57 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. November 16-20, 2015. Savannah, GA 1.Stangeby, P. C. The plasma boundary of magnetic fusion devices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Advertisements

9th TTF Spain September 11, 2002 B. J. Peterson, NIFS, Japan page 1 Radiative Collapse and Density Limit in the Large Helical Device.
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
1 CENTER for EDGE PLASMA SCIENCES C E PS Status of Divertor Plasma Simulator – II (DiPS-II) 2 nd PMIF Workshop Sep. 19, 2011 Julich, Germany H.-J. Woo.
DPP 2006 Reduction of Particle and Heat Transport in HSX with Quasisymmetry J.M. Canik, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson, K.M. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, K. Zhai.
Bayesian modelling of a diagnostic helium beam ADAS workshop, Armagh Observatory, October 4th, 2010 Maciej Krychowiak M. Brix, D. Dodt, R. König, O. Schmitz,
Physics of fusion power
HEAT TRANSPORT andCONFINEMENTin EXTRAP T2R L. Frassinetti, P.R. Brunsell, M. Cecconello, S. Menmuir and J.R. Drake.
European Joint PhD Programme, Lisboa, Diagnostics of Fusion Plasmas Spectroscopy Ralph Dux.
Imaging Diagnostics at the H-1 National Plasma Fusion Research Facility Left: The coherence tomography system Above: Plasma emission reconstructions compared.
49th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2007, Orlando, Florida Ion Temperature Measurements and Impurity Radiation in.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions G M McCracken Hefei, October 2007.
Fast imaging of global eigenmodes in the H-1 heliac ABSTRACT We report a study of coherent plasma instabilities in the H-1 plasma using a synchronous gated.
RFX-mod Workshop – Padova, January Experimental QSH confinement and transport Fulvio Auriemma on behalf of RFX-mod team Consorzio RFX, Euratom-ENEA.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
Model prediction of impurity retention in ergodic layer and comparison with edge carbon emission in LHD (Impurity retention in the ergodic layer of LHD)
Profile Measurement of HSX Plasma Using Thomson Scattering K. Zhai, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik, K. Likin, K. J. Willis, D.T. Anderson, HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Simulation Study on behaviors of a detachment front in a divertor plasma: roles of the cross-field transport Makoto Nakamura Prof. Y. Ogawa, S. Togo, M.
The toroidal current is consistent with numerical estimates of bootstrap current The measured magnetic diagnostic signals match predictions of V3FIT Comparisons.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
Plasma diagnostics using spectroscopic techniques
Tritium burnup fraction C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project meeting, July 27-28, 2011 Gaithersburg, MD.
Maingi p.1 Supported by Office of Science The Edge Physics Program During Initial Operation in NCSX Rajesh Maingi Oak Ridge National Laboratory For the.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
Electron Density Distribution in HSX C. Deng, D.L. Brower Electrical Engineering Department University of California, Los Angeles J. Canik, S.P. Gerhardt,
Pellet Charge Exchange Measurement in LHD & ITER ITPA Tohoku Univ. Tetsuo Ozaki, P.Goncharov, E.Veschev 1), N.Tamura, K.Sato, D.Kalinina and.
Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
HT-7 ASIPP The measurement of the light impurity radiation profiles for the impurity particle transport in the HT-7 tokamak Qian Zhou, B.N.Wan, Z.W.Wu,
Edge Turbulence in High Density Ohmic Plasmas on NSTX K.M. Williams, S.J. Zweben, J. Boedo, R. Maingi, C.E. Bush NSTX XP Presentation Draft 5/25/06.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
47th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 24-28, 2005, Denver, Colorado ECE spectrum of HSX plasma at 0.5 T K.M.Likin, H.J.Lu, D.T.Anderson,
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Chicago, Illinois Non-symmetric components were intentionally added to the.
1 NSTX EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL - OP-XP-712 Title: HHFW Power Balance Optimization at High B Field J. Hosea, R. Bell, S. Bernabei, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S.
APS, 44th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics November 11-15, 2002; Orlando, Florida Hard X-ray Diagnostics in the HSX A. E. Abdou, A. F.
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Chicago, Illinois 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure floating potential.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure the Reynolds.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2011, Salt Lake City, Utah When the total flow will move approximately along the.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 13 – November 18, 2011, Salt Lake City, UT Laser Blow-Off Impurity Injection Experiments.
5.4 Stored Energy Crashes  Diamagnetic loop shows the plasma energy crashes at low plasma density  ECE signals are in phase with the energy crashes 
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 8 – November 12, 2010, Chicago, IL Development of Laser Blow-Off Impurity Injection Experiments.
51st Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 2 - 6, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia ∆I BS = 170 Amps J BS e-root J BS i-root Multiple ambipolar.
56th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 27 – October 31, 2014, New Orleans, LA Increase ion temperature with neutral beams: Study.
