FARE STUDY ECOPASS Board of Directors Study Session August 25, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Advertisements

Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
Title VI and Fares March 18, 2013 Jonathan Ocana Equal Opportunity Specialist.
Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination System Regional Program Administrator Seattle, WA Cheryl Huston March 18, 2013.
STRATEGIES FOR ORGANIZATION, VALIDATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRANSIT GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS DATA Jonathan Wade Manager, Service Development Support.
The Fare Study Objective: Simplify RTD’s fare policy in an equitable and cost-effective manner to better serve the needs of the District and its customers.
Jefferson County PUD 1 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered professional engineering and management consulting firm with.
Eco Pass Program Evaluation Update SVLG Transportation Policy Committee October
On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.
The Economic Impact of a University on its Community and State: Examining Trends Four Years Later Presented by: Allison M. Ohme Institutional Research.
Five-Year Mass Transit Fund Financial Forecast April 6,
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 26: Transit Pricing.
Creating a Win-Win Relationship Presented by: John McCarthy GO Airport Express.
Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant. III. Recommendations for Applying Outcomes Planning to ESC  I. Introduction to Outcomes Planning II. A Sample ESC.
Airport Shuttle Agreements Presented by: John McCarthy GO Airport Express.
© Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (ACS) 2007, 2008 February 2012 Update February 22, 2012.
1 Draft NYISO 2003 Budget Report BS&P Report to Management Committee October 16, 2002.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
English 212: Technical Writing Sarah A. Bujno. Overview Introduction Criteria Methods Research Results Conclusions Recommendations.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
South Lake Union On-Street Parking Plan November 1, 2005.
Utah Transit Authority Proposed Changes to ADA Paratransit Services October 5, 2015 John M. Inglish, CEO/General Manager.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
FARE STUDY ECOPASS RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee September 8, 2015.
WYDOT Transit Program Reporting 101 June 16, 2011 Taylor J. Rossetti Joni Kithas Harlan.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
New Fare Product Analysis, Marketing Strategies and Implementation.
SROI Report Card: Year Ending July Inner City Renovation: Social Mission Overview  Hire majority of ICR employees from low – income, inner city.
Region X Local Human Service Transit Coordination Plan Public Workshop RDC Title Date Location Insert transit photo from your community here.
The RATP Marketing Strategy
Holiday Eco Pass Presentation by Michael Klein.  What is the Holiday Eco Pass Program?  How much does it cost the Holiday HOA?  How is it paid for?
PRTC Challenges, Opportunities, and Experience with a Regional Fare Collection System.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Chapter 257 of the Acts of 2008 Provider Information & Dialogue Session: Lead.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Pilot Programs, Fare Products & Transfers. Pass Development Goals/Criteria Increase ridership Increase revenue Convenient for Public Total number of pass.
Wherever Your Path May Lead …. RTS Takes You There! FPTA /CTD 2015 Annual Training and Expo Marketing Network (FTMN) Session 1 Transit Discount Programs.
Review of Fare Collection Concept of Operations and High Level Data Requirements FC RSTWG Webinar May 19, :30 – 4 pm Prepared by: Paula Okunieff,
MOASBO Presentation Outsourcing Substitutes October
2011 RTD Customer Satisfaction Research Results: Executive Summary – Ops Committee March 2013.
Increasing Success & Credibility of Your Service Through End-User Involvement.
Successful Commute Programs Critical components include: 1.An active and informed Employee Transportation Coordinator (you!) 2.Guaranteed ride home 3.Parking.
Project Concept Project Concept Outline Project Concept Outline ► Executive Summary ► Background ► Challenge ► Suggested Solution ► Suggested Solution.
FARE STUDY: STRUCTURE & LEVEL RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee February 10,
FARE STUDY RTD Board Study Session April 28,
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee October 21,
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
Service Development Process 1. Our mission: To meet our constituents’ present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous,
FARE STUDY PASS PROGRAM UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee August 11, 2015.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
Board of Directors Operations Committee Meeting December 11, 2012 Smart Media Technology 1.
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee September 9,
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education Update August 28,
2015 – 2020 Strategic Budget Plan Financial Administration & Audit Committee June 10, 2014.
2018 – 2023 Strategic Budget Plan
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Summary of Outreach Webpage with video & comment form Public meetings
Affordable Fares Connecting to Opportunity in the Denver metro region
Background Program started more than 25 years ago
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
An Overview Title VI Applicability Public Outreach Fare Policy
PPWG Recommendation February 27, 2018
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN FARE ANALYSIS FINDINGS
Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination System
Managing Farebox Ratio
Automated Fare Collection 2.0 Next Generation MBTA Fare System
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

FARE STUDY ECOPASS Board of Directors Study Session August 25, 2015

Background: Existing Pass Programs and Study Schedule 2

Existing Pass Programs 3 Employer Pass Programs –EcoPass (all-in, “insurance model”) –FlexPass (opt-in) Community Pass Programs –CollegePass (all-in) –Neighborhood EcoPass (all-in) Non-Profit Agency Reduced Fare Program –RTD sells discounted fare products to non- profit agencies to distribute to low-income individuals –Passengers get free or reduced fares

