Ralf Eichhorn Cornell on behalf of Paul Bishop, Benjamin Bullock, Brian Clasby, Holly Conklin, Joe Conway, Brendan Elmore, Fumio Furuta, Andriy Ganshyn,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interface of Plug-Compatible Cryomodule Components KEK Norihito Ohuchi 2008/3/41GDE-Sendai Meeting.
Advertisements

CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Eric Smith Internal Review of MLC.
Superconducting Spoke Resonator Cavities and Cryomodules
Progress and Plan for Superconducting RF Cavity RF Group.
CRYO PIPING & INTER-MODULE CONNECTIONS Yun He, Daniel Sabol, Joe Conway External Review of MLC Daniel Sabol, MLC External Review 10/3/2012.
Internal Cryomodule Instrumentation Sensors, Actuators, Heaters, and Wiring ERL Main Linac Cryomodule 9/5/2012 Peter Quigley Internal Design Review.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
TDR Part 2: 3.3 Cavity Integration (10 pages) H. Hayano Baseline Design based on the meeting discussion.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
650 MHz Cryomodule Design, 21 Feb 2011Page 1650 MHz Cryomodule Design, 21 Feb 2011Page 1 Project X Cryomodules Tom Peterson and Yuriy Orlov with material.
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule Yun He MLC external review October 03, 2012.
SCU Layout Concept - Minimal Segmentation Joel Fuerst (ANL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting Dec. 16, 2014.
Internal Cryomodule Instrumentation ERL Main Linac Cryomodule 10/10/2015 Peter Quigley, MLC Design Review.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Cooldown Scheme Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
IHEP 1.3 GHz Cryomodule and Cryogenics IHEP Cryogenic group 2nd Workshop of the IHEP 1.3 GHz SRF R&D Project Dec 2 nd, 2009.
Present status of TTF-cryomodules short overview Bernd Petersen DESY MKS March, 7, 2005 Main design features of TESLA-cryomodules Design changes for XFEL-cryomodule.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
Stress and Cool-down Analysis Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
Mechanical Design of Main Linac Cryomodule (MLC) Yun He, Dan Sabol, Joe Conway On behalf of Matthias Liepe, Eric Smith, James Sears, Tim O’Connell, Ralf.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Piping in the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Cryomodule prototype Yun He, Dan Sabol, Joe Conway On behalf of Matthias Liepe, Eric Smith, James Sears, Peter Quigley, Tim O’Connell, Ralf Eichhorn, Georg.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
Test plan for SPL short cryomodule O. Brunner, W. Weingarten WW 1SPL cryo-module meeting 19 October 2010.
Date 2007/Oct./25 FNAL-GDE-Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Report N. Ohuchi KEK 1.Cryomodule & Cryogenics KOM 2.GDE-meeting discussion I.Interface.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
Date 2007/Oct./23 FNAL-GDE-Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface Definition (FNAL-GDE-Meeting) N. Ohuchi.
Summery of the power coupler session at the LCWS13 workshop E. Kako W.-D. Möller H. Hayano A. Yamamoto All members of SCRF WG November 14, 2013.
Cryomodule prototype Yun He, Dan Sabol, Joe Conway On behalf of Matthias Liepe, Eric Smith, James Sears, Peter Quigley, Tim O’Connell, Ralf Eichhorn, Georg.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
FLS2010 Workshop, Stanford, March 1-5, 2010 Florian Loehl (Cornell University) Commissioning of the High Current ERL Injector at Cornell Florian Loehl.
MAIN LINAC CRYOMODULE DESIGN REVIEW INPUT COUPLER September 5, 2012V. Veshcherevich.
S1 global: thermal analysis TILC09, April 19th, 2009 Serena Barbanotti Paolo Pierini.
Detail plan of S1-Global H. Hayano (KEK),
Overview of Main Linac Cryomodule (MLC)
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
S1-Global status report KEK Norihito Ohuchi 2008/11/171ILC08-GDE-Meeting-Chicago.
Overview of Main Linac Cryomodule (MLC) Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
Plug compatibility discussion TILC09 cavity integration session H. Hayano.
Preparation procedure and RF processining of cERL-ML power coupler at KEK Hiroshi Sakai, Takaaki Furuya, Masato Sato, Kenji Shinoe, Kensei Umemori, Kazuhiro.
Power couplers Timergali Khabiboulline (FNAL) FNAL-LBNL meeting on NGLS April 13, 2012.
26 April, 2016 LCLS II Cryomodules and Cryoplant, Joe Preble LCLS-II Overview JLAB Organization for LCLS-II JLAB responsibilities & Schedule and Status.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
Low Beta Cryomodule Development at Fermilab Tom Nicol March 2, 2011.
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. Ralf Eichhorn, Cornell – Cornell’s HOM Beamline Absorbers – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF ps bunch.
JLAB Cryomodule Assembly Facilities Visit Report Tug Arkan, Yuriy Orlov March 26, 2012.
Shuichi NoguchiTTC Meeting at Milano, Injector Cryomodule for cERL at KEK Cavity 2 Prototypes were tested. Input Coupler 2 Couplers were tested.
650 MHz, Beta = 0.9, 11 April 2012Page 1650 MHz, Beta = 0.9, 11 April 2012Page 1 Project X Beta = 0.9, 650 MHz Cavity and Cryomodule Status Tom Peterson.
CERN – Zanon discussions
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
at STFC Daresbury laboratory
WG3 Summary High current and CW accelerators
MLC Schedule Plan Proven in-house expertise and infrastructure for fabrication, assembly, and testing cryomodules Confident in our technical expertise.
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
V. Veshcherevich Cornell University
KEK injector cryomodule
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
CEPC Input Coupler Discuss 6th IHEP-KEK SCRF Collaboration Meeting
Alignment of Main Linac Cryomodule (MLC)
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
CEPC-650MHz Cavity Cryomodule
V. Veshcherevich Cornell University
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Presentation transcript:

Ralf Eichhorn Cornell on behalf of Paul Bishop, Benjamin Bullock, Brian Clasby, Holly Conklin, Joe Conway, Brendan Elmore, Fumio Furuta, Andriy Ganshyn, Mingqi Ge, Terri Gruber, Yun He, Vivian Ho, Georg Hoffstaetter, Roger Kaplan, John Kaufman, Gregory Kulina, Matthias Liepe, Tim O’Connell, Hassan Padamsee, Peter Quigley, John Reilly, Dave, Rice, James Sears, Valery Shemelin, John Sikora, Eric Smith, Karl Smolenski, Maury Tigner, Vadim Veshcherevich

5 GeV, 100 mA, 8 pm emittances, 2 ps bunch length, 16 M/m cw, Q > 2*10 10, 200 W HOM power per cavity,

cavityHOM load HGRP 80K shield Gate valve Horizontal Test Cryostat: 16MV/m, 1.8K: Q0 = 2.E10 (reached with coupler) Q0 = 3.5E10 without coupler Q0 with 2 HOM absorbers to be measured in January 2013.

Using a CsK 2 Sb photocathode (QE of 6-8%) Maximum current of 65 mA (1300 MHz CW, 4 MeV) Ran 60 mA (1300 MHz CW, 4 MeV) for 20+ minutes without a trip Ran 50 mA for 8 hours, 40 minutes max without a trip Ran 35 mA for 3 hours without a trip Previous world record was 35 mA (Boeing RF gun) 11/02/12

Total 64 cryomodules, each: six packages of 7-cell cavity/Coupler/tuner a SC magnets/BPMs package five regular HOMs/two taper HOMs Linac A 344 m with 35 cryomodules Linac B 285 m with 29 cryomodules nominal length: 9.8 m Beamline HOM absorber 7-cell cavity SC magnets & BPMs Intermodule unit

Use the same cryomodule concept in the injector and the main linac. – Reduces risk Rely on well established and tested performance of the TTF III technology to reduce risk, cost and minimize development time. – Some improvements – Cavities supported by large diameter Helium-gas return pipe (HGRP) – All cryogenic piping inside of cryomodule – Some changes needed Further simplify and reduce cost.

HGRP 1.8K gas 6K return bar 80K return bar 2K-2 Phase 1/3 full level 4.5K supply bar 40K delivery bar 40K supply bar 2K supply subcooled bar 2K 1 line for 2K supply subcooled bar 2K helium bath for cavities via 2K-2 phase line pre-cool gas for cool-down 90% heat load from RF losses in the cavities 2 lines for 4.5-6K 3.0 bar He liquid Single phase flow Thermal intercept for HOM absorbers and couplers 2/3 dynamic heat load 3 lines for 40-80K 20 bar He gas Thermal intercept for HOM absorbers and couplers 40K thermal shield, low thermal expansion rate over K range 90% heat load from HOM

Changes compared to a TTF cryomodule: – Increase the diameter of the cavity helium vessel chimney to 10 cm for the high CW heat load. – Include a JT valve in each cryomodule for the high CW heat load. – Increase the diameter of the 2-phase 2K He pipe to 10 cm for the high CW gas load. – Do not include a 5K shield. – Implement beamline HOM loads for strong broadband damping of HOMs generated by the high current and short bunches. – Use a low average power coax RF input coupler per cavity, with lateral flexibility for cool down and fixed coupling.

Inside each cryomodule 4 Valves control flow into local distribution lines: 1.8 K Pre-cool 5 K 40/80 K 2K, 5K and 40K supply pipes run for the entire half linac

Tuner stepper replaceable while string is in cryomodule Rail system for cold mass insertion Gate valve inside of module with outside drive Precision fixed cavity support surfaces between the beamline components and the HGRP -> easy “self” alignment

Fixed point 9.8 m, vacuum vessel at room temperature 9.5 mm -- HGRP 19 mm – thermal shield 8 mm – beamline 1 mm – cavity LHe vessel Axial displacement due to thermal contractions of materials at cold ComponentsMaterialTemperature∆L/L∆L HGRPTi300K-2K0.172%17 mm Thermal shieldAl K-40K0.350%34.5 mm Beamline (cavity)Nb300K-2K0.146%14.5 mm 7.5 mm -- HGRP 15.5 mm – thermal shield 6.5 mm – beamline Axial displacement is allowed by: Sliding post Cavity flexible support Key alignment of component supports Coupler design allows an offset of 10 mm Bellows in HOMs Sliding post

Bellows Air Cooling Waveguide Flange Cold Ceramic Window Instrumentation Port Pump Port 40K Flange 5K Intercept Cavity Flange (2K) Cavity Flange (2K) Antenna (Solid Copper) Antenna (Solid Copper) Warm Ceramic Window 300K Flange Most of the Parts: 316 Stainless Steel with 5 m Copper Coating 40K He Gas Cooling 40K He Gas Cooling

Based on the first generation ERL HOM load but greatly simplified and improved: – One absorber instead of many small tiles – A single braze reduces cost – Thermal expansion of outer Tungsten ring matched to SiC absorber – Graphite loaded SiC (SC-35) gives effective, broad band absorbing properties (ε ~ (50 – 25i) ε 0 ) ICM Absorbers MLC Absorbers

Full-circumference heat sink to allow >500W 80K Broadband SiC absorber ring Includes bellow sections Flanges allow easy cleaning Zero-impedance beamline flanges 5K intercept 40 to 80K intercept SiC absorber ring brazed to metal ring Shielded bellow Flange for disassembly Flange to cavity

To verify cost of this cost- driving part of the full ERL.

Check the x-ray background produced by its dark current (tunnel design and shielding of electronics)

To verify cost of this cost- driving part of the full ERL. Check the x-ray background produced by its dark current (tunnel design and shielding of electronics) Study of HOMs in multi- cavity structure with imperfect cavities

To verify cost of this cost- driving part of the full ERL. Check the x-ray background produced by its dark current (tunnel design and shielding of electronics) Study of HOMs in multi- cavity structure with imperfect cavities High Q performance studies with significant statistics (6 cavities)

Oct ‘12 – External design review Nov ‘12 – 3 unstiffened cavity vertical tests Dec ‘12 – Order 6 remaining input couplers (6 month fab) Jan ‘13 – 3 stiffened cavity vertical tests Feb ‘13 – Award vacuum vessel PO (11 month fab) May ‘13 – In-house fabrication of string components complete (tuners, HOMs, tapers…) May ‘13 - HGRP and 2 phase line fabrication complete (vendor) Jun ‘13 – Begin string assembly in clean room Sep ‘13 – Begin cold mass assembly and instrumentation (outside clean room) May ‘14 – Commence MLC testing