USING DATA TO INSPIRE PROGRAMMATIC CHANGE EARLY DEVELOPMENT INDEX (EDI) & DRDP/ASSESSMENTS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
Advertisements

Penny Milburn August 2011 How are the children? Preschool Program Reporting.
Desired Results Developmental Profile - school readiness© A Project of the California department of education, child development division.
Slide 1 Comparison of Young Children’s Development by Child and Family Characteristics Tulsa County Results February 2014.
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE SCHOOL READINESS:. WHERE DID WE START? 1999 : KSDE began working with Kansas Action for Children to define School Readiness 2000:
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
An Overview of the WV Pre-K Child Assessment System Prepared by the WVDE Office of School Readiness Revised April 2012.
Understanding the Early Years Action Planning Session Thursday, May 22, 2008 Delta Brunswick Hotel Saint John, NB.
EDI Neighbourhood Data EDI Results & 2011 Neighbourhood Demographics.
Improving school readiness one village at a time in Ontario, Canada: Early Years parenting centres and teacher opinion of 5 years old’s development using.
Reaching for the Stars: Building State Systems for School Readiness.
The Achievement Gap: Lessons from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) Tamara Halle, Nicole Forry, Elizabeth Hair & Kate Perper.
Which factors make a difference when identifying pockets of under-immunization? Gayle Moxness Hennepin County Community Health Department Minneapolis,
The Creative Curriculum Developmental Continuum Assessment System
Ready to Grow… Ready to Learn… Ready to Succeed Kentucky’s Plan for Kindergarten Readiness October 2012.
90% by 2020 Priority Areas – Data Findings Leadership Meeting February 18, 2014, 3:00 pm – 5:00 pm.
Bill Buchanan Ready Kids Conference Louisville June 2014 Count Down to New Eligibility Requirement for Kindergarten.
Early Childhood Education Dr. Bill Bauer William L. Heward Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education, 8e Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education,
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
Updated January “There’s an enormous brain drain being lost in our country. Children under 5 are not being empowered to reach their potential and.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
Presenters: Donna Morrison and Laurie Lafortune Alberta Understanding the Early Years Conference: October, 2008.
Understanding The Early Years Niagara College ECE Program  October 2007 Glory Ressler, B.A., Dip. GIT Coordinator, Understanding the Early Years Niagara.
Human Early Learning Partnership (HELP) Provincial ECD Mapping Project Early Development Instrument (EDI) Implementation in BC School Districts Teacher.
Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation AGAIN in 2010 Data Driven Decisions: Separating Fact from Fiction in Building Early Care and Education Systems.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
The Early Learning Challenge Fund: Metrics and Data Danielle Ewen February 22, 2010.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
1 UEY Red Deer Preliminary Results Research Forum: December 1, 2009 The School Readiness of Red Deer’s Kindergarten Children: A Preliminary Report on the.
Monitoring community progress on School Readiness : The Early Development Instrument World Bank, May 2008.
COMMUNITY KNOWLEDGE: Readiness to Learn in Niagara GLORY RESSLER Coordinator Understanding the Early Years TIFFANY GARTNER Data Analysis Coordinator Ontario.
WELCOME Parents Child Care Providers Preschool Teachers TO CK’S EARLY CHILDHOOD & SCHOOL READINESS MEETING.
Understanding The Early Years and The Community Action Plan Michelle Ward,Executive Director - Kids First Association Lisa MacRae, Public Health Nurse.
Slide 1. slide 2 slide 3 Risk to Ready begins with the Early Development Instrument Developed in Canada in 1998 and expanding across US since 2009 through.
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Adults Reading to Two Year Old Children: A Population-based Study Olivia Sappenfield Emory University School of Public Health.
The Link Between Thriving Children and Economic Security: Creating Equity in Early Childhood for Our Common Good.
Reload images Reload Images Understanding the AEDI results Blue Mountains LGA – Key Stakeholders 16 September 2013.
Georgia CTAE Resource Network Instructional Resources office July 2009
Kyrene School District Meet Our Staff Lori Conroy, Special Education Preschool Teacher Lori Conroy, Special Education Preschool Teacher Mary.
Measuring School Readiness : The Early Development Instrument Washington, DC, 17 February 2005 Magdalena Janus, Ph.D.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Minnesota’s School Readiness Study 1 Developmental Assessment at Kindergarten Entrance.
Early Childhood and Diversity in Iowa: Challenges and Opportunities Setting the Context Charles Bruner September 26, 2007.
Using the Early Development Instrument to Support School Readiness NURTURING NEW ROOTS Supporting the Newcomer Family 6 th Ontario Professional Development.
Creating a jigsaw for early learning: developing high quality teaching and learning programs for K-3 classrooms Jean Rice September 2008.
How Male and Female Students Perform in Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Schools Equally Prepared for Life?
Summary of EDI SK Results Algoma 2004/05 & 2005/06 Sept 25th 2007 Algoma-Manitoulin Ontario Early Years.
Getting Ready Opportunities for Progress on Early Childhood Education Presented by: Elizabeth Burke Bryant Rhode Island KIDS COUNT May 1, 2009.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data dissemination and further analysis workshop Child Development MICS4 Data Dissemination and Further Analysis Workshop.
Early Development Instrument The. A teacher completed instrument which measures children’s development - Offord Centre for Child Studies.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARY DATA.
Small Wins Charlene Walker EDU 697 Capstone: A Project Approach September 13, 2015.
Early Development Index (EDI). What is the Early Development Index?  Teacher-completed checklist on children’s development measured in the spring of.
Linking the DRDP to Instruction: Using the DRDP (2015) Reports
1 Early Learning Vision Planning & Policy Questions Tuesday, November 15, 2011 Teresa Whiting & John Brandt (UT) Carol Eichinger (WI) Reyna Hernandez (IL)
Good Start, Grow Smart Inter-American Symposium Understanding the State of the Art in Early Childhood Education and Care: The First Three Years of Life.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Bennington County Head Start Child Outcomes Midpoint Data Report.
The Creative Curriculum ® and OSEP Outcomes April 25, 2006.
Our Children Our Communities Our Future Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) Prepared by Gail Clark, WA AEDC Coordinator.
Performance and Progress 2012/2013. Why We Do an Annual Data Presentation To assess the Levy’s performance in various categories against goals. To highlight.
Australian Early Development Census
Reload images Reload Images Understanding the AEDI results.
Our Children, Our Community, Our Change
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Maryland January 2017 November 2016.
Curriculum & Programming for Kindergarten
Using Data To Learn About Our Young Children: Mapping Early Development Instrument (EDI) Results in Miami-Dade County. Zafreen Jaffery, Ed.D.
The 2016 Early Development Instrument Results
Presentation transcript:

