Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 4 The Micro-foundations of the Demand for Money.
Advertisements

Paradoxes in Decision Making With a Solution. Lottery 1 $3000 S1 $4000 $0 80% 20% R1 80%20%
Chapter 12 Uncertainty Consider two lotteries L 1 : 500,000 (1) L 1 ’: 2,500,000 (0.1), 500,000 (0.89), 0 (0.01) Which one would you choose? Another two.
Utility Theory.
1 Intuitive Irrationality: Reasons for Unreason. 2 Epistemology Branch of philosophy focused on how people acquire knowledge about the world Descriptive.
Thinking: Concept Formation Concept formation: identifying commonalities across stimuli that unite them into a common category Rule learning: identifying.
Lecture 4 Environmental Cost - Benefit - Analysis under risk and uncertainty.
Decision-Making under Uncertainty – Part I Topic 4.
Behavioral Finance Uncertain Choices February 18, 2014 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
CHAPTER 14 Utility Axioms Paradoxes & Implications.
1 Utility Theory. 2 Option 1: bet that pays $5,000,000 if a coin flipped comes up tails you get $0 if the coin comes up heads. Option 2: get $2,000,000.
Risk a situation in which there is a probability that an event will occur. People tend to prefer greater certainty and less risk.
Judgment and Decision Making in Information Systems Utility Functions, Utility Elicitation, and Risk Attitudes Yuval Shahar, M.D., Ph.D.
Prospect Theory, Framing and Behavioral Traps Yuval Shahar M.D., Ph.D. Judgment and Decision Making in Information Systems.
Decision making and economics. Economic theories Economic theories provide normative standards Expected value Expected utility Specialized branches like.

BEE3049 Behaviour, Decisions and Markets Miguel A. Fonseca.
Copyright © 2004 South-Western 27 The Basic Tools of Finance.
Notes – Theory of Choice
Do we always make the best possible decisions?
Behavioral Finance Other Noise Trader Models Feb 3, 2015 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Basic Tools of Finance Finance is the field that studies how people make decisions regarding the allocation of resources over time and the handling of.
PSY 5018H: Math Models Hum Behavior, Prof. Paul Schrater, Spring 2005 Rational Decision Making.
Review of Related Literature Different decision-making: – Budget decisions of managers – Irrationality of continuing the risk of losing a prospect – Decision-making.
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects
Framing Effects From Chapter 34 ‘Frame and Reality’ of Thinking Fast and Slow, by D. Kahneman.
TOPIC THREE Chapter 4: Understanding Risk and Return By Diana Beal and Michelle Goyen.
Markets, Firms and Consumers Lecture 4- Capital and the Firm.
A Heuristic Solution To The Allais Paradox And Its Implications Seán Muller, University of Cape Town.
Prospect Theory. 23A i 23B, reference point 23A) Your country is plagued with an outbreak of an exotic Asian disease, which may kill 600 people. You.
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, 1979.
Copyright © 2006 Thomson Learning 27 The Basic Tools of Finance.
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects.
How Could The Expected Utility Model Be So Wrong?
Decision theory under uncertainty
Psychology 485 March 23,  Intro & Definitions Why learn about probabilities and risk?  What is learned? Expected Utility Prospect Theory Scalar.
Chapter Seventeen Uncertainty. © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Topics  Degree of Risk.  Decision Making Under Uncertainty.
1 DECISION MAKING Suppose your patient (from the Brazilian rainforest) has tested positive for a rare but serious disease. Treatment exists but is risky.
Utility Theory Investors maximize Expected Utility U = f(W) U(W) W Risk Averse Investor.
Prospect Theory. Two Worlds Economist: “The agent of economic theory is rational, selfish, and his tastes do not change” “To a psychologist, it is evident.
Allais Paradox, Ellsberg Paradox, and the Common Consequence Principle Then: Introduction to Prospect Theory Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making.
Utility An economic term referring to the total satisfaction received from consuming a good or service. A consumer's utility is hard to measure. However,
The Capital Asset Pricing Model Lecture XII. .Literature u Most of today’s materials comes from Eugene F. Fama and Merton H. Miller The Theory of Finance.
On Investor Behavior Objective Define and discuss the concept of rational behavior.
Behavioral Finance Preferences Part II Feb18 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
1 BAMS 517 – 2011 Decision Analysis -IV Utility Failures and Prospect Theory Martin L. Puterman UBC Sauder School of Business Winter Term
Behavioral Finance Preferences Part I Feb 16 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Chapter 5 Understanding Risk
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATIONS OF FINANCE I: EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY
Decisions under risk Sri Hermawati.
Chapter Five Understanding Risk.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
DIS 280 Social Science Research Methodology: Problem Framing
The Basic Tools of Finance
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Choices, Values and Frames
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
The Basic Tools of Finance
Prospect Theory.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Presentation transcript:

