HSM Applications to Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections Prediction of Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections - Session #9.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Advertisements

HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
Hcm 2010: roundabouts praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
Transportation Engineering
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 3 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Traffic Signal.
HSM Applications to Two-Lane Rural Highways Predicting Crash Frequency and Applying CMF’s for Two-Lane Rural Highway Intersections - Session #6 6-1.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
1 Channelization and Turn Bays. 2 Island Channelization flush, paved, and delineated with markings – or unpaved and delineated with pavement edge and.
Enhanced Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges James A. Bonneson August 2012 NCHRP Project
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 4 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Signal Timing.
Lec 19, Ch.17, pp : Sample simple timing problems (Objectives) Master the steps of simple signal timing through 4 sample problems in the textbook.
Lec 14, Ch.8, pp : Intersection control and warrants (objectives) Know the purpose of traffic control Know what MUTCD is and what’s in it Know what.
Module 5 Displaced Left Turn (DLT) Intersections
Transportation Engineering
1 SPR 667 – Assessment of Statewide Intersection Safety Performance TAC Meeting August 31, :00-3:30PM.
Role of SPFs in the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Mike Dimaiuta LENDIS Corporation.
The Empirical Bayes Method for Safety Estimation Doug Harwood MRIGlobal Kansas City, MO.
Intersection Design Spring 2015.
INTRODUCTION An intersection is the general area where two or more highways join or cross, including the roadway and roadside facilities for traffic movements.
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
What do you do when…. when making a right turn on a red light after a stop? you stop where there is a stop sign or flashing red signal? making a left turn.
1 At-Grade Intersection Design. 2 Objectives Define general intersection design objectives Describe factors that influence curb return design For a nice.
ROUNDABOUTS Improving Safety and Efficiency The Ohio Department of Transportation District Clark Ave. Ashland, OH Julie Cichello, P.E. District.
Role of SPFs in SafetyAnalyst Ray Krammes Federal Highway Administration.
Introduction to Transport
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
The Highway Safety Manual: A New Tool for Safety Analysis John Zegeer, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc. HSM Production Team Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
1 Intersection Design. 2 Intersection Design – Operational Requirements Provide adequate sight distance – for approach and departure maneuvers Minimize.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) By Josh Hinds.
Calibrating Highway Safety Manual Equations for Application in Florida Dr. Siva Srinivasan, Phillip Haas, Nagendra Dhakar, and Ryan Hormel (UF) Doug Harwood.
NCHRP Crash Reduction Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements UNC HSRC VHB Ryerson University (Bhagwant and Craig)
Intersection Design Chapter 7 Dr. TALEB AL-ROUSAN.
Fall  Crashes are “independent” and “random” events (probabilistic events)  Estimate a relationship between crashes and covariates (or explanatory.
MAINE Highway Safety Information System Liaison Meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina September , 2015 Darryl Belz, P.E. Maine Department of Transportation.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
1 Intersection Design CE 453 Lecture Intersections More complicated area for drivers Main function is to provide for change of direction Source.
Role of Safety Performance Functions in the Highway Safety Manual July 29, 2009.
ROUNDABOUTS: HOW THEY WORK FOR PEDESTRIANS Module Golden CO.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY PROBLEMS WITHIN ROAD TRANSPORT DECISION MAKING Prof. Dr. Nikolay Georgiev eng. Violina Velyova ‘Todor Kableshkov’ University.
Exercise I – Prediction of Safety Performance for Rural Multilane Highway and Comparison to Substantive Safety Performance - Session #4 HSM Applications.
HSM Applications to Rural Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Predicting Crash Frequency and CMFs for Rural Divided Multilane Highways - Session.
HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL APPLICATIONS
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Applications to Two-Lane Rural Highways
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Prediction of Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Streets
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
Using CMFs in Planning for Virginia’s Project Funding Prioritization
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Prediction of Crash Frequency and CMF’s for Undivided Rural Multilane Highways.
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Transportation Engineering Basic safety methods April 8, 2011
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Canadian Associate of Road Safety Professionals Conference May 2019
Presentation transcript:

HSM Applications to Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections Prediction of Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections - Session #9

Learning Outcomes: ► Describe the models to Predict Crash Frequency for Multilane Suburban/Urban Intersections ►Describe the Crash Modification Factors for Multilane Suburban/Urban Intersections ► Apply Crash Modification Factors to Predicted Crash Frequency for Multilane Suburban/Urban Intersections Predicting Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections

Definition of Intersections: “the general area where two or more roadways join or cross, including the roadway and roadside facilities for traffic movements within the area.” Intersections may be: ►signalized, ►stop controlled, and ►roundabouts

Definition of an Intersection 1. Perception-reaction distance; 2. Maneuver distance; and, 3. Queue-storage distance. Three Basic Elements at Approaches:

