“Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014”.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GMs in Europe: Reflections on the Economic Consequences Julian Park, Ian McFarlane.
Advertisements

The impact of the EU regulatory constraint of transgenic crops on farm income Julian Park, Ian McFarlane, Richard Phippsand Graziano Ceddia New Biotechnology.
Global impact of Biotech crops: economic & environmental effects Graham Brookes PG Economics UK ©PG Economics Ltd 2008.
“Agricultural productivity and the impact of GM crops: What do we know?” Ian Sheldon Andersons Professor of International Trade.
Arm yourself against attacks by anti-GMO activists Alan McHughen Botany and Plant Sciences University of California, Riverside, Ca.
SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.
AGEC 340 – International Economic Development Course slides for week 7 (Feb. 23 & 24) What drives growth? Market prices and innovation* In economics, if.
Biotechnology education at Purdue University and beyond Peter Goldsbrough Dept. of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University January 2006.
Providing Options for Philippine Agriculture BiotechnologyBiotechnology (Revised: June 2003)
What are GMOs The Non-GMO Project Working together to ensure the sustained availability of non-GMO food and products A Non-GMO Month Special Edition for.
Genetically Modified Crops/Foods: The Future of the World Agricultural Economy? C. Ford Runge, Ph.D. University of Minnesota April 15, 2005.
Biotechnology: International Diffusion, Recent Findings, and Opportunities for China. Carl E. Pray Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics Rutgers, the.
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Economic, Environmental, and Health Effects of GM Crops Matin Qaim Keynote Lecture, 19 th ICABR.
WHAT’S PRECISION WORTH?
Export Market for Seeds from India
SOURCE: Clive James / Total all GE varieties in U.S. in 2007 Corn = 73% Cotton = 87% Soybean = 91%
Present and Future of U.S. Agricultural Biotechnology Paul Spencer Senior Agricultural Attaché American Embassy, Tokyo.
NDSU Agriculture TRENDS IN THE USE OF CROPS DEVELOPED THROUGH BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE USA AND THE WORLD BY: Dr. Duane R. Berglund Professor of Plant Science.
The Green Revolution Bryan Chia Jun Qing (4) 3P2.
Genetically Modified Crops and the Third World Allison Miller “Worrying about starving future generations won’t feed the world. Food biotechnology will.”
A MULTI - COUNTRY ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCER WILLINGNESS TO ADOPT GM RICE Alvaro Durand-Morat Ravello (Italy): June , 2015.
Hybrid Rice Development Across Asia Need of the Hour India Pakistan Indonesia Philippines Bangladesh Vietnam China Map Not to Scale.
Institutional Learning and Change Initiative of the CGIAR 1 The new dynamics of poverty and the role of science in poverty alleviation Javier M. Ekboir.
Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops 2010 Clive James, Chair, ISAAA Randy A. Hautea, Global Coordinator, ISAAA and Director, ISAAA SEAsiaCenter.
Technische Universität München H ERBICITE TOLERANTE (HT) GENETICALLY MODIFIED RAPESEED IN GERMANY – A S OCIO -E CONOMIC A SSESSMENT 1 P HILIPP W REE AND.
AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY IN AFRICA Maj Bilal Sadiq Gondal.
Biotechnology - Agriculture And Food. Food problems have been a challenge to man since before we kept records. By the mid-1960’s, hunger and malnutrition.
Putting Biotechnology into Practice in International Development Josette Lewis, Ph.D. USAID.
GMOs in fisheries  Food is an essential need and each government is expected to ensure that it is available to all its citizens.  But the challenge is.
Global Value of GM Rice Matty Demont a and Alexander J. Stein b a Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), Saint-Louis, Senegal, b International.
Sai lara Banana plants = Greater Farmer prosperity.
Global View of Grain Markets James Dunn Ag Economist Pennsylvania State University.
1 International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council October 25, 2004 Jerry Steiner Executive Vice President.
The case against GM crops Alissa Cook policy officer Soil Association.
Biotechnology Priorities for South Africa Prof. Diran Makinde AfricaBio Cape Town- 14/15 April 2003.
I S A A A 2007 ISAAA Report on Global Status of Biotech/GM Crops 2007 ISAAA Report on Global Status of Biotech/GM Cropsby Dr. Clive James, Chair, ISAAA.
1 SOUTH AFRICAN AND GLOBAL STATUS OF COMMERCIALIZED BIOTECH CROPS PRESENTATION AT THE ISAAA-SOUTH AFRICAN MEDIA CONFERENCE CENTURION, SOUTH AFRICA 8 MARCH.
Global Adoption, Impact and Future Prospects of Commercialized
Chapter 12 – Agricultural land, water and yields.
Biosecurity in agricultural field within neoliberal policies Schaper and Parada, 2001; Melgarejo et al., 2002; Russell, 2008; Azadi and Ho, 2009; Qaim,
A Brief History of Agricultural Technology Senate District Forum on GMO’s & GMO Labeling Senate District Forum on GMO’s & GMO Labeling Watertown, MA October.
Will New technologies save the planet? An Agricultural Perspective. David C. Heering, Ph.D Monsanto Company.
I S A A A Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2013 SEMINAR Seoul, Korea 17 February, February, 2014 Global Status of Commercialized.
Green World Genetics Sdn Bhd 广润种源国际有限公司 Asian Solanaceous Round Table th - 10 th Sept, 2014 Bangalore, India.
GMO Fact or Fiction?. Fact or Fiction? GMOs are created by injecting chemicals into food AFTER it is harvested Fiction GMOs are developed through genetic.
Excerpted Maps/Graphics from 2015 ISAAA Report
What do these labels mean to you?. Have you seen these labels? Are there any food labels that could be misleading or meaningless?
Jessa Ziekenhuis Symposium Milieu en Gezondheid Research & Ontwikkeling GGOs Carel du Marchie Sarvaas 2012: Green Biotechnology Europe (GBE)
Global Impact of Biotech Crops: economic & environmental effects Graham Brookes PG Economics Ltd UK ©PG Economics Ltd 2016.
TULI RAHMAN BUSHRA BINTE RASHID JOYNOB JEBA FAIZA AHMED TUTUN
MarketsandMarkets Presents Seeds Market worth $85.2 Billion By 2018
Graham Brookes, Farzad Taheripour, and Wallace E. Tyner
The Socio-Economic Benefits of Crop Protection Products
Economic and Social Benefits of GM Cotton
Biotech Plants Two Different Visions and their Implications in Global Trading Carlos Moreira “Plants for Life” International PhD Program – 2017 (course.
GMO and agriculture: pest management and how the landscape has changed Midwest and MidContinental Chapter of the Medical Library Association Micheal D.K.
Changing locations: quaternary and tertiary
What do these labels mean to you?
What do these labels mean to you?
Global Genetically Modified Seed Market : Trends, Forecast, and Opportunity Analysis 1.
Genetically Modified Food
What do these labels mean to you?
Who benefits from Biotechnology?
What do these labels mean to you?
World Cotton Supply &Use Outlook Andrei Guitchounts, ICAC
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
What do these labels mean to you?
What do these labels mean to you?
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
Presentation transcript:

“Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014”.

Remarkably, in 2014 global biotech crop hectarage continued to grow for the 19th consecutive year of commercialization; 18 million farmers in 28 countries planted more than 181 million hectares in 2014, up from 175 million in 27 countries in Notably, Bangladesh, a small poor country approved Bt brinjal/eggplant for the first time on 30 October 2013, and in record time ‒ less than 100 days after approval ‒ small farmers commercialized Bt brinjal on 22 January Innate™ potato, another food crop, was approved in the US in November It has lower levels of acrylamide, a potential carcinogen in humans, and suffers less wastage from bruising; potato is the fourth most important food staple in the world. A safer product and decreased wastage in a vegetatively propagated and perishable crop, can contribute to higher productivity and food security. Also in November 2014, a new biotech alfalfa (event KK179) with up to 22% less lignin, which leads to higher digestibility and productivity, was approved for planting in the US.

The first biotech drought tolerant maize, planted in the US in 2013 on 50,000 hectares increased over 5 fold to 275,000 hectares in 2014 reflecting high acceptance by US farmers. Importantly, a new 2014 comprehensive global meta-analysis, on 147 published biotech crop studies over the last 20 years worldwide confirmed the significant and multiple benefits that biotech crops have generated over the past 20 years, 1995 to 2014; on average GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. These findings corroborate earlier and consistent results from other annual global studies which estimated increases in crop productivity valued at US$133.3 billion for the period

Biotech crop hectarage increases yet again in 2014, in their 19th consecutive year of commercialization. A record million hectares of biotech crops were grown globally in 2014, at an annual growth rate of between 3 and 4%, up 6.3 million hectares from million hectares in This year, 2014, was the 19th year of commercialization, , when growth continued after a remarkable 18 consecutive years of increases every single year; notably 12 of the 18 years were double-digit growth rates.

Biotech crops are the fastest adopted crop technology in the world. The global hectarage of biotech crops has increased more than 100-fold from 1.7 million hectares in 1996 to181.5 million hectares in 2014 – this makes biotech crops the fastest adopted crop technology in recent times. This impressive adoption rate speaks for itself, in terms of its sustainability, resilience and the significant benefits it delivers to both small and large farmers as well as consumers.

A new and rigorous 2014 comprehensive global meta-analysis of 147 published biotech crop studies over the last 20 years, confirmed the significant and multiple benefits that biotech crops have generated over the past 20 years (1995 to 2014). The meta-analysis was performed by Klumper and Qaim (2014) on 147 published biotech crop studies conducted during the last 20 years, using primary data from farm surveys or field trials world- wide and reporting impacts of GM soybean, maize, or cotton on crop yields, pesticide use, and/or farmer profits. The meta-analysis concluded that “on average GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield gains and pesticide reductions are larger for insect-resistant crops than for herbicide-tolerant crops. Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed countries.”

28 countries, up one from 27 in 2013, grew biotech crops in Of the 28 countries which planted biotech crops in 2014 (Table 1 and Figure 1), 20 were developing (including the new biotech crop country Bangladesh) and only 8 were industrial countries. Each of the top 10 countries, of which 8 were developing, grew more than 1 million hectares providing a broad-based worldwide foundation for continued and diversified growth in the future. More than half the world’s population, ~60% or ~4 billion people, live in the 28 countries planting biotech crops.

RankCountryArea (million hectares) Biotech Crops 1USA*73.1Maize, soybean, cotton, canola, sugarbeet, alfalfa, papaya, squash 2Brazil*42.2Soybean, maize, cotton 3Argentina*24.3Soybean, maize, cotton 4India*11.6Cotton 5Canada*11.6Canola, maize, soybean, sugar beet 6China*3.9Cotton, papaya, poplar, tomato, sweet pepper 7Paraguay*3.9Soybean, maize, cotton 8Pakistan*2.9Cotton 9South Africa *2.7Maize, soybean, cotton 10Uruguay*1.6Soybean, maize 11Bolivia*1.0Soybean 12Philippines*0.8Maize 13Australia*0.5Cotton, canola 14Burkina Faso*0.5Cotton 15Myanmar*0.3Cotton 16Mexico*0.2Cotton, soybean 17Spain *0.1Maize 18Colombia*0.1Cotton, maize 19Sudan*0.1Cotton 20Honduras<0.05Maize 21Chile<0.05Maize, soybean, canola 22Portugal<0.05Maize 23Cuba<0.05Maize 24Czech Republic<0.05Maize 25Romania<0.05Maize 26Slovakia<0.05Maize 27Costa Rica<0.05Cotton, soybean 28Bangladesh<0.05Brinjal/Eggplant Total181.5 Table 1. Global Area of Biotech Crops in 2014: by Country (Million Hectares)** * 19 biotech mega-countries growing 50,000 hectares, or more, of biotech crops ** Rounded off to the nearest hundred thousand Source: Clive James, 2014.

Bangladesh, one of the smaller and poorest countries in the world, approved and commercialized Bt brinjal in record time in Vietnam and Indonesia moved towards planting their first biotech crops in 2015, for a total of 9 biotech countries in Asia. Bangladesh approved a biotech crop (Bt brinjal/eggplant) for planting for the first time on 30 October 2013, and in record time ‒ less than 100 days after approval ‒ commercialization was initiated on 22 January 2014 when 20 very small farmers planted their first crop of Bt brinjal; a total of 120 farmers planted 12 hectares of Bt brinjal in This feat, which is an excellent working model for other small poor countries, could not have been achieved without strong political will and support from the government, particularly from the Minister of Agriculture Matia Chowdhury. This approval by Bangladesh is important in that it serves as an exemplary model for other small poor countries. Also, very importantly, Bangladesh has broken the impasse experienced in trying to gain approval for commercialization of Bt brinjal in both India and the Philippines. It is noteworthy that in Asia, two other developing countries, Vietnam and Indonesia also approved cultivation of biotech crops in 2014 for commercialization in 2015 (these hectarages are not included in the data base for this Brief). Vietnam approved biotech maize and Indonesia approved a drought tolerant sugarcane for food, whilst approval for feed is pending; 50 hectares of biotech seed setts of sugarcane were planted in 2014 for planned commercialization in With the addition of Vietnam and Indonesia this would bring the total number of countries in Asia commercializing biotech crops to nine.

Increased adoption of biotech drought tolerant maize in the US The estimated hectares of DroughtGard™ maize with event MON planted for the first time in the US in 2013 was 50,000 hectares and in 2014 was of the order of 275,000 hectares. This is equivalent to a large 5.5-fold year-to-year increase in planted hectares between 2013 and 2014, and reflects strong US farmer acceptance of the first biotech- derived drought-tolerant maize technology to be deployed globally. It is noteworthy that Event MON was donated by Monsanto to the Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA), a public-private partnership (PPP) designed to deliver the first biotech drought tolerant maize to selected African countries starting 2017.

For the third consecutive year in 2014, developing countries planted more biotech crops than industrial countries. Latin American, Asian and African farmers collectively grew 96 million hectares or 53% of the global 181 million biotech hectares (versus 54% in 2013) compared with industrial countries at 85 million hectares or 47% (versus 46% in 2013), equivalent to a gap of 11 million hectares in favor of developing countries. In the long term, this trend is expected to continue despite the fact that in 2014 the US had the highest increase (3.0 million hectares) whereas Brazil (with an increase of 1.9 million hectares in 2014) had the highest year-to-year increase for the last five years. The higher hectarage in developing countries is contrary to the prediction of critics who, prior to the commercialization of the technology in 1996, prematurely declared that biotech crops were only for industrial countries and would never be accepted and adopted by developing countries, particularly small poor farmers. During the period cumulative provisional economic benefits in industrial countries were at US$65.2 billion compared to US$68.1 billion generated by developing countries. In 2013, developing countries had 49.5% equivalent to US$10.1 billion of the total US$20.4 billion gain, with industrial countries at US$10.3 billion (Brookes and Barfoot, 2015, Forthcoming).