Multipole components in the RCS-BM Hideaki Hotchi Dec. 8, Tokai.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Crab Waist Studies for SuperB and KEKB Y. Ohnishi/KEK SuperB Workshop V Paris 10/May/2007.
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CD2 LATTICE IMPROVEMENTS Accelerator Systems Advisory Committee April 23-24, 2007 Stephen Kramer for the NSLS-II Design Team.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
115 December 2011 Holger Witte Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Elliptical Dipole.
RCS simulation 現状 と 今後 平成1 8 年 4 月14日 發知. Comparison with Machida’s result Machida’s result (6.72, 6.35) 181 INJ., 0.6 W/O CC W/ CC W/ Mult. of.
Comparison between Simulation and Experiment on Injection Beam Loss and Other Beam Behaviours in the SPring-8 Storage Ring Presented by Hitoshi TANAKA,
1 IR with elliptical compensated solenoids in FCC-ee S. Sinyatkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 13 July 2015, CERN.
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
Alexander Molodozhentsev KEK for MR-commissioning group September 20, 2005 for RCS-MR commissioning group September 27, 2005 Sextupole effect for MR -
BL1U at TRIUMF UCN Beamline Septum & Dipole Magnets (April 12, 2010)
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
1 NICA Collider: status and further steps O.S. Kozlov LHEP, JINR, Dubna for the NICA team Machine Advisory Committee, JINR, Dubna, October 19-20, 2015.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Lecture 7 - E. Wilson - 2/16/ Slide 1 Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
2 July 2002Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Magnet System -- S.Kahn Page 1 Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Steve Kahn 2 July 2002 NuFact’02 Meeting.
Off-momentum DA of RCS 3D_BM & QFF & CC AP meeting / December 8, 2004 Alexander Molodozhentsev Etienne Forest KEK.
Study of the space charge effects for J-PARC Main Ring Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) SAD Workshop, September 5-7, 2006.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Resonance correction: -Q x +2Q y =6 for the AP-group Etienne Forest Alexander Molodozhentsev KEK January 12, 2005.
A Possible Source of the Tune Drift on the Front Porch in the Tevatron.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Beam Loss Budget during Injection Process for MR Alexander Molodozhentsev KEK for RCS-MR group meeting
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
Choice of L* for FCCee: IR optics and DA A.Bogomyagkov, E.Levichev, P.Piminov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk HF2014, IHEP Beijing, 9-12.
Muon Collider Physics Workshop FNAL November 10-12, 2009 Muon Collider Lattice Design FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY f Y.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
Simulation of Particle Trajectories for RIKEN Rare-RI Ring Nishina Center, RIKEN SUZUKI Hiroshi Nov. / 11 / 2011.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Oleksiy Dolinskyy 1st December, 2014
Lecture 8 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections
FFAG Recirculation and Permanent Magnet Technology for ERL’s
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Review of new High Energy Rings
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Beam Collector Ring Dmitry Shwartz BINP, Novosibirsk 6th BINP-GSI-FAIR workshop
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
NuSTORM - μ Storage Ring with Injection
General Particle Tracer (GPT) Simplified Simulations: Counter-wound Solenoids A. Hofler July 12, /14/2017.
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections
DAFNE wiggler optimization
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Update of DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
First Look at Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Multipole components in the RCS-BM Hideaki Hotchi Dec. 8, Tokai

Central orbit (cm) x y s ideal orbit orbit estimated by tracking 6.67mm  L=  =  m  x 24=  m for whole circumference)

Field distribution (181 MeV) along the actual central orbit B y (T) s (m)

Estimation of muptipole field components in the BM Assuming A x =A y =0 and  →∞, Assuming the mid-plane symmetry (no skew field) : a n =0, Case1 : estimation with the B y distribution on the medium plane Case2 : estimation with the B y distribution along a circle (radius=R) x y  Medium plane Central orbit

Estimation of multipole field components (case1) B y (T) s (m) ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨ Ⅹ B y L (Tm) x (m) ⅠⅡ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ ⅦⅧ Ⅸ Ⅹ B y distribution along the central orbit The field area is divided into 10 pieces. B y L distribution for each region

Multipoles in the BM (case1) B y L (Tm) x (m) Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ fitting curve s (m) K0K0 K 1 (m -1 ) K 2 (m -2 ) K 4 (m -4 ) K 6 (m -6 ) K 3 (m -3 ) K 5 (m -5 ) K 7 (m -7 ) ⅠⅡⅢⅣ ⅤⅥⅦ ⅧⅨⅩ

Estimation of multipole field components (case2) R=5.0 cm x y   (rad) B y (T) s=0 s=1.38 m s=1.75 m

Estimation of multipole field components (case2) - cont’d - B y (T) s (m) ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨ Ⅹ B y L (Tm)  (rad) ⅠⅡ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ ⅦⅧ Ⅸ Ⅹ B y distribution along the central orbit The field area is divided into 10 pieces. B y L distribution for each region

Multipoles in the BM (case2) B y L (Tm)  (rad) Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Reconstructed curve (up to n=4) s (m) K0K0 K 1 (m -1 ) K 2 (m -2 ) K 4 (m -4 ) K 6 (m -6 ) K 3 (m -3 ) K 5 (m -5 ) K 7 (m -7 ) ⅠⅡⅢⅣ ⅤⅥⅦ ⅧⅨⅩ where

Comparison s (m) K0K0 K 1 (m -1 ) K 2 (m -2 ) K 4 (m -4 ) K 6 (m -6 ) K 3 (m -3 ) K 5 (m -5 ) K 7 (m -7 ) ⅠⅡⅢⅣ ⅤⅥⅦ ⅧⅨⅩ Blue - case1 Red - case2 A x, A y ≠0 in the end-field region !! The end field has a sextupole-like and octupole-like multipole field component. Assuming  →∞,

- cont’d- The parameters (b n, b 0 ”,b 1 ”) can be determined with the B y distribution on the medium plane. s=0.0 m s=0.8 m s=0.4 m s=1.2 m s=1.6 m s=0.2 m s=1.0 m s=0.6 m s=1.4 m s=1.8 m B y (T)  (rad) The B y distribution along a circle (r=5cm) can be reconstructed reasonably well using the parameters (bn, b0”,b1”) determined from the By distribution on the medium plane.

- cont’d- K 2 ( Ⅵ - Ⅹ ) =  m -2 for “case1” =  m -2 for “case2” K 3 ( Ⅵ - Ⅹ ) =  m -3 for “case1” =  m -3 for “case2” ○ K 2 and K 3 in the fringe field region ○ Driving term for “Q x  2Q y =  6” and “4Q x =27” The effects from b 0 ” and b 1 ” are canceled out due to a characteristic shape of the fringe field. G 1,-2,-6 ( Ⅵ - Ⅹ ) = (cos: , sin: ) for “case1” = (cos: , sin: ) for “case2” Q x  2Q y =  6 G 4,0,27 ( Ⅵ - Ⅹ ) = (cos:  , sin: ) for “case1” = (cos:  , sin: ) for “case2” 4Q x = (6.74,6.27)

Tracking by SAD - modeling - B y (T) s (m) ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧ - The bending field is considered as “step function”. - Multpole field components (K 1 ~ K 6 ) are introduced as “thin lens” at the center of each region. Ⅸ Ⅹ

Tracking by SAD - condition - -The start point of tracking is set at the entrance of the 1 st BM. -Initial condition of the beam particle : x=y, x’=y’=0. z=0.,  p/p=0., +0.5, +1.0% -Physical apertures are set for all the BEND, QUAD and SEXT. -Multipoles up to n=6 (14-pole) are introduced for tracking. -The field strength of quadrupole magnets is re-fitted after introducing multipole field components of the BM. -Q’s fringe : ON (f1=0.431) -Chromaticity correction : ON and OFF - Synchrotron oscillation : OFF -Number of turns : 1000

Tracking by SAD - results (1) - Q x (Q y ~ 6.19) Q x (Q y ~ 6.23) Q x (Q y ~ 6.27) Xmax=Ymax (cm)  p/p=0%  p/p=0.5%  p/p=1% w/o chromatic correction case1 case2 Sasha’s cal. (3D_BM & QFF)

Tracking by SAD - results (2) - Q x (Q y ~ 6.27) Xmax=Ymax (cm)  p/p=0%  p/p=0.5%  p/p=1% w/ chromatic correction case1 case2 Sasha’s cal. (3D_BM, QFF & SCC)

 mm mrad Qx Qy Mapping - Multipoles up to n=4 (case1) [calculations with n=<6 are underway.] - With chromatic correction - With synchrotron oscillation (assuming stationary bucket) - Start point of tracking : 1 st QDX - Initial condition of the beam particle:  x =  y, x=(  x /  x ) 1/2, x’=0, y=(  y /  x ) 1/2, y’=0, z=0,  p/p=0 and 0.5% - Number of turns : 5000 Q x -2Q y =-6 4Q x =27 Q x -4Q y =-18 Q x -Q y =0 5Q x =33 6Q x =39 ?  p/p=0%  p/p=0.5%