Explanation of Revised Draft Reserves Schedule, Service Schedule D Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC 202-393-1200.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Advertisements

NAESB Coordinate Interchange
1 WECC/AESO Membership and Coordinating Operating Agreement WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 2007 Diana Pommen Director Interjurisdictional Affairs.
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Standard, Version 1 / 0
NERC TPL Standard Issues TSS Meeting #146 Seattle, WA August 15-17, 2007 Chifong Thomas.
WECC BAL-STD-002 Workshop February 6, 2008
OC ORSTF Position WECC Board Meeting December 8, 2006.
Contingency Reserve Standard Drafting Team Presentation before the WECC Board Technical Conference David Lemmons Standard Drafting Team Chair December.
BAL-002-WECC-1 Contingency Reserves
Presented to the WECC MIC June 15, 2007
Cleco Transmission Planning Summit Attachment K November 15, 2007 Terry Whitmore.
2000, Independent Electricity Market Operator All Rights Reserved 1.
Wholesale Restructuring 1.PURPA 2.Market based wholesale rates 3.Incentive rates 4.Energy Policy Act of 1992 Clarified power to order third party wheeling.
03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
S PIEGEL & M C D IARMID LLP Wrap up Report on the APPA Wholesale Power Project Robert C. McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar Seattle, October 15, 2007.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
GSPTF Schedule 13 Review for RTWG August 4-5, 2010.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
WSPP REC Webinar Discussion Outline September 7, 2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel
WSPP REC Training A Walk Through The REC Schedule WSPP Webinar August 24, 2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel
Draft SAWG/RAWG Agenda Survey A Presentation to the MISO Supply Adequacy Working Group by the OMS Resource Adequacy Working Group August 16, 2004.
Reserves Issue For years there has been disagreement over reserves issues and what constitutes firm power. We’ve been able to function as a market, despite.
Arnold Podgorsky Wright & Talisman PC February 3, 2011.
WSPP Operating Committee Spring 2008 LEGAL UPDATE Arnie Podgorsky Wright & Talisman, PC This educational presentation states no legal opinion of WSPP or.
WSPP REC Training A Walk Through The REC Schedule WSPP Webinar August 24, 2011 Updated (corrected) Version 9/5/2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
NERC Data Collection & Coordination. Rules of Procedure: Section 1600 Overview  NERC’s authority to issue a mandatory data request in the U.S. is contained.
Crucial Clauses in Complex Supply Agreements AIJA Half Year Conference 2015 – Antwerp Moritz Maurer.
WSPP Contract Subcommittee February 3, 2011 Meeting Notes These notes are to facilitate discussions of a WSPP REC Service Schedule, are subject to revision,
Bulk Power Transmission System
Reserves…Where are we??? Service Schedule C Service Schedule C C-3.10 Seller shall be responsible for ensuring that Service Schedule C transactions are.
“FERC-LITE,” WHOLESALE REFUND AUTHORITY, AND RELATED PROVISIONS NOVEMBER 10, 2005 ROBERT R. NORDHAUS VAN NESS FELDMAN WASHINGTON, DC (202)
Simplified & Reorganized Tariff Docket No. ER FERC Technical Conference December 7, 2005 Sidney M. Davies Assistant General Counsel-Tariff David.
Western Energy Markets Working Group Form of California ISO Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade (MRTU) Contract Amendment Panelist: Jeremy D. Weinstein.
2.2 Acquisition Methodology. “Acquisition methodology” – the processes employed and the means used to solicit, request, or invite offers that will normally.
RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
Transfer Service Issues Meeting Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) “Considerations” From Exhibit A, of the 20-Year Contract OTHER ISSUES AS THEY RELATE.
Explanation of Latest Changes to Draft Reserves Schedule, Service Schedule D Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
WSPP Reserves Issue Educational Webinar February 26, 2008.
COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning..
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Explanation of Changes to Draft “Firming” Schedule, Service Schedule E Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
Resource Cost Working Group December 2, 2015 WMS Update.
1 WSPP EC SLIDES FOR AGENDA ITEMS 3 AND 4 WSPP SERVICE SCHEDULE C WSPP Service Schedule C includes a provision allowing interruption “to meet Seller’s.
Tariff Change Recommendations to the Commercial Practices Committee From the Regional Tariff Working Group.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) TITLE: Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin March.
WSPP Webinar Proposed Service Schedules Operating Reserve Service (D) Intra-Hour Supplemental Power (E) February 4, 2010.
Proposed Schedules: Reserves (D) and Intra-Hour Firming (E) October 13, 2009.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Utility owned generator Federal Power Project Distribution System Residential users Commercial users Industrial users Municipal Utility Residential users.
Overview of the Contract Carriage Gas Markets in Eastern Australia James Mellsop Director 4 December 2012 Presentation to PEA.
Lecture 11: Methods of Payments p. 2 Bank Guarantees
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
CMTF Tariff Language Clarification 1. Parking Lot Question Is the Planning Reserve Margin requirement meant to be maintained throughout the whole calendar.
MTM/Lease Accounting Criteria Tier 1 Criteria The presence of any one of these attributes will result in lease classification for the contract despite.
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
FERC Standard Market Design Working Papers
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Regional Transmission Organizations
Restructuring Roundtable:
Gas-Electric Coordination Can New Services Bridge the Divide?
GMD Data Request NERC Rules of Procedure Section 1600
FERC Order in Devon Power LLC, et al. ER
Summer Peak Energy Pricing in New England: The ISO-NE Response
Presentation transcript:

Explanation of Revised Draft Reserves Schedule, Service Schedule D Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC

Recap: why a Reserves Schedule?  What is an Operating Reserves Schedule?  Would define an operating reserves product.  As previously discussed, and consistent with approach in other regions, would have more stringent damages provisions than Schedules B or C.

Recap: why a Reserves Schedule?  Why not describe product in the confirm and trade Operating Reserves under Schedule C? o To foster ancillary services markets, FERC requires that market-based ancillary services trading by jurisdictional entities occur under market based tariffs that contain a product definition. o Drafting goal is to have sufficient product definition to satisfy FERC and facilitate Members obtaining market-based ancillary services tariff.  Any other reasons? o A separate schedule can have more stringent damages provisions, which may facilitate purchaser’s willingness to rely on the product.

OC Discussion 4/6/09  Generally supportive of continuing development of reserves product.  Consensus favored removal of 125% “penalty” for buyer non-performance included in previous draft’s damages provisions.  Many requested more information about derivation of provision requiring three days’ service without demand charge in event of seller non- performance.

The Proposed Schedule - general  Product: from generation capacity that can respond within applicable NERC etc. criteria.  Purchaser is Regional Reliability Organization, BA or RSG.  Price may have capacity (demand) and energy components

Revisions to Proposed Schedule  Definition for WSPP Agreement o New Definition of “Operating Reserve Service” is modified slightly to clarify that product definition refers to applicable criteria of RROs, rather than of NERC itself.  Section D-3 – Terms of Service o Section D-3.2.1/3.2.2: price cap language is added to conform with FERC rulings; language used here tracks that used in other service schedules. o Section D-3.3: editorial changes only, intended only to clarify the description of the obligation to file confirmations for transactions of more than one year duration. o Section D-3.4: editorial changes to first sentence are intended to clarify that Parties must identify in the Confirmation the RRO, BA, or RSG whose Operating Reserve requirements/criteria their transaction is intended to meet.

Revisions to Proposed Schedule (cont’d)  Section D-4 – Damages o Damages provisions are modified from the previous version of this Schedule to reflect OC discussion. o As this schedule has evolved, the principal damages provisions have come to coincide to a large degree with those of Sections 21.3(a)(1) and (2) of the WSPP Agreement, i.e., to the extent that damages are measured by differences between Contract Price and Replacement Price (including differences in associated transmission charges).

Revisions to Proposed Schedule (cont’d)  Hence, the first sentence of D-4.1, subparagraph (c) of Section D-4.2, and Section D-4.3 are stricken. Thus, damages will be as stated in Section 21.3(a)(1) and (2), with the following additions in the event of Seller’s non- performance: o Seller will forego any capacity charge and any applicable transmission service charge during period of non- performance, and o Seller will be obligated to provide Operating Reserve Service for three business days following the period of non-performance without payment of any capacity charge and applicable transmission service charge.

Revisions to Proposed Schedule (cont’d)  The latter provision is based conceptually on a provision in PJM tariff that obligates a non-performing provider of spinning reserve to provide such reserve, in a quantity equivalent to the quantity it failed to provide when required, for three days.

Revisions to Proposed Schedule (cont’d)  Section D-4.4 is stricken based on OC discussion, which revealed a strong consensus against the idea of imposing a penalty in the event a Purchaser called on capacity under this Operating Reserve Service schedule for a purpose other than meeting a reserve obligation.

Let’s Discuss  Reactions to the modified provisions we have discussed.  Product definition