54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 3-D Plasma Equilibrium Reconstruction.
= 2·10 18 m -3 T e (0) = 0.4 keV ECH and ECE on HSX Stellarator K.M.Likin, A.F.Almagri, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B.Anderson, C.Deng 1, C.W.Domier 2, R.W.Harvey.
56 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. October 27-31, New Orleans, LA Using the single reservoir model [3], shown on right, to:
54 th APS-DPP Annual Meeting, October 29 - November 2, 2012, Providence, RI Study of ICRH and Ion Confinement in the HSX Stellarator K. M. Likin, S. Murakami.
57th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , Savannah, Georgia Equilibrium Reconstruction Theory and Modeling Optimized.
C. Deng and D.L. Brower University of California, Los Angeles J. Canik, D.T. Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson and the HSX Group University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Profiles of density fluctuations in frequency range of (20-110)kHz Core density fluctuations Parallel flow measured by CHERS Core Density Fluctuations.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
54th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 5-pin Langmuir probe measures floating potential.
Member of the Helmholtz Association Meike Clever | Institute of Energy Research – Plasma Physics | Association EURATOM – FZJ Graduiertenkolleg 1203 Dynamics.
48th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 30 – November 3, 2006, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania HIBP Designs for Measurement of the Electric.
Measurements of Reynolds stress flow drive and radial electric fields in the edge of HSX Bob Wilcox HSX Plasma Laboratory University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Neoclassical Predictions of ‘Electron Root’ Plasmas at HSX
Zhouqian, Wan baonian and spectroscopy team
Modeling Neutral Hydrogen in the HSX Stellarator
Stellarator Divertor Design and Optimization with NCSX Examples
Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS
Similarities and differences in SOL physics
Major aims of IPP-NIFS collaboration on divertor physics
Impurity Transport Research at the HSX Stellarator
Recycling and impurity retention in high-density,
Generation of Toroidal Rotation by Gas Puffing
Jerry Hughes C-Mod Ideas Forum December 15, 2006
Presentation transcript:

57 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. November 16-20, Savannah, GA 1.Stangeby, P. C. The plasma boundary of magnetic fusion devices (2000) 2.Feng, Y., Sardei, F., Kisslinger, J., et al. Contrib. Plasma Physics 44, 57–69 (2004). 3.D.S. Gray et al. J. Nucl. Fusion, 38 (1998) O. Schmitz. J. Nucl. Mat.,390=391 (2009), Hintz, E. & Bogen, P. Plasma edge diagnostics by optical methods. J. Nucl. Mat. 128 and 129, 229–239 (1984). 6.Mertens, P., Brezinsek, S., Greenland, P. T., et al. Plasma Phys. And Contr. Fusion 43, A349–A373 (2001) 7.Y. Feng et al, Contribution Plasma Physics, (2004) p Neutral source and particle balance in the HSX edge L. Stephey, A. R. Akerson, D. T. Anderson, F. S. B. Anderson, A. Bader, C. Biedermann, F. Effenberg, J. Harris, C. C. Hegna, M. Jakubowski, M. Krychowiak, S. T. A. Kumar, O. Schmitz, J. N. Talmadge, E. Unterberg, G. Wurden HSX Plasma Laboratory, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, USA Measuring limiter particle flux References Estimating D ˔ This work supported by US DOE Grants DE-FG02-93ER54222 and DE-SC Particle balance is used to understand plasma sources, sinks, and confinement Future Work Motivation and goals The ability to control the neutral particle and impurity source in fusion devices is critical to obtaining high purity, high confinement plasmas (“supershots” in TFTR, HDH mode in W7-AS) Better understand the neutral particle source, which defines the edge density gradients and plasma flows Measure and monitor particle flux to understand erosion (  radiative collapse) and relationship to impurities Compare measurements to simulation tools like EMC3-EIRENE that play an interpretative and predictive role (i.e. for W7-X) N tot is the total number of plasma particles f rec, f gas, f lim are the fueling efficiency coefficients Φ rec,Φ gas,Φ lim are the neutral particle fluxes Φ ext is the total external plasma fueling Φ pump is the pumped plasma flux τ p is the particle confinement time Why is particle balance analysis useful [3,4]? An indication of global particle confinement (τ p ) Quantify role of the wall (sinking, sourcing particles  especially important for D and T inventory), global recycling coefficient R Quantify relative source contribution from wall, gas puff, NBI, etc., and location of source Building block for multi-reservoir model, which can provide information about dwell time in SOL and divertor region Integrated puff profile is linear with number of particles puffed into the HSX vacuum vessel Whole operation space has been characterized to determine gas puff flux Total number of particles and change in time can be determined from interferometer inversion. Since we have the capability to measure the wall particle flux in W7-X, we will not assume that the recycling flux goes to zero (as we will for HSX) We will use data from 5 optical fibers positioned in different locations on W7-X Two outboard Two inboard One viewing limiter (same limiter as cameras view) Each ORNL filterscope spatial channel has 4 spectral channels: H-alpha, proxy for H recycling H-beta, proxy for H recycling (ratio