Flight Rescheduling Jo-Anne Loh (jl3963) Anna Ming (axm2000) Dhruv Purushottam (dp2631) IEOR 4405 Production Scheduling (Spring 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vastly Distributed System ATCSCC CDM net TFM hub TRACONs TRACON(s) Towers ARTCC ARTCC(s) Towers Airports Industry AOC(s) GA International.
Advertisements

Crew Pairing Optimization with Genetic Algorithms
Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment I)
Collaborative Gate Allocation Alex Cuevas, Joanna Ji, Mattan Mansoor, Katie McLaughlin, Joshua Sachse, and Amir Shushtarian.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n New Approaches to Improving the Robustness of Airline Schedules Prof.
Hypothesis Tests IEF 217a: Lecture 2.b Fall 2002.
Hub and Spoke vs. Point to Point Evan Demick February 28, 2013.
Efficiency and Equity Tradeoffs in Rationing Airport Arrival Slots Preliminary Results Taryn Butler Robert Hoffman, Ph.D.
1 Data Quality Metric Based on Time-out CNX CDM A&D Meeting 5 June 2001 Dennis Gallus.
5/25/2015 Operations Research Group Continental Airlines Bridging Schedule Changes When Bookings Exist Judy Pastor Continental Airlines AGIFORS YM 2002.
1 FAA Aviation Forecasts Fiscal Years Presented at the 30 th Annual FAA Aviation Forecast Conference By Robert L. Bowles Manager, Statistics.
Airlines and Linear Programming (and other stuff) Dr. Ron Lembke.
Stochastic optimization of a timetable M.E. van Kooten Niekerk.
Airlines and Linear Programming Dr. Ron Tibben-Lembke.
1 A Second Stage Network Recourse Problem in Stochastic Airline Crew Scheduling Joyce W. Yen University of Michigan John R. Birge Northwestern University.
Ant Colonies As Logistic Processes Optimizers
DATE Optimizations of an Application- Level Protocol for Enhanced Dependability in FlexRay Wenchao Li 1, Marco Di Natale 2, Wei Zheng 1, Paolo Giusto.
Carl Bro a|s - Route 2000 Solving real life vehicle routing problems Carl Bro a|s International consulting engineering company 2100 employees worldwide.
1 EMSR vs. EMSU: Revenue or Utility? 2003 Agifors Yield Management Study Group Honolulu, Hawaii Larry Weatherford,PhD University of Wyoming.
Effects of the 3- Hour Tarmac Delay Rule Yi-Hsin Lin 15 December Final Project.
What is Yield Management?  Experienced overbooking by an airline?  American saved $1.4 billion from 1989 to 1992 (50% more than its net profit)  Management.
New Approaches to Add Robustness into Airline Schedules Shan Lan, Cindy Barnhart and John-Paul Clarke Center for Transportation and Logistics Massachusetts.
Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II) Saba Neyshabouri.
SCHEDULING AIRCRAFT LANDING Mike Gerson Albina Shapiro.
A S CENARIO A GGREGATION –B ASED A PPROACH FOR D ETERMINING A R OBUST A IRLINE F LEET C OMPOSITION FOR D YNAMIC C APACITY A LLOCATION Ovidiu Listes, Rommert.
Airline Schedule Planning: Accomplishments and Opportunities Airline Schedule Planning: Accomplishments and Opportunities C. Barnhart and A. Cohn, 2004.
Capt Mike Brisker LT Andy Olson 1. 2  UA is world’s largest airline by amount of passenger traffic  Over 5000 flights/day on six continents  Serves.
Location Models For Airline Hubs Behaving as M/D/C Queues By: Shuxing Cheng Yi-Chieh Han Emile White.
SMU Senior Design Project: Southwest Airlines Spring 2010 EMIS May
Column Generation Approach for Operating Rooms Planning Mehdi LAMIRI, Xiaolan XIE and ZHANG Shuguang Industrial Engineering and Computer Sciences Division.
MIT ICAT ICATMIT M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Virtual Hubs: A Case Study Michelle Karow
Introduction to Network Planning Concepts and Practice Course Outline Dynaston Inc.
Ranking Queries on Uncertain Data: A Probabilistic Threshold Approach Wenjie Zhang, Xuemin Lin The University of New South Wales & NICTA Ming Hua,
Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Aviation Data Bases Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative Technology Administration United States.
AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM François Soumis & Mirela Stojković.
LMINET2: An Enhanced LMINET Dou Long, Shahab Hasan December 10, 2008.
Structure of a Waiting Line System Queuing theory is the study of waiting lines Four characteristics of a queuing system: –The manner in which customers.
Ville Mattila and Kai Virtanen Systems Analysis Laboratory,
Flight Itinerary Problem ICS 311 Fall 2006 Matt Freeburg.
Austin Windsor Emily Waugh Tiffany Vidonish Feng Wang.
ASIA PACIFIC Air Traffic Flow Management
Optimal Selection of Power Saving Classes in IEEE e Lei Kong, Danny H.K. Tsang Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering Hong Kong University.
Airlines and Linear Programming (and other stuff) Dr. Ron Lembke.
Plane Spotting Or how to put yourself on no-fly lists. Predicting Air Delays at SeaTac airport. A CS 773C Project by Sam Delaney.
Will I Make My Connection? Ryan Chen Bonny Simi. Scenario Grandparents invited the young couple to Florida for Family reunion during Thanks Giving. Grandparents.
Object-Oriented Design and Implementation of the OE-Scheduler in Real-time Environments Ilhyun Lee Cherry K. Owen Haesun K. Lee The University of Texas.
© J. Christopher Beck Lecture 25: Workforce Scheduling 3.
15-853:Algorithms in the Real World
Columbia Express Algorithms and heuristics used by shipping company Yoon Keun Ane Jeongwho Lee Co- Express.
1 An Integer Linear Programming model for Airline Use (in the context of CDM) Intro to Air Traffic Control Dr. Lance Sherry Ref: Exploiting the Opportunities.
Dan Allen MEM DCL Trials. 2 FedEx Corporation Operate Independently, Compete Collectively, Manage Collaboratively.
Stuck Flying Standby. Have you ever flown standby? What are some of the reasons that people would fly standby?
COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING
How do we mitigate weather impacts to the NAS?
Problems n The main problem is the congestion of traffic in the air. With the congestion come further problems, such as: –There are too few large airports.
THE INVENTORY ROUTING PROBLEM
By: Stephanie Creek Craig Galyon. Background Founded by David Neeleman in February 1999 Several executives are former Southwest Airlines employees Offer.
Air Traffic Control System Command Center Activities and Perspective Steve McMahon, Manager, System Efficiency.
Minot, N. Dakota, USA, is served over one Hub. Minot Feeds to Minneapolis Hub MOT MSP.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Quantification of Benefits of Aviation Weather A discussion of benefits Friends and Partners in.
Biography for William Swan Chief Economist, Seabury-Airline Planning Group. AGIFORS Senior Fellow. ATRG Senior Fellow. Retired Chief Economist for Boeing.
Simplifying Travel How We Manufacture Time, Increase Productivity and Reduce Costs An educational presentation on why businesses and individuals use private.
Pathfinder 101 Finding the best route…………….
Introduction to Linear Programs
Analyzing Security and Energy Tradeoffs in Autonomic Capacity Management Wei Wu.
A Modeling Framework for Flight Schedule Planning
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
Complex World 2015 Workshop
Airlines and Linear Programming (and other stuff)
Presentation transcript:

Flight Rescheduling Jo-Anne Loh (jl3963) Anna Ming (axm2000) Dhruv Purushottam (dp2631) IEOR 4405 Production Scheduling (Spring 2016)

Outline Background Situation 1 –Model I –Model II –Comparison Situation 2 –Model III Extensions

Background Airlines and their delays affect the economy –In 2007, passengers experienced a total delay of ~30,000 years with a cost of $16.1B in the US How should flights be effectively rescheduled? –Minimize flight delay –Minimize passenger delay –Minimize revenue loss in emergency situations

Situation 1 Currently airlines reschedule to minimize flight delay. Does this also minimize passenger delay? Goal: Minimize passenger trip delay using Schedule Minimization foR Generalized Operational Logistics (SRMGOL) algorithm Assumptions: –24 hour window –Flights are on a normal distribution –Flights do not depend on previous flights for the aircraft –All passengers have 1 stop over

Situation 1: Data 1)Create initial flight times between 6 airports 2)Add average flight times to create final flight time 3)Create possible itineraries for passengers and generate final arrival time 4)Use percentage late data of each airport to determine which flights are delayed randomly 5)Run algorithms on passengers that miss the next leg of their flight

Situation 1: Data Appendix Average Flight Time(BTS) AirportsORDJFKLAXMIAATLIAH ORD JFK LAX MIA ATL IAH Average Delay Time(BTS) AirportsORDJFKLAXMIAATLIAH ORD JFK LAX MIA ATL IAH Percent Flights Late AirportsORDJFKLAXMIAATLIAH ORD JFK LAX MIA ATL IAH Passenge rs (Random between ) AirportsORDJFKLAXMIAATLIAH ORD JFK LAX MIA ATL IAH

Model I Algorithm The intuitive solution: minimize flight time by putting passenger on the next available flight Prioritizes planes arriving at original schedule

Model II Algorithm Reschedule passenger on the next available flight or hold the connecting flight for a period of time to allow the passenger to make the flight.

Situation 1: Model I vs II ~20,000 passengers, 300 flights Total hours of passenger delay: DatasetModel IModel II

Situation II Aircraft Recovery Problem – unforeseen events disrupt a flight schedule –Ex. In a snowstorm many flights are delayed. Which flights should go first with a limited amount of aircrafts? Goal – reduce losses as much as possible Assumptions: –There are less aircrafts than flights –Flights are full –Relax cancellation constraint

Model III

Model III Data

Model III Results Sample run using AMPL and Gurobi

Extensions Situation I –Include trade-off between passenger delay and airline costs Situation II –Create a dynamic model that can constantly update the unscheduled flights and rerun Combine the two models into a real world situation where there are aircraft shortages and a need to minimize passenger delays