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Behavioral Finance Economics 437

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 A. [0.001] B. [0.020] C. [0.65] D. [0.95] Imagine that one in every thousand athletes use steroids. Imagine also that the test for steroids has a 5 % false positive rate. If a particular athlete tested positive for steroids what is the probability that that athlete was a steroid user

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Expected Utility Theory Begin with a utility function defined only for certain dollar amounts: Increasing in wealth (positive marginal utility) Risk averse (diminishing marginal utility) Then, using U(W), define expected utility as: U(lottery) = p 1 U(X 1 ) + p 2 U(X 2 ) Expected Utility is the “expected value of utility gained from different outcomes (X’s)” If U(W) = W, then expected utility equals expected value

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Maurice Allais Example Choose between A and B A: $ 1 million gain with certainty B: Either $ 5 million with probability.10 $ 1 million with probability.89 $ 0 with probability 0.01

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Maurice Allais Example Choose between C and D C: Either $ 1 million with probability 0.11 or, nothing with probability 0.89 D: Either $ 5 million with probability 0.1 nothing with probabiolity 0.9

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Maurice Allais Example Choose between A and B A: $ 1 million gain with certainty B: Either $ 5 million with probability.10 $ 1 million with probability.89 $ 0 with probability 0.01 Choose between C and D C: Either $ 1 million with probability 0.11 or, nothing with probability 0.89 D: Either $ 5 million with probability 0.1 nothing with probabiolity 0.9

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Proof that Allais’s example involves violates “expected utility” hypothesis Violation occurs when people prefer both A and D 0.1 U(5) U(0) > 0.11 U(1) +.89 U(0) If D is preferred to C: IF A is preferred to B: U(1) >.1 U(5) +.89 U(1) +.11 U(0) Combining: 0.1 U(5) + U(1) U(0) >.1 U(5) + U(1) U(0) Cannot be >

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 But, Expected Utility Most Widely Used Example Capital Asset Pricing Model But, for CAPM, you need Either a quadratic utility function, or Normal distribution of returns

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Risk Aversion Utility Wealth X Y U(X) U(Y) αU(X) + (1 – α)U(Y)

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Risk Preference Utility Wealth X Y U(X) U(Y) αU(X) + (1 – α)U(Y)

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 US is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual foreign disease which is expected to kill 600 people Program A: 200 people will be saved Program B: 1/3 probability that 600 will be saved; 2/3 probability that no one will be saved A Dilemna

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Another Dilemna Program C: If adopted 400 people will die Program D: 1/3 probability that no one will die and 2/3 probability that 600 people will die

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Concurrent Decisions: Choose Between: A: A sure gain of $ 240 B: 25 % gain of $ 1,000 and 75 % chance to gain nothing Choose Between: C: A sure loss of $ 750 D: 75 % chance to lose $ 1,000 and 25 % chance to lose nothing

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Oops Choose Between: A: A sure gain of $ 240 B: 25 % gain of $ 1,000 and 75 % chance to gain nothing Choose Between: C: A sure loss of $ 750 D: 75 % chance to lose $ 1,000 and 25 % chance to lose nothing If you chose A & D: 25 % gain of $ 240 and 75 % chance to lose $ 760 {B & C} dominates {A & D} 25 % gain of $ 250 and 75 % chance to lose $ 750

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Make a choice You have been given $ 2,000 Choose between A and B A: 50 % chance of losing $ 1,000 or receiving nothing B: A sure loss of $ 500

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Make a choice You have been given $ 1,000 Choose between C and D C: 50 % chance of winning $ 1,000 or receiving nothing D: A sure $ 500

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Make a choice Choose between A and B (assuming you have been given $ 1,000) A: 50 % chance of winning $ 1,000 B: A sure gain of $ 500 Choose between C and D (assuming you have been given $ 2,000) C: 50 % chance of losing $ 1,000 or receiving nothing D: A sure loss of $ 500 A and C are identicalB and D are identical

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Another Choice Which would you prefer? A: Certain gain of $ 30 B: 80% chance to win $ 45 and 20% chance to win $ 0

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Another C: 25 % chance to win $ 30 and 75 % chance to win nothing, or D: 20 % chance to win $ 45 and 80 % chance to win nothing

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 And again A Two Stage Game 75 % chance of ending the game winning nothing and 25 % chance of going to second stage of the game At second stage R:Certain win of $ 30, or S:80% chance to win $ 45 and 20% chance to win nothing

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Two kinds of schools School A has 65 % boys; 35 % girls School B has 45 % boys; 55 % girls A class has 55 % boys: Which school is it most likely to be taken from?

Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 The End