Why Pass Programs? Increase ridership Promote ridership among “specialized” populations; potentially increases future ridership (college students become regular riders) Promote the RTD brand and establish customer loyalty Provide revenue certainty with upfront payments Reduce the cost of fare collection Improve efficiency of vehicle boarding Add convenience for passengers Promote relationships with local governments and businesses 4

Pass Program Study Schedule Aug 25 (Study Session) –Discussion about EcoPass August 27 –Stakeholder meeting Sept 8 (Ops Committee) –Report on stakeholder feedback –Present EcoPass recommendation to the Board Sept 15 (Full Board Meeting) –Board action on EcoPass Sept/Oct: EcoPass contracts to participants October: Target for non-profit / low-income recommendations 5

Current EcoPass Pricing 6

Current Business EcoPass Pricing Matrix 7

Business EcoPass Service Level Areas Map showing Service Level Areas A, B and C near Downtown Denver SLA B was expanded to include West Rail Line in 2013 SLA B will be expanded again to include the 2016 rail lines Example SLA Map for Downtown 8

Current Policy for EcoPass Utilization Pricing 2009 Board adopted policy –No changes to EcoPass pricing until smart card ridership data are available or there is a general RTD fare increase –Continued use of a matrix with employer size and service area to determine Business EcoPass contract prices –Prices will be based on the value of all trips within a matrix category with a 40 percent discount once data are available (not yet implemented) –No company contract should increase by more than 10 percent unless there is a general fare increase (for the first two years) –Revisit approach after three years of pricing based on smart card data 9

Current Thinking for Modifying EcoPass Pricing 10

Current Thinking on Discount Level 40 percent discount was based on the following: –Monthly pass: 20 percent discount –ValuPass: 8.3 percent discount –Pre-tax benefit (FlexPass): 5 percent discount –Quantity discount (>200/mo FlexPass): 5 percent discount –Induced demand from all-in program: 1.7 percent Current staff thinking: Change 40 percent discount to a 30 percent discount –Monthly pass discount decreased with the new fare policies –Discounts should be compounded not added 11

Detail for 30 Percent Discount Current Fare Structure Discount Levels Discount Example ($100 Pass) Corrected Calculation (Compounding) Monthly Pass20%$8020% ValuPass8.3%$ % FlexPass PreTax5%$ % FlexPass Quantity5%$ % Induced Demand1.7%$ % Total Discount40%$ % 2016 Fare Structure Discount Levels Discount Example ($100 Pass) Corrected Calculation (Compounding) Monthly Pass15%$8515% ValuPass8.3%$ % FlexPass PreTax5%$ % FlexPass Quantity5%$ % Induced Demand1.7%$ % Total Discount35%$ % Round to a 30% Discount 12

Current Thinking for 2016 Business EcoPass Contracts Increase Business EcoPass contracts by 18.3 percent –Apply 13.3 percent increase due to the new fare structure (general fare increase factored by ridership) –Apply additional 4.4 percent increase based on average fare analysis (survey data) that suggests Business EcoPass is currently underpriced (incorporates 30 percent discount) Eliminate $2.50 upgrade charge to DIA –Include Airport trips on EcoPass consistent with other Regional passes that include trips to DIA 13

Detail for 13.3 Percent Increase Applying the current policy, EcoPass contracts would increase at the rate of the general fare increase factored by ridership Proportion of Boardings Fare Increase % Local79.6%15.6% Express13.3%12.5% Regional7.1%-10.0% Weighted Average13.3% 14

Detail for 4.4 Percent Increase Determined undiscounted average fare for EcoPass riders based on EcoPass ridership data from 2011 Customer Survey Applying 30 percent discount results in a target average fare of $2.38 per trip for EcoPass riders –CH2M analysis showed an average fare of $2.28 for EcoPass riders (4.4 increase to get to the $2.38 target) Proportion of EcoPass Riders FareWeighted Fare Local50.3%$2.25$1.13 Express22.2%$4.00$0.89 Regional / SkyRide27.5%$5.00$1.38 Weighted Average Fare$

EcoPass Pricing Matrix with 18.3 Percent Increase 16

Detail for Upgrade Charge to DIA 2014 data were used to estimate that the revenue generated from the $2.50 upgrade was approximately $85,000 –Approximately 34,000 trips Administrative costs associated with $2.50 upgrade –Separate smart cards are required for DIA EcoPasses Logistical challenges with train service to DIA Confusion for customers All other Regional passes will be valid for travel to DIA including Day Passes 17

Current Thinking for 2016 Neighborhood EcoPass Contracts Increase Neighborhood EcoPass contracts by 14.4 percent –Apply 13.3 percent increase from the new fare structure (general fare increase factored by ridership) –Apply additional 1 percent increase based on average fare analysis (survey data) that suggests Neighborhood EcoPass is currently underpriced (incorporates 30 percent discount) Eliminate $2.50 upgrade charge to DIA –Include Airport trips on EcoPass consistent with other Regional passes that include trips to DIA 18

Revenue Impact 13.3 percent increase was included as an assumption in the revenue modeling for the structure and level analysis –Minimum amount of increase needed to achieve SBP fare revenue targets Additional increase in EcoPass contracts would result in approximately $1 million of additional fare revenue per year 19

Next Steps 20

September Actions Discuss current thinking with stakeholders at the Local Government Meeting Incorporate feedback from stakeholders to develop a final recommendation for 2016 EcoPass contracts to be presented at the September Operations Committee and Board Meeting 21