USING DATA TO INSPIRE PROGRAMMATIC CHANGE EARLY DEVELOPMENT INDEX (EDI) & DRDP/ASSESSMENTS

OBJECTIVES To answer the following questions: What is the Early Development Index (EDI)? How can EDI data be used? What are the EDI results in our district? Using DRDP Data OR other assessment data

WHAT IS THE EARLY DEVELOPMENT INDEX (EDI)? Teacher-completed checklist on children’s development measured in spring of kindergarten (using online software) Data are aggregated to a group level (neighborhood, city, etc.) to provide a population-based measure of children’s development: School entry provides the first opportunity for a universal point to collect data about the development of all children as they finish their pre- school years Possible to obtain a census of all children’s development in a given region Census is more accurate than a sampling approach because it is much less likely to miss the hardest to reach, highest risk children EDI is not reported at the child or class level and is not used as a diagnostic tool for individual children Orange County is one of more than 50 communities around the country leading this effort

WHAT DOES THE EDI MEASURE? Five developmental domains:  Physical health and well-being. Child is healthy, independent, ready each day  Social competence. Child plays, gets along with others and shares, is self-confident  Emotional maturity. Child is able to concentrate, help others, is patient, not aggressive or angry  Language and cognitive development. Child is interested in reading and writing, can count and recognize numbers, shapes  Communication skills and general knowledge. Child can tell a story, communicate with adults and children, articulate themselves Additional information: Special skills (Literacy, numeracy, dance, music, etc.) Special problems (Health problems, learning problems, behavior problems) Child-level information (Race/ethnicity, primary language, gender, age, preschool experience, etc.)

