 12, and 13)  However, LEA may reduce MOE based solely on amount of reduction for exception, NOT by 50% 21 Allowable Exceptions to MOE

What Do We Do If We Get an MOE Letter from TEA? 22

MOE Letter from TEA What do we do if we get a letter from TEA?  Read the letter carefully  Verify the data  See if you qualify for adjustment and/or exceptions  Submit only what they want, in the format requested, by the deadline set 23

What If We Owe Money?  Don’t send a check until TEA asks you to do so.  What if we owe more than we received in federal dollars?  It is lesser of the absolute value of decline in MOE or IDEA-B maximum entitlement for the year  Who is responsible for paying back funds if the LEA is an SSA member?  LEA responsible, not the SSA 24

How Do We Avoid an MOE Problem? 25

How Do We Avoid MOE Problem?  Give Special Education staff access to budget information and expenditure information to assist in catching errors—at budgeting and during the fiscal year  Give Special Education staff access to PEIMS/TSDS reports prior to final submission deadlines for quality control for accuracy  These sharing practices are important for all special populations, not just special education 26

What If We Had Bad Data?  Bad data, bad data, bad data!  Staff or expenses miscoded in budgets  May claim inaccurate data as reason for decline in effort  May result in additional monitoring for inaccurate data  Requires significant documentation, including statement from independent auditor  Requires plan to avoid future problems 27

MOE: What We Have (or Haven’t) Learned  LEAs can be in a grey area—where total expenditures increase or remain the same and expenditures per pupil decline, or visa versa  SSVI and Medicaid Administrative Claiming (MAC) are NOT coded to the general fund  SHARS should be coded to the general fund  Must be able to track how SHARS revenue is spent ( local code) 28

MOE: Where Do We Go from Here?  Devise a record keeping system and systematically keep anything that might possibly apply to MOE  Let everyone know where those records are filed 29

General Records To Collect  Independent audit reports  Spending trends analysis  Spreadsheets run to track MOE  Copies of Edit+ reports  Maximum entitlements  Any board policies that impact MOE (capitalization, voluntary retirements/resignations, etc.) 30

Times To Check MOE When you: Propose a new budget Prepare to close a fiscal year Review the real figures for the prior fiscal year after the mid-year PEIMS collection 31

Next Steps  Foster strong working relationship among special education director, PEIMS coordinator, and business manager  Establish procedures regarding who keeps what records and makes what decisions  Make sure all know what affects MOE  Make sure new business managers understand MOE implications before they change bookkeeping and/or coding procedures  Train campus administrators on appropriate coding procedures and monitor use of PIC codes 32

MOE for Charter Schools Maintenance of Effort (MOE) for charters  Calculated in same manner as ISDs with two exceptions:  Charter schools include net asset codes 199 and 420 (whereas school LEAs include fund code 199 only) 33

MOE Reference Documents  Texas Education Agency Compliance and Reporting  ompliance_and_Reporting/Compliance_and_Reporting/ ompliance_and_Reporting/Compliance_and_Reporting/  eGrants Program Guidelines amSearch.aspx  IDEA-B Compliance ompliance_and_Reporting/IDEA_Fiscal_Compliance/IDEA_Fiscal_C ompliance/ 34

It is the policy of Region 10 Education Service Center not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex or handicap in its vocational programs, services or activities as required by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; and Section 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. Region 10 Education Service Center will take steps to ensure that lack of English language skills will not be a barrier to admission and participation in all educational programs and services. Rosemary Manges