Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transverse dynamics Selected topics, University of Oslo, Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2014,
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
FFAG Ring of magnets, like synchrotron, not solid like cyclotron Fixed field magnets, like cyclotron, not variable like synchrotron Can work at relativistic.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Introduction to Particle Accelerators Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN & University of Oxford October 2010 Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
Lecture 3 - E. Wilson - 22 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 3 - Magnets and Transverse Dynamics I ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In terms of total charge and current  In terms of free charge an current USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2013 Lecture 2 - Basic.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
TRANSITION-FREE LATTICES C Johnstone and B. Eredelyi Fermilab NuFact02 Imperial College, London July1-6, 2002 *special thanks to A. Thiessan WG1 July 4.
Synchrotron Radiation
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Alexander Molodozhentsev KEK for MR-commissioning group September 20, 2005 for RCS-MR commissioning group September 27, 2005 Sextupole effect for MR -
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
Zeuten 19 - E. Wilson - 1/18/ Slide 1 Recap. of Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson – 15 th September 2003  Transverse Coordinates  Relativistic definitions.
Adams Accelerator Institute 10 - E. Wilson - 1/24/ Slide 1 Lecture 14 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2004 E. J. N. Wilson.
HST 2009 Introduction to AcceleratorsD. Brandt 1 The LHC: Physics without mathematics ! D. Brandt, CERN.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 19 November 20141/39 Electron beam dynamics in storage rings Synchrotron radiation and its effect on electron dynamics.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Zeuten 2 - E. Wilson - 2/26/ Slide 1 Transverse Dynamics – E. Wilson – CERN – 16 th September 2003  The lattice calculated  Solution of Hill 
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Analysis of Garren’s 27-Jul-2011 Hybrid Synchrotron Lattice J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting February 2,
Lecture 2 Transverse Optics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Lecture 5 - E. Wilson - 6/29/ Slide 1 Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 27 January 20161/23 HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I) Motivations: nonlinear magnetic multipoles Phenomenology.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Contents:  Lattices and TWISS Parameters  Tune Calculations and Corrections  Dispersion  Momentum Compaction  Chromaticity  Sextupole Magnets 
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I)
Beam Dynamics in Electron Storage Ring
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Lecture 1: Synchrotron radiation Lecture 2: Undulators and Wigglers
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Lecture 3 - Magnets and Transverse Dynamics I
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2011 E. J. N. Wilson.
Longitudinal Dynamics & RF Capture
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 8
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
Alejandro Castilla CASA/CAS-ODU
Longitudinal Focusing & The Gamma Transition
Presentation transcript:

Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics I 1

Acknowledgements 2 Ted Wilson Ken Peach Emmanuel Tsesmelis

Lecture 4 outline 3 Longitudinal motion Momentum compaction Transition Dispersion Radio frequency (RF) systems Longitudinal phase space Chromaticity

Longitudinal motion (1) 4 So far assumed motion in accelerator with constant speed (momentum) in the direction of the orbit, s Neglected: differences in momentum between particles acceleration (change in speed/momentum) as particles traverse accelerator

5 If particle momentum increases: Particles travel faster, until ultra-relativistic when v ≈ c In a fixed dipole bend field the orbit will get longer Longitudinal motion (2)

6 How does revolution frequency, f, change with momentum? df / f=dv / v-dr / r frequencyspeedradius If p increases, the length of the orbit will change (for a given magnetic lattice) Can define dr / r = α p dp / p α p is the momentum compaction factor Change in radius of closed orbit for a change in momentum So df / f=dv / v-α p dp / p Longitudinal motion (3)

7 So df / f=dv / v-α p dp / p Longitudinal motion (4)

8 So df / f=dv / v-α p dp / p Recall β = v / c, so dv / v = dβ / β Longitudinal motion (4)

9 So df / f=dv / v-α p dp / p Recall β = v / c, so dv / v = dβ / β p = γ m 0 v = γ m 0 β c= m 0 c β / √ (1 - β 2 ) Longitudinal motion (4)

10 So df / f=dv / v-α p dp / p Recall β = v / c, so dv / v = dβ / β p = γ m 0 v = γ m 0 β c= m 0 c β / √ (1 - β 2 ) Exercise: show that dp / dβ = m 0 c γ 3 = γ 2 p / β Longitudinal motion (4)

11 So df / f=dv / v-α p dp / p Recall β = v / c, so dv / v = dβ / β p = γ m 0 v = γ m 0 β c= m 0 c β / √ (1 - β 2 ) Exercise: show that dp / dβ = m 0 c γ 3 = γ 2 p / β dβ / β= 1 / γ 2 dp / p Longitudinal motion (4)

12 So df / f=dv / v-α p dp / p Recall β = v / c, so dv / v = dβ / β p = γ m 0 v = γ m 0 β c= m 0 c β / √ (1 - β 2 ) Exercise: show that dp / dβ = m 0 c γ 3 = γ 2 p / β dβ / β= 1 / γ 2 dp / p df / f= ( 1 / γ 2 - α p ) dp / p Longitudinal motion (4)

13 df / f= ( 1 / γ 2 - α p ) dp / p momentum lattice Transition

14 df / f= ( 1 / γ 2 - α p ) dp / p momentum lattice For a particle in a constant magnetic bend field: Low p: β α p f ↑ as p ↑ Transition

15 df / f= ( 1 / γ 2 - α p ) dp / p momentum lattice For a particle in a constant magnetic bend field: Low p: β α p f ↑ as p ↑ High p:β  1, γ >> 1: 1 / γ 2 < α p f ↓ as p ↑ Transition

16 df / f= ( 1 / γ 2 - α p ) dp / p momentum lattice For a particle in a constant magnetic bend field: Low p: β α p f ↑ as p ↑ High p:β  1, γ >> 1: 1 / γ 2 < α p f ↓ as p ↑ Transition energy: 1 / γ 2 = α p Transition

17 df / f= ( 1 / γ 2 - α p ) dp / p = η dp / p frequency slip factor Frequency slip factor

18 df / f= ( 1 / γ 2 - α p ) dp / p = η dp / p frequency slip factor Below transition (low p): η > 0 Transition:η = 0 Above transition (high p):η < 0 Frequency slip factor

19 df / f= ( 1 / γ 2 - α p ) dp / p = η dp / p frequency slip factor Below transition (low p): η > 0 Transition:η = 0 Above transition (high p):η < 0 Proton Synchrotron (CERN): transition energy ≈ 6 GeV Frequency slip factor

20 df / f= ( 1 / γ 2 - α p ) dp / p = η dp / p frequency slip factor Below transition (low p): η > 0 Transition:η = 0 Above transition (high p):η < 0 Proton Synchrotron (CERN): transition energy ≈ 6 GeV Not applicable to electron accelerators – discuss! Frequency slip factor

21 So far assumed beam has no energy/momentum spread: Δ E / E = 0 = Δ p / p Different momentum  different radius of curvature r in main dipole magnets Particles pass through quadrupoles at different positions Quadrupoles bend differently, depending on position Closed orbits different, depend on momentum Horizontal displacement characterised by dispersion function D(s): depends on s Dispersion (1)

22 Local radial displacement at position s caused by momentum spread: Δ x (s) = D (s) Δ p / p D (s) is a property of the magnetic lattice, units meters Non-zero Δ p / p  non-zero Δ x Momentum spread causes finite beam size Normally no vertical dipoles: D = 0 in vertical plane Dispersion (2)

23 Magnetic fields deflect, but do not accelerate, charged particles For acceleration need electric field Early days: V fixed Modern accelerators: use an oscillating voltage of ‘radio frequency’ (RF) Acceleration

24 Consider single particle in oscillating RF longitudinal electric field produced by a RF cavity Set oscillation frequency = period of revolution of the particle RF electric field (1)

25 Add a second particle of lower energy, which arrives later in time, with respect to the first particle, at the RF cavity On first turn: B arrives late w.r.t. A  sees a higher voltage and gets accelerated w.r.t. A Second turn: still late, but not quite as late, accelerated again RF electric field (2)

26 Turn 1

27 Turn 100

28 Turn 200

29 Turn 400

30 Turn 500

31 Turn 600

32 Turn 700

33 Turn 800

34 Turn 900

Synchrotron oscillations 35 In this toy example, after 900 turns particle B has made one full oscillation around particle A Motion due to energy difference is ‘synchrotron oscillation’ Amplitude of oscillation depends on initial energy difference, i.e. initial ‘phase difference’

36 Potential well (1) A B Cavity voltage Potential

37 Potential well (2) A B Cavity voltage Potential

38 Potential well (3) A B Cavity voltage Potential

39 Potential well (4) A B Cavity voltage Potential

40 Potential well (5) A B Cavity voltage Potential

41 Potential well (6) A B Cavity voltage Potential

42 Potential well (7) A B Cavity voltage Potential

43 Potential well (8) A B Cavity voltage Potential

44 Potential well (9) A B Cavity voltage Potential

45 Potential well (10) Cavity voltage Potential A B

46 Potential well (11) Cavity voltage Potential A B

47 Potential well (12) Cavity voltage Potential A B

48 Potential well (13) Cavity voltage Potential A B

49 Potential well (14) Cavity voltage Potential A B

50 Potential well (15) Cavity voltage Potential A B

Longitudinal phase space 51 By analogy with transverse phase space (x, x’) and (y, y’) define longitudinal phase space in terms of conjugate variables E and t, or the relative variables ΔE and Δt:

Motion in phase space (1) 52 Define zero to be at phase space position of particle A Particle B oscillates around particle A:

Motion in phase space (2) 53 Define zero to be at phase space position of particle A Particle B oscillates around particle A:

Motion in phase space (3) 54 Define zero to be at phase space position of particle A Particle B oscillates around particle A:

Motion in phase space (4) 55 Define zero to be at phase space position of particle A Particle B oscillates around particle A:

Motion in phase space (5) 56 Define zero to be at phase space position of particle A Particle B oscillates around particle A: synchrotron oscillations

Chromaticity 57 Recall normalised focussing strength of quadrupoles: k=1/Bρ dB y /dx

Chromaticity 58 Recall normalised focussing strength of quadrupoles: k=1/Bρ dB y /dx andB ρ~p

Chromaticity 59 Recall normalised focussing strength of quadrupoles: k=1/Bρ dB y /dx andB ρ~p hence Δk / k=- Δp / p

Chromaticity 60 Recall normalised focussing strength of quadrupoles: k=1/Bρ dB y /dx andB ρ~p hence Δk / k=- Δp / p but tune shift ΔQ / Q~ Δk / k

Chromaticity 61 Recall normalised focussing strength of quadrupoles: k=1/Bρ dB y /dx andB ρ~p hence Δk / k=- Δp / p but tune shift ΔQ / Q~ Δk / k so ΔQ / Q= ξ Δp / p

Chromaticity 62 Recall normalised focussing strength of quadrupoles: k=1/Bρ dB y /dx andB ρ~p hence Δk / k=- Δp / p but tune shift ΔQ / Q~ Δk / k so ΔQ / Q= ξ Δp / p ξ is chromaticity

Interpretation of chromaticity 63 Chromaticity relates tune spread of transverse motion to the momentum spread of the beam: ΔQ / Q= ξ Δp / p

Calculation of chromaticity 64 RecallΔQ = 1/4π β Δk ds and Δk / k = - Δp/p HenceΔQ / Q = - 1/4π β k/Q ds Δp/p comparing ΔQ / Q = ξ Δp/p ξ = - 1/4π β k/Q ds To correct the tune spread ΔQ need to: increase k for higher momentum particles decrease k for lower momentum particles

This is physically easy to see 65 Chromaticity relates tune spread of transverse motion to the momentum spread of the beam: ΔQ / Q= ξ Δp / p

Sextupole magnets 66 Used to compensate for chromatic aberrations in strongly- focussing magnetic structures Particle motion in horizontal plane is coupled to vertical plane Field along x-axis:

Sextupole magnets: examples 67 LEP sextupole: electromagnet, 1m long, few 100 kg LHC correction sextupole: SC magnet, 11cm long, 10 kg 2K  1630 T/m 2

Summary 68 RF accelerating system forms a ‘potential well’ within which particles oscillate: synchrotron oscillation Describe motion using longitudinal phase space: energy vs. time (or phase) Works for particles below ‘transition’ Oscillation is non-linear motion Chromaticity and sextupole corrections