EDI data are captured in two ways:  Use by the school district: Each participating school receives a School Report (not broken out by classroom) District also receives a District Report District and School reports only shared with schools districts and are not a public document  Use by community: Public information that includes EDI tables and maps Information based on where children live rather than where they go to school 5 HOW IS THE EDI INFORMATION PRESENTED?

COMMUNITY USE OF EDI RESULTS Community Profile Report: EDI data are presented using GIS (Geographic Information System) mapping (Example on the next slide) Each child’s EDI form is geographically coded according to home address of child. Maps show:  The percent of children entering school who are developmentally vulnerable in each developmental domain and by geographic region  Community services and other assets  Other population-based indicators: for example, parent education levels, parent-child reading at home, residential mobility, poverty level, etc.  Maps DO NOT identify where children go to school  Maps help service providers, residents, and other stakeholder identify ways to support children in the community 6

IUSD EDI MAP: CHILDREN VULNERABLE ON 1 OR MORE DEVELOPMENTAL DOMAIN

HOW CAN DISTRICTS USE THE EDI RESULTS… School districts can use the EDI results in many ways, including:  For planning and to target interventions  Prepare for incoming K through 4 th graders (predictive validity)  Identify where to invest and open new programs  Work with local preschool programs / and Transitional Kindergarten classes to adjust curriculum to match with school need  Understand changes in demographics of children entering schools  Develop district level goals that will best support children and families  Realign services based on changing needs  Measure effectiveness of services (with repeating EDI data collection)  Dialogue around supporting the strengths and challenges of current cohort  Involve families in specific activities to better support their children

HOW HAS THE EDI BEEN IMPLEMENTED? Orange County EDI Participation… ( ) # of Elementary School Districts # of Schools with K Students # of K-Students in Public Schools Orange County ,945 EDI Participants ,288 % EDI Participation 100% 90% # of Elementary Schools # of Schools Participating # of K/TK Students Participating IUSD 24 2,331 EDI Participants 24 2,273 (valid) % EDI Participation 100% 97.5%

EDI Results 2012/13 to 2014/15

DEMOGRAPHICS All Participating Schools in District All Participating Districts in Orange County Number of EDI Records Collected 2,331 34,897 Number and Percent of EDI Records Valid for Analysis 2, %34,28898% Number and Percent of Participating Schools in District 24100%379100% Student DemographicsN%N% Race/ethnicity: African-American, Black54 2%5222% Asian, Native Hawaiian, or other Pacific Islander %5,71317% Hispanic, Latino/a 131 6%16,04747% White %9,03926% Other/Multiracial %2,9169% Mean Age (years, months)5 yr, 10 mo Females1,057 47%16,53948% Students with ELL Status %15,58846% Students with an IEP 159 7%2,0796% Needs Further Assessment 90 4%2,0746% Waitlisted for Further Assessment 35 2%8673% Students in Transitional K %4,78314% K Students with TK Experience 79 4%2,81810% Parents/Guardians Volunteered in Classroom 1,335 59%14,01241%