with H-alpha can provide density) He-I, proxy for He recycling C-II, proxy for carbon source In the same manner as described above, we can equate the measured photons to the wall recycling flux Use line emission measurements in conjunction with EMC3-EIRENE [7] as a synthetic diagnostic The filterscopes are now absolutely calibrated and ready to take plasma data EMC3-EIRENE [7] modeling can be used to infer the particle diffusivity in the edge This will be performed by finding the best fit between the experimental characteristic decay length and the prescribed value of D ˔ in the EMC3-EIRENE modeling For both HSX and W7-X, preliminary limiter particle flux modeling has been completed and is ready for experimental comparison It is estimated that the diffusivity in the W7-X edge will be greater than in the HSX edge HSX and W7-X have field line connection lengths on the same order in their limiter configurations W7-X will have higher plasma density  more collisions  more perpendicular transport A beamsplitter (Ge) allows IR to penetrate and reflects the visible. This allows the two cameras to share the same limiter view, providing simultaneous measurements of heat and particle flux. The filterscope system has been installed and calibrated and is ready for plasma data acquisition at W7-X. High resolution visible camera will view limiter to provide particle flux data. H-alpha, helium, and carbon line filters will be used. Particle flux deposition calculation as a function of D and heating power from EMC3-EIRENE courtesy of F. Effenberg. 1D cut of particle flux deposition as a function of D. This more clearly shows the differences in characteristic decay length. Particle flux deposition calculation from EMC3-EIRENE courtesy of A. Bader. The predicted particle flux footprint is shown on a single limiter. This calculation assumed D=0.3 m 2 /s. Periscope used to provide view of limiter. Initial photographs show outboard half of limiter. Measuring gas flux and total particles Measuring wall particle flux Complete measurement of HSX limiter particle flux using calibrated camera intensity data and EMC3-EIRENE as a synthetic diagnostic Use this information to complete HSX particle balance and determine confinement time Complete measurement of W7-X limiter particle flux using calibrated camera intensity data and EMC3-EIRENE and a synthetic diagnostic Complete measurement of W7-X recycling flux using filterscopes and EMC3-EIRENE [5] as synthetic diagnostic Use this information to complete W7-X particle balance and determine confinement time Compare recycling behavior of hydrogen and helium plasmas and how they differ in HSX and W7-X Compare HSX to W7-X and determine impact of magnetic topology and plasma density on global source distribution and confinement HSXW7-X HSX W7-X HSXW7-X Will use same procedure at W7-X as at HSX Get Φ gas from calibrated gas system Get N tot from interferometer chord and Thomson scattering HSX has no specifically designed divertor --the vacuum vessel serves as the divertor plate As a result, the estimated plasma wetted area is ~ 1 m 2 Due to the geometry and port availability of HSX, it is not currently possible to monitor all of this area We therefore insert two limiters to intercept more than 99% of field lines and assume the wall recycling flux goes to zero Visible camera images will be used to infer the limiter particle flux W7-X will have five symmetric inboard limiters for OP 1.1 These limiters are predicted to intercept 99% of field lines Visible camera images will be used to infer the particle flux from the limiters Data from embedded Langmuir probes can also be compared to the optically determined particle flux Without limiters, the predicted strike points (red) on the HSX vacuum vessel from Biot-Savart calculations. Measuring photon fluxes using line emission Two limiters,, conformal to the QHS LCFS, together are predicted to intercept 99% of field lines Measured photons can be used to infer particle flux in the following manner [5]: The measured intensity I (photons/cm 2 /sr/s) depends on the plasma density, the emission cross section, and the neutral density This formulation assumes that the target is perpendicular to the camera Once the intensity has been measured, the particle flux Γ can be determined by [6]: where h is Planck’s constant, v is the wavelength of the light, S is the ionization rate coefficient, X is the excitation rate coefficient, and B is the branching ratio. S/XB is well known for H-alpha and other emission lines. Once the optical system is absolutely calibrated, the measured photon intensity can therefore be used to determine the limiter particle flux The relationship between ionization events and H- alpha photons emitted. This is the quantity S/XB. Both a visible and an infrared camera (G. Wurden) share a perpendicular view of the limiter through W7-X port A30. Beamsplitters allow each spatial channel to be split into 4 spectral channels, providing more information without adjustment. Typical gas puff profiles Time (s) Signal to piezo valve Integrated gas puff profile Total number of particles N tot Φ gas A representation of the density profile and how it is affected by the location of the plasma source. Reproduced from [1]. The normal confinement (NC) and improved confinement (IC) regimes of W7-AS [2]. The improved confinement regime was found to be related to improved neutral screening by the islands. Fiber locations HSX W7-X R (m ) Limiter edge