A little bit of history 1965 - Directive 65/65/EC founds European pharmaceutical legislation but excludes medicines used for research purposes from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

WG 2 (data exchange) During the transitional period and till the Single Authorisation electronic information and communication system is implemented,
Registration in Europe Current situation and future outlook Thomas K ü rner, M.D. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
Safety Reporting IN Clinical Trials
Special populations- What makes them so special? AGAH Association for Applied Human Pharmacology Annual meeting 2004 Berlin 29. Februar 2004 Birka Lehmann.
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
FEDERAL AGENCY FOR MEDICINES AND HEALTH PRODUCTS Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP) Compassionate Use and Medical Need Program Pharma.be-BeApp,
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
I&EHL: EU Pharmaceutical Law André den Exter
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
Research Ethics-Integrity-Governance. University Initiative:The Catalyst? ‘02 Good Research Practice Standards & Procedure to Investigate Potential Research.
3rd Baltic Conference on Medicines Economic Evaluation, Reimbursement and Rational Use of Pharmaceuticals Pricing and Reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals.
Clinical Research Conference 2012 Legal, Ethical, and Social Dimensions of Clinical Research Takis Vidalis, Ph. D., Hellenic National Bioethics Commission.
EFPIA EFPIA IT Proposals ppt Slide 1 EFPIA Proposals for IT Support to the European Regulatory Procedures Mr S. Hasler EFPIA PAT Regulation 2000.
Pharma.be The Initiative to Promote Clinical Trials in Belgium Key Performance Indicators: Impact on Clinical Research of European Legislation Square –
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
Pharmacovigilance obligations of the Pharmaceutical companies in India
Stakeholders In Clinical Research Government and Regulatory Bodies Professor Phil Warner.
Summary About me & AMRC About the EU Clinical Trials Regulation – what’s new Implementation timeline What does this mean for UK ethicists?
H. Lundbeck A/S21-Sep-151 Pharmacovigilance during clinical development SAE reporting, ASUR and PSUR IFF Seminar, 21. February 2007.
Clinical Trial Review and Approval: New Regulations and their implications Siddika Mithani, Ph.D Clinical Trials & Special Access Programme Therapeutic.
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
Authorisation of medicinal products: selected challenges Rocío Salvador Roldán Pharmaceuticals Unit/DG SANCO This presentation only reflects the views.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
GCP & ETHICS COMMITTEES Ravi Rengachari Vector Control Research Centre PONDICHERRY.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
European Commission Rita L’ABBATE Legal aspects linked to internal market DG Enterprise and Industry MARKET SURVEILLANCE COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK UNECE “MARS”
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
International conference Quality of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Hyderabad, September 2009 API Inspections: the EDQM experience – 7 September.
The New Legislative Framework
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Overcoming challenges in pediatric oncology product development: Regulatory oversight of multi-national clinical studies Ursula Kern, Advisory Committees.
New from 2013… to 2017 Declaration of Helsinki 2013 Updated definition of Critical Audit Finding from HRA April 2014 European Regulation 2014 Care Act.
China EU Pharmaceutical Forum
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 6 – Company Law Bilateral screening:
Compassionate use programs and the European regulatory system Filip Josephson M.D., Ph.D. Clinical Assessor.
THE OFFICE FOR REGISTRATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, MEDICAL DEVICES AND BIOCIDAL PRODUCTS Responsibility in the handling of medical devices.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
An agency of the European Union Guidance on the Submission of Clinical Reports intended for Publication in Accordance with Policy 0070 Principles Industry.
An agency of the European Union Guidance on the anonymisation of clinical reports for the purpose of publication in accordance with policy 0070 Industry.
POST APPROVAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOLS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
EU Clinical Trial Regulation(CTR)
A capacity building programme for patient representatives
Principles of Risk Management
Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSUR)
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Use case review update 10 September 2018 Agenda item 4.0
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Regulation EU 536/2014 on clinical trials
EudraCT V10 and the clinical trial regulation
Administering Informed Consent Issues for Discussion
REGULATORY PROBLEMS IN CARING OUT PRE- AND POST- AUTHORISATION CLINICAL TRIALS Dr Penka Decheva GCP Inspector, BDA.
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
UK Legal Requirement for Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or The Trial Protocol John Poland, PhD Senior Director, Regulatory.
EudraCT Public information on Clinical Trials - update
Union referral procedures
EMA Working Groups on Committees' Operational Preparedness
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
An introduction to EMA’s support for medicines development
Conclusions from the Review of REACH
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Good clinical practice
Presentation transcript:

The New Regulation – How will the outcome affect the needs of Europe The New Regulation – How will the outcome affect the needs of Europe? Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 DIA , 23 September 2014 Presented by: Fergus Sweeney, Head, Inspections and Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance Division

A little bit of history 1965 - Directive 65/65/EC founds European pharmaceutical legislation but excludes medicines used for research purposes from its scope 1990 - EC GCP published 1991 - Directive 91/507/EC studies included in MAA to be run to GCP 1991 - Commission discussion paper on a future clinical trials legislation 2001 - Directive 2001/20/EC published includes clinical trial authorization and GCP and GMP requirements for IMPs in European Pharmaceutical legislation 2004 - Directive 2001/20/EC comes into force 2012 - Commission proposal for a Regulation on clinical trials 2014 - Regulation (EU) N0. 536/2014 (clinical trial Regulation) published 2018 - Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 comes into application And now …….Europe’s opportunity to enhance its global status as the base for innovation in clinical research and medicines development

http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol- 1/reg_2014_536/reg_2014_536_en.pdf http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-1/reg_2014_536/reg_2014_536_en.pdf

Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 Key Objectives: Streamlining the clinical trial application and supervision process – enabling research and underpinning EU as a location of clinical trials at global level Single electronic application dossier for whole EU Coordinated assessment Strict timelines Transparency of clinical trial authorisation, conduct and results

Scope of clinical trial Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 Interventional clinical trials on medicines conducted in the EU/EEA (i.e. with at least one investigator site in EU/EEA) Clinical trials authorized under the new Regulation or still ongoing three years after it comes into application

Regulation Key components and objectives Scope (unchanged) – interventional clinical trials of medicinal products Single EU portal and database to support: One application dossier for each clinical trial or modification to it Coordinated approach to clinical trial authorization and supervision Transparency of clinical trial authorization, conduct and results Protection of trial subjects, including special provisions to enable trials in emergency situations and cluster trials Streamlined safety reporting for SUSARs and Annual Safety Reports Proportionate approach to trial supervision and conduct

Single EU portal and database One clinical trial application form and supporting dossier to cover: One or more Member States, and all regulatory and ethics assessment Public registration of the trial and its subsequent updates, including the necessary elements of international registration at WHO ICTRP portal Providing the trial design elements to support subsequent entry and publication of the summary of results EU numbers to identify of products and substances to underpin linking and aggregation of information on IMPs (with MA via art 57, without MA EU number provided via CT system before or during CT assessment) EU trial number – one per trial

Processes for each stakeholders in the system 28 April 2017 Processes for each stakeholders in the system This slide depicts the processes each stakeholder will be able to complete in the new EU Portal and Database: Submission of CSR Submission of Union Control Reports Submit submission package (CTA & dossier) / Address request for information Notification of willingness to be RMS(Part 1)/Decision on RMS Update of Clinical Trial information re non substantial modifications Applicant of a MA Commission Submit notifications: Withdrawal Start of trial First visit first subject End of recruitment End of trial (in each MS, All MS, Global) Temporary halt Restart of trial Early termination Serious Breaches Unexpected events which affect risk/benefit Submission of requests for information Notification of the final validation (initial, additional MS or Substantial Modification) Sponsors Member States Submission final AR Part 1 and 2 Final single decision notification Submission Inspection Information Search and view CT related information saved in the EU database (that is not confidential) Submission of clinical study result summary General public Communication disagreement to part 1 assessment Submission of Inspection Reports of third country authorities EMA Runs the system but does not undertake any specific processes in the EU Portal and Database Communication on implementation of corrective measures

Authorisation procedure Part I – including joint assessment for trial in more than one MS (role of the RMS) + Part II national part Single assessment of Part I with single set of questions and responses and single outcome, regardless of the number of MS involved (1-28), Combines and consolidates best expertise of the MS involved Strictly defined timelines Ethics committees involved in the assessment in parts I and II as applicable according to the law of the MS concerned (no derogation from timelines) Single decision per MS (including regulatory and ethics review) in line with coordinated assessment of Part I Tacit approval if the MS fails to comply with deadline

Transparency EU database publically accessible by default, with exceptions justified on any of the following grounds: Protection of personal data; Protection of commercially confidential information in particular taking into account the MA status of the medicinal product, unless there is an overriding public interest in disclosure; Protecting confidential communication between MS in relation to the preparation of the assessment report; Ensuring effective supervision of the conduct of a clinical trial MSs.