EDI RESULTS, BY DOMAIN 12 Domain Children Not on TrackChildren On Track Children Developmentally Vulnerable (lowest 10 th percentile) Children Developmentally At Risk (10 th -25 th percentile) Children Developmentally On Track (25 th -100 th percentile) All Participating Schools in District All Participating Districts in Orange County All Participating Schools in District All Participating Districts in Orange County All Participating Schools in District All Participating Districts in Orange County N*% % % % % % Physical Health & Well-being 1225% 2,5607% 2079% 4,35113% 1,94486% 27,37580% Social Competence 1135% 3,0139% 26912% 4,77614% 1,89083% 26,49777% Emotional Maturity 1346% 2,5548% 21710% 4,37113% 1,90984% 27,07680% Language & Cognitive Development 693% 3,98212% 24211% 7,19521% 1,96186% 23,08267% General Knowledge & Communication 1537% 3,94312% 26512% 5,75117% 1,85582% 24,58572%

PHYSICAL HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Sub-domain All Participating Schools in District All Participating Districts in Orange County NNot Ready Somewhat Ready ReadyNNot Ready Somewhat Ready Ready Physical readiness for school day* 2,2731%N/A99%34,2842%N/A98% Physical independence*2,2738%N/A92%34,28111%N/A89% Gross and fine motor skills2,27225%13%62%34,27835%17%49% Data Source: Teacher Reported EDI. Totals of 99 percent and 101 percent are due to rounding. * The “somewhat ready” category does not apply because the response options on the EDI for these sub-domains were dichotomous (yes/no).

SOCIAL COMPETENCE Sub-domain All Participating Schools in District All Participating Districts in Orange County NNot Ready Somewhat Ready ReadyNNot Ready Somewhat Ready Ready Overall social competence2,2727%38%55%34,27811%44%45% Responsibility and respect2,2724%16%80%34,2857%18%75% Approaches to learning2,2727%25%68%34,28611%29%60% Readiness to explore new things2,2621%13%86%33,8523%18%79% Data Source: Teacher Reported EDI. Totals of 99 percent and 101 percent are due to rounding.

EMOTIONAL MATURITY Sub-domain All Participating Schools in District All Participating Districts in Orange County N Not Ready Somewhat Ready ReadyN Not Ready Somewhat Ready Ready Prosocial and helping behavior2,14425%31%43%32,19632%31%37% Anxious and fearful behavior2,2612%7%91%34,2533%9%89% Aggressive behavior2,2645% 90%34,2157%6%87% Hyperactive and inattentive behavior 2,26712% 76%34,24714% 72% Data Source: Teacher Reported EDI. Totals of 99 percent and 101 percent are due to rounding.

LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT Sub-domain All Participating Schools in District All Participating Districts in Orange County NNot Ready Somewhat Ready ReadyNNot Ready Somewhat Ready Ready Basic literacy skills 2,273 2%7%91%34,2518%18%74% Interest in literacy/numeracy and memory 2,264 5%7%88%33,88813%11%76% Advanced literary skills 2,248 6%3%92%34,06417%7%76% Basic numeracy skills 2,268 4%5%91%34,15913%9%78% Data Source: Teacher Reported EDI. Totals of 99 percent and 101 percent are due to rounding.

COMMUNICATION SKILLS AND GENERAL KNOWLEDGE Sub-domain All Participating Schools in District All Participating Districts in Orange County NNot Ready Somewhat Ready ReadyN Not Ready Somewhat Ready Ready Communication Skills and General Knowledge 2,27230%21%49%34,26641%23%37% Data Source: Teacher Reported EDI. Totals of 99 percent and 101 percent are due to rounding.

POTENTIAL WAYS OF USING EDI DATA In addition to district uses of the EDI discussed at beginning of presentation, the county could also use EDI data to:  Support local needs assessments  Inform investments  Inform strategic planning and decision making  Inform curriculum and planning efforts for K-3  Develop new initiatives  Improve collaboration and integration  Support funding applications  Increase community awareness of early childhood development  Map assets with early childhood developmental data

SUMMARY OF EDI RESULTS BY DEVELOPMENTAL DOMAIN 19

WHAT CAN YOU DO IN YOUR PROGRAM?  Domain Data  Sub-Domain Data  Activities to support development 20