SPF Models for Prediction of Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections 1)Multiple-vehicle collisions 2)Single-vehicle collisions 3)Vehicle-pedestrian collisions 4)Vehicle-bicycle collisions Four types of Collisions are considered:

N spf int = N bimv + N bisv Where: N spf int = predicted number of total intersection- related crashes for base conditions (excludes pedestrians and bicycle related crashes) N bimv = Predicted number of multiple-vehicle crashes per year for base conditions N bisv = Predicted number of single-vehicle crashes per year for base conditions SPF Models for Prediction of Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections

1)Three-leg intersections with STOP control on the minor road approach (3ST) 2)Three-leg signalized intersections (3SG) 3)Four-leg intersections with STOP control on the minor-road approaches (4ST) 4)Four-leg signalized intersection (4SG) SPF Base Models and Adjustment Factors (CMFs) are organized by four types of Intersection Right of Way Control: SPF Models for Prediction of Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections

N bimv = exp(a + b ln(AADT maj ) + c ln(AADT min )) Multiple-Vehicle NonDriveway Crashes Where: ►Nbimv = expected number of multiple vehicle intersection- related crashes per year for base conditions ►AADTmaj = annual average daily traffic volume for the major road (vpd) ►AADTmin = annual average daily traffic volume for the minor road (vpd) ►a, b, and c = regression coefficients from Table SPF Models for Prediction of Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections

N bimv = exp(a + b ln(AADT maj ) + c ln(AADT min )) SPF Models for Prediction of Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections

N bisv = exp(a + b ln(AADT maj ) + c ln(AADT min )) Single-Vehicle NonDriveway Crashes Where: ►Nbisv = expected number of single vehicle intersection- related crashes per year for base conditions ►AADTmaj = annual average daily traffic volume for the major road (vpd) ►AADTmin = annual average daily traffic volume for the minor road (vpd) ►a, b, and c = regression coefficients from Table SPF Models for Prediction of Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections

N bisv = exp(a + b ln(AADT maj ) + c ln(AADT min )) SPF Models for Prediction of Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections

Prediction Crash Frequency for an Urban Multilane Intersection: EXAMPLE Four-Leg Signalized Intersection:  25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT N spf int = N bimv + N bisv Where: N bimv = Predicted number of multiple-vehicle crashes per year for base conditions N bisv = Predicted number of single-vehicle crashes per year for base conditions

Four-Leg Signalized Intersection:  25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT = 6.08 crashes per year N bimv = exp( ln(25,000)) ln(5,000) = exp( ) = exp(1.804) N bimv = exp(a + b ln(AADT maj ) + c ln(AADT min )) Prediction Crash Frequency for an Urban Multilane Intersection – Example:

Four-Leg Signalized Intersection:  25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT = 0.36 crashes per year N bisv = exp( ln(25,000)) ln(5,000) = exp( ) = exp(-1.024) N bisv = exp(a + b ln(AADT maj ) + c ln(AADT min )) Prediction Crash Frequency for an Urban Multilane Intersection – Example:

Four-Leg Signalized Intersection:  25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT N spf int = N bimv + N bisv N spf int = ______ + ________ = 6.44 crashes per year Prediction Crash Frequency for an Urban Multilane Intersection - Example:

Example: Four Approach Signalized Intersection with 25,000 AADT on Major and 5,000 AADT on minor; Fatal and Injury crashes are 5 of 12 total crashes Applying Severity Index to Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections a. Compute the actual Severity Index (SI) SI 4sg = Fatal + Injury Crashes = 5/12 = 0.42 Total Crashes

Applying Severity Index to Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections b. Compute Predicted Fatal + Injury Crashes N bimv = exp( ln(25,000)) ln(5,000) = 1.98

Applying Severity Index to Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections N bisv = exp( ln(25,000)) ln(5,000) = 0.09

Example: Four Approach Signalized Intersection with 25,000 AADT on Major and 5,000 AADT on minor; Fatal and Injury crashes are 5 of 12 total crashes Applying Severity Index to Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections a. Compute the actual Severity Index (SI) SI 4sg = Fatal + Injury Crashes = 5/12 = 0.42 Total Crashes b. Compute the Predicted Severity Index (SI) SI 4sg = Fatal + Injury Crashes = ( )/6.44 Total Crashes = ►Actual Severity is greater than Predicted Severity

N bi = N spf int (CMF 1i x CMF 2i.... CMF ni ) ► N bi = Predicted number of total roadway segment crashes per year with CMFs applied ► N spf int = Predicted number of total roadway segment crashes per year for base conditions ► CMF 1i CMF 2i,.. CMF ni = Crash Modification Factors for intersections Where: Predicting Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban At-Grade Intersections

