X-band Based FEL proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tessa Charles Australian Synchrotron / Monash University 1 Bunch Compression Schemes for X-band FELs.
Advertisements

1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
CALCULATIONS OF THE LCLS INJECTOR USING ASTRA Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Juhao Wu Feedback & Oct. 12 – 13, 2004 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Longitudinal Feedback with CSR as Diagnostic.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
New Electron Beam Test Facility EBTF at Daresbury Laboratory B.L. Militsyn on behalf of the ASTeC team Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Science.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
SLAC Accelerator Development Program: X-Band Applications Chris Adolphsen OHEP Accelerator Development Review January 24-26, 2011.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
CLIC and High Gradient FEL Design D. Schulte for the CLIC collaboration and FEL friends D. Schulte, LSUM, Ankara, October
ParameterL-bandS-bandX-band Length (m) Aperture 2a (mm) Gradient (Unloaded/Loaded) (MV/m)17/1328/2250/40 Power/structure (MW) Beam.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
Overview of NLC X-Band Technology and Applications Including a Compact XFEL Chris Adolphsen SLAC.
Christopher Gerth DL/RAL Joint Workshop 28-29/4/04 Modelling of the ERLP injector system Christopher Gerth ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
CLIC developments Xband FEL linac introduction W. Wuensch Xband technology.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Interface between TAC SR and SASE FEL Possibility for testing CLIC structure Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Twin bunches at FACET-II Zhen Zhang, Zhirong Huang, Ago Marinelli … FACET-II accelerator physics workshop Oct. 12, 2015.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
A Compact X-Band FEL Linac Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Chose X-Band technology as an evolutionary next step for the Next Linear Collider (NLC) from the SLAC.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Overview Turkish Projects TAC / TARLA Avni Aksoy Ankara University Institute of Accelerator Technologies.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Status and Interest of the X-ray FEL SINAP
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
X-band FEL beam dynamics issues
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Paul Scherrer Institut
XFEL Beam Physics 10/30/2015 Tor Raubenheimer.
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
Operational Experience with LCLS RF systems
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
SuperKEKB required (e+ / e-)
Presentation transcript:

X-band Based FEL proposal Avni Aksoy, Ankara University

Beam Dynamics requirements Outline Introduction Proposed layout S-Band injector+X-Band main accelerator All X-Band layout Injectors Beam Dynamics requirements Main accelerating section Conclusion

Example of Basic Parameters Unit Beam energy GeV 6 Bunch charge pC 250 Electron Energy Emittance µm <0.5 Peak Current kA 3 Energy Spread (sliced) % 0.01 Undulator Period mm 15 FEL wavelength nm 0.1 Und. Strength # 1 Mean Und Beta m Sat. Length ~60 Sat. Power GW ~1 Pulse Length fs ~15 Photons/Pulse ~5x1010

Design considerations Resonanat wavelength of an FEL λu  undulator period lenth, Ku  undulator strenght =0.94 B[T] λu [cm] γ  electron beam energy but short wavelength requires high energy FEL power grows exponentially with undulator distance Gain Length Pierce parameter Peak Current Emitance Beta function Requires large period length and high undulator strength and small beam energy Typical undulator period Typical undulator strength undulator period undulator strength

Proposed Layout-1 It consist of S-Band based injector + X-Band based main accelerator It consist of ■ RF photocathode gun  S band structure delivering beam @7 MeV with 250 pC charge, 9ps (800μm) lengt and 0.25 mm rad emittance ■ Injector consist of S-band structures and one X-band structure as linearizer, accelerating beam up to 300 MeV ■ Two main linacs consist of X-band modules, accelerating beam in two stage 0.3 GeV  2 GeV and 2 GeV  6 GeV ■ Two bunch compressors , Beam delivery lines , Undulator(s), Laser transport line (s)

Proposed Layout-2 It consist of All X-Band based injector and main accelerator It consist of ■ RF photocathode gun  X band structure delivering beam @7 MeV with 250 pC charge, 2.5 ps (200μm) lengt and 0.45 mm rad emittance ■ Injector consist of X-band structures and one X-band structure to optimize chirp, accelerating beam up to 200 MeV ■ Two main linacs consist of X-band modules, accelerating beam in two stage 0.2 GeV  1.5 GeV and 1.5 GeV  6 GeV ■ Two bunch compressors , Beam delivery lines , Undulator(s), Laser transport line (s)

Main Linac Module Layout D. Schulte I. Syratchev Depending on compressor type we can adjust N klystron N structure In case of using SLED type of pulse compressor 50 MW, 1.5 s input power is compressed to 150 ns with 460 MW This unit should provide ~516 MeV acceleration beam loading. Need ~14 RF structures.

S-band based Injector Laser Booster -1 Booster -2 σz = 9 ps (FWHM) σx,y = 0.4 mm X-band structure 75 cell, ~0.9 m, 65MV/m 3 GHz RF Gun 2.6 Cell, 100 MV/m 3 GHz Traveling wave structures (PSI type) 120 cell, ~4 m, max 18 MV/m Parameter Value Unit Frequency 3 GHz Gradient 100 MV/m Total lengt 0.125 m Cell number 1.6 # Parameter Value Unit Frequency 3 GHz Gradient 20 MV/m Total lengt 4 m Cell number 117+2 #

S-band Injector Optimization Acceptable projected emittance has been observed Sliced emittance can be optimized with mismatch parameter..

X-band based Injector Laser σz = 3 ps (FWHM) σx,y = 0.3 mm 12 GHz RF Gun 5.6 Cell, 200 MV/m 12 GHz Traveling wave structures 75 cell, ~0.9 m, 65MV/m, 150 degree Parameter Value Unit Frequency 12 GHz Gradient 200 MV/m Length 8 cm Cell number 5.6 # Parameter Value Unit Frequency 12 GHz Gradient 65 MV/m Total lengt 0.78 m Cell number 72+2 #

X-band Injector Optimization For better projected emittance x band structures are very close to gun. (0.5 m) Projected emittance is twice worse than s-band based.. Sliced emittance is close..

Wake poetantials ↔ Bunch charge distribution FEL gain mechanism requires Minimum sliced emittance Minimum sliced energy spread Transverse wake potential Causes transverse deflection along bunch Instability is driven by strong wake field of high frequency structure. Longitudinal wake potential Causes enegy change along bunch Longitudinal wake potential Transverse wake potential σz=100 um To reduce the wake effect  Optimize charge distribution For both transverse and longitudinal case uniform bunch distribution and no tail is preferred Bunch distribution is fixed in injector  try to make it uniform on bunch compressors

Transverse beam dynamics The transverse deflection of beam is proportional FODO type of lattice is proposed In order to optimize phase advance per cell and minimize β functions we propose different number of structures per one FODO cell → Minimize β functions The most critical section is the injector and linac 1 since the energy is low and bunch length is long

Transverse deflection in Linac 1 Plots show the transverse deflection of coordinate (x) and angle (x’) of slices along the bunch in linac 1 for a Gaussian bunch. The lattice houses 10 structure per FODO cell. σz= 100µm σz= 150µm For compression of lattices and bunch profile we check

The amplification on Linac - 1 The amplification for different bunch charge distribution on a lattice that has FODO cell with 6 structure per cell and 16 structure per cell The uniform charge distribution has lowest amplification. In order to get lower amplification factor than 2 we need to have bunch length σz < 100 µm for 6 structure per cell For 16 structure per cell we need σz < 40 µm

The amplification on Linac – 1 (compression rate) The amplification of uniform and parabolic charge distribution on different type of lattices In order to get lower amplification factor less than 2 The bunch length must be less than 80 μm Number of structures per FODO must be less than 8

The lattice for Layout 1 We have proposed FODO type of lattice on which 8 structures located in one cell Linac 1: 40 x-band strcuture, phase 25 degre Linac 1: 80 x-band strcuture, phase 3 degre BC1 R56=-0.082 BC2 R56=-0.011

Layout -1 Longitudinal phase space along beam line

The lattice for Layout 2 Same as S+X band based we have proposed FODO type of lattice on which 8 structures located in one cell Linac 1: 32 x-band strcuture, phase 25 degre Linac 1: 104 x-band strcuture, phase 20 degre BC1 R56=+0.001 T566=0.04 BC2 R56=0.011

Layout -2 Longitudinal phase space along beam line

Comperasion Final bunch @ S+X band layout Final bunch @ All X-band layout

Conclusion An injector based on S-band and X-band based structures has been preliminary designed The beam dynamics issues for Main linac sections based on CLIC X-Band structure has almost been complated We have shown that CLIC X-Band structure is sufficient to generate FEL Incase of using the structure with given a/λ effective length 8 structures per one FODO cell with <β>=8m fulfills transverse stability requirements agains transverse wakefields. All X-band layout will be useful for going hih repetition rate up to 500 Hz.. However the gun still under developlopment @ SLAC For S-band based injector layout the beam proporties are much better. S-band based injector is used in many laboratories Needs to be checked Static & dynamics errors CSR effect The effect of transverse beam jitter and size oscillations to FEL perfomance ….

Thank you for your attention!