Transparency – results of clinical trials Specific obligations on sponsor to submit summary of results and lay person summary one year after the end of the trial this applies to all clinical trials authorised under the new regulation or transitioned to it. MAH required to submit the CSR once the MA procedure is complete (positive or negative) or withdrawn by the applicant this applies to trials in a MA with EU sites and authorised under the new regulation – hence not to non-EU trials or trials in EU authorised under current legislation. MS introduce the penalties for breach of transparency provisions

Streamlined safety reporting Central reporting to EudraVigilance of SUSARs Central reporting of Annual Safety Reports Rerouting of these to Member States Protocol may provide that not all AE and serious AE recorded and reported; Same rules for annual reporting for all IMPs; Possibility to have a grouped annual safety reporting when several IMPs are used; Cooperation between MS in the assessment of safety.

Protection of trial subjects Clear requirements for informed consent, including in specific populations Clinical trials on incapacitated subjects Clinical trials on minors Clinical trials on pregnant or breastfeeding women - Emergency clinical trials: CT expected to produce a potential direct clinical relevant benefit for the subject; Minimal risk and minimal burden in comparison with standard treatment. - MS may maintain additional national measures for clinical trials in persons performing mandatory military service, prisoners, persons in residential institutions - Possible cluster trials with simplified informed consent

Proportionate approaches to regulation Low intervention trials – marketed product in accordance with labeling or established therapeutic uses Dossier requirements adapted to marketing authorization status, simplified IMPD etc Safety reporting – core requirements but adaptable to the needs and objectives of the protocol in line with knowledge of the safety profile Monitoring – the extent and nature to be determined based on trial characteristics including : whether the trial is a low-intervention trial, its objectives and methodology the degree of deviation of the intervention from normal clinical practice.

Other Provisions Supervision: - Inspections reports submitted to the EU database Union controls Serious Breaches Co-sponsorship Legal representative/contact person Damage compensation

Clinical Trial Regulation A real opportunity for EU to innovate and to lead in clinical trial regulation and in innovation of new medicines and better use of existing medicines, Streamlined, coordinated, proportionate and transparent Single electronic submission of data and documents to cover trial application, modification, registration and results reporting Streamlined and coordinated clinical trial between and within MS, using best expertise in the MS concerned Streamlined safety reporting, Proportionate supervision of clinical trials, Transparency supporting public confidence, participation and critique and enabling innovation.

Supporting Cooperation with China The clinical trial Regulation: Facilitates Multi Regional Clinical Trials (MRCTs) Enabling China to develop medicines destined for the EU market by readily including investigator sites in EU in MRCTs Medicines being developed internationally in MRCTs should equally include patients relevant for the patients of China, so that one set of clinical trials can fulfil all markets needs including EU and China.

Supporting cooperation with China – supply chain aspects China currently a major source of supply of medicines – particularly APIs >200 EU inspections carried out in China 2013-2015 EU wants to move towards greater reliance on Chinese inspections – Provided they are Based on international standards ( equivalent to EU) Performed by trained inspectors Independence and conflict of interest rules apply Facility to exchange information in case of problems EU/EMA offers possibility for Chinese authorities to observe EU inspections EU/EMA can offer training and staff exchange possibilities Working together towards a more global approach and best use of global resources

Cooperation with China Broad based Clinical Trials The Clinical Trial Regulation broadens the opportunities for such cooperation Manufacturing APIs and finished products China is an important source of medicines for EU Building the framework to sustain the quality of this supply is important to EU and to China

European Medicines Agency 28 April 2017 Thank you for your attention Further information GCP@ema.europa.eu EMAInternational@ema.europa.eu European Medicines Agency 30 Churchill Place • Canary Wharf • London E14 5EU • United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact Note: This slide is OPTIONAL. It uses the 'Closing slide' layout. Delete if not needed. Follow us on @EMA_News