► Left-Turn Lanes ► Left-Turn Signal phasing ► Right Turn Lanes ► Right Turn on Red ► Lighting ► Red Light Camera Photo Enforcement CMF’s for Urban Multilane Intersections

CMF 1i for Presence of Left-Turn Lanes at Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections: For STOP-Controlled Intersections: CMF applies only on uncontrolled major-road approaches --

CMF 1i for Left Turn Lane on one approach for a three-Leg Intersection:

CMF 1i for Left Turn Lane on one approach for a four-Leg Intersection:

CMF 1i for Left Turn Lane on two approaches for a four-Leg Intersection:

CMF 2i for Type of Left-Turn Signal Phasing at Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections: If several approaches have left-turn phasing: ►CMF values for each approach should be multiplied together ►CMF 2 approaches protected = 0.94 x 0.94 = 0.88

CMF 3i for Presence of Right-Turn Lanes at Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections: --

CMF 4i for Prohibiting Right-Turn On Red at Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections: CMF 4i = (0.98) nprohib Where, CMF 4i = CMF for the effect of prohibiting right turns on red on total crashes n prohib = number of signalized intersection approaches for which right turn on red is prohibited - Example: For 2 approaches, n=2 CMF 4i = (0.98) n = (0.98) 2 = 0.96

Where: CMF 5i = CMF for the effect of lighting on total crashes P ni = proportion of total crashes for unlighted intersections that occur at night CMF 5i for Lighting at Urban/Suburban Multilane Intersections: CMF 5i = P ni

CMF 5i for Lighting Example: For 4 Approach Signalized Intersection Signalized (4SG) with no lighting: = CMF 5i = p nr = x CMF 5i = p nr = x ) = = 1.00 as the base condition is unlit Example: For 4 Approach Signalized Intersection Signalized (4SG) with lighting:

CMF 6i for Red Light Running Automated Enforcement:

N spf int = 6.44 crashes/yr Applying CMF’s to Urban Multilane Intersection: Example CMF 1i = _______ CMF 3i = _____CMF 4i = _____ CMF 2i = _____ 0.81 CMF 5i = _____ CMF 6i = _____ 1.00 Four-Leg Signalized Intersection: 25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT Lt & Rt Turn Lanes on Major Approaches Protected Left-Turn Phasing on Major Road Lighted

Four-Leg Signalized Intersection: 25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT Lt & Rt Turn Lanes on Major Approaches Protected Left-Turn Phasing on Major Road Lighted N bi = N spf int (CMF 1i x CMF 2i.... CMF 6i ) = 6.44 (0.81 x x 1.00 x 1.00 x x 1.00) = 4.2 crashes per year Applying CMF’s to Urban Multilane Intersection: Example

N predicted int = (N bi + N pedi + N bikei ) C i Where: N int = Predicted number of total intersection crashes per year after application of CM F’s N bi = Predicted number of total intersection crashes per year (excluding ped and bike crashes) N pedi = Predicted number of vehicle-ped crashes per year N bikei = Predicted number of vehicle-bicycle collisions per year Ci = calibration factor for a particular geographical area Consdieration for Pedestrians and Bicyclists Predicting Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban Intersections

Prediction of Crash Frequency for Vehicle- Pedestrian Collisions at Urban/Suburban Intersections: Two Separate Procedures for pedestrians based on Intersection Type:  Signalized Intersections N pedi = N pedbase (CMF 1p x CMF 2p x CMF 3p )  Stop – Controlled Intersections N pedi = N bi x f pedi

Prediction of Vehicle-Pedestrian Crash Frequency for Signalized Urban/Suburban Intersections: N pedi = N pedbase (CMF 1p x CMF 2p x CMF 3p ) Where, N pedbase = predicted number of vehicle pedestrian collisions per year for base conditions CMF 1p … CMF 3p = CMFs for vehicle- pedestrian collisions Signalized Intersections

N pedi = N pedbase (CMF 1p x CMF 2p x CMF 3p ) CMF 1p -- accounts for the presence of bus stops (Table 12-28) CMF 2p -- accounts for the presence of schools (Table 12-29) CMF 3p -- accounts for the number of alcohol establishments (Table 12-30) Prediction of Vehicle-Pedestrian Crash Frequency for Signalized Urban/Suburban Intersections:

N pedbase = exp [a + b ln(ADT tot ) + c ln(AADT min /AADT maj ) + d ln(PedVol) + e (n lanesx )] Where, AADT tot = Sum of AADT for major and minor roads (vpd) PedVol = Sum of daily pedestrian volumes crossing each intersection leg (pedestrians/day) N lanesx = Maximum # of traffic lanes crossed by peds in one movement a, b, c, d, e = regression coefficients, Table Prediction of Vehicle-Pedestrian Crash Frequency for Signalized Urban/Suburban Intersections:

Values for a, b, c, d, & e regression Coefficients Prediction of Vehicle-Pedestrian Crash Frequency for Signalized Urban/Suburban Intersections:

Estimates of Pedestrian Crossing Volumes:

Example: Four-Leg Signalized Intersection: ► 25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT ► Pedestrian Volume (crossing all legs) = 235 peds/day; ► Four lanes each Approach on Major Road; two on minor ► Left Turn Lanes on major road approaches N pedbase = crashes per year = exp [ ln(30,000) ln(5000/25000) ln(235) (5 )] N pedbase = exp [a + b ln(ADT tot ) + c ln(AADT min /AADT maj ) + d ln(PedVol) + e (n lanesx )] Prediction of Vehicle-Pedestrian Crash Frequency for Signalized Urban/Suburban Intersections:

Pedestrian CMFs for Signalized Urban/Suburban Intersections:

Four-Leg Signalized Intersection: ► 25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT ► Pedestrian Volume (crossing all legs) = 235 peds/day ► Four lanes each Approach on Major Road; two on minor ► Left Turn Lanes on major road approaches ► within 1,000 ft ( Two bus stops + a School + 2 Alcohol Sales) Prediction of Veh-Ped Crash Frequency for an Urban Multilane Intersection: EXAMPLE N pedbase = crashes per year N pedi = (2.78 x 1.35 x 1.12) = crashes per year N pedi = N pedbase (CMF 1p x CMF 2p x CMF 3p )

Prediction of Vehicle-Bicycle Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban Intersections: N bikei = N bi x f bikei  N bi = Predicted number of total roadway segment crashes per year  f pedi = Bicycle safety adjustment factor, Table For Bicyclists:

Example: Four-Leg Signalized Intersection ► 25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT ► Pedestrian Volume = 235 peds/day ► Two lanes each direction on Major Road; one lane in each direction on minor ► Left turn lanes on major road and minor Prediction of Crash Frequency for Vehicle-Bicycle Collisions at an Urban/Suburban Intersection = 4.20 x = crashes per year N bikei = N bi x f bikei N bi = N spf int x 0.65 = 6.44 x 0.65 = 4.20 crashes/yr

Predicting Total Crash Frequency for Urban/Suburban At-Grade Intersections N int = (N bi + N pedi + N bikei ) C i Example: Four-Leg Signalized Intersection: ► 25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT ► Pedestrian Volume = 235 peds/day ► Two lanes each direction on Major Road + Left Turn Lane ► Two Bus Stops within 1,000 feet; one school ► Two Convenient Store in SE Quadrant that sells alcohol = ( ) x 1.0 = 4.44 crashes per year

Pedestrian Islands Benefits: ►Separate conflicts & decision points ►Reduce crossing distance (reduces the # of lanes crossed in CMF for Pedestrians) ►Improve signal timing ►Reduce crashes Application of Islands to Improve Pedestrian Safety ► Reducing # of lanes crossed Reduces Ped Crash Frequency

Right-Turn Slip Lane - Details Cut through medians and islands for pedestrians 55° to 70° between vehicular flows. Bicycle lane 25’ to 40’ radius depending on design vehicle 150 to 275’ radius Crosswalk one car length back Long radius followed by short 2:1 length/width ratio

Prediction of Vehicle-Pedestrian Crash Frequency for Stop–Controlled Urban/Suburban Intersections: N pedi = N bi x f pedi ► N bi = Predicted number of total roadway segment crashes per year ► f pedi = Pedestrian safety adjustment factor, Table 12-16

Four-Leg Stop Controlled Intersection:  25,000 AADT and 5,000 AADT N bimv = exp( ln(25,000)) ln(5,000) = 4.63 crashes per year N bimv & bisv = exp(a + b ln(AADT maj ) + c ln(AADT min )) Prediction Crash Frequency for an Urban Multilane Intersection – EXAMPLE: N bisv = exp( ln(25,000)) ln(5,000) = 0.38 crashes per year N spf int = = 5.01 crashes per year

N pedi = N bi x f pedi = 5.01 x For a 4-approach stop controlled suburban intersection with N bi = 5.01 = Prediction of Vehicle-Pedestrian Crash Frequency for Stop–Controlled Urban/Suburban Intersections:

Learning Outcomes: ► Described the models to Predict Crash Frequency for Multilane Suburban/Urban Intersections ►Described the Crash Modification Factors for Multilane Suburban/Urban Intersections ► Applied Crash Modification Factors to Predicted Crash Frequency for Multilane Suburban/Urban Intersections Predicting Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections

Questions and Discussion